Next Article in Journal
MLK3 Signaling in Cancer Invasion
Next Article in Special Issue
The MYC 3′ Wnt-Responsive Element Drives Oncogenic MYC Expression in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
In Hyperthermia Increased ERK and WNT Signaling Suppress Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Frizzled7: A Promising Achilles’ Heel for Targeting the Wnt Receptor Complex to Treat Cancer

by
Toby Phesse
1,2,*,†,‡,
Dustin Flanagan
1,† and
Elizabeth Vincan
1,3,*
1
Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory and the Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
2
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
3
School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Current Address: European Cancer Stem Cell Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK
Cancers 2016, 8(5), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers8050050
Submission received: 31 March 2016 / Revised: 3 May 2016 / Accepted: 9 May 2016 / Published: 17 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wnt Signaling in Cancer)

Abstract

:
Frizzled7 is arguably the most studied member of the Frizzled family, which are the cognate Wnt receptors. Frizzled7 is highly conserved through evolution, from Hydra through to humans, and is expressed in diverse organisms, tissues and human disease contexts. Frizzled receptors can homo- or hetero-polymerise and associate with several co-receptors to transmit Wnt signalling. Notably, Frizzled7 can transmit signalling via multiple Wnt transduction pathways and bind to several different Wnt ligands, Frizzled receptors and co-receptors. These promiscuous binding and functional properties are thought to underlie the pivotal role Frizzled7 plays in embryonic developmental and stem cell function. Recent studies have identified that Frizzled7 is upregulated in diverse human cancers, and promotes proliferation, progression and invasion, and orchestrates cellular transitions that underscore cancer metastasis. Importantly, Frizzled7 is able to regulate Wnt signalling activity even in cancer cells which have mutations to down-stream signal transducers. In this review we discuss the various aspects of Frizzled7 signalling and function, and the implications these have for therapeutic targeting of Frizzled7 in cancer.

1. Introduction

Frizzled7 (FZD7) is located on human chromosome 2q33 and contains 3859 nucleotides that produce a 574 amino acid transmembrane protein, which belongs to a family of Wnt receptors. The Wnt signalling pathway regulates a diverse repertoire of cellular functions, playing critical roles during embryonic development, stem cell function and is often deregulated in cancer. Frizzled (Fzd) receptors have an extracellular N-terminal with a conserved cysteine rich domain (CRD), which is responsible for binding to Wnt ligands, seven transmembrane domains and an intracellular C-terminal with a putative PDZ binding domain. The number of Fzd genes varies between class of organism; mammals have ten Fzd’s, Drosophila have four, whilst C. elegans have three. Sequence analysis indicates that vertebrate Fzd genes can be divided into discrete classes based on structural homology. Fzd1, Fzd2 and Fzd7 share approximately 97% identity, Fzd5 and Fzd8 share 70% identity, Fzd4, Fzd9 and Fzd10 share 65% identity and Fzd3 and Fzd6 share 50% amino acid identity [1,2]. Fzd receptors are able to associate with several distinct co-receptors giving the Wnt pathway considerable complexity and flexibility. The cytoplasmic components of Wnt signalling are frequently mutated in cancer, for example ~90% of colorectal cancers contain mutations which activate the Wnt pathway [3]. However, it is becoming clear that the Wnt receptor complex also plays an important role during cancer despite mutations in the downstream components of the pathway. There is now convincing data to demonstrate that the level at which the Wnt pathway is activated is instrumental to phenotypic outcomes, and that the strength of the signal is regulated at multiple points in the signalling cascade including the Wnt/Fzd receptor complex. Fzd7 is of particular interest as it is the Wnt receptor most commonly up-regulated in several different cancers and can also transmit signals through the different arms of the Wnt pathway referred to broadly as canonical (Wnt/β-catenin dependent) and non-canonical (Wnt/β-catenin independent). The decision of which pathway Fzd7 will signal through upon ligand binding is still a subject of current research in the field, but appears to be dependent on the availability of co-receptors, Wnts and the cellular and extra-cellular milieu. As both the canonical and non-canonical pathways are deregulated in many different cancers, Fzd7 offers an exciting target for therapeutic intervention and will be the main focus of this review.

2. Wnt Signalling

The Wnt1 gene (originally called Int1) was first identified during a screen to identify oncogenes capable of inducing breast tumours in mice when mutated by infection with mouse mammary tumour virus (MMTV) [4]. Since then, a whole family of Wnt proteins has been discovered (19 in mammals, including humans) which are highly conserved from humans through to the simplest free living organisms, placozoans [5] and sponges [6]. Experiments in Drosophila and Xenopus demonstrate that Wnt1 is an important regulator of many cell functions during development including proliferation, migration, differentiation, apoptosis and cell polarity. These experiments, and subsequent ones, identified that Wnt1 is a homolog of Drosophila Wingless (Wg) and is the ligand for a signalling pathway which signals through Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3β), β-catenin and the transcription factors T-cell factor-4 (Tcf4)/Lymphoid enhancer binding factor-1 (Lef1), and was consequently called the Wnt pathway (an amalgam of “Wg” and “Int1”) [7]. In addition to its critical role during development, the Wnt pathway also controls the activity of stem cells in adult tissues including the intestine, stomach, liver, ovary, breast and hair follicle, during homeostasis and regeneration [8].
Wnt proteins are ~40 KDa in size and mediate relatively close-range signalling between cells. Recent evidence for the mechanism of this short-range signalling suggests that lipid modifications to Wnt by the palmitoyltransferase enzyme Porcupine in the endoplasmic reticulum target it for tethering to the membrane by the carrier protein Wntless [9]. Thus exocytosed Wnt proteins are thought to be either attached to the cell membrane or expelled in secretory vesicles, with very recent evidence suggesting that cell division, and not diffusion, is the primary mechanism for forming Wnt gradients, at least in the mammalian intestinal crypt [10]. However, studies in Drosophila suggest Wg can act as both a short and long-range inducer, which presents an interesting paradox; how do Wg ligands, which are hydrophobic and prone to form aggregates in an aqueous extracellular environment, act as long-range inducers if their lipid moieties confer high affinity for membrane tethering? Recent research from Roel Nusse’s lab has addressed this long standing question. Secreted Wg-interacting molecule (Swim), a member of the Lipocalin family of transporter proteins, can bind with nanomolar affinity to Wg, chaperoning Wg through the extracellular milieu, whilst preserving Wg solubility and signalling activity [11]. As such, RNAi-mediated Swim knockdown disrupts the identity of cells positioned distally from the local Wg source, demonstrating that they require long-range Wg signaling. As anticipated, Swim reduction resembles Wg mutant long-range phenotypes [11]. Furthermore, seminal work from Vivian Budnik’s group has elegantly demonstrated in the Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) that Wg signal transmission can occur via exosome release, which contain the Wnt binding protein Evenness Interrupted (Evi) [12]. Evi is required for Wg secretion on the pre-synaptic side, as Evi mutants phenocopy Wg mutant tissues [13]. Additionally, Evi plays an important cell autonomous role targeting dGRIP, a Wg-receptor-interacting protein, to post-synaptic sites where it facilitates post-synaptic Wg signal transmission [13]. Besides its role in transporting Wg via exosomes across the NMJ, Evi also functions in the retromer system, where it is recycled from endosome to the Golgi apparatus for subsequent rounds of Wg release at the plasma membrane [12].

3. Canonical and Non-Canonical Signalling

Wnt signalling is broadly divided into canonical and non-canonical pathways based primarily on whether signalling activates β-catenin (for canonical), and associated phenotypes including transformation of mammary epithelial cells and Xenopus axis duplication for canonical signalling and orientation of hairs on the wing surface of Drosophila for non-canonical. The interaction between the Wnt ligand and the receptors it associates with on neighbouring cells determines which of these pathways is activated (Figure 1). Some Wnts that have been shown over many years of research to robustly activate particular pathways, such as Wnt3a and Wnt2b activating canonical signalling whilst Wnt5a and Wnt11 predominantly activate non-canonical pathways, however, this is by no means an exclusive activation of just one pathway. Indeed, several studies now indicate considerable cross-talk between the canonical and non-canonical pathways and thus this division should not been considered entirely separate but rather as a signalling network depending on cell and situation context [14]. Consequently, Wnt5a provides an excellent example of how a single Wnt ligand can activate discrete signalling outcomes, depending on cellular context and receptor availability. Well studied for its role in PCP and Wnt/Ca2+ activation (discussed in detail below), Wnt5a in co-operation with Ror2 can inhibit Wnt3a-mediated canonical Wnt signalling through promoting β-catenin degradation independent of Gsk-3 [15,16]. Demonstrated in parallel, Wnt5a/Ca2+ signalling triggers calcium calmodulin dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) activation, which induces the Transforming growth factor-beta-activated kinase 1 (TAK1)-Nemo-like kinase (NLK)-Mitogen-activated-protein-kinase (MAPK) pathway, shown to phosphorylate TCF/LEF factors and inhibit the interaction of the β-catenin/TCF complex with DNA. Thus, the TAK1-NLK-MAPK-like pathway, via Wnt5a/Ca2+ signaling, negatively regulates the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway [17,18]. Interestingly, in other contexts, Wnt5a can activate β-catenin/TCF/LEF-mediated transcription in the presence of the appropriate Fzd receptor, Fzd4 [15].
The pivotal effector of the canonical Wnt pathway is the co-transcription factor β-catenin. In the absence of active Wnt signalling, β-catenin is primarily localised to cell-cell adherens junctions and any free cytoplasmic β-catenin is rapidly phosphorylated by GSK3 in a degradation complex which targets β-catenin for proteosomal degradation. The destruction complex also includes Adenamatous polyposis coli (Apc), Casein kinase 1 (CK1) and Axin to facilitate phosphorylation of β-catenin. During canonical Wnt signaling, Wnt ligands bind to transmembrane Fzd receptors and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6 (Lrp5/6) co-receptors. Once activated, this receptor complex associates with the cytosolic scaffold protein Dishevelled (Dvl) to inhibit GSK3 enzyme activity. Consequently, β-catenin escapes phosphorylation and subsequent degradation, accumulates in the cytoplasm and translocates into the nucleus. β-catenin cannot bind to DNA directly but instead regulates transcription by associating with the transcription factor complex Tcf4/Lef1 that bind to conserved E-box sequences in regulatory elements of genes. Wnt1 and Wnt3a are prototypical examples of ligands that consistently activate this pathway [19].
The non-canonical Wnt pathway is defined as being able to signal independent of β-catenin and has two arms; the Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) pathway and the Calcium pathway (Ca2+). PCP signalling is activated when Wnt ligands including Wnt5a [20], Wnt7a [21], Wnt8b [22] or Wnt11 [23,24] bind to Fzd receptors and associated receptor tyrosine kinases such as Ror2 or Ryk [25], thus allowing for significant complexity in the transmission of the signal. Depending on which Wnt/receptor complex is activated, a variety of cytoplasmic PCP pathway signal transduction components are then activated including DVL, Cdc42, c-JUN N-terminal Kinase (Jnk) and the GTPases RhoA, Rac1 [26]. The PCP pathway also includes the so called “core” components (Fzd, Dsh, Celsr, Vangl and Prickle) which set up cell polarity within the plane of the epithelial sheet [27]. Although primarily involved in cell polarity and migration, recent data suggests that PCP signalling can also promote proliferation in several different cancers [28,29,30,31,32].
The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway derives originally from the observations that over-expression of Wnt5a or rat Fzd2 can cause an increase in intracellular calcium in zebrafish [33] and can activate protein kinase C (PKC) and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaM kinase) in Xenopus [34]. Wnt/Fzd ligand receptor interaction with participating co-receptor Ror 1/2 leads to the production of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and 1,2 diacylglycerol (DAG) and calcium from membrane-bound phospholipid phosphatidyl inositol 4,5-bisphosphate via the action of membrane-bound enzyme phospholipase C (PLC). PLC then modifies IP3 and DAG allowing IP3 to diffuse through the cytosol and interact with calcium channels present on the endoplasmic reticulum, which result in the release of calcium ions. Calcium in conjunction with calmodulin activates CaMKII. Meanwhile, DAG and intracellular calcium activate PKC. PKC and CaMKII can activate various regulatory proteins, including NFκB and CREB, which are nuclear transcription factors, and thus regulate target gene expression [35].

