Next Article in Journal
Graphene Nanoplatelet-Reinforced Poly(vinylidene fluoride)/High Density Polyethylene Blend-Based Nanocomposites with Enhanced Thermal and Electrical Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
PMMA Thin Film with Embedded Carbon Quantum Dots for Post-Fabrication Improvement of Light Harvesting in Perovskite Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Hexagonal CuCo2O4 Nanoplatelets, a Highly Active Catalyst for the Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane for Hydrogen Production
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 3
10.3390/nano9030359
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metal/Semiconductor Nanocomposites for Photocatalysis: Fundamentals, Structures, Applications and Properties

by
Yong-sheng Fu
,
Jun Li
* and
Jianguo Li
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(3), 359; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030359
Submission received: 1 February 2019 / Revised: 16 February 2019 / Accepted: 19 February 2019 / Published: 4 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photoactive Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due to the capability of utilizing light energy to drive chemical reactions, photocatalysis has been widely accepted as a green technology to help us address the increasingly severe environment and energy issues facing human society. To date, a large amount of research has been devoted to enhancing the properties of photocatalysts. As reported, coupling semiconductors with metals is one of the most effective methods to achieve high-performance photocatalysts. The excellent properties of metal/semiconductor (M/S) nanocomposite photocatalysts originate in two aspects: (a) improved charge separation at the metal-semiconductor interface; and (b) increased absorption of visible light due to the surface plasmon resonance of metals. So far, many M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts with different structures have been developed for the application in environmental remediation, selective organic transformation, hydrogen evolution, and disinfection. Herein, we will give a review on the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts, regarding their fundamentals, structures (as well as their typical synthetic approaches), applications and properties. Finally, we will also present our perspective on the future development of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since the discovery of water splitting on a TiO2 electrode under irradiation of ultraviolet (UV) light by Fujishima and Honda in 1972, many semiconductors, such as CdS, ZnO, SrTiO3 and g-C3N4, have been demonstrated to exhibit photocatalytic properties and, through the efforts of researchers, the application areas of semiconductor photocatalysts have been greatly extended [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Unfortunately, due to fast charge separation and limited light absorption, the properties of semiconductor photocatalysts are relatively unsatisfactory for practical application [15,16,17]. To improve the properties of semiconductor photocatalysts, several strategies have been proposed by researchers, such as doping, dye-sensitization, coupling, etc. [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. However, each of these strategies has its own pros and cons. Toward the strategy of doping, the band structures of semiconductor photocatalysts could be modulated by the doping atoms to exhibit better properties for light absorption, but the doped semiconductor photocatalysts could be more susceptible to photo-corrosion and the charge recombination of the doped semiconductor photocatalysts could be aggravated at the defects introduced by the doping atoms [19,21,27]. As for the strategy of dye-sensitization, although the light-sensitive dyes can absorb light more efficiently and transfer the photoexcited electrons to the semiconductor photocatalysts, the light-sensitive dyes are susceptible to chemical corrosion, resulting in the poor stability of dye-sensitized semiconductor photocatalysts [24,25,26]. Coupling, as a strategy with a relatively short history, has aroused great interest among researchers since its very beginning. When coupled with metals, especially the noble metals, the properties of semiconductor photocatalysts can be considerably improved due to the enhanced charge separation at the metal–semiconductor interface and the enhanced visible light absorption caused by the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of metals [28,29,30]. Except for the high cost of noble metals, the main drawback of the coupling strategy used to be the poor control of the process of coupling semiconductors with metals. However, with the development of nanotechnology, the coupling process now could be delicately controlled and several new structures have been synthesized to improve the properties of metal/semiconductor (M/S) nanocomposite photocatalysts [29,31].
Herein, we would like to review the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts regarding their fundamentals, structures (as well as their typical synthetic approaches), applications and properties. Finally, we will also present our perspective on the future development of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts.

2. Fundamentals

2.1. Principles of Photocatalysis

As defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), photocatalysis is “A catalytic reaction involving light absorption by substrate” [32]. When semiconductor photocatalysts are irradiated by light with the photon energy larger than their band gap (BG) energy, the electrons in the valence band (VB) will be excited into the conduction band (CB), leaving positive holes in the VB. Because photocatalytic reactions are reactions happening at the surface of photocatalysts, the photo-induced free charge carriers need first to diffuse into the active sites on the surface of photocatalysts before they can induce photocatalytic reactions [33,34,35]. The photocatalytic process is schematically presented in Figure 1. However, for a particular substrate, whether it can undergo chemical reactions on the semiconductor photocatalysts depends on the relative positions between its redox potentials and the band edges of semiconductor photocatalysts [36,37,38]. There are four possibilities as follows:
(1)
If the redox potential of the substrate is lower than the CB edge of the semiconductor photocatalyst, then the substrate can undergo reductive reactions.
(2)
If the redox potential of the substrate is higher than the VB edge of the semiconductor photocatalyst, then the substrate can undergo oxidative reactions.
(3)
If the redox potential of the substrate is higher than the CB edge or lower than the VB of the semiconductor photocatalyst, then the substrate can undergo neither reductive nor oxidative reactions.
(4)
If the redox potential of the substrate is lower than the CB edge and higher than the VB of the semiconductor photocatalyst, then the substrate can undergo either reductive or oxidative reactions.

2.2. Mechanisms for the Enhanced Properties of Metal/Semiconductor (M/S) Nanocomposite Photocatalysts

As mentioned above, by coupling with different metals, the mechanisms for the enhanced properties of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts can be divided into two categories, i.e., the enhanced charge separation at the metal-semiconductor interface and the enhanced visible light absorption due to the SPR of metals.

2.2.1. Enhanced Charge Separation

The enhanced charge separation of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts originates from the electron transfer across the metal–semiconductor interface [31,39,40,41]. When a semiconductor is coupled with a metal, which possesses a higher work function than that of the semiconductor (it is the most common case for M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts), then the electrons will flow from the semiconductor to the metal until their Fermi levels (i.e., EF,m and EF,s) are aligned, leading to the upward bending of the band edges in the semiconductor as revealed in Figure 2. Accompanied with the band bending, a Schottky barrier (i.e., ϕSB in Figure 2) forms at the metal–semiconductor interface [39]. As has been shown, the efficiency of electron transfer across the metal–semiconductor interface increases with the height of the Schottky barrier [42]. In addition, the metals in M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts not only act as the electron reservoir to enhance the charge separation of the semiconductors, but also provide active sites for reductive reactions, hence dramatically improving the properties of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts [43].

2.2.2. Enhanced Visible Light Absorption

When coupled with metals such as Ag and Au, the SPR of metals could endow the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts with enhanced absorption toward visible light [44,45]. However, the mechanism governing the SPR-enhanced visible light absorption of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts is still unclear [28,29,46,47]. So far, there exist three non-mutually exclusive mechanisms for the explanation of the SPR-enhanced properties of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts under visible light irradiation, i.e., (a) SPR-induced electron injection from metals to semiconductors; (b) charge separation induced by near-field electric field (NFEF); (c) scattering-enhanced light absorption.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)-Induced Electron Injection

Due to the SPR of metals such as Au and Ag, the energy of excited electrons in the metals can be excited to the range between 1.0 and 4.0 eV above their Fermi levels. Then, the energetic electrons will overcome the Schottky barrier at the metal–semiconductor interface and transfer to the CB of semiconductors, leaving energetic holes in the metals, as schematically shown in Figure 3a. Thus, the hot electrons in the semiconductors will drive reduction reactions and the hot holes in the metals will drive oxidation reactions.

Charge Separation Induced by Near-Field Electric Field (NFEF)

Under visible light irradiation, the SPR-excited hot electrons in the metal particles of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts will generate intense electric field in their proximity (i.e., NFEF), which could be up to 100–10000 times larger than the electric field of incident light. Since the formation rate of electron-hole pairs in the semiconductors of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts is proportional to the intensity of the NFEF (more specifically, |E|2), the generation of electron-hole pairs in M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts can be significantly enhanced. The process of NFEF-induced charge separation is schematically shown in Figure 3b.

Scattering-Enhanced Light Absorption

If the size of the metal particles in M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts is larger than 50 nm, the SPR-excited metal particles can efficiently scatter the incident light, leading to the increase of the path length of light through the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts. Thus, the light absorption of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts will be improved due to the increased path length of light, resulting in the enhancement of the properties of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts. Figure 3c schematically reveals the scattering-enhanced photon absorption mechanism.

3. Structures of M/S Nanocomposite Photocatalysts

Based on the morphologies and synthetic approaches, the structures of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts could be divided into six categories, i.e., the conventional structure, core-shell structure, yolk-shell structure, Janus structure, array structure and multi-junction structure, which are schematically shown in Figure 4.

3.1. Conventional Structure

The conventional structure of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts refers to the structure, in which the combination of semiconductor nanoparticles and metal nanoparticles is not delicately controlled. So far, many approaches have been developed to synthesize M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts with conventional structure, which include photoreduction, impregnation, deposition-precipitation, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) etc. [48,49,50,51].

3.1.1. Photoreduction

Since some chemical compounds containing metal element can be reduced to metal under irradiation, photoreduction is regarded as a facile approach to decorate semiconductor nanostructures with noble metal. Typically, in the work of Yu et al., hydrothermally-synthesized TiO2 nanosheets were added to an aqueous solution of H2PtCl6. Under stirring and the irradiation of ultraviolet (UV) light, H2PtCl6 was reduced to Pt and deposited on TiO2 nanosheets, leading to the formation of Pt-decorated TiO2 nanosheets [48].

3.1.2. Impregnation

During the impregnation process, the combination of noble metal and semiconductor nanostructures is achieved through the attachment of noble metal precursor onto semiconductor substrate due to the van der Waals force, coulomb force or some other interactions between them. Typically, in the work of Lin et al., H2PtCl6 was added into a suspension of TiO2 (B) nanofibers. Then the solvent was evaporated under stirring. Then, the as-obtained powders were heated in a reducing atmosphere to reduce H2PtCl6 absorbed on TiO2 (B) nanofibers, leading to the formation of Pt-decorated TiO2 (B) nanofibers [49].

3.1.3. Deposition-Precipitation

Deposition-precipitation is also a facile approach to synthesize M/S nanocomposites. Typically, in the work of Wu et al., TiO2 nanoparticles were dispersed in an aqueous solution of chloroauric acid. Then NaOH solution was added into the suspension to adjust the pH value to the desired level. After stirring, the precipitates were filtered, washed and dried. Then, the as-obtained products were calcined to form the Au-decorated TiO2 nanoparticles [50].

3.1.4. Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD)

As is well known, CVD is a powerful approach in synthesizing nanostructure and is often utilized to prepare metal-decorated nanostructures. Typically, in the work of Shi et al., HAuCl4 was vaporized at a high temperature in a tube furnace. Then, the vapor was blown at the TiO2 nanorod arrays at a relatively low temperature with the carrier gas of nitrogen. Thus, the gold would deposit on the TiO2 nanorods, leading to the formation of Au-decorated TiO2 nanorod arrays [51].

3.2. Core-Shell Structure

The core-shell structure was first developed to improve the quantum yield of quantum dots in the 1990s [52]. After that, the core-shell structure attracted great interest from researchers and its application areas were greatly extended. In photocatalysis, M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts with core-shell structure occupy an important position due to their outstanding photocatalytic properties [53]. Besides, the enhanced charge transfer between metal and semiconductor, the core-shell structure can also hinder the aggregation of particles and protect the metal core from undesired corrosion or dissolution during the photocatalytic process.
The synthesis of core-shell M/S nanoparticles usually involves the coating of a semiconductor layer on metal nanoparticles. For example, in the work of Sudeep, photocatalytic Ag@TiO2 core-shell nanoparticles were synthesized through controlled hydrolysis of titanium-(triethanolaminato) isopropoxide (TTEAIP) on the surface of Ag nanoparticles. Briefly, TTEAIP and silver nitrate were added into 2-propanol followed by stirring. Then dimethyl formamide (DMF) was added to the solution. Next, the solution was heated and refluxed. During this process, silver nitrate was first reduced to Ag nanoparticles by DMF. Then, due to the interaction between Ag nanoparticles and triethanolamine ligands, TTEAIP hydrolyzed on the surface of Ag nanoparticles, leading to the formation of Ag@TiO2 core-shell nanoparticles [54].

3.3. Yolk-Shell Structure

The yolk-shell structure originates from the pioneer work of Xia’s group as a variation of the core-shell structure [55]. Under the efforts of researchers, the yolk-shell structure has shown promising application in nanoreactors, drug delivery and lithium ion batteries [56]. Recently, some researchers have also investigated the application of yolk-shell structures in photocatalysis [57,58,59].
The synthesis of yolk-shell structures usually needs a sacrificial template. In the work of Li et al., gold nanoparticles were first coated with a layer of SiO2 by the hydrolysis of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS). Next, the SiO2-coated gold nanoparticles were coated with a layer of TiO2 by the hydrolysis of tetrabutyl titanate (TBOT). Then, the as-prepared gold nanoparticles were coated with a layer of SiO2 again to protect the TiO2 layer during the calcination process. After calcination, the two SiO2 layers were removed by the etch of NaOH solution. Thus, the Au@TiO2 yolk-shell nanoparticles were prepared. The SiO2 layers served as the sacrificial template during the synthetic process [57].

3.4. Janus Structure

Janus particles, as first described by de Gennes in 1991, refer to the particles with anisotropic structure, which are composed of two distinct parts [60]. The dual nature of Janus particles endows themselves with fascinating properties, such as unique surface properties, controlled self-assembly behavior and response to multiple stimuli, etc. [61,62]. When applied in photocatalysis, Janus nanoparticles composed of metal and semiconductor can also exhibit remarkable photocatalytic properties.
Different from conventional structures, the synthesis of Janus structures needs delicate control over the combination of two distinct parts. As demonstrated by the work of Seh et al., Au/TiO2 Janus nanoparticles were synthesized through controlled hydrolysis of titanium diisopropoxide bis(acetylacetonate) (TAA) on the surface of gold nanoparticles. The reason for choosing TAA was that the hydrolysis rate of TAA was rather slow, which had a significant influence on the structure of the products. Thus, during the slow hydrolysis of TAA in the alkaline suspension of gold nanoparticles in isopropanol, TiO2 combined with gold nanoparticles to form the Au/TiO2 Janus nanoparticles [63].

3.5. Array Structure

Due to the promising application in nanodevices, the array structure has been widely researched during the past few decades [64,65,66]. In photocatalysis, the array structure has also been utilized to improve the photocatalytic properties of M/S nanocomposites [67].
The synthesis of array structures is mainly achieved through a template-assisted deposition process. In the work of Wang et al., an anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) template with one side deposited with a layer of gold and connected to a piece of aluminum foil was utilized as the working electrode in an electrochemical cell. For the deposition of CdS, the working electrode was biased to −2.5 V vs. standard calomel electrode (SCE) in the electrolyte of sulfur and cadmium chloride dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). For the deposition of Au, the working electrode was biased to –0.95 V vs. SCE in commercial Au Orotemp 24. After alternate deposition of CdS and Au, the AAO template was removed through chemical etching. Thus, photocatalytic Au/CdS nanorod arrays were obtained [67].

3.6. Multi-Junction Structure

M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts with multi-junction structures are formed by sandwiching metal nanoparticles between two semiconductors. Thus, the electron transfer process in multi-junction M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts is very similar to that of Z-scheme photocatalytic systems in nature, which could endow them excellent photocatalytic properties [68,69,70].
Take the pioneer work of Tada et al. for example. The CdS/Au/TiO2 multi-junction nanoparticles as the all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic system were synthesized through a two-step deposition process. In the first step, gold was deposited on the TiO2 nanoparticles through an impregnation process with chloroauric acid as the precursor. In the second step, cadmium sulfide was deposited on the Au/TiO2 nanoparticles through the UV-induced reaction of sulfur and cadmium perchlorate. Thus, CdS/Au/TiO2 multi-junction nanoparticles were prepared [71].

4. Applications and Properties of M/S Nanocomposite Photocatalysts

To date, the application areas of photocatalysis are mainly focused on environmental remediation, selective organic transformation, hydrogen evolution and disinfection.

4.1. Environmental Remediation

The photo-excited electrons and holes in semiconductor photocatalysts as well as the associated radicals possess high chemical activity, which can degrade pollutants to low- or non-hazardous substances [72,73,74,75]. As reported, most of the researches in photocatalytic environmental remediation were focused on degradation of organic pollutants such as Rhodamine B (RhB), Methylene blue (MB), methyl orange (MO) and so on. To the best of our knowledge, the only inorganic pollutant that has been involved in the research of photocatalytic environmental remediation is nitric oxide (NO). Table 1 lists some of the most representative M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts applied in environmental remediation [51,59,71,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100].
Due to the facile synthesis, more than half of the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts listed in Table 1 possess the conventional structure. In the work of Lin et al., through coupling ZnO nanofibers with Ag, the as-synthesized Ag/ZnO photocatalysts exhibited much better properties for photocatalytic degradation of RhB than pristine ZnO photocatalysts, which was revealed in Figure 5a [79]. As revealed in Figure 5b, the properties of Ag/ZnO photocatalysts did not increase linearly with the Ag loading content and reached a peak at the Ag loading content of 7.5 at%. In addition, the repeatability test results in Figure 5c manifested the attenuation of the properties of Ag/ZnO photocatalysts was negligible after three cycles. The excellent properties of Ag/ZnO photocatalysts originated from the enhanced charge separation at the Ag-ZnO interface, which was evidenced by the photoluminescence (PL) spectra in Figure 5d. Toward removal of NO, Li et al. synthesized Bi/A-BO photocatalysts which could remove NO effectively under visible light illumination [86]. The remarkable properties of Bi/A-BO photocatalysts originated from SPR of Bi which could absorb visible light effectively and enhance the charge separation in A-BO. Li et al. also utilized electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy for in-situ investigation of the reactive species during the photocatalytic process. (For detailed information about utilizing ESR spectroscopy to detect radicals, these two reviews, [101,102], are recommended.) The results revealed superoxide radicals (O2−•) radicals were the major active species for photocatalytic NO oxidation.
For the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts possessing the core-shell structure, their properties in photocatalytic environmental remediation were in strong relationship with the metal core and shell thickness. In the work of Zhang et al., the effect of Au, Pd and Pt cores on the photocatalytic activity of M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd and Pt) core-shell nanoparticles for degradation of RhB was investigated [91]. As revealed in Figure 6, core-shell M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd and Pt) exhibited different photocatalytic properties under the irradiation of UV light and visible light. Under irradiation of UV light, the photocatalytic properties of core-shell M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd and Pt) followed the order P25 TiO2 > Pt@TiO2 > Pd@TiO2 > Au@TiO2, while under irradiation of visible light the photocatalytic properties of core-shell M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd and Pt) followed the order Pd@TiO2 > Pt@TiO2 > Au@TiO2 > P25 TiO2. The results indicated the metal core had two impacts on the photocatalytic properties of core-shell M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd and Pt), i.e., improving charge separation at the metal-TiO2 interface and modulating light absorption of TiO2. In addition, Zhang et al. also demonstrated that the hydroxyl radicals (•OH) generated on core-shell M@TiO2 played a more important role than superoxide radicals and holes in degradation of RhB under irradiation of UV light, while under the irradiation of visible light holes generated on core-shell M@TiO2 played a predominant role in degradation of RhB. The effect of shell thickness on core-shell M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts was revealed by Kong et al. [93]. In their research, the properties of core-shell Au@Cu2O photocatalysts for degradation of MO varied with the Cu2O shell thickness in the order 127 nm > 96 nm > 197 nm > 250 nm > 158 nm. Kong et al. thought the nonlinear relationship between the properties of core-shell Au@Cu2O photocatalysts and the shell thickness could be attributed to several factors, i.e., surface area, light absorption and scattering, charge-carrier dynamics and core-shell interactions, which competed with each other.
Compared with M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts possessing the conventional and core-shell structures, there is less research on M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts with the yolk-shell, Janus and multi-junction structures for environmental remediation. Wang et al. investigated the properties of yolk-shell Au@TiO2 photocatalysts for degradation of RhB [59]. In their research, they also introduced reduced graphene oxide (r-GO) into the TiO2 shell. The results demonstrated the properties of yolk-shell Au@r-GO/TiO2 photocatalysts were better than yolk-shell Au@TiO2 photocatalysts, which indicated the charge separation in the TiO2 shell increased with the electron conductivity of the TiO2 shell. In the work of Yao et al., the properties of Janus Au/ZnO photocatalysts were investigated for degradation of MO [100]. The results demonstrated the properties of Janus Au/ZnO photocatalysts for degradation of MO were higher than that of pristine ZnO photocatalysts and increased with the size of Au nanoparticles under UV light illumination. In the pioneer work of Tada et al., multi-junction CdS/Au/TiO2 photocatalysts were synthesized as the all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalysts for the degradation of MV [71]. As revealed in Figure 7a, multi-junction CdS/Au/TiO2 photocatalysts exhibited much higher properties than CdS/TiO2, Au/TiO2 and TiO2 photocatalysts, which revealed the charge separation caused by TiO2 → Au → CdS Z-scheme electron transfer was more efficient than that of the single- or double-component systems. The Z-scheme electron transfer was illustrated in Figure 7b. Besides, Tada et al. pointed out that the properties of all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalysts could be further improved by modifying the energy band structures of the semiconductor components.