4. Regulators of Wnt/Fzd Receptor Interaction

In canonical Wnt signalling, Fzd receptors respond to Wnt proteins in the presence of co-receptor LRP5/6 to activate and propagate the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Alternatively, Fzd receptors can respond to Wnt proteins in the presence of the Wnt co-receptor Ror2 to activate the non-canonical pathway [20]. Thus, it seems likely that the decision for a cell to activate canonical or non-canonical Wnt signalling largely depends on the receptor/co-receptor/ligand combination and availability of these components, which is a current research focus in the field (Table 1 and Figure 1) [14]. This interaction between Wnt ligand and its co-receptors is also regulated by several other proteins, to ensure that Wnt signalling is tightly regulated as described below.

4.1. sFRP Protein Family

The family of secreted frizzled-related proteins (sFRPs) is comprised of five secreted glycoproteins (sFRP-1, sFRP-2, sFRP-3, sFRP-4, and sFRP-5), which bind directly to Wnts, thereby altering their ability to bind to the Wnt receptor complex [36]. All sFRP family members contain an N-terminal domain that is 30%–50% homologous to the CRD of Frizzled receptors, which is considered both necessary and sufficient for Wnt binding and inhibition [37,38]. In contrast to Fzd family proteins, sFRPs lack a transmembrane region and the cytoplasmic domain required for signal transduction into the cells. However, other structure and function analyses of sFRP1 demonstrate that both the CRD and C-terminal Netrin-related motif (NTR) domains are required for optimal Wnt inhibition [39].
The crystal structures of the CRDs from mouse Fzd8 and sFRP3 reveal the potential to form dimers [40], which is supported by evidence showing Fzd and sFRP proteins can form homo- and heteromeric complexes via the CRD [41]. These findings may imply that sFRPs have multiple modes in which they can inhibit Wnt signalling. Unlike Dkks, which specifically target and inhibit canonical Wnt signalling, sFRPs can bind directly to Wnt ligands, thereby inhibiting both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signalling [36,42].
It should be noted that sFRPs do not always inhibit Wnt signalling, as nanomolar concentrations of sFRP1 increase Wnt3a signalling in HEK293 cells, whilst higher concentrations inhibit Wnt signalling [43]. In addition to the concentration specific activities of sFRPs [44], cell type and the expression of Fzd receptors [43] and GSK3 [45] have also been show to modulate the ability of SFRPs to inhibit Wnt signalling. For example, sFRP2 has been shown to inhibit Wnt3a signalling in ES cells [44], whilst in HEK293 cells it inhibits Wnt signalling [46].

4.2. Wnt Inhibitory Factor 1 (WIF-1)

Similar to SFRPs, Wnt inhibitory factor 1 (WIF-1) is also able to bind to Wnt ligands and inhibit Wnt signalling [47]. WIF-1 is conserved amongst the vertebrates and consists of an N-terminal secretion signal sequence, the WIF domain, five Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains and a hydrophilic C terminus [48]. Structural analysis, site mutagenesis and cell assays show that Wnt can bind to the WIF domain and the EGF-like domains of WIF-1 [48].
WIF-1 inhibits Wnt signalling during development to help regulate Wnt expression in the paraxial mesoderm [47], and its promoter region is frequently methylated, and consequently downregulated in many cancers as detailed below.

4.3. Dkk Protein Family

There are four Dickkopf (Dkk) proteins in the vertebrate genome, Dkk-1, -2, -3 and -4. Dkk proteins selectively antagonise canonical Wnt signalling by binding to Lrp5/6, thus preventing Fzd and Wnt to form a ternary complex [49]. They can also modulate Wnt signalling by associating with Kremen1 and 2 to form a complex which regulates internalisation of Lrp [50]. Dkks are critical during development, and forced expression of Dkk1 in the mouse intestine inhibits epithelial cell proliferation and results in a loss of stem cells, highlighting the importance of Wnt signalling in intestinal stem cells [51,52].

4.4. R-Spondin & the E3 Ligases (Rnf43 & Znrf3)

R-Spondin (R-Spo) proteins are potent agonists of Wnt signalling, but only in the presence of Wnt ligands [53]. There are four R-Spo proteins in the vertebrate genome, R-Spo1, 2, 3 and 4. These excreted proteins are characterised by two N-terminal furin domains, a thrombospondin domain in the centre of the protein and a positively charged C-terminal region [54]. Gene expression and co-immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that Lgr proteins form a complex with other Wnt receptor components including Fzd and Lrp5/6, suggesting a potential role as a Wnt receptor [55,56]. It was subsequently shown that tagged R-Spo1 can bind to Lgr4, -5, and -6 in HEK293 and Ls174 cells. In support of an interaction between R-Spo and Lgr, R-Spo/Lgr complexes are revoked following Lgr4 or 5 deletions [55,56].
The highly related transmembrane E3 ubiquitin ligases, ZNRF3 and RNF43, act as negative regulators of canonical Wnt signalling that are integral to R-Spo/Lgr Wnt potentiation [57,58]. Both ZNRF3 and RNF43 were identified from gene expression profiling to discover genes that positively correlated with known negative regulators of Wnt signalling, such as Axin2 or Dkk-1 [57]. In common with other Wnt antagonists, including Axin2 and Dkk, ZNR43 and RNF43 are also Wnt target genes [57]. ZNRF3 regulates Wnt signalling by ubiquitylating Fzd-Lrp receptor complexes and thus targeting them for internalisation and proteasomal degradation [57]. It has also been demonstrated that R-Spo can induce membrane clearance of ZNRF3 through ZNRF3-Lgr4 dimerisation, thus leading to an accumulation of Wnt receptors on the cell surface [57,59]. These findings support a model where in the absence of R-Spo, ZNRF3 ubiquitylates Fzd and promotes the degradation of Fzd-LRP6 complex, thus keeping Wnt signalling to low levels. However, in the presence of R-Spo, an interaction between Lgr4 and ZNRF3, via R-Spo Furin domains (1 & 2), leads to the clearance of ZNRF3, allowing Fzd/LRP6 to stabilise and accumulate at the membrane to enhance canonical Wnt signalling [57,59] (Figure 1).
In addition to its important role in regulating canonical Wnt signalling, R-Spo3, is able to regulate the Wnt/PCP pathway [56]. R-Spo3 forms a complex with Fzd7 to transmit Wnt5a signals by inducing Sdc4-dependent, clathrin-mediated endocytosis during development (Table 1 and Figure 1). These data support a model whereby internalisation of the Wnt/receptor complex is an important mechanism by which R-Spondins promote Wnt/PCP signalling [60].

5. The Wnt Receptor as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer

A vast body of research data exists on the cytoplasmic events involved in Wnt signalling [72] but only relatively recently have the Wnt receptors that transmit these signals began to attract more interest. This is due, in part, to the observations made in the 1990’s that the cytoplasmic components of Wnt signalling are often mutated in many different cancers, thus resulting in more intensive research into their function and potential as targets for therapeutic intervention. For example, it is now established that Apc is mutated in 80%–90% of colorectal tumours [73]. As such, strategies to target the Wnt receptor complex in cancers harbouring mutations to downstream Wnt signalling components, e.g., Apc in colorectal tumours, appeared counter-intuitive. However, in 2002, observations from Ron Smits lab based on the location of mutations occurring naturally in the Apc gene led them to propose the “just right” or Goldilocks model of Wnt signalling in cancer which proposes an optimal, but not excessive, level of Wnt pathway activation to transform cells, suggestive of constrained Wnt activation [74]. Furthermore, a surprising result from Ian Tomlinson’s group also supported the Goldilocks model, in which a novel Apc mutant mouse (Apc1322T) developed severe intestinal polyposis associated with weaker Wnt pathway activation when compared to ApcMin/+ mice (which are predisposed to develop intestinal tumours after loss of heterozygosity results in Apc mutations on both alleles [75,76]. Conversely, work from Alan Clarke’s lab demonstrated that ApcMin mice deficient for the Wnt target gene Cited1 developed significantly less tumours and had extended life span compared to their ApcMin, Cited1 proficient littermates [77]. Further analysis of this phenotype revealed that Cited1 deficient mice displayed elevated levels of Wnt signalling during tumourigenesis, which became cytotoxic and induced cell death, consequently resulting in the development of fewer intestinal tumours [77]. This is consistent with many in vitro studies demonstrating that high levels of Wnt can induce cell death, but was the first to observe this phenotype during tumourigenesis in vivo. Conversely, co-deletion of the Wnt target gene c-Myc and Apc is sufficient to inhibit all intestinal tumourigenic phenotypes, which is due to restoration of Wnt signaling back to wild type levels. [78]. This concept, that Wnt signalling is not 100% activated when Apc is mutated in cancer cells, reveals a therapeutic window whereby targeting the Wnt receptor can still reduce the level of Wnt signalling even in cells which have mutations in Apc [78].
The Goldilocks model also requires that the degradation complex is still partially functional even in cells with mutations in Apc (a critical component of the complex that phosphorylates β-catenin and targets it for degradation), and thus leaves open the possibility that Wnt signalling can be modified in cells with Apc mutations. Indeed, several publications in the mid 2000’s demonstrated that manipulation of factors up-stream of the degradation complex, at the level of the Wnt ligand and receptor, could alter the response of colorectal cancer cells even if they contained mutations to APC. For example, the promoter regions of SFRPs [79,80,81] and WIF1 [82] are hypermethylated and consequently down-regulated in the very early stages of gastrointestinal cancer, with the methylation status of certain SFRPs serving as biomarkers for cancer detection and progression [14,83]. The Fzd7 extracellular domain has also been shown to potently inhibit the growth of APC mutant CRC tumour cells in a mouse xenograft model [84]. Furthermore, exogenous Wnt originating from tumour associated myofibroblasts was not only capable of maintaining cancer stem cell function and clonality in cells isolated from human colon tumours, but was also able to promote the stemness and clonality of non-cancer stem cells [85]. Importantly, these data indicate that the Wnt receptor complex is not redundant in cancers that have mutations to cytoplasmic Wnt regulators, but in fact still play an active role to promote cancer initiation and growth. As detailed below, many cancers in addition to gastrointestinal cancer have now been reported to display hypermethlylation and downregulation of Wnt ligand/receptor inhibitors such as the SFRP, DKK and WIF, and many also display elevated levels of FZD receptors, suggesting that activation of Wnt signalling via the receptor is involved in driving cancer growth. Furthermore, expression of Wnt and FZD’s are often up-regulated in diverse cancers as detailed below [79,86,87,88].