4.2. Selective Organic Transformation

Unlike the non-selective mineralization process in environmental remediation, photocatalysis can also drive organic transformation processes to selectively synthesize valuable chemicals [103,104,105]. Compared with thermochemical synthetic process, the photocatalytic selective organic transformation process often requires milder conditions and shorter reaction sequences and can exclude some undesirable side reactions. Based on the reported research, the photocatalytic selective organic transformation reactions can be divided into three categories, i.e., the oxidation reaction, reduction reaction and coupling reaction [103]. In Table 2, some of the most representative M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts applied in selective organic transformation are listed [106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120].
Towards the photocatalytic selective oxidation reactions, Yuzawa et al. investigated the effect of Pt loading on the properties of Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts for amination of benzene to aniline and unfolded the reaction mechanism governing the photocatalytic amination process [108]. As revealed in Figure 8, the conversion yield of Pt/TiO2 did not increase linearly with the Pt loading content and reached a peak at about 0.1 wt% Pt loading content, while the aniline selectivity of Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts was hardly influenced by the Pt loading content and remained about 97%. The mechanism governing the photocatalytic amination process was clarified through ESR spectroscopy. First, the holes on the TiO2 surface oxidized an ammonia molecule to form a neutral amide radical, which then reacted with the aromatic ring to form an intermediate, and afterwards the hydrogen of the intermediate was abstracted by the active sites on the Pt surface, leading to the formation of aniline. Thus, it could be deduced that the charge separation at the Pt-TiO2 interface could significantly enhance the properties of Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts for the amination of benzene. Zhang et al. investigated the properties of core-shell and yolk-shell Pt@CeO2 photocatalysts for oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde [111]. As revealed in Figure 9, core-shell Pt@CeO2 photocatalysts exhibited much higher benzaldehyde yield and selectivity than yolk-shell Pt@CeO2 photocatalysts. Zhang et al. attributed the unsatisfactory properties of yolk-shell Pt@CeO2 photocatalysts to the loose contact between the Pt core and CeO2 shell, which deteriorated the charge separation at the Pt-CeO2 interface.
As listed in Table 2, the photocatalytic selective reduction reactions mainly involve hydrogenation of nitroaromatics and reduction of CO2. The investigation of Tada et al. on hydrogenation of nitroaromatics demonstrated that the life time of electrons could also be prolonged by the charge separation at the Ag-TiO2 interface, leading to the enhanced properties of Ag/TiO2 photocatalysts for hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline [113]. For better properties of photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CH4, Xie et al. combined P25 TiO2 with five noble metals, i.e., Pt, Pd, Rh, Ag and Au [114]. During the photocatalytic test, the properties of M/TiO2 photocatalysts increased in the sequence of Ag/TiO2 < Rh/TiO2 < Au/TiO2 < Pd/TiO2 < Pt/TiO2, which indicated the charge separation at the metal-TiO2 interface improved with the Schottky barrier height.
Towards the photocatalytic coupling reactions, Jiao et al. investigated the properties of Pd/SiC photocatalysts for Suzuki coupling of iodobenzene and phenylboronic acid [120]. Under visible light illumination, the conversion of iodobenzene and selectivity for the main product of Pd/SiC both reached nearly 100%. Jiao et al. also evaluated the effect of photogenerated electrons and holes in Pd/SiC on the Suzuki coupling process. After adding the electron-capturing agent (or hole-capturing agent) into the reaction system, the photocatalytic properties of Pd/SiC decreased dramatically, which indicated both the photogenerated electrons and holes contributed to the Suzuki coupling process.

4.3. Hydrogen Evolution

As a significant process to convert solar energy into chemical energy, photocatalytic hydrogen evolution has always been the hot spot in the research field of photocatalysis [47,121,122,123]. Table 3 lists some of the most representative M/S photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution [48,63,67,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144].
For the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts listed in Table 3, their properties for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution achieved remarkable enhancement from the charge separation at the metal-semiconductor interface and the SPR of the metal component. In the work of Bi et al., they utilized Pt-Ni alloy nanoparticles to decorate g-C3N4 for saving the usage of Pt [124]. The results revealed the PtNix/g-C3N4 photocatalysts could exhibit comparable properties to that of Pt/g-C3N4 photocatalysts, which provided a possible approach for developing M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts with excellent properties as well as low cost. In the work of Ingram et al., the difference in the properties of Ag/TiO2 and Au/TiO2 (TiO2 was doped by nitrogen atoms, i.e., N-TiO2) photocatalysts for visible light-driven hydrogen evolution was investigated, which shed light on more effective utilization of SPR [125]. As revealed in Figure 10a, the SPR of Ag and Au was excited at the wavelengths of about 400 and 500 nm, respectively, while the absorption edge of N-TiO2 was around 400 nm. Therefore, the SPR of Ag was more efficient for exciting electron-hole pairs in N-TiO2 than Au, which was supported by the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution test results in Figure 10b.
Towards the core-shell and yolk-shell structure, Ma et al. investigated the effect of Au cores on the properties of core-shell Au@CdS photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution [136]. As revealed in Figure 11, under irradiation of visible light with wavelength ≥ 420 nm, core-shell Au@CdS exhibited apparently higher photocatalytic properties than pristine CdS, while under irradiation of visible light with wavelength ≥500 nm, the photocatalytic properties of core-shell Au@CdS were only slightly higher than pristine CdS. Thus, Ma et al. thought the radiative energy transfer from SPR-excited Au to CdS was the main contribution to the enhanced photocatalytic properties of core-shell Au@CdS, rather than the electron transfer from SPR-excited Au to CdS. In the work of Ngaw et al., the effect of Au content on the photocatalytic properties of yolk-shell Au@TiO2 for water splitting was investigated [137]. The photocatalytic properties of yolk-shell Au@TiO2 also did not improve linearly with the Au content under the irradiation of both visible light and UV light, and reached a peak at 2 wt% Au content. In addition, Ngaw et al. ascribed the enhanced photocatalytic properties of yolk-shell Au@TiO2 to the void space and highly porous shell in yolk-shell Au@TiO2, which provided more active sites for H+ ions to be reduced and more channels for reactants to diffuse into and out of the photocatalytic particles.
In the work of Seh et al., the properties of Janus Au/TiO2 and core-shell Au@TiO2 photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution were compared and investigated [63]. As revealed in Figure 12a,b, Janus Au/TiO2 photocatalysts exhibited higher properties than core-shell Au@TiO2 photocatalysts and the properties of Janus Au/TiO2 photocatalysts increased with the size of Au nanoparticles. Moreover, Seh et al. attributed the enhanced charge separation in Janus Au/TiO2 photocatalysts to the strong plasmonic near-fields localized closely to the Au-TiO2 interface, which was supported by the discrete-dipole approximation simulation results.
As for the array structure, Wang et al. demonstrated the excellent properties of multi-segmented Au/CdS nanorod arrays (NRAs) for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution [67]. As revealed in Figure 13a, the activities of Au/CdS NRAs for hydrogen evolution increased with the number of Au-CdS segments under irradiation of simulated sunlight. In addition, compared with pristine CdS NRAs, the activities of Au/CdS NRAs for hydrogen evolution gained significant enhancement under irradiation of simulated sunlight, which was presented in Figure 13b. Wang et al. attributed the excellent properties of Au/CdS NRAs for hydrogen evolution to the charge separation at the Au-CdS interface under irradiation of simulated sunlight.
Toward the multi-junction structure, Yu et al. demonstrated the excellent properties of multi-junction CdS/Au/ZnO photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution [139]. To reveal the high charge separation efficiency bought by the Z-scheme electron transfer, Yu el al. also synthesized Au/CdS/ZnO photocatalysts by depositing Au on CdS/ZnO photocatalysts. As shown in Figure 14a, the properties of multi-junction CdS/Au/ZnO photocatalysts was 4.5 times higher than that of CdS/ZnO photocatalysts, while the properties of Au/CdS/ZnO photocatalysts achieved only a small enhancement compared with CdS/ZnO photocatalysts. The PL spectra in Figure 14b further confirmed the high charge separation efficiency due to the Z-scheme electron transfer in multi-junction CdS/Au/ZnO photocatalysts.

4.4. Disinfection

In 1985, Matsunaga et al. first reported the photocatalytic inactivation of bacteria on the surface of TiO2 [145]. Since then, a lot of research has been devoted to the photocatalytic inactivation of microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, protozoa and so on [18,146,147,148,149,150]. Furthermore, due to the nonexistence of secondary pollution, photocatalytic disinfection is a promising alternative approach for water purification. Table 4 lists some of the most representative M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts for disinfection [151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159].
Taking into account the practical application of photocatalytic disinfection for water purification, most of the light sources involved in the research are visible light as revealed in Table 4. Therefore, the enhanced properties of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts for disinfection are mainly attributed to the SPR of the metal component. In the work of Shi et al., due to the SPR of Ag, the Ag/AgX (X = Cl, Br, I) photocatalysts exhibited remarkable properties for the inactivation of Escherichia coli under visible light illumination [157]. Shi el al. also evaluated the contribution of different photo-generated reactive species to the disinfection process by adding scavengers into the reaction system. The results indicated holes are the dominant reactive species over other reactive species such as electrons, •OH, H2O2 and so on.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

In this review, we demonstrate the properties of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts in relation to their structures for application in environmental remediation, selective organic transformation, hydrogen evolution and disinfection. Due to the enhanced charge separation at the metal-semiconductor interface and increased absorption of visible light induced by the SPR of metals, M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts usually exhibit much better properties than pristine semiconductor photocatalysts.
For future development of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts, our perspectives can be summarized as the following four points:
(1)
To date, most of metals utilized to combine with semiconductor photocatalysts are noble metals, which are scarce in nature and expensive. To save the use of noble metals, coupling semiconductors with alloys composed of noble and non-noble metals is highly recommended. In addition, due to the non-linear relationship between the properties of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts and metal loading, precise control over the metal loading in the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts deserve further research.
(2)
For more efficient utilization of SPR to enhance the properties of M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts, the SPR excitation wavelength of the metal nanoparticles should overlap the absorption edge of the semiconductor nanoparticles, which could be achieved by changing the shape and particle size of the metal nanoparticles and modulating the band structure of the semiconductor nanoparticles.
(3)
Synergistic utilization of enhanced charge separation at the metal-semiconductor interface and SPR of metals might endow the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts with even better properties under visible light illumination, because the SPR-induced charge separation in M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts could be further enhanced by introducing another metal co-catalyst with large work function to the M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts.
(4)
Due to their intrinsic ability to prohibit particle agglomeration, the core-shell, yolk-shell and array structures (especially the array structure) might be the ideal structures for M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts. Therefore, there exists a strong demand for more facile synthesis of these structures.