6. Frizzled 7

The Fzd genes were originally discovered along with several other genes including dishevelled (dsh), fuzzy (fy) and multiple wing hairs (mwh), that affect planar cell polarity in Drosophila, which was monitored by changes to the orientation of hairs on the wings surface. As such mutations in Fzd genes resulted in changes to the PCP pathway, which disrupted the orientation of wing hairs into a whorl-like appearance [89,90]. Since then, Fzd genes have been found in a diverse range of organisms, from sponges [91] and hydra [92] to vertebrates [93], and have been experimentally demonstrated to be receptors for Wnt ligands [61,94]. Human FZD7 was first identified and characterised in 1998 [1], and was also discovered to be upregulated in oesophageal cancer by a different group in the same year, who named it FzE3 [95].
Following the discovery of Fzd genes in Drosophila, intense research into the identification, expression and function of Wnt and Fzd homologues during development in other model organisms such as Xenopus, C. elgans and vertebrates (mice) ensued. Indeed, the successful cloning of Xenopus Fzd7 (Xfz7) by Wheeler and Hoppler [96] facilitated a surge in the understanding of evolutionary conserved roles for Wnt/Fzd7 signalling during various developmental and adult processes such as neural crest induction [97], gastrulation [98] and intestinal homeostasis [62]. This is particularly well exemplified in the gut. For example, the gastric tube of hydra, which is separated into endodermal and ectodermal layers, express Wnt signalling orthologues such as β-catenin [99], Fzd7, Gsk-3β, Dvl, Apc, and Axin from the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [92,100] and Van Gogh, Flamingo and JNK from the Wnt/PCP pathway [101] along an oral-aboral axis during gastrulation [102]. The organisation and coordinated balance of cell renewal and movement of epithelial and interstitial cells throughout the gastric tube is regulated by Wnt/Fzd signalling [103,104,105]. Of note, when compared to the ten mammalian Fzd family members, the hydra Fzd shares closest homology with Fzd7 (and Drosophila Fzd2) [92,106], which suggests an essential role for Fzd7 in regulating cell differentiation, proliferation and the establishment and homeostasis of three-dimensional gut tissue architecture, which has been maintained throughout millions of years of evolution as it is also critical in higher organisms [62].
Indeed, Xfz7 has been shown to regulate the coordinated convergent extension movement of cells [67], tissue separation [98] and dorsal axis specification [107] during gastrulation in developing Xenopus laevis. Furthermore, the absolute requirement for canonical Wnt signalling in the developing and adult intestinal epithelium implicates a pivotal role for Fzd receptors [51,52,108,109]. In the mammalian intestinal epithelium, Fzd7 expression is restricted to the stem cell/progenitor compartment, the crypts of Lieberkühn, suggesting a role in Wnt signal transduction to intestinal stem cells [62,110]. As such, Fzd7 has been recently shown to be the Fzd receptor responsible for transmitting key Wnt signals to intestinal stem cells, facilitating intestinal stem cell maintenance, epithelial homeostasis and regeneration following DNA damage [62].
Fzd7−/− mice are viable and have a mild truncation and kink in the tail [111], which is reminiscent of the loop-tail phenotype in PCP mutant mice [112,113,114,115], suggesting Fzd7 partially regulates PCP signalling during development. However, as Fzd7−/− mice do not have an intestinal phenotype, this suggests that PCP signalling via Fzd7 is less important during intestinal development and homeostasis. Furthermore, canonical Wnt signalling is absolutely required during intestinal development and homeostasis [108]. Therefore regulation of canonical Wnt signalling via Fzd7 must be functionally compensated by other frizzled receptors in Fzd7−/− mice during development and homeostasis of the intestine. Fzd2 has been demonstrated to compensate for loss of Fzd7 during development, since compound Fzd2−/−; Fzd7−/− mice die at E10.5, whilst Fzd1−/−; Fzd7−/− are healthy and fertile [111]. Although genetic deficiency of Fzd7 can be tolerated during development and homeostasis of the intestine, surprisingly, acute genetic deletion of Fzd7 is deleterious in intestinal stem cells [62]. This could be due to a combination of factors.
Firstly, in Fzd7−/− mice, the compensation mechanism using Fzd2 in the absence of Fzd7, has been occurring all through development and thus the system is fully established in the adult intestinal epithelium. This is a very different scenario from acute, conditional deletion which would result in significant stress for intestinal stem cells, which require Wnt signalling, possibly resulting in a different response from that of continued absence of Fzd7 from the beginning of conception as in a Fzd7−/− mouse.
Secondly, conditional deletion of Fzd7 in the intestinal epithelium triggers rapid repopulation of the epithelium with Fzd7 proficient cells, which is not possible in a Fzd7−/− mouse [62]. Conditional deletion of other genes in the intestine, including c-Myc [116] and Chk1 [117], also trigger rapid repopulation, and thus it seems this mechanism is a sufficient safe-guard to protect intestinal stem cells if they experience the deletion of a critical gene such as Fzd7 [62], rather than relying on Fzd2 to transmit the crucial Wnt signals. Thirdly, the capacity of the intestinal epithelium to regenerate after irradiation-induced DNA damage is markedly reduced in Fzd7−/− mice, however regeneration does recover and is associated with an increased expression of Fzd2 and Fzd1, suggesting that if repopulation with Fzd7 proficient cells is not possible (as in a Fzd7−/− mouse), then compensation with other Fzd genes can occur [62].
Fzd7 is able to modulate the transmission of both canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathways. There are many examples of Fzd7 transmitting canonical Wnt signalling in several tissues during development, homeostasis and disease in many organisms including humans [118]. This occurs via Fzd7 associating with Lgr4/5 [55] and a Wnt ligand such as Wnt3, and is greatly enhanced in the presence of R-Spondin which prevents Rnf43 mediated degradation of the Fzd7 receptor complex [119]. In the neural crest, Fzd7/Wn6 induces epithelialisation of the somites via β-catenin [120], while Fzd7/Wnt11 orchestrates neural crest cell migration via the PCP and Ca2+ pathways [24].
Another layer of complexity that can influence the activation of specific Wnt/Fzd pathways is the subcellular localisation of Fzd receptors. This was formally demonstrated in experiments overexpressing chimeric DFzd1 and DFzd2 proteins in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc epithelium. This study revealed that the intracellular C-terminal of Fzd proteins is responsible for directing the localisation of specific Fzd receptors within an apical-basal axis, which in turn direct either PCP (apical) or canonical (basal) Wnt signalling [121]. Of note, the recent visualisation of a short-range Wnt gradient operating in the intestinal stem cell niche identified Wnt3, a prototypical canonical Wnt ligand, to be expressed on the baso-lateral membrane of Paneth cells, which is received by Fzd receptors on adjacent Lgr5+ stem cells [10]. This finding is consistent with observations that Fzd7 is expressed in Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells [62,122] on the baso-lateral membrane [123], and is required for their function in vivo [62]. It will be of future interest to investigate whether the intracellular C-terminal of Fzd7 is required for its baso-lateral localisation and how this may impact on intestinal stem cell function.
During Xenopus development Fzd7 can form a complex with R-Spo3 to transmit Wnt5a signals and activate PCP signalling by inducing Sdc4-dependent, clathrin-mediated endocytosis [60]. These data support a model whereby internalisation of the Wnt/receptor complex is an important mechanism by which R-Spondins promote Wnt signalling.
Fzd7 can also co-operate with Ryk co-receptors to transmit Wnt 11-mediated signals via β-arrestin2-dependant endocytosis and JNK in convergent extension during Xenopus development [67]. Furthermore, low levels of β-catenin and non-canonical JNK (PCP) signalling can both be activated by Fzd7 to regulate foregut fate and proliferation during Xenopus development [124]. Fzd7 has also been shown to regulate PKC, and its translocation to the cell membrane during Xenopus gastrulation, suggesting it can regulate the Ca2+ pathway [98]. Recently it has also been demonstrated that Fzd7 (and Fzd1, Fzd2 and Fzd6) is able to directly interact with G proteins to activate MAPK (PCP) signalling [71].
Finally, the specification and expansion of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) during development relies on controlled spatial and temporal Wnt signalling. Meta-analysis of 38 publications studying gene signatures of hESCs identified that FZD7 is consistently expressed highlighting that FZD7 is the predominant FZ receptor in many stem cell populations [125]. This was also observed at the protein and transcriptome level [126]. Indeed, canonical Wnt signalling via Wnt3a and FZD7 promote the proliferation of hESCs and subsequent knockdown of FZD7 has been shown to induce hESC differentiation [127,128]. However, interestingly, in the same model system, non-canonical Wnt signalling activated by Wnt11 and FZD7, is sufficient to direct hESCs from pluripotency towards mesodermal lineage specification [23]. Collectively, these studies demonstrate not only the promiscuity of Wnt/Fzd interactions, but how subtle changes in the availability of Wnt ligands and/or receptor components can direct different cellular outcomes.
The Wnt-Fzd interaction is promiscuous, with a single Wnt able to bind multiple Fzd proteins, and vice versa, to activate canonical and/or non-canonical Wnt signalling. Successful crystallisation of Xenopus Wnt8 bound to Fzd8 CRD revealed two distinct residue moieties that facilitate Wnt/Fzd binding [129]. One is via a palmitoleic acid lipid group found on the Wnt protein that projects into a deep groove in the Fzd8 CRD. The second is a conserved finger-like projection that forms a hydrophobic amino acid interface with a depression in the opposite side of the Fzd8 CRD [129]. The authors of this important work also conclude that the binding chemistry of the Wnt/Fzd interaction strongly suggests that mono-specificity is not compatible and thus it is highly unlikely that a restricted ligand-receptor matched code exists [129].
The Wnt-Fzd structure reveals the precision with which Wnt binds Fzd and provides evidence for complex oligomerisation with co-receptors to transduce signals to cytoplasmic signal transducers, most notably, Dvl [129]. The Fzd receptors are thought to homo- or hetero-dimerise in order to signal, which adds another level of complexity to Wnt/Fzd signalling [40,129]. This notion, based on the crystal structure of the CRD region, is supported by Fzd oligomerisation assays, which show that each Fzd tested (Fzd1, 2, 4, 7, 9) homo-oligomerise, and that some Fzd receptors are able to hetero-oligomerise (e.g., Fzd1, 2 & 7). Notably, Fzd7 could oligomerise with each Fzd tested [65], and is also able to associate with several co-receptors which may help explain why Fzd7 is the only member of the Fzd family that has been demonstrated to activate each branch of the pathway: Wnt/β-catenin pathway [107,130], the PCP pathway [22,131] and the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway [98].
This promiscuity of Fzd7 to associate with different co-receptors and regulate both arms of the Wnt pathway may explain its frequent up-regulation in many different cancers to drive tumour growth, as both pathways are implicated in cancer. Although a variety of proteins have been discovered to bind Fzd7, not all of them have been functionally characterised [70] (Table 1 listing the different proteins that Fzd7 can bind to and the signalling output). However Fzd7 is not unique in its ability to activate canonical and non-canonical pathways, with examples also published for other Fzd’s. For example, Fzd5/Wnt5a activates the Ca2+ pathway in melanoma and is associated with a more aggressive phenotype [132], whilst in the developing retina Fzd5 signals via β-catenin [133].
These exciting developments have spawned a new focus in cancer research to target the Wnt ligand/receptor complex as a potentially therapeutic strategy to treat several different cancers detailed in the sections below.