Author Contributions

Y.-s.F., J.L. and J.G.L. conceptualized this review; Y.-s.F. collected and analyzed the data; Y.-s.F. and J.L. wrote the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by National Key Research & Development Program of China through the grant number 2017YFB0305300 and Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China through the grant number U1660203.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tao Deng and Jianbo Wu for their valuable suggestions to this review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huang, Y.; Sun, F.; Wang, H.; He, Y.; Li, L.; Huang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Yu, J.C. Photochemical growth of cadmium-rich CdS nanotubes at the air–water interface and their use in photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 6901–6906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, S.; Wang, X. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction by CdS promoted with a zeolitic imidazolate framework. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 162, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. An, X.; Yu, X.; Yu, J.C.; Zhang, G. CdS nanorods/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for photocatalysis and electrochemical sensing. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 5158–5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.; Shi, R.; Lin, J.; Zhu, Y. Enhancement of photocurrent and photocatalytic activity of ZnO hybridized with graphite-like C3N4. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2922–2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McLaren, A.; Valdes-Solis, T.; Li, G.; Tsang, S.C. Shape and Size Effects of ZnO Nanocrystals on Photocatalytic Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12540–12541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Elmolla, E.S.; Chaudhuri, M. Degradation of amoxicillin, ampicillin and cloxacillin antibiotics in aqueous solution by the UV/ZnO photocatalytic process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 173, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Miyauchi, M.; Takashio, M.; Tobimatsu, H. Photocatalytic Activity of SrTiO3 Codoped with Nitrogen and Lanthanum under Visible Light Illumination. Langmuir 2004, 20, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Konta, R.; Ishii, T.; Kato, H.; Kudo, A. Photocatalytic Activities of Noble Metal Ion Doped SrTiO3 under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 8992–8995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ye, S.; Wang, R.; Wu, M.-Z.; Yuan, Y.-P. A review on g-C3N4 for photocatalytic water splitting and CO2 reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lam, S.-M.; Sin, J.-C.; Mohamed, A.R. A review on photocatalytic application of g-C3N4/semiconductor (CNS) nanocomposites towards the erasure of dyeing wastewater. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2016, 47, 62–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, J.; Wu, N. Semiconductor-based photocatalysts and photoelectrochemical cells for solar fuel generation: A review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 1360–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhan, X.; Wang, F.; Safdar, M.; He, J. Visible light driven type II heterostructures and their enhanced photocatalysis properties: A review. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8326–8339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Montini, T.; Melchionna, M.; Monai, M.; Fornasiero, P. Fundamentals and Catalytic Applications of CeO2-Based Materials. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5987–6041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rao, P.M.; Cai, L.; Liu, C.; Cho, I.S.; Lee, C.H.; Weisse, J.M.; Yang, P.; Zheng, X. Simultaneously Efficient Light Absorption and Charge Separation in WO3/BiVO4 Core/Shell Nanowire Photoanode for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 1099–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Z.; Hu, J.; Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, X. Semiconductor heterojunction photocatalysts: Design, construction, and photocatalytic performances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5234–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Daghrir, R.; Drogui, P.; Robert, D. Modified TiO2 For Environmental Photocatalytic Applications: A Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 3581–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dong, S.; Feng, J.; Fan, M.; Pi, Y.; Hu, L.; Han, X.; Liu, M.; Sun, J.; Sun, J. Recent developments in heterogeneous photocatalytic water treatment using visible light-responsive photocatalysts: A review. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 14610–14630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Burda, C.; Lou, Y.; Chen, X.; Samia, A.C.S.; Stout, J.; Gole, J.L. Enhanced Nitrogen Doping in TiO2 Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1049–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, J.C.; Yu, J.; Ho, W.; Zhang, J. Effects of F- Doping on the Photocatalytic Activity and Microstructures of Nanocrystalline TiO2 Powders. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 3808–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, L.; Ouyang, S.; Ye, J. Gold-Nanorod-Photosensitized Titanium Dioxide with Wide-Range Visible-Light Harvesting Based on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 6821–6825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, M.; Chen, C.; Ma, W.; Zhao, J. Visible-Light-Induced Aerobic Oxidation of Alcohols in a Coupled Photocatalytic System of Dye-Sensitized TiO2 and TEMPO. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9730–9733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Ohwaki, T.; Aoki, K.; Taga, Y. Visible-Light Photocatalysis in Nitrogen-Doped Titanium Oxides. Science 2001, 293, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dhanalakshmi, K.B.; Latha, S.; Anandan, S.; Maruthamuthu, P. Dye sensitized hydrogen evolution from water. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2001, 26, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Youngblood, W.J.; Lee, S.-H.A.; Maeda, K.; Mallouk, T.E. Visible Light Water Splitting Using Dye-Sensitized Oxide Semiconductors. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1966–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Zhang, X.; Peng, T.; Song, S. Recent advances in dye-sensitized semiconductor systems for photocatalytic hydrogen production. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 2365–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khaki, M.R.D.; Shafeeyan, M.S.; Raman, A.A.A.; Daud, W.M.A.W. Application of doped photocatalysts for organic pollutant degradation—A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 198, 78–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wu, N. Plasmonic metal–semiconductor photocatalysts and photoelectrochemical cells: A review. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 2679–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Linic, S.; Christopher, P.; Ingram, D.B. Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Marschall, R. Semiconductor Composites: Strategies for Enhancing Charge Carrier Separation to Improve Photocatalytic Activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2421–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qu, Y.; Duan, X. Progress, challenge and perspective of heterogeneous photocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2568–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Schneider, J.; Bahnemann, D.; Ye, J.; Li, G. Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Perspectives; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Castellote, M.; Bengtsson, N. Principles of TiO2 Photocatalysis. In Applications of Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysis to Construction Materials: State-of-the-Art Report of the RILEM Technical Committee 194-TDP; Ohama, Y., Van Gemert, D., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peter, L.M. CHAPTER 1 Photoelectrochemistry: From Basic Principles to Photocatalysis. In Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Perspectives; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2016; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mills, A.; Le Hunte, S. An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 1997, 108, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, S.; Wang, L.-W. Thermodynamic Oxidation and Reduction Potentials of Photocatalytic Semiconductors in Aqueous Solution. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 3659–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ohtani, B. Revisiting the fundamental physical chemistry in heterogeneous photocatalysis: Its thermodynamics and kinetics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 1788–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, B.; Zhao, X.; Terashima, C.; Fujishima, A.; Nakata, K. Thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of heterogeneous photocatalysis for semiconductor systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 8751–8760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, Z.; Yates, J.T. Band Bending in Semiconductors: Chemical and Physical Consequences at Surfaces and Interfaces. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5520–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kamat, P.V. Manipulation of Charge Transfer Across Semiconductor Interface. A Criterion That Cannot Be Ignored in Photocatalyst Design. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cai, Y.-Y.; Li, X.-H.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Wei, X.; Wang, K.-X.; Chen, J.-S. Highly Efficient Dehydrogenation of Formic Acid over a Palladium-Nanoparticle-Based Mott–Schottky Photocatalyst. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 12038–12041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Y.; Gu, X.; Qi, W.; Zhu, H.; Shan, H.; Chen, W.L.; Tao, P.; Song, C.Y.; Shang, W.; Deng, T.; et al. Enhancing the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Performance of a Metal/Semiconductor Catalyst through Modulation of the Schottky Barrier Height by Controlling the Orientation of the Interface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12494–12500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, J.H.; Wang, D.G.; Han, H.X.; Li, C. Roles of Cocatalysts in Photocatalysis and Photoelectrocatalysis. Accounts Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1900–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kubacka, A.; Fernández-García, M.; Colón, G. Advanced Nanoarchitectures for Solar Photocatalytic Applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1555–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Teoh, W.Y.; Scott, J.A.; Amal, R. Progress in Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: From Classical Radical Chemistry to Engineering Nanomaterials and Solar Reactors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 629–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hou, W.; Cronin, S.B. A Review of Surface Plasmon Resonance-Enhanced Photocatalysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 1612–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Warren, S.C.; Thimsen, E. Plasmonic solar water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5133–5146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yu, J.; Qi, L.; Jaroniec, M. Hydrogen Production by Photocatalytic Water Splitting over Pt/TiO2 Nanosheets with Exposed (001) Facets. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 13118–13125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lin, C.-H.; Chao, J.-H.; Liu, C.-H.; Chang, J.-C.; Wang, F.-C. Effect of Calcination Temperature on the Structure of a Pt/TiO2 (B) Nanofiber and Its Photocatalytic Activity in Generating H2. Langmuir 2008, 24, 9907–9915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wu, G.; Chen, T.; Su, W.; Zhou, G.; Zong, X.; Lei, Z.; Li, C. H-2 production with ultra-low CO selectivity via photocatalytic reforming of methanol on Au/TiO2 catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 1243–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shi, H.; Wang, X.; Zheng, M.; Wu, X.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, G.; Duan, H. Hot-Electrons Mediated Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalysis of Hierarchical Black Au-TiO2 Nanorod Arrays on Flexible Substrate. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1600588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ghosh Chaudhuri, R.; Paria, S. Core/Shell Nanoparticles: Classes, Properties, Synthesis Mechanisms, Characterization, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2373–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhang, N.; Liu, S.Q.; Xu, Y.J. Recent progress on metal core@semiconductor shell nanocomposites as a promising type of photocatalyst. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 2227–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sudeep, P.K.; Takechi, K.; Kamat, P.V. Harvesting photons in the infrared. Electron injection from excited tricarbocyanine dye (IR-125) into TiO2 and Ag@TiO2 core-shell nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kamata, K.; Lu, Y.; Xia, Y.N. Synthesis and characterization of monodispersed core-shell spherical colloids with movable cores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2384–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liu, J.; Qiao, S.Z.; Chen, J.S.; Lou, X.W.; Xing, X.R.; Lu, G.Q. Yolk/shell nanoparticles: New platforms for nanoreactors, drug delivery and lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12578–12591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, A.; Zhang, P.; Chang, X.; Cai, W.; Wang, T.; Gong, J. Gold Nanorod@TiO2 Yolk-Shell Nanostructures for Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Oxidation of Benzyl Alcohol. Small 2015, 11, 1892–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Li, P.; Zou, Z. Au@TiO2 yolk-shell hollow spheres for plasmon-induced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to solar fuel via a local electromagnetic field. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 14232–14236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wang, M.; Han, J.; Xiong, H.; Guo, R. Yolk@Shell Nanoarchitecture of Au@r-GO/TiO2 Hybrids as Powerful Visible Light Photocatalysts. Langmuir 2015, 31, 6220–6228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. de Gennes, P.-G. Soft Matter (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1992, 31, 842–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lattuada, M.; Hatton, T.A. Synthesis, properties and applications of Janus nanoparticles. Nano Today 2011, 6, 286–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Walther, A.; Müller, A.H.E. Janus Particles: Synthesis, Self-Assembly, Physical Properties, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5194–5261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Seh, Z.W.; Liu, S.; Low, M.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Liu, Z.; Mlayah, A.; Han, M.-Y. Janus Au-TiO2 Photocatalysts with Strong Localization of Plasmonic Near-Fields for Efficient Visible-Light Hydrogen Generation. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2310–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, Z.L.; Song, J. Piezoelectric Nanogenerators Based on Zinc Oxide Nanowire Arrays. Science 2006, 312, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhu, K.; Neale, N.R.; Miedaner, A.; Frank, A.J. Enhanced Charge-Collection Efficiencies and Light Scattering in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Using Oriented TiO2 Nanotubes Arrays. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lin, H.-W.; Lu, Y.-J.; Chen, H.-Y.; Lee, H.-M.; Gwo, S. InGaN/GaN nanorod array white light-emitting diode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 073101. [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang, X.; Liow, C.; Qi, D.; Zhu, B.; Leow, W.R.; Wang, H.; Xue, C.; Chen, X.; Li, S. Programmable Photo-Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution Based on Multi-Segmented CdS-Au Nanorod Arrays. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3506–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhou, P.; Yu, J.G.; Jaroniec, M. All-Solid-State Z-Scheme Photocatalytic Systems. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4920–4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Low, J.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, B.; Wageh, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Yu, J. A Review of Direct Z-Scheme Photocatalysts. Small Methods 2017, 1, 1700080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Qi, K.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J.; Ho, W. A review on TiO2-based Z-scheme photocatalysts. Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 1936–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tada, H.; Mitsui, T.; Kiyonaga, T.; Akita, T.; Tanaka, K. All-solid-state Z-scheme in CdS–Au–TiO2 three-component nanojunction system. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. McCullagh, C.; Skillen, N.; Adams, M.; Robertson, P.K.J. Photocatalytic reactors for environmental remediation: A review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011, 86, 1002–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Khin, M.M.; Nair, A.S.; Babu, V.J.; Murugan, R.; Ramakrishna, S. A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8075–8109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Singh, S.; Mahalingam, H.; Singh, P.K. Polymer-supported titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental remediation: A review. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 462–463, 178–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hoffmann, M.R.; Martin, S.T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D.W. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tahir, M.N.; Natalio, F.; Cambaz, M.A.; Panthöfer, M.; Branscheid, R.; Kolb, U.; Tremel, W. Controlled synthesis of linear and branched Au@ZnO hybrid nanocrystals and their photocatalytic properties. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9944–9949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Chen, Y.; Zeng, D.; Zhang, K.; Lu, A.; Wang, L.; Peng, D.-L. Au–ZnO hybrid nanoflowers, nanomultipods and nanopyramids: One-pot reaction synthesis and photocatalytic properties. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 874–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ren, C.; Yang, B.; Wu, M.; Xu, J.; Fu, Z.; Lv, Y.; Guo, T.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, C. Synthesis of Ag/ZnO nanorods array with enhanced photocatalytic performance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Lin, D.; Wu, H.; Zhang, R.; Pan, W. Enhanced Photocatalysis of Electrospun Ag−ZnO Heterostructured Nanofibers. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 3479–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Georgekutty, R.; Seery, M.K.; Pillai, S.C. A highly efficient Ag-ZnO photocatalyst: Synthesis, properties, and mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 13563–13570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kochuveedu, S.T.; Kim, D.-P.; Kim, D.H. Surface-Plasmon-Induced Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Nanospheres Decorated by Au Nanoparticles with Controlled Configuration. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 2500–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, Y.; Wei, S.; Gao, W. Ag/ZnO heterostructures and their photocatalytic activity under visible light: Effect of reducing medium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 287, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Subramanian, V.; Wolf, E.; Kamat, P.V. Semiconductor−Metal Composite Nanostructures. To What Extent Do Metal Nanoparticles Improve the Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Films? J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 11439–11446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jiang, Z.; Wei, W.; Mao, D.; Chen, C.; Shi, Y.; Lv, X.; Xie, J. Silver-loaded nitrogen-doped yolk-shell mesoporous TiO2 hollow microspheres with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 784–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chen, H.; Tu, T.; Wen, M.; Wu, Q. Assembly synthesis of Cu2O-on-Cu nanowires with visible-light-enhanced photocatalytic activity. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 15645–15652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Li, X.; Sun, Y.; Xiong, T.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Dong, F. Activation of amorphous bismuth oxide via plasmonic Bi metal for efficient visible-light photocatalysis. J. Catal. 2017, 352, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dong, F.; Li, Q.; Sun, Y.; Ho, W.-K. Noble Metal-Like Behavior of Plasmonic Bi Particles as a Cocatalyst Deposited on (BiO)2CO3 Microspheres for Efficient Visible Light Photocatalysis. Acs Catal. 2014, 4, 4341–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dong, F.; Zhao, Z.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, S.; Wu, Z. An Advanced Semimetal–Organic Bi Spheres–g-C3N4 Nanohybrid with SPR-Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Performance for NO Purification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 12432–12440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gao, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, J.-j.; Ho, W.; Lee, S.C. Plasmonic Bi/ZnWO4 Microspheres with Improved Photocatalytic Activity on NO Removal under Visible Light. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 6912–6920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dong, F.; Xiong, T.; Yan, S.; Wang, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H.; Wu, Z. Facets and defects cooperatively promote visible light plasmonic photocatalysis with Bi nanowires@BiOCl nanosheets. J. Catal. 2016, 344, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhang, N.; Liu, S.; Fu, X.; Xu, Y.-J. Synthesis of M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd, Pt) Core–Shell Nanocomposites with Tunable Photoreactivity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 9136–9145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Cushing, S.K.; Li, J.; Meng, F.; Senty, T.R.; Suri, S.; Zhi, M.; Li, M.; Bristow, A.D.; Wu, N. Photocatalytic Activity Enhanced by Plasmonic Resonant Energy Transfer from Metal to Semiconductor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15033–15041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kong, L.; Chen, W.; Ma, D.; Yang, Y.; Liu, S.; Huang, S. Size control of Au@Cu2O octahedra for excellent photocatalytic performance. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yang, T.-T.; Chen, W.-T.; Hsu, Y.-J.; Wei, K.-H.; Lin, T.-Y.; Lin, T.-W. Interfacial Charge Carrier Dynamics in Core-Shell Au-CdS Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 11414–11420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wu, X.-F.; Song, H.-Y.; Yoon, J.-M.; Yu, Y.-T.; Chen, Y.-F. Synthesis of Core-Shell Au@TiO2 Nanoparticles with Truncated Wedge-Shaped Morphology and Their Photocatalytic Properties. Langmuir 2009, 25, 6438–6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chen, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Huang, Y.; Cao, J.; Ho, W.; Lee, S. Controllable Synthesis of Core–Shell Bi@Amorphous Bi2O3 Nanospheres with Tunable Optical and Photocatalytic Activity for NO Removal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 10251–10258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, J.T.; Cushing, S.K.; Bright, J.; Meng, F.K.; Senty, T.R.; Zheng, P.; Bristow, A.D.; Wu, N.Q. Ag@Cu2O Core-Shell Nanoparticles as Visible-Light Plasmonic Photocatalysts. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Li, Q.; Wang, F.; Sun, L.; Jiang, Z.; Ye, T.; Chen, M.; Bai, Q.; Wang, C.; Han, X. Design and Synthesis of Cu@CuS Yolk–Shell Structures with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. Nano-Micro Lett. 2017, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Li, P.; Wei, Z.; Wu, T.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y. Au−ZnO Hybrid Nanopyramids and Their Photocatalytic Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5660–5663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Yao, K.X.; Liu, X.; Zhao, L.; Zeng, H.C.; Han, Y. Site-specific growth of Au particles on ZnO nanopyramids under ultraviolet illumination. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4195–4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Muñoz-Batista, M.J.; Ballari, M.M.; Kubacka, A.; Alfano, O.M.; Fernández-García, M. Braiding kinetics and spectroscopy in photo-catalysis: The spectro-kinetic approach. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 637–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Davies, M.J. Detection and characterisation of radicals using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin trapping and related methods. Methods 2016, 109, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Shiraishi, Y.; Hirai, T. Selective organic transformations on titanium oxide-based photocatalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2008, 9, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhao, J. Heterogeneous visible light photocatalysis for selective organic transformations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kisch, H. Semiconductor photocatalysis for organic synthesis. Adv. Photochem. 2001, 26, 93–143. [Google Scholar]