Regulation of Fzd7

Gene regulation is governed by a complex network of cellular mechanisms, which can be modulated at every step. As such, the ever-expanding interplay between signaling pathways, transcription factors and post-transcriptional modifiers demonstrates that the expression of a single gene is not exclusively governed by a single factor. Indeed several recent studies have demonstrated the expression of Fzd7 to be regulated by multiple highly conserved signalling pathways and post-transcriptional modifiers (miRNAs). Wnt/β-catenin signaling is one of the key signalling pathways shown to regulate FZD7 expression, as FZD7 expression is increased in human embryonic carcinoma cells following exposure to Wnt3a conditioned medium [87]. In addition, the FZD7 promoter houses putative TCF binding sites, confirming its regulation by Wnt/β-catenin signaling [87]. Wnt/β-catenin-mediated regulation of FZD7 is further supported by findings demonstrating the activation and repression of a FZD7 promoter-driven luciferase reporter in response to β-catenin stimulation and inhibition respectively [88]. However, given the increasing complexity of crosstalk between signalling pathways, it’s of little surprise that Fzd7 expression is regulated by more than just Wnt signalling. For instance, unpublished data from our own lab indicates that Fzd7 is a transcriptional target of Jak/Stat3 signalling [123]. These findings are corroborated by observations made in articular chondrocytes, demonstrating a reduction in FZD7 expression following pharmacological inhibition (AG490) of JAK2 [134]. More recently, the Notch signaling pathway, specifically NOTCH3, was shown to regulate the expression of FZD7 in human mammary epithelial cells [135]. Further analysis revealed FZD7 to be expressed predominantly by luminal progenitor cells, which is hypothesised to regulate luminal cell differentiation through a NOTCH3-FZD7 signalling axis [135].
Furthermore, microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs), small non-coding RNAs that influence post-transcriptional gene expression through imperfect binding to the 3’ UTR of mRNA, play important roles in development and disease, placing them as potential therapeutic targets. As such, several miRNAs have been identified to influence the activation of Wnt signalling via regulation of Fzd7 expression. For instance, miRNA-206 is a critical myogenic regulation factor required for correct skeletal muscle development and differentiation [136]. Subsequent algorithmic and bioinformatic analysis of gene expression databases reveal Fzd7 to be a direct target of miRNA-206 [137]. As such, overexpression of Fzd7 induces increased proliferation and abnormal myoblast differentiation [137]. These findings are supported by previous studies demonstrating a central role for Fzd7 in skeletal stem cell maintenance in muscular dystrophy animal models via activation of Akt/mTOR signalling [21].
Wnt signalling is a critical signaling pathway during the development, homeostasis and regeneration of the intestinal epithelium [8,62,138]. Recent research has identified several miRNAs, including miRNA-222, that influence intestinal epithelial biology [139]. Intestinal regeneration was significantly impaired in a novel miRNA-222 overexpressing transgenic mouse, which was associated with impaired Wnt activation, through downregulation of Fzd7 [140]. Indeed, Fzd7 was subsequently shown to be a direct target of miRNA-222, thus revealing induction of miRNA-222 negatively regulates intestinal regeneration through suppressing the expression of Fzd7 [140]. These data are strongly supported by recent work showing intestinal regeneration to be significantly impaired in Fzd7−/− mice [62].
Likewise, miRNAs have been shown to influence the expression of Fzd7 in several different cancers, and associated with reduced tumour growth, which are discussed in the relevant cancer sections below. However, recently Li et al. uncovered a two-faceted role for miRNA-126 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), demonstrating that either overexpression or knockout of miRNA-126 could promote AML via inducing the expression of oncogenic fusion genes [141]. Interestingly, knockdown of miRNA-126 repressed the expression of tumour suppressor genes ERRFI1 and SPRED1, but increased Wnt pathway activation via increased FZD7 expression. This resulted in accelerated AML progession, however, cells were sensitised to standard chemotherapy agents [141]. Collectively, these studies reveal some of the factors regulating Fzd7 expression, and illustrate its importance in several biological contexts, from development and regeneration through to homeostasis and cancer.

7. Intestinal Cancer

Wnt signalling has been recognised as an important driver of intestinal cancer for many years. Mutations to APC were first observed in colon tumours of FAP (familial adenomatous polyposis) patients in the 1990’s [142,143,144]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that Apc is a potent tumour suppressor; a mutagenesis screen in mice identified that mutation to Apc caused multiple intestinal adenoma’s (these mice were called ApcMin/+) [75,145], whilst conditional truncation of Apc throughout the intestine using transgenic mice resulted in rapid uncontrolled proliferation similar to tumourigenesis [146,147]. Furthermore, intestinal stem cells, marked by the Wnt target gene Lgr5 were identified as the cell of origin for intestinal cancer, as truncation of Apc specifically in Lgr5+ cells resulted in widespread, rapid, development of adenoma’s throughout the small intestine and colon [148]. Although β-catenin mutations are observed at much lower frequencies than Apc in intestinal tumours (~5% compared to ~75%) [3], conditional activation of β-catenin is sufficient to induce tumourigenesis in the mouse intestine [149,150], supporting the model of cytoplasmic Wnt signalling components as regulators of intestinal cancer. Indeed, truncating mutations in Apc or oncogenic mutation in β-catenin are mutually exclusive but appear to be obligatory initiating steps for CRC [151]. Thus, intestinal tumourigenesis requires constitutive activation of the canonical Wnt pathway, although the aetiology of APC and β-catenin mediated intestinal cancer is different [151,152]. Oncogenic mutations in β-catenin are more common in intestinal tumours with microsatellite instability [3]. Intriguingly, APC truncation may provide the genetic make-up for additional regulation by the Wnt pathway (reviewed in [106] and papers cited within). For example, LEF-1 over-expression alone is sufficient to induce EMT in a developmental context, but both LEF-1 over-expression and APC truncation are required to induce EMT in a colon cancer setting. Furthermore, restoring full length APC is sufficient to abrogate tumour growth in human colon cancer cells in vitro [153], or using a mouse model which allows deletion and restoration of Apc in vivo [154].
Due to the high frequency of Apc mutations observed in intestinal cancer it was assumed that the Wnt receptor complex would not be important in regulating Wnt activity in this setting. However, as described above, SFRPs, WIF-1 and DKK1 are often hypermethylated and downregulated very early in intestinal cancer suggesting the Wnt receptor complex does play a role [79,80,155]. Indeed the Wnt agonists RSPO2 and RSPO3 are fused in 10% of human colon tumours and act to potentiate Wnt signalling [156]. As such, the treatment of human patient-derived colon tumour xenografts with specific monoclonal antibodies generated against RSPO family members (anti-RSPO) have shown promising growth inhibition and reduced Wnt/β-catenin signalling when used in combination with standard chemotherapy [157]. In addition, loss-of-function (LOF) mutations to the E3 family ligases ZNRF3 and RNF43, which serve to negatively regulate Fzd receptor turnover, are commonly observed in human colon tumour biopsies [3]. Such tumours are predicted to be hypersensitive to Wnt signalling through the stabilisation of Fzd receptors [58].
Several FZD receptors are over expressed in human intestinal tumours and cell lines, including FZD3, FZD6 and FZD7 [1,106,158]. Inhibition of FZD7 using a dominant negative extracellular domain is able to block the growth of human colon cancer cells in vitro and in xenograft experiments with stably transfected SK-CO-1 cells, which harbour mutations to APC [84]. Recently Fzd7 has also been demonstrated to be the predominant Wnt receptor required to transmit Wnt signalling (via Wnt 3 or 2b) in intestinal Lgr5+ stem cells during homeostasis and regeneration [62]. Conditional deletion of Fzd7 in intestinal organoids resulted in crypt atrophy and organoid death, whilst conditional deletion of Fzd7 specifically in the Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells triggered rapid epithelial repopulation in transgenic mice [62], demonstrating that Fzd7 is critical for intestinal stem cell function. As Lgr5+ stem cells are the cell of origin for intestinal cancer and also a marker of intestinal cancer stem cells, this data opens new avenues of research to determine the therapeutic benefit of inhibiting Fzd7 to specifically target these cells.
In addition to its role in the very first stages of tumourigenesis, Wnt signalling is also implicated in the progression and invasion of intestinal tumours. Analysis of gene expression in the metastatic potential of human primary colon cancers identified several Wnt target genes to be important, including BAMBI, BOP1, CKS2 and NFIL3. Inhibition of these Wnt target genes with shRNA was able to reduce migration and invasion in vitro and also completely block the formation of secondary liver tumours in mice following intrasplenic injection of SW620 cells transduced with the corresponding shRNA [159].
Fzd7 also plays an important role during metastasis by regulating the critical stages in which epithelial cancer cells transition into mesenchymal cells when leaving the primary tumour (EMT), and then from mesenchymal to epithelial (MET) at the secondary site [152,160,161,162,163]. Expression of a dominant negative FZD7 in human SK-CO-1 cells blocked their growth in xenograft experiments and induced morphological changes suggesting that FZD7 promotes MET [84]. The role of Fzd7 during MET was further supported in experiments using a novel model of tumour morphogenesis termed LIM1836-Mph cells (human colon cancer cells) which go through cycles of EMT and MET in vitro [158]. MET in these cells is associated with a sharp increase in nuclear β-catenin, and treatment with FZD7 specific shRNA is able to inhibit MET suggesting FZD7 regulates canonical Wnt signalling in this process [158]. On the other hand, nuclear β-catenin was very low in migrating LIM1836-Mph cells, however FZD7 shRNA could also inhibit migration of these cells suggesting Fzd7 mediates non-canonical signalling of migrating colon cancer cells [158]. Indeed, this was subsequently formally demonstrated by Ueno and colleagues who showed FZD7-mediated vertebrate PCP pathway is involved in colon cancer cell migration [164].
Furthermore, high-throughput screening for miRNAs implicated in human carcinomas has revealed significant downregulation of miR-23b in human colon cancers, which promotes metastasis, tumour growth, invasion and angiogenesis [165]. Subsequent investigations demonstrate that FZD7 is a direct regulatory target of miR-23b and targeted inhibition of FZD7 or miR-23b can significantly reduce migration, growth and angiogenesis in human colon cancer cells [165].

8. Hepatocellular Carcinoma

By far the most characterised cancer with relation to FZD7 is Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Between 40%–70% of HCC display elevated nuclear β-catenin [166] suggesting that canonical Wnt signalling maybe important, and it is especially high in HCC associated with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection [167]. Although intracellular components of the Wnt pathway such as Axin1 and β-catenin are mutated in some cases of HCC, they are not sufficient in number to account for the high frequency of Wnt pathway activation observed, suggesting activation of the pathway at the level of the ligand/receptor. Indeed, several Wnt ligands are overexpressed in HCC, including Wnt1/3/4/5a and 10b, whilst Wnt antagonists sFRP1/4/5, Wif1, Dkk3, Dkk4 are frequently reduced [168]. Many of these genes have been functionally demonstrated to regulate tumour growth, thus highlighting that HCC can be modulated by Wnt signalling at the level of the receptor [168]. Indeed, serum levels of Dkk1 can be used to diagnose HCC and differentiate HCC from HBV infection [169].
FZD7 is frequently over expressed in HCC, especially in patients infected with HBV [167], and has been shown to interact with Wnt3a to transmit canonical Wnt signalling in HCC [63]. One strategy to treat HCC via manipulation of FZD7 may involve the use of soluble peptide fragments to antagonise FZD7 signalling. For instance, HCC cell lines (HepG2 and Huh7) treated with a recombinant soluble FZD7 (sFZD7) peptide, which contains the extracellular domain of FZD7, inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signalling and decreases cell proliferation and viability (without effecting normal hepatocytes) [170]. The effects of sFzd7 on abating HCC tumourigenicity were accomplished by the competitive binding of the Fzd7 extracellular CRD with Wnt3, which activates the canonical Wnt signalling pathway [170]. This is consistent with results observed in colon cancer cells using the same strategy [84].
Post transcriptional control of FZD7 is also observed in HCC. The expression of miR199a is frequently downregulated in human liver tumours, and associated with poor clinical outcome. Experimental overexpression of miR199a in human HepG2 HCC cells was able to repress cancer growth in vitro and in vivo, and was associated with inhibition of FZD7 [171].
FZD7 is overexpressed in the surrounding periportal and dysplastic liver suggesting it may be important during early stages of HCC [63]. However, the precise role of Wnt signalling during the very early stages of the disease are still the subject of debate as conditional activation of Wnt signalling in transgenic mouse models reveals that elevated Wnt signalling causes hepatomegaly and disorganisation of liver zonation, but does not result in the development of tumours [172,173]. It seems therefore that deregulated Wnt signalling acts more to promote HCC in co-operation with other oncogenic pathways such as AKT, MET, H-RAS, insulin receptor substrate-1 and chemical mutagens. This does not make targeting FZD7 for the treatment of HCC any less attractive as mono-therapies have failed to provide any robust clinical outcomes and co-treatments targeting multiple pathways is now the focus of most targeted therapy approaches.

9. Gastric Cancer

Wnt signalling is emerging as an important oncogenic pathway in gastric cancer (GC). The recent Cancer Genome Atlas paper, which analysed 295 primary gastric adenocarcinomas, identified that APC is the 6th most frequently mutated gene in the non-hypermutated gastric tumours (over three times more frequent than the hypermutated subgroup which does not contain APC mutations). When combined with gain-of-function mutations in β-catenin, the Wnt pathway is found to be activated in over 10% of GCs [174]. These observations are consistent with a second paper investigating molecular profiling of GC in Nature Genetics in which the authors conclude that aberrant Wnt/β-catenin signalling plays an important role in gastric adenoma [175]. Deregulation of Wnt signalling by conditional deletion of all 4 copies of Gsk3 (both α and β isoforms) was able to induce formation of gastric tumours in mice, thus providing functional proof that activation of Wnt is able to trigger tumourigenesis in the gastric epithelium in vivo [176].
Components that are known to be associated with signalling via FZD7 are strongly implicated in GC. For example, it has been shown extracellular secreted Wnt antagonists (sFRP and Dkk) are frequently epigenetically silenced through promoter hyper-methylation [81,177]. Critically, exogenous re-introduction of Wnt pathway inhibitors, such as sFRP1, 2 or 5 and Dkk1, or reversing promoter methylation can significantly limit and reduce in vitro tumourgenicity and tumour xenograft burden of Wnt pathway-activated gastric cancer models by means of attenuating Wnt/β-catenin signalling [81,177,178]. Importantly, these studies demonstrate (a) activated Wnt signalling is sufficient to drive gastric tumourigenesis and (b) provide proof-of-principle that modulation of extracellular/upstream signalling components can impact on Wnt pathway output irrespective of intracellular/downstream mutations that would otherwise drive positive feed-forward Wnt signalling. Furthermore, the fact that sFRPs and Dkks act by inhibiting Wnt/FZD signalling implies a role for Wnt/FZD in tumourigenesis of GC.
There are several reports suggesting that the non-canonical Wnt pathway is active in GC. RHOA, a downstream component of non-canonical Wnt signalling and FZD7 [179], is upregulated in GC [174,180], whilst ROR1, a tyrosine kinase like receptor able to transmit non-canonical Wnt5a signals [181], is phosphorylated in HS746T human gastric cancer cells, via a Met dependant mechanism [31]. Wnt5a, which primarily activates the non-canonical pathway, is up-regulated in human gastric tumours, however, this is not observed in cultured human GC cell lines (OKAJIMA, TMK1, MKN7, MKN28, MKN74 and KATOIII) suggesting the source of Wnt5a is from stromal cells [182]. Similarly, Wnt5a and Wnt2 were found to be significantly up-regulated in colon cancer associated macrophages [183], illustrating that Wnt signals can originate from outside the tumour cells themselves.
Several reports demonstrate that FZD7 expression is upregulated in GC, with high expression associated with poor clinical outcome [184,185,186]. However, mutations in RNF43, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that regulates FZD receptor turnover and therefore activate Wnt signalling, are frequently observed in GC [174]. This data, together with methylation of SFRPs (frequently observed in GC) identifies additional mechanisms that increase Wnt signalling, which cannot be identified by transcriptional and mutational analysis of FZD’s itself, and suggests that the importance of FZD in GC could presently be underestimated. FZD7 expression is also increased in a side population of cells isolated from GC cell lines, which were found to have increased cancer stem cell properties, supporting a role for FZD7 in promoting GC [186]. Indeed, conditional deletion of Fzd7 is able to inhibit the growth of gastric cancer cells and in mouse models of GC and colony forming assays with human GC cells [123].
Finally, the strong association between aberrant Wnt signaling and H. pylori-induced gastric tumourigenesis, implicates a role for Fzd receptors to promote Wnt signalling in gastric cancer. As such, recent research has shown FZD7 to be highly expressed following H. pylori infection and associated increases in cell proliferation [187]. Subsequent analysis demonstrates FZD7 to be negatively regulated by miRNA-27b, which when overexpressed is sufficient to inhibit the expression of FZD7 and reduce gastric cancer cell proliferation. Likewise, targeted knockdown (siRNA) of FZD7 in H. pylori-induced gastric cancer cells effectively phenocopies the effect of miRNA-27b overexpression [187].