  106. Park, H.; Choi, W. Photocatalytic conversion of benzene to phenol using modified TiO2 and polyoxometalates. Catal. Today 2005, 101, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ide, Y.; Nakamura, N.; Hattori, H.; Ogino, R.; Ogawa, M.; Sadakane, M.; Sano, T. Sunlight-induced efficient and selective photocatalytic benzene oxidation on TiO2-supported gold nanoparticles under CO2 atmosphere. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11531–11533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Yuzawa, H.; Kumagai, J.; Yoshida, H. Reaction Mechanism of Aromatic Ring Amination of Benzene and Substituted Benzenes by Aqueous Ammonia over Platinum-Loaded Titanium Oxide Photocatalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 11047–11058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yuzawa, H.; Yoshida, H. Direct aromatic-ring amination by aqueous ammonia with a platinum loaded titanium oxide photocatalyst. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8854–8856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Tanaka, A.; Hashimoto, K.; Kominami, H. Preparation of Au/CeO2 Exhibiting Strong Surface Plasmon Resonance Effective for Selective or Chemoselective Oxidation of Alcohols to Aldehydes or Ketones in Aqueous Suspensions under Irradiation by Green Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14526–14533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Zhang, N.; Fu, X.; Xu, Y.-J. A facile and green approach to synthesize Pt@CeO2 nanocomposite with tunable core-shell and yolk-shell structure and its application as a visible light photocatalyst. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 8152–8158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pradhan, S.; Ghosh, D.; Chen, S. Janus Nanostructures Based on Au−TiO2 Heterodimers and Their Photocatalytic Activity in the Oxidation of Methanol. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2009, 1, 2060–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Tada, H.; Ishida, T.; Takao, A.; Ito, S. Drastic Enhancement of TiO2-Photocatalyzed Reduction of Nitrobenzene by Loading Ag Clusters. Langmuir 2004, 20, 7898–7900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Xie, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, W.; Wang, Y. MgO- and Pt-Promoted TiO2 as an Efficient Photocatalyst for the Preferential Reduction of Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of Water. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3644–3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhai, Q.; Xie, S.; Fan, W.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Deng, W.; Wang, Y. Photocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide with Water into Methane: Platinum and Copper(I) Oxide Co-catalysts with a Core-Shell Structure. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5776–5779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Liu, L.; Pitts, D.T.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, C.; Li, Y. Silver-incorporated bicrystalline (anatase/brookite) TiO2 microspheres for CO2 photoreduction with water in the presence of methanol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 467, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, Z.; Teramura, K.; Hosokawa, S.; Tanaka, T. Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 in water over Ag-modified La2Ti2O7. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 163, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Feng, X.; Sloppy, J.D.; LaTemp, T.J.; Paulose, M.; Komarneni, S.; Bao, N.; Grimes, C.A. Synthesis and deposition of ultrafine Pt nanoparticles within high aspect ratio TiO2 nanotube arrays: Application to the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 13429–13433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Sarina, S.; Zhu, H.; Jaatinen, E.; Xiao, Q.; Liu, H.; Jia, J.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J. Enhancing Catalytic Performance of Palladium in Gold and Palladium Alloy Nanoparticles for Organic Synthesis Reactions through Visible Light Irradiation at Ambient Temperatures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5793–5801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Jiao, Z.; Zhai, Z.; Guo, X.; Guo, X.-Y. Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling Reaction on Mott–Schottky-type Pd/SiC Catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 3238–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kudo, A.; Miseki, Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Maeda, K.; Domen, K. Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2655–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ahmad, H.; Kamarudin, S.K.; Minggu, L.J.; Kassim, M. Hydrogen from photo-catalytic water splitting process: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 43, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bi, L.; Gao, X.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, D.; Xie, T. Enhanced Separation Efficiency of PtNix/g-C3N4 for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 3779–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ingram, D.B.; Linic, S. Water Splitting on Composite Plasmonic-Metal/Semiconductor Photoelectrodes: Evidence for Selective Plasmon-Induced Formation of Charge Carriers near the Semiconductor Surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5202–5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Munoz-Batista, M.J.; Meira, D.M.; Colon, G.; Kubacka, A.; Fernandez-Garcia, M. Phase-Contact Engineering in Mono- and Bimetallic Cu-Ni Co-catalysts for Hydrogen Photocatalytic Materials. Angew. Chem. -Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1199–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Hu, Z.; Yu, J.C. Pt3Co-loaded CdS and TiO2 for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 12221–12228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Kang, Z. 3D Branched ZnO Nanowire Arrays Decorated with Plasmonic Au Nanoparticles for High-Performance Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 4480–4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Yin, Z.; Chen, B.; Bosman, M.; Cao, X.; Chen, J.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, H. Au Nanoparticle-Modified MoS2 Nanosheet-Based Photoelectrochemical Cells for Water Splitting. Small 2014, 10, 3537–3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zhang, C.; Shao, M.; Ning, F.; Xu, S.; Li, Z.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Au nanoparticles sensitized ZnO nanorod@nanoplatelet core-shell arrays for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Energy 2015, 12, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sheeney-Haj-Ichia, L.; Pogorelova, S.; Gofer, Y.; Willner, I. Enhanced Photoelectrochemistry in CdS/Au Nanoparticle Bilayers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2004, 14, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhukovskyi, M.; Tongying, P.; Yashan, H.; Wang, Y.; Kuno, M. Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation from Ni Nanoparticle Decorated CdS Nanosheets. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 6615–6623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Rosseler, O.; Shankar, M.V.; Du, M.K.-L.; Schmidlin, L.; Keller, N.; Keller, V. Solar light photocatalytic hydrogen production from water over Pt and Au/TiO2(anatase/rutile) photocatalysts: Influence of noble metal and porogen promotion. J. Catal. 2010, 269, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gu, Q.; Long, J.; Fan, L.; Chen, L.; Zhao, L.; Lin, H.; Wang, X. Single-site Sn-grafted Ru/TiO2 photocatalysts for biomass reforming: Synergistic effect of dual co-catalysts and molecular mechanism. J. Catal. 2013, 303, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Hong, J.W.; Wi, D.H.; Lee, S.-U.; Han, S.W. Metal–Semiconductor Heteronanocrystals with Desired Configurations for Plasmonic Photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15766–15773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ma, X.; Zhao, K.; Tang, H.; Chen, Y.; Lu, C.; Liu, W.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Tang, Z. New Insight into the Role of Gold Nanoparticles in Au@CdS Core–Shell Nanostructures for Hydrogen Evolution. Small 2014, 10, 4664–4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Ngaw, C.K.; Xu, Q.; Tan, T.T.Y.; Hu, P.; Cao, S.; Loo, J.S.C. A strategy for in-situ synthesis of well-defined core–shell Au@TiO2 hollow spheres for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 257, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Lee, Y.J.; Joo, J.B.; Yin, Y.; Zaera, F. Evaluation of the Effective Photoexcitation Distances in the Photocatalytic Production of H2 from Water using Au@Void@TiO2 Yolk–Shell Nanostructures. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Yu, Z.B.; Xie, Y.P.; Liu, G.; Lu, G.Q.; Ma, X.L.; Cheng, H.-M. Self-assembled CdS/Au/ZnO heterostructure induced by surface polar charges for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 2773–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Chava, R.K.; Do, J.Y.; Kang, M. Smart Hybridization of Au Coupled CdS Nanorods with Few Layered MoS2 Nanosheets for High Performance Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 6445–6457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kim, Y.G.; Jo, W.-K. Photodeposited-metal/CdS/ZnO heterostructures for solar photocatalytic hydrogen production under different conditions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 11356–11363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhou, H.; Pan, J.; Ding, L.; Tang, Y.; Ding, J.; Guo, Q.; Fan, T.; Zhang, D. Biomass-derived hierarchical porous CdS/M/TiO2 (M = Au, Ag, pt, pd) ternary heterojunctions for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 16293–16301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wang, Q.; Hisatomi, T.; Ma, S.S.K.; Li, Y.; Domen, K. Core/Shell Structured La- and Rh-Codoped SrTiO3 as a Hydrogen Evolution Photocatalyst in Z-Scheme Overall Water Splitting under Visible Light Irradiation. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 4144–4150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Maeda, K.; Teramura, K.; Lu, D.; Saito, N.; Inoue, Y.; Domen, K. Noble-metal/Cr2O3 core/shell nanoparticles as a cocatalyst for photocatalytic overall water splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7806–7809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Matsunaga, T.; Tomoda, R.; Nakajima, T.; Wake, H. Photoelectrochemical sterilization of microbial cells by semiconductor powders. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1985, 29, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Gamage, J.; Zhang, Z. Applications of Photocatalytic Disinfection. Int. J. Photoenergy 2010, 2010, 764870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Malato, S.; Fernández-Ibáñez, P.; Maldonado, M.I.; Blanco, J.; Gernjak, W. Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: Recent overview and trends. Catal. Today 2009, 147, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Byrne, J.A.; Fernandez-Ibañez, P.A.; Dunlop, P.S.M.; Alrousan, D.M.A.; Hamilton, J.W.J. Photocatalytic Enhancement for Solar Disinfection of Water: A Review. Int. J. Photoenergy 2011, 2011, 798051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sarria, V.; Parra, S.; Adler, N.; Péringer, P.; Benitez, N.; Pulgarin, C. Recent developments in the coupling of photoassisted and aerobic biological processes for the treatment of biorecalcitrant compounds. Catal. Today 2002, 76, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Dalrymple, O.K.; Stefanakos, E.; Trotz, M.A.; Goswami, D.Y. A review of the mechanisms and modeling of photocatalytic disinfection. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 98, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Muñoz-Batista, M.J.; Fontelles-Carceller, O.; Ferrer, M.; Fernández-García, M.; Kubacka, A. Disinfection capability of Ag/g-C3N4 composite photocatalysts under UV and visible light illumination. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 183, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Pratap Reddy, M.; Venugopal, A.; Subrahmanyam, M. Hydroxyapatite-supported Ag–TiO2 as Escherichia coli disinfection photocatalyst. Water Res. 2007, 41, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Kumar, R.V.; Raza, G. Photocatalytic disinfection of water with Ag–TiO2 nanocrystalline composite. Ionics 2009, 15, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Liu, L.; Liu, Z.; Bai, H.; Sun, D.D. Concurrent filtration and solar photocatalytic disinfection/degradation using high-performance Ag/TiO2 nanofiber membrane. Water Res. 2012, 46, 1101–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Rtimi, S.; Giannakis, S.; Sanjines, R.; Pulgarin, C.; Bensimon, M.; Kiwi, J. Insight on the photocatalytic bacterial inactivation by co-sputtered TiO2–Cu in aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 182, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zhu, L.; He, C.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xia, D.; Su, M.; Xiong, Y.; Li, S.; Shu, D. Enhanced photocatalytic disinfection of E. coli 8099 using Ag/BiOI composite under visible light irradiation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 91, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Shi, H.; Li, G.; Sun, H.; An, T.; Zhao, H.; Wong, P.-K. Visible-light-driven photocatalytic inactivation of E. coli by Ag/AgX-CNTs (X=Cl, Br, I) plasmonic photocatalysts: Bacterial performance and deactivation mechanism. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 158–159, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Gao, P.; Ng, K.; Sun, D.D. Sulfonated graphene oxide–ZnO–Ag photocatalyst for fast photodegradation and disinfection under visible light. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 826–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Das, S.; Sinha, S.; Suar, M.; Yun, S.-I.; Mishra, A.; Tripathy, S.K. Solar-photocatalytic disinfection of Vibrio cholerae by using Ag@ZnO core–shell structure nanocomposites. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2015, 142, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for the photocatalytic process.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for the photocatalytic process.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g001
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g002 550
Figure 2. Enhanced charge separation at the metal-semiconductor interface.
Figure 2. Enhanced charge separation at the metal-semiconductor interface.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g002
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) SPR-induced electron injection; (b) Charge separation induced by NFEF; (c) Scattering-enhanced light absorption.
Figure 3. (a) SPR-induced electron injection; (b) Charge separation induced by NFEF; (c) Scattering-enhanced light absorption.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g003
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Conventional structure; (b) Core-shell structure; (c) Yolk-shell structure; (d) Janus structure; (e) Array structure; (f) Multi-junction structure.
Figure 4. (a) Conventional structure; (b) Core-shell structure; (c) Yolk-shell structure; (d) Janus structure; (e) Array structure; (f) Multi-junction structure.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g004
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Kinetics of the photodegradation of RhB by Ag/ZnO nanoparticles; (b) The degradation rate constant versus the Ag loading content; (c) Photodegradation of RhB by Ag/ZnO nanoparticles for three cycles; (d) PL spectra of the Ag/ZnO nanofibers with various Ag loading contents ((a) pure ZnO, (b) 1 atom% Ag, (c) 3 atom% Ag, (d) 5 atom% Ag, (e) 7.5 atom% Ag, (f) 10 atom% Ag). Reproduced from [79], with copyright permission from American Chemical Society, 2009.