10. Breast Cancer

Wnt signalling regulates the development and homeostasis of the breast [188] and is deregulated in breast cancer. Indeed Wnt1 was first identified as a gene, the ectopic expression of which via pro-viral insertion, was able to promote mammary tumourigenesis [4]. SFRPs and WIF are frequently methylated and consequently down regulated in breast cancer leading to activation of the Wnt pathway [189,190]. Similarly, LRP6 overexpression was found in a subtype of ER-negative and HER2-negative breast tumours [191].
A screen to analyse which pathways were active in triple negative (TN) breast cancer, identified that the Wnt pathway was an important driver in this aggressive type of breast cancer and that FZD7 was often overexpressed [192]. Indeed, knockdown of FZD7 using shRNA was able to inhibit migration, colony formation and xenograft growth of human MBA-MB-231 TNBC cells which was associated with reduced canonical Wnt signalling [192].
Furthermore, recent research has revealed a novel mechanism by which FZD7 expression is regulated in breast cancer cells. SIRT1, an NAD+-dependent deacetylase positively regulates FZD7 mRNA and protein levels, promoting increased cell migration and proliferation [193]. As such, genetic and/or pharmacological inhibition of SIRT1 significantly reduced FZD7 levels through perturbing the binding of β-catenin and c-Jun transcription factors to the endogenous FZD7 promoter, reversing the potent tumourigenic effect of FZD7 overexpression in breast cancer cells [193]. In addition, an elegant study from Yibin Kang’s group recently demonstrated a separate regulatory mechanism of FZD7 in human mammary stem cells (MaSCs) and TN breast cancer cells. A specific isoform of the p63 family, ΔNp63, is commonly expressed in the normal mammary epithelium, where it regulates MaSCs and when overexpressed is sufficient to transform normal MaSCs to tumour-initiating cells (TICs) [194]. Gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of ΔNp63/+ MaSCs reveals alterations exclusively to Wnt signalling, with substantial decreases in Fzd7 and Wnt5a expression, resulting in a significant reduction in MaSCs [194]. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis on wild type MaSCs demonstrates a strong enrichment of the FZD7 enhancer in p63 bound chromatin, which was further supported by the activation of a FZD7 enhancer-driven luciferase reporter in response to ΔNp63, thus demonstrating Fzd7 is a direct target of ΔNp63 [194]. Subsequent overexpression and knockdown studies targeting ΔNp63 or FZD7 in patient-derived xenografts (PDX) from TN breast tumours significantly attenuated tumourigenicity, which was associated with a reduction in the number of TICs [194]. These data demonstrate a pivotal ΔNp63-Fzd7-WNT signalling axis, which may represent a driving force for the initiation and maintenance of TN breast tumours, thus serving as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.

11. Ovarian Cancer

As with other cancers, a role for the Wnt signalling pathway at the level of the receptor/ligand has been suggested from studies on the SFRP genes. SFRP1 SFRP2 and SFRP5 are methylated in ovarian cancer [195], and experimental overexpression or knockdown, demonstrated that epigenetic silencing of SFRP5 was related to tumour growth, invasion (via EMT) and chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer [196].
Ovarian cancer is a heterogenous disease but can be broadly separated into five distinct subtypes based on molecular characteristics; epithelial-A (Epi-A), Epi-B, mesenchymal (Mes), Stem-A and Stem-B. FZD7 is upregulated in the Stem-A subgroup of ovarian cancer, which has a poor clinical outcome [197]. Knockdown of FZD7 using siRNA was able to inhibit proliferation of human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell lines [179] associated with changes in cell morphology which have also been observed in colon cancer cells [84].
Interestingly, inhibition of FZD7 in ovarian cancer cells resulted in an increase in the level of canonical signalling, whilst the non-canonical signalling components including RhoA were slightly down regulated. These data suggest FZD7 maybe regulating ovarian cancer cell growth via the Wnt/PCP pathway rather than the canonical pathway, which is upregulated in Stem-A ovarian tumours [179].

12. Cervical Cancer

Nuclear β-catenin is observed in ~70% of cervical tumours indicating deregulation of Wnt signalling is common in cervical cancer [198]. However, mutations to APC and β-catenin are rare in this cancer, suggesting that Wnt signalling could be activated at the level of the receptor in cervical cancer [198]. Indeed, this is supported by studies reporting hypermethylation and downregulation of DKK-3 [199], WIF-1 [200], SFRP-1, SFRP-2 and SFRP-4 [201] in cervical tumours.
Inhibition of FZD7 using shRNA was able substantially reduce invasion and EMT in HeLa and SiHa cervical cancer cell lines in vitro [202]. These phenotypes were associated with changes in the regulation of EMT markers including E-Cadherin, Vimetin and Snail, and also down regulation of MMP genes which are implicated in invasion. Levels of phosphorylated c-Jun and JNK were also reduced when FZD7 was inhibited suggesting the PCP pathway maybe involved in transducing signals downstream of FZD7 in cervical cancer, although no assays were performed to determine the activation of canonical Wnt signalling [202]. Moreover, subsequent studies from the same lab demonstrated FZD7 to be a direct target of miRNA-142-3p, which is normally expressed at low levels in cervical cancer cells. Importantly, restoration of miRNA-142-3p expression significantly reduced FZD7 expression, cell proliferation and invasion, thus identifying miRNA-142-3p and FZD7 as attractive therapeutic targets for cervical cancer therapy [203].
There is no data to demonstrate that FZD7 is upregulated in cervical cancer, however, as mentioned above, the role of FZD7 in cancer could be underestimated, as seems the case in cervical cancer, due to changes in the membrane turnover of FZD7, which will greatly affect the response of a cell to Wnt ligands.

13. Melanoma

There are conflicting reports on the role of canonical Wnt signalling in melanoma. Some reports have shown that canonical Wnt signalling is reduced as melanoma progresses, suggesting that activating canonical Wnt signalling could be a therapeutic strategy for treatment of melanoma. Indeed, overexpression of Wnt3a reduced proliferation of human or mouse melanoma cells [204], and pharmacological activation of Wnt via treatment with Riluzole [205] or a GSK3 inhibitor (LY2090314) inhibits melanoma cell growth [206]. Conversely, it has been shown that cell intrinsic canonical Wnt signalling mediates resistance to recent immunotherapy approaches such as PD-1 inhibitors [207], thus suggesting that activation of Wnt would not be an effective therapy, at least not in combination with the promising immune check point inhibitors. Of note, Wnt5a is able to promote melanoma progression via Fzd5 and the Ca2+ pathway [132], and as canonical Wnt signalling has been shown to be able to inhibit non-canonical signalling, this is a potential mechanism that may help explain how increased canonical Wnt signalling results in reduced melanoma growth [208,209].
FZD7 is upregulated in human, metastatic melanoma cells, and shRNA mediated knockdown of FZD7 in these cells was able to inhibit formation of xenograft tumours and also metastasis following intravenous injection [210]. Melanoma’s which develop resistance to treatment with BRAF inhibitor PLX4720 display upregulated Wnt5a which was consequently show to promote tumour growth via FZD7 and AKT [208]. Interestingly, treatment of MA-2 human melanoma cells with WNT3 or LiCl increased canonical WNT signalling, and decreased JNK (non-canonical Wnt signalling) in cells with FZD7 knockdown, suggesting that FZD7 suppresses the canonical Wnt pathway in melanoma cells [132].

14. Wilm’s Tumour and Renal Cancer

Wilm’s tumour (WT) is a renal solid tumour, most commonly observed in children. Canonical Wnt signalling is frequently deregulated in Wilm’s tumour, associated with mutations to β-catenin [211], and FZD7 is also frequently overexpressed [212].
Inhibition of FZD7 using a blocking antibody resulted in reduced clonality of cancer cells isolated from human WT samples, and apoptosis in those cells which expressed FZD7. Interestingly, WT cells become resistant to treatment with FZD7 antibody when SFRP1 or DKK1 are expressed, suggesting that the Wnt pathway is deregulated at the level of the Wnt receptor complex in WT [213].
In renal cell carcinoma (RCC), Wnt signalling is also activated, with reports of loss of Apc [214] and mutations to β-catenin [215]. Indeed, conditional truncation of Apc in the kidneys of mice resulted in multiple renal tumours, indicating that deregulated canonical Wnt signalling is sufficient to induce tumourigenesis in the adult kidney [216].
Deregulation of Wnt signalling at the level of the Wnt receptor is also implanted in RCC as SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP4, SFRP5, DKK3, and WIF1 are hypermethylated in primary RCC samples [217]. FZD7 has recently been shown to be upregulated in ~36% of human RCC [218]. Addition of Wnt3a is also sufficient to increase the growth of human RCC cells in vitro, whilst inhibition of FZD7 with shRNA is able to reduce proliferation in the human RCC cells [218], suggesting FZD7 may be an attractive therapeutic target to treat RCC. However, the modest reduction in proliferation of RCC cells upon FZD7 inhibition suggests that strategies combining current standard-of-care therapies for RCC with FZD7 inhibition could be an attractive approach rather than mono-therapies which are often unsuccessful.

15. Fzd7 in Other Cancers and Tissues

Deregulated Wnt signalling is observed in many cancers, and, as described above, the Wnt receptor complex is often involved in this aberrant Wnt activation. Although the role of FZD7 has not been described in all cancers with high Wnt activity it is tempting to speculate that FZD7 may be involved in these cancers also, particularly as it is a Wnt target gene [87,88], and it will be interesting in future studies to examine to full extent to which FZD7 is required in the following cancers.
FZD7 is upregulated in esophageal cancer [95], but there is no functional data to determine its role. Likewise, FZD7 is upregulated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [219,220], and Wnt signalling is deregulated in head and neck cancer [221], but the importance of FZD7 has not been studied. Wnt signalling is also deregulated in lung cancer [222,223] and prostate cancer [224,225], but it is unknown if FZD7 is important in these two devastating cancers with very high morbidity rates. Developmental pathways are often deregulated in cancers, and thus it is tempting to speculate whether FZD7 may be involved in hematopoietic malignancies as T-cell maturation in the thymus is blocked by expression of the FZD7 ectodomain [226]. FZD7 is upregulated in human glioblastoma stem cells, and whilst no experiments have yet been performed to specifically address the role of FZD7 in these cells, overexpression of sFRP1 halts cell cycle and induces apoptosis, suggesting the Wnt receptor complex, and possibly FZD7, are attractive targets to treat glioblastoma [227,228].
Wnt signalling does not act alone in promoting cancer, and is able to co-operate with other pathways, oncogenes and tumour suppressors, including JAK/STAT [229], K-ras [225,230], p53 [216], mTOR [231] and Notch [232]. Future studies to determine the efficacy of combined targeting of these factors (or re-expression in the case of p53) along with FZD7 inhibition will yield important pre-clinical information, which is likely the future of cancer therapy given the failure of mono-therapies to provide a robust clinical outcome.

16. Targeting FZD7 for the Treatment of Cancer

The plethora of studies detailed above has established that signalling via Wnt/FZD is epigenetically regulated in many cancers, and therefore offers an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. As FZD receptors belong to a large family of proteins with high levels of promiscuity to several Wnt ligands it was initially thought that targeting a single FZD receptor would not be an effective strategy to treat cancer due to functional redundancy by another FZD receptor. However, this has not proven to be the case, as experiments inhibiting FZD7 alone have shown that it can have potent anti-tumour effects, as detailed above. Interestingly, DNA damage induced regeneration in the intestine was impaired when Fzd7 was deleted, but eventually recovered and was associated with an increase in the expression of Fzd2, suggesting Fzd2 may have been able to compensate for Fzd7 loss in this setting [62]. It will be interesting in future research to investigate if inhibiting multiple Fzd receptors is able to increase the anti-tumour effects of targeting Fzd7 by eliminating the redundancy between receptors.
Deregulated Wnt signalling in cancer is often the result of mutations to cytoplasmic components of the Wnt pathway. Although the concept of targeting a receptor for a cancer driven by a mutation to a downstream, cytoplasm signal transducer (such as Apc), seems counter-intuitive, the Goldilocks model of Wnt signalling helps explain how this is possible. The data that has contributed to this model demonstrates that mutations to Apc do not completely prevent its action to regulate β-catenin and thus upstream events at the level of the receptor can also be targeted in cancers with mutant Apc [74]. Apc is mutated at several different places, with different levels of Wnt pathway activity associated with each mutation, most likely as a result of the mutations ability to prevent Apc regulating β-catenin phosphorylation. Thus, all Apc mutations do not result in the same impact on Wnt signalling, and it will be useful in future research to map which Apc mutations correlate to a cellular response to upstream regulators at the level of the ligand/receptor. This information will be important to help stratify which patients will respond to cancer treatments targeting FZD7 or any other regulators of the ligand/receptor complex, based on which mutations to Apc their individual cancers have.
Stem cells are required for the continuous tissue maintenance within diverse organs, and Wnt signalling has been identified as regulating stem cells in several organs including the gastrointestinal tract, breast, skin, kidney, and ovary [8]. Stem cells are able to self-renew and proliferate autonomously, if they are located in their niche environment within a tissue, and thus already possess some characteristics of cancer cells [233]. Consequently, stem cells have been identified as the cells of origin for several different cancers including the intestine, stomach, prostate and lung [234]. Wnt signalling has been shown to regulate stem cells in several organs and as such, deregulated Wnt signalling in stem cells is able to induce tumourigenesis in the intestine and stomach [148]. Fzd7 has recently been demonstrated to be the predominant receptor transmitting critical Wnt signals to Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells [62]. Although deletion of Fzd7 was deleterious to intestinal stem cells, the intestine has a remarkable capacity to repopulate the epithelium with non-recombined, Fzd7 proficient cells, and therefore inhibition of Fzd7 is well tolerated. Thus, future tumour prevention strategies could employ inhibition of FZD7 to prevent Wnt induced transformation of stem cells in FAP patients who are inherently predisposed to develop this type of pathology due to loss of heterozygosity of APC. Cancer stem cells are biologically distinct from the differentiated cancer cells that form the bulk of a tumour, and are often the cells responsible for the continued proliferation and resistance to therapies of the tumour [235]. Lgr5 also marks cancer stem cells as well as normal stem cells in intestinal tumours, suggesting FZD7 may offer a novel target to specifically kill cancer stem cells in established tumours. Notably, FZD7, but not FZD2 or FZD1, expression is dramatically up-regulated in CRC [158], thus compensation by closely related FZD’s is unlikely. Recently, FZD7+ cells isolated from Wilm’s tumour were shown to be highly clonogenic and proliferative, displaying many stem like gene expression patterns and characteristics, and thus inhibition of FZD7 may also be an attractive strategy to specifically target the cancer stem cells in Wilm’s tumour [213].
Another potential strategy for the use of FZD7 inhibition could be to target disseminated metastatic cells that are responsible for the development of secondary tumours, often many years after the primary tumour has been successfully removed by surgery/chemotherapy. Dormant, disseminated tumour cells are the hindrance to curative treatment for colon cancer, the vast majority of deaths from colon cancer attributable to tumour recurrence. CRC can metastasise early, long before diagnosis, and the disseminated cells can sit dormant for many years, providing ample opportunity to target these cells and eliminate them [152]. As detailed above, FZD7 is able to orchestrate MET in colon cancer cells which is required for disseminated mesenchymal tumour cells to re-establish a tumour at the secondary site, therefore, inhibition of FZD7 could prevent these cells from forming metastases at the new site.
As FZD7 is located on the cell surface, this enables it to be targeted efficiently using antibodies. Indeed, monoclonal antibodies to target FZD7 developed by Oncomed Pharmaceuticals (OMP-18R5 or Vantictumab) are already in phase 1b clinical trials for solid tumours including colorectal, neuroendocrine, breast, sarcoma, pancreatic and NSCLC [236]. As Wnt signalling is critical for the homeostasis of adult tissues, targeting the Wnt pathway for the treatment of cancer has been proved very challenging due to toxicity, mainly to the GI tract and bones [237]. Indeed, the initial enthusiasm for results using Vantictumab were diminished when clinical trials were transiently halted due to bone related side-effects in ~13% of patients. However, a review of the program and subsequent revised safety plan has allowed the trial to continue with a more stringent exclusion plan and bone turn over successfully managed through careful monitoring, and administration of prophylactic Vitamin D, calcium carbonate and zoledronic acid (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02005315). Although Vantictumab was identified in a screen for antibodies that bind to FZD7, it also binds with high affinity to several other FZD receptors including FZD1, 2, 5 and 8 [236]. This may provide for a more potent anti-tumour effect as it negates the redundancy between FZD receptors but may also facilitate toxicity. Future therapies targeting a single FZD are an obvious solution to this but the high levels of sequence similarity, particularly in the N-terminal portion, which would be targeted extracellularly, make this a challenging prospect. To date there are no antibodies which block a specific frizzled receptor. However, genetic evidence demonstrates that deletion of Fzd7 is able to significantly reduce the transcription of Wnt target genes suggesting that such an antibody would be effective in combating specific cancers [62].
Over recent years it has become clear that activation of the Wnt pathway at the level of the receptor, via upregulation of Wnt ligands and downregulation of Wnt receptor antagonists, plays a major role in promoting cancer initiation, growth and metastasis. Even cancers which contain mutations to cytoplamsic transduction components such as APC can respond to FZD7 inhibition. The mechanism for this is not yet fully understood, but could be dependent on the type of mutation present in Apc, or the ability of FZD7 to transmit signalling via all the currently known Wnt pathways and consequently by-pass Apc. Thus, FZD7 acts as the lynchpin for multiple Wnt transduction pathways, depending on the availability of co-receptors, ligands and antagonists. This promiscuity of FZD7, may represent the Achilles’ heel of targeting the Wnt receptor complex for the treatment of cancer, as FZD7 is involved in multiple malignancies characterised by deregulated Wnt signalling.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Gavan Mitchell for helping generate the figure in this manuscript. Funding from National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC, 566679 and APP1099302), Melbourne Health (605030 and PG-002) and the Cancer Council of Victoria (CCV, APP1020716) project grants awarded to Elizabeth Vincan / Toby Phesse; and a CCV postgraduate scholarship awarded to Dustin Flanagan are gratefully acknowledged.

Author Contributions

Manuscript prepared by Toby Phesse, Dustin Flanagan and Elizabeth Vincan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
FzdFrizzled
CRDCysteine rich domain
PDZamalgam of Post-synaptic density protein 95, Disc-large tumour suppressor and Zonula occludens
MMTVMouse Mammary tumour virus
WgWingless
GSK3Glycogen synthase kinase-3
TCF4T-cell factor-4
LEF1Lymphoid enhancer binding factor-1
ApcAdenomatous polyposis coli
CK1Casein kinase 1
Lrp5/6Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6
DvlDishevelled
PCPPlanar Cell Polarity
ROR2Receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2
RykReceptor-like tyrosine kinase
JNKc-JUN N-terminal Kinase
PKCProtein kinase C
CaM kinaseCalcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase
RhoARas homolog family member A
Rac1Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1
CelsrCadherin,EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor
VanglVang-like (“Van Gogh”)
IP3Inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate
Dag1,2 diacylglycerol
PLCPhospholipase C
CaMKIICalcium calmodulin dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII)
NFκBNuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of B cells
CREBcAMP response element-binding protein
sFRPSecreted Frizzled Related Proteins
DkkDickkopf
NTRNetrin realted motif
R-SpoR-Spondin
Lgr4/5Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 4 or 5
ZNRF3Zinc-ring finger 3
RNF43Ring finger 43
Sdc4Syndecan-4
PKN1Protein kinase N1
WIF1Wnt inhibitory factor 1
MAPKMitogen activated protein kinase
hESCsHuman embryonic stem cells
FAPFamilial Adenomatous Polyposis
CRCColorectal Cancer
EMTEpithelial-Mesenchymal transition
METMesenchymal-Epithelial transition
HCCHepatocellular Carcinoma
HBVHepatitis B Virus
GCGastric cancer
WTWilms Tumour
RCCRenal Cell Carcinoma
mTORMammalian target of Rapamycin
JAKJanus kinase
STATSignal Transducer and Activator of Transcription

References

  1. Sagara, N.; Toda, G.; Hirai, M.; Terada, M.; Katoh, M. Molecular cloning, differential expression, and chromosomal localization of human frizzled-1, frizzled-2, and frizzled-7. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 252, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fredriksson, R.; Lagerström, M.C.; Lundin, L.G.; Schiöth, H.B. The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. Mol. Pharmacol. 2003, 63, 1256–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. TCGA. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012, 487, 330–337. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nusse, R.; Varmus, H.E. Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell 1982, 31, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Srivastava, M.; Begovic, E.; Chapman, J.; Putnam, N.H.; Hellsten, U.; Kawashima, T.; Kuo, A.; Mitros, T.; Salamov, A.; Carpenter, M.L.; et al. The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans. Nature 2008, 454, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nichols, S.A.; Dirks, W.; Pearse, J.S.; King, N. Early evolution of animal cell signaling and adhesion genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12451–12456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. van Amerongen, R.; Nusse, R. Towards an integrated view of Wnt signaling in development. Development 2009, 136, 3205–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Clevers, H.; Loh, K.M.; Nusse, R. Stem cell signaling. An integral program for tissue renewal and regeneration: Wnt signaling and stem cell control. Science 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gross, J.C.; Chaudhary, V.; Bartscherer, K.; Boutros, M. Active Wnt proteins are secreted on exosomes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 1036–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Farin, H.F.; Jordens, I.; Mosa, M.H.; Basak, O.; Korving, J.; Tauriello, D.V.; de Punder, K.; Angers, S.; Peters, P.J.; Maurice, M.M.; et al. Visualization of a short-range Wnt gradient in the intestinal stem-cell niche. Nature 2016, 530, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mulligan, K.A.; Fuerer, C.; Ching, W.; Fish, M.; Willert, K.; Nusse, R. Secreted Wingless-interacting molecule (Swim) promotes long-range signaling by maintaining Wingless solubility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Koles, K.; Budnik, V. Exosomes go with the Wnt. Cell Logist. 2012, 2, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Korkut, C.; Ataman, B.; Ramachandran, P.; Ashley, J.; Barria, R.; Gherbesi, N.; Budnik, V. Trans-synaptic transmission of vesicular Wnt signals through Evi/Wntless. Cell 2009, 139, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Niehrs, C. The complex world of WNT receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 767–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mikels, A.J.; Nusse, R. Purified Wnt5a protein activates or inhibits beta-catenin-TCF signaling depending on receptor context. PLoS Biol. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Topol, L.; Jiang, X.; Choi, H.; Garrett-Beal, L.; Carolan, P.J.; Yang, Y. Wnt-5a inhibits the canonical Wnt pathway by promoting GSK-3-independent beta-catenin degradation. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 162, 899–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ishitani, T.; Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.; Nagai, S.; Nishita, M.; Meneghini, M.; Barker, N.; Waterman, M.; Bowerman, B.; Clevers, H.; Shibuya, H.; et al. The TAK1-NLK-MAPK-related pathway antagonizes signalling between beta-catenin and transcription factor TCF. Nature 1999, 399, 798–802. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Ishitani, T.; Kishida, S.; Hyodo-Miura, J.; Ueno, N.; Yasuda, J.; Waterman, M.; Shibuya, H.; Moon, R.T.; Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.; Matsumoto, K. The TAK1-NLK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade functions in the Wnt-5a/Ca(2+) pathway to antagonize Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 23, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kikuchi, A.; Yamamoto, H.; Sato, A.; Matsumoto, S. New insights into the mechanism of Wnt signaling pathway activation. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2011, 291, 21–71. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Nishita, M.; Itsukushima, S.; Nomachi, A.; Endo, M.; Wang, Z.; Inaba, D.; Qiao, S.; Takada, S.; Kikuchi, A.; Minami, Y. Ror2/Frizzled complex mediates Wnt5a-induced AP-1 activation by regulating Dishevelled polymerization. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 30, 3610–3619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. von Maltzahn, J.; Bentzinger, C.F.; Rudnicki, M.A. Wnt7a-Fzd7 signalling directly activates the Akt/mTOR anabolic growth pathway in skeletal muscle. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Medina, A.; Reintsch, W.; Steinbeisser, H. Xenopus frizzled 7 can act in canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways: Implications on early patterning and morphogenesis. Mech. Dev. 2000, 92, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vijayaragavan, K.; Szabo, E.; Bosse, M.; Ramos-Mejia, V.; Moon, R.T.; Bhatia, M. Noncanonical Wnt signaling orchestrates early developmental events toward hematopoietic cell fate from human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 4, 248–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. De Calisto, J.; Araya, C.; Marchant, L.; Riaz, C.F.; Mayor, R. Essential role of non-canonical Wnt signalling in neural crest migration. Development 2005, 132, 2587–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sebbagh, M.; Borg, J.P. Insight into planar cell polarity. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 328, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Anastas, J.N.; Moon, R.T. WNT signalling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Walck-Shannon, E.; Hardin, J. Cell intercalation from top to bottom. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Puvirajesinghe, T.M.; Bertucci, F.; Jain, A.; Scerbo, P.; Belotti, E.; Audebert, S.; Sebbagh, M.; Lopez, M.; Brech, A.; Finetti, P.; et al. Identification of p62/SQSTM1 as a component of non-canonical Wnt VANGL2-JNK signalling in breast cancer. Nat. Commun. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yamaguchi, T.; Yanagisawa, K.; Sugiyama, R.; Hosono, Y.; Shimada, Y.; Arima, C.; Kato, S.; Tomida, S.; Suzuki, M.; Osada, H.; et al. NKX2-1/TITF1/TTF-1-Induced ROR1 is required to sustain EGFR survival signaling in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 2012, 21, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang, S.; Chen, L.; Cui, B.; Chuang, H.Y.; Yu, J.; Wang-Rodriguez, J.; Tang, L.; Chen, G.; Basak, G.W.; Kipps, T.J. ROR1 is expressed in human breast cancer and associated with enhanced tumor-cell growth. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gentile, A.; Lazzari, L.; Benvenuti, S.; Trusolino, L.; Comoglio, P.M. Ror1 is a pseudokinase that is crucial for Met-driven tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 3132–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rasmussen, N.R.; Debebe, Z.; Wright, T.M.; Brooks, S.A.; Sendor, A.B.; Brannon, A.R.; Hakimi, A.A.; Hsieh, J.J.; Choueiri, T.K.; Tamboli, P.; et al. Expression of Ror2 mediates invasive phenotypes in renal cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e116101. [Google Scholar]
  33. Slusarski, D.C.; Yang-Snyder, J.; Busa, W.B.; Moon, R.T. Modulation of embryonic intracellular Ca2+ signaling by Wnt-5A. Dev. Biol. 1997, 182, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sheldahl, L.C.; Park, M.; Malbon, C.C.; Moon, R.T. Protein kinase C is differentially stimulated by Wnt and Frizzled homologs in a G-protein-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, 695–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kreusser, M.M.; Backs, J. Integrated mechanisms of CaMKII-dependent ventricular remodeling. Front. Pharmacol. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jones, S.E.; Jomary, C. Secreted Frizzled-related proteins: Searching for relationships and patterns. Bioessays 2002, 24, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rehn, M.; Pihlajaniemi, T.; Hofmann, K.; Bucher, P. The frizzled motif: In how many different protein families does it occur? Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998, 23, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lin, K.; Wang, S.; Julius, M.A.; Kitajewski, J.; Moos, M., Jr.; Luyten, F.P. The cysteine-rich frizzled domain of Frzb-1 is required and sufficient for modulation of Wnt signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 11196–11200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bhat, R.A.; Stauffer, B.; Komm, B.S.; Bodine, P.V. Structure-function analysis of secreted frizzled-related protein-1 for its Wnt antagonist function. J. Cell Biochem. 2007, 102, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Dann, C.E.; Hsieh, J.C.; Rattner, A.; Sharma, D.; Nathans, J.; Leahy, D.J. Insights into Wnt binding and signalling from the structures of two Frizzled cysteine-rich domains. Nature 2001, 412, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bafico, A.; Gazit, A.; Pramila, T.; Finch, P.W.; Yaniv, A.; Aaronson, S.A. Interaction of frizzled related protein (FRP) with Wnt ligands and the frizzled receptor suggests alternative mechanisms for FRP inhibition of Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 16180–16187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bovolenta, P.; Esteve, P.; Ruiz, J.M.; Cisneros, E.; Lopez-Rios, J. Beyond Wnt inhibition: New functions of secreted Frizzled-related proteins in development and disease. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xavier, C.P.; Melikova, M.; Chuman, Y.; Uren, A.; Baljinnyam, B.; Rubin, J.S. Secreted Frizzled-related protein potentiation versus inhibition of Wnt3a/beta-catenin signaling. Cell Signal. 2014, 26, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wawrzak, D.; Metioui, M.; Willems, E.; Hendrickx, M.; de Genst, E.; Leyns, L. Wnt3a binds to several sFRPs in the nanomolar range. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 357, 1119–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Galli, L.M.; Barnes, T.; Cheng, T.; Acosta, L.; Anglade, A.; Willert, K.; Nusse, R.; Burrus, L.W. Differential inhibition of Wnt-3a by Sfrp-1, Sfrp-2, and Sfrp-3. Dev. Dyn. 2006, 235, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. von Marschall, Z.; Fisher, L.W. Secreted Frizzled-related protein-2 (sFRP2) augments canonical Wnt3a-induced signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 400, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hsieh, J.C.; Kodjabachian, L.; Rebbert, M.L.; Rattner, A.; Smallwood, P.M.; Samos, C.H.; Nusse, R.; Dawid, I.B.; Nathans, J. A new secreted protein that binds to Wnt proteins and inhibits their activities. Nature 1999, 398, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Malinauskas, T.; Aricescu, A.R.; Lu, W.; Siebold, C.; Jones, E.Y. Modular mechanism of Wnt signaling inhibition by Wnt inhibitory factor 1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 886–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. MacDonald, B.T.; Adamska, M.; Meisler, M.H. Hypomorphic expression of Dkk1 in the doubleridge mouse: Dose dependence and compensatory interactions with Lrp6. Development 2004, 131, 2543–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Niehrs, C. Function and biological roles of the Dickkopf family of Wnt modulators. Oncogene 2006, 25, 7469–7481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pinto, D.; Gregorieff, A.; Begthel, H.; Clevers, H. Canonical Wnt signals are essential for homeostasis of the intestinal epithelium. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1709–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kuhnert, F.; Davis, C.R.; Wang, H.T.; Chu, P.; Lee, M.; Yuan, J.; Nusse, R.; Kuo, C.J. Essential requirement for Wnt signaling in proliferation of adult small intestine and colon revealed by adenoviral expression of Dickkopf-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, K.A.; Wagle, M.; Tran, K.; Zhan, X.; Dixon, M.A.; Liu, S.; Gros, D.; Korver, W.; Yonkovich, S.; Tomasevic, N.; et al. R-Spondin family members regulate the Wnt pathway by a common mechanism. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 2588–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Schuijers, J.; Clevers, H. Adult mammalian stem cells: The role of Wnt, Lgr5 and R-spondins. Embo. J. 2012, 31, 2685–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. de Lau, W.; Barker, N.; Low, T.Y.; Koo, B.K.; Li, V.S.; Teunissen, H.; Kujala, P.; Haegebarth, A.; Peters, P.J.; van de Wetering, M.; et al. Lgr5 homologues associate with Wnt receptors and mediate R-spondin signalling. Nature 2011, 476, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Carmon, K.S.; Gong, X.; Lin, Q.; Thomas, A.; Liu, Q. R-spondins function as ligands of the orphan receptors LGR4 and LGR5 to regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 11452–11457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hao, H.X.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Charlat, O.; Oster, E.; Avello, M.; Lei, H.; Mickanin, C.; Liu, D.; Ruffner, H.; et al. ZNRF3 promotes Wnt receptor turnover in an R-spondin-sensitive manner. Nature 2012, 485, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Koo, B.K.; Spit, M.; Jordens, I.; Low, T.Y.; Stange, D.E.; van de Wetering, M.; van Es, J.H.; Mohammed, S.; Heck, A.J.; Maurice, M.M.; et al. Tumour suppressor RNF43 is a stem-cell E3 ligase that induces endocytosis of Wnt receptors. Nature 2012, 488, 665–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Peng, W.C.; de Lau, W.; Madoori, P.K.; Forneris, F.; Granneman, J.C.; Clevers, H.; Gros, P. Structures of Wnt-antagonist ZNRF3 and its complex with R-spondin 1 and implications for signaling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ohkawara