Figure 5. (a) Kinetics of the photodegradation of RhB by Ag/ZnO nanoparticles; (b) The degradation rate constant versus the Ag loading content; (c) Photodegradation of RhB by Ag/ZnO nanoparticles for three cycles; (d) PL spectra of the Ag/ZnO nanofibers with various Ag loading contents ((a) pure ZnO, (b) 1 atom% Ag, (c) 3 atom% Ag, (d) 5 atom% Ag, (e) 7.5 atom% Ag, (f) 10 atom% Ag). Reproduced from [79], with copyright permission from American Chemical Society, 2009.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g005
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Degradation of RhB by P25 and M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd and Pt) under UV irradiation; (b) Degradation of RhB by P25 and M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd and Pt) under visible light irradiation. Reproduced from [90], with copyright permission from American Chemical Society, 2011.
Figure 6. (a) Degradation of RhB by P25 and M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd and Pt) under UV irradiation; (b) Degradation of RhB by P25 and M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd and Pt) under visible light irradiation. Reproduced from [90], with copyright permission from American Chemical Society, 2011.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g006
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Photocatalytic reduction of MV by TiO2, Au/TiO2, CdS/TiO2 and Au@CdS/TiO2 (CdS/Au/TiO2). Reproduced from [71], with copyright permission from Springer Nature, 2006; (b) Schematic diagram of Z-scheme electron transfer. Reproduced from [68], with copyright permission from John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Figure 7. (a) Photocatalytic reduction of MV by TiO2, Au/TiO2, CdS/TiO2 and Au@CdS/TiO2 (CdS/Au/TiO2). Reproduced from [71], with copyright permission from Springer Nature, 2006; (b) Schematic diagram of Z-scheme electron transfer. Reproduced from [68], with copyright permission from John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g007
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Conversion yield of Pt/TiO2 versus the Pt loading amount; (b) Aniline selectivity of Pt/TiO2 versus the Pt loading amount. Reproduced from [107], with copyright permission from American Chemical Society, 2013.
Figure 8. (a) Conversion yield of Pt/TiO2 versus the Pt loading amount; (b) Aniline selectivity of Pt/TiO2 versus the Pt loading amount. Reproduced from [107], with copyright permission from American Chemical Society, 2013.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g008
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g009 550
Figure 9. Results of photocatalytic selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzyl aldehyde over the core-shell Pt@CeO2, yolk-shell Pt@CeO2, supported Pt/CeO2, CeO2 nanoparticles and blank CeO2. Reproduced from [110], with copyright permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2011.
Figure 9. Results of photocatalytic selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzyl aldehyde over the core-shell Pt@CeO2, yolk-shell Pt@CeO2, supported Pt/CeO2, CeO2 nanoparticles and blank CeO2. Reproduced from [110], with copyright permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2011.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g009
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) Ultraviolet-visible extinction spectra of TiO2, N-TiO2, Ag/N-TiO2 and Au/N-TiO2 samples. The inset shows difference spectra for Ag and Au (i.e., the Ag/N-TiO2 or Au/N-TiO2 spectrum minus the N-TiO2 spectrum); (b) Photocurrent responses (per macroscopic electrode area) under visible light illumination. Reproduced from [124], with copyright permission from American Chemical Society, 2011.
Figure 10. (a) Ultraviolet-visible extinction spectra of TiO2, N-TiO2, Ag/N-TiO2 and Au/N-TiO2 samples. The inset shows difference spectra for Ag and Au (i.e., the Ag/N-TiO2 or Au/N-TiO2 spectrum minus the N-TiO2 spectrum); (b) Photocurrent responses (per macroscopic electrode area) under visible light illumination. Reproduced from [124], with copyright permission from American Chemical Society, 2011.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g010
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g011 550
Figure 11. Photocatalytic water splitting of core-shell Au@CdS and CdS nanoparticles under irradiation of visible light with wavelength more than 420 nm and 500 nm, respectively. Reproduced from [133], with copyright permission from John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Figure 11. Photocatalytic water splitting of core-shell Au@CdS and CdS nanoparticles under irradiation of visible light with wavelength more than 420 nm and 500 nm, respectively. Reproduced from [133], with copyright permission from John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g011
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g012 550
Figure 12. (a) Hydrogen evolution through photocatalytic water splitting on Janus Au/TiO2, core-shell Au@TiO2, amorphous TiO2 and pristine Au nanoparticles; (b) Hydrogen evolution through photocatalytic water splitting on Janus Au/TiO2 with different Au nanoparticle sizes. Reproduced from [63], with copyright permission from John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
Figure 12. (a) Hydrogen evolution through photocatalytic water splitting on Janus Au/TiO2, core-shell Au@TiO2, amorphous TiO2 and pristine Au nanoparticles; (b) Hydrogen evolution through photocatalytic water splitting on Janus Au/TiO2 with different Au nanoparticle sizes. Reproduced from [63], with copyright permission from John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g012
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g013 550
Figure 13. (a) Hydrogen evolution on the multi-segmented CdS/Au NRAs in the photoelectrochemical cell under irradiation of simulated sun light. (I-V) SEM images of the side view of the CdS-Au NRAs. (b) Comparison of the activities for hydrogen evolution on the CdS/Au NRAs and pristine CdS NRAs under irradiation of simulated sunlight. Reproduced from [67], with copyright permission from John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Figure 13. (a) Hydrogen evolution on the multi-segmented CdS/Au NRAs in the photoelectrochemical cell under irradiation of simulated sun light. (I-V) SEM images of the side view of the CdS-Au NRAs. (b) Comparison of the activities for hydrogen evolution on the CdS/Au NRAs and pristine CdS NRAs under irradiation of simulated sunlight. Reproduced from [67], with copyright permission from John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g013
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g014 550
Figure 14. (a) Hydrogen evolution through photocatalytic water splitting on CdS/ZnO, Au/CdS/ZnO and CdS/Au/ZnO, respectively. (b) PL spectra of ZnO, CdS/ZnO and CdS/Au/ZnO at a 270 nm excitation wavelength. Reproduced from [136], with copyright permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013.
Figure 14. (a) Hydrogen evolution through photocatalytic water splitting on CdS/ZnO, Au/CdS/ZnO and CdS/Au/ZnO, respectively. (b) PL spectra of ZnO, CdS/ZnO and CdS/Au/ZnO at a 270 nm excitation wavelength. Reproduced from [136], with copyright permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013.
Nanomaterials 09 00359 g014
Table
Table 1. Metal/semiconductor (M/S) nanocomposite photocatalysts for environmental remediation.
Table 1. Metal/semiconductor (M/S) nanocomposite photocatalysts for environmental remediation.
PhotocatalystStructurePollutantLight sourceReference
Au/TiO2Conventional structureRhBVisible light[51]
Au/ZnOConventional structureRhB, phenol red, procion redUltraviolet (UV) light[76]
Au/ZnOConventional structureRhBUV light[77]
Ag/ZnOConventional structureMBUV light[78]
Ag/ZnOConventional structureRhBUV light[79]
Ag/ZnOConventional structureRhBSimulated sunlight[80]
Au/TiO2Conventional structureMB, MO, p-nitrophenolVisible light[81]
Ag/ZnOConventional structureRhBVisible light[82]
Au/TiO2, Pt/TiO2, Ir/TiO2Conventional structureAzo dyeUV light[83]
Ag/TiO2Conventional structureRhB, ciprofloxacinVisible light[84]
Cu/Cu2OConventional structureRhB, MO, MBVisible light[85]
Bi/amorphous bismuth oxide (A-BO)Conventional structureNOVisible light[86]
Bi/(BiO)2CO3Conventional structureNOVisible light[87]
Bi/g-C3N4Conventional structureNOVisible light[88]
Bi/ZnWO4Conventional structureNOVisible light[89]
Bi/BiOClConventional structureNOVisible light[90]
M@TiO2 (M = Au, Pd, Pt)Core–shell structureRhBUV light, visible light[91]
Au@Cu2OCore–shell structureMOVisible light[92]
Au@Cu2OCore–shell structureMOVisible light[93]
Au@CdSCore–shell structureRhBVisible light[94]
Au@TiO2Core–shell structureAcetaldehydeUV light, visible light[95]
Bi@Bi2O3Core–shell structureNOVisible light[96]
Ag@Cu2OCore–shell structureMOVisible light[97]
Au@TiO2Yolk–shell structureRhBVisible light, simulated sunlight[59]
Cu@CuSYolk–shell structureMBSimulated sunlight[98]
Au/ZnOJanus structureRhBUV light[99]
Au/ZnOJanus structureMOUV light[100]
CdS/Au/TiO2Multi-junction structureMethyl viologen (MV)UV light[71]
Table
Table 2. M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts for selective organic transformation.
Table 2. M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts for selective organic transformation.
PhotocatalystStructureReaction TypeReactantLight SourceReference
Pt/TiO2, Pd/TiO2Conventional structureOxidation reactionBenzeneUV light[106]
Au/TiO2Conventional structureOxidation reactionBenzeneSimulated sunlight[107]
Pt/TiO2Conventional structureOxidation reactionBenzeneUV light[108]
Pt/TiO2Conventional structureOxidation reaction(substituted) BenzeneUV light[109]
Au/CeO2Conventional structureOxidation reactionAromatic alcoholsVisible light[110]
Pt@CeO2Core-shell, yolk-shell structureOxidation reactionBenzyl alcoholVisible light[111]
Au/TiO2Janus structureOxidation reactionMethanolUV light[112]
Ag/TiO2Conventional structureReduction reactionNitrobenzeneUV light[113]
M/TiO2 (M = Pt, Pd, Rh, Ag and Au)Conventional structureReduction reactionCarbon dioxide (CO2)UV light[114]
Pt-Cu/TiO2Conventional structureReduction reactionCO2Visible light[115]
Ag/TiO2Conventional structureReduction reactionCO2Simulated sunlight[116]
Ag/La2Ti2O7Conventional structureReduction reactionCO2UV light[117]
Pt/TiO2Conventional structureReduction reactionCO2Simulated sunlight[118]
Au-Pd/ZrO2Conventional structureOxidation, coupling reactionBenzylamine, benzyl alcohol etc.Visible light[119]
Pd/SiCConventional structureCoupling reactionIodobenzene, phenylboronic acidVisible light[120]
Table
Table 3. M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution.
Table 3. M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution.
PhotocatalystStructureLight SouceReference
Pt/TiO2Conventional structureUV light[27]
PtNix/g-C3N4Conventional structureUV light[124]
Au/TiO2, Ag/TiO2Conventional structureVisible light[125]
Cu/TiO2, Ni/TiO2, CuNi/TiO2Conventional structureUV light[126]
Pt3Co/CdS, Pt3Co/ TiO2Conventional structureUV light[127]
Au/ZnOConventional structureSimulated sunlight[128]
Au/MoS2Conventional structureVisible light[129]
Au/ZnOConventional structureVisible light[130]
Au/CdSConventional structureSimulated sunlight[131]
Ni/CdSConventional structureUV light[132]
Pt/TiO2, Au/TiO2Conventional structureSimulated sunlight[133]
SnRux/TiO2Conventional structureUV light[134]
Au/Cu2OConventional, core-shell structureVisible light[135]
Au@CdSCore-shell structureVisible light[136]
Au@TiO2Yolk-shell structureUV light[137]
Au@TiO2Yolk-shell structureUV light[138]
Au/TiO2Janus structureVisible light[63]
Au/CdSArray structureVisible light[67]
CdS/Au/ZnOMulti-junction structureUV light[139]
CdS/Au/MoS2Multi-junction structureVisible light[140]
CdS/Pt/ZnOMulti-junction structureSimulated sunlight[141]
CdS/M/TiO2 (M = Au, Ag, Pt, Pd)Multi-junction structureSimulated sunlight[142]
CoOx/Ir/Ta3N5Multi-junction structureSimulated sunlight[143]
Cr2O3/Rh/ (Ga1-xZnx)(N1-xOx)Multi-junction structureVisible light[144]
Table
Table 4. M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts for disinfection.
Table 4. M/S nanocomposite photocatalysts for disinfection.
PhotocatalystStructureBacteriaLight SourceReference
Ag/g-C3N4Conventional structureEscherichia coliUV and visible light[151]
Ag/TiO2Conventional structureEscherichia coliUV light[152]
Ag/TiO2Conventional structureEscherichia coliSunlight[153]
Ag/TiO2Conventional structureEscherichia coliSimulated sunlight[154]
Cu/TiO2Conventional structureEscherichia coliUV and visible light[155]
Ag/BiOIConventional structureEscherichia coliVisible light[156]
Ag/AgX (X = Cl, Br, I)Conventional structureEscherichia coliVisible light[157]
Ag/ZnOConventional structureEscherichia coliVisible light[158]
Ag@ZnOCore–shell structureVibrio choleraeSunlight[159]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, Y.-s.; Li, J.; Li, J. Metal/Semiconductor Nanocomposites for Photocatalysis: Fundamentals, Structures, Applications and Properties. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030359

AMA Style

Fu Y-s, Li J, Li J. Metal/Semiconductor Nanocomposites for Photocatalysis: Fundamentals, Structures, Applications and Properties. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(3):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Yong-sheng, Jun Li, and Jianguo Li. 2019. "Metal/Semiconductor Nanocomposites for Photocatalysis: Fundamentals, Structures, Applications and Properties" Nanomaterials 9, no. 3: 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030359

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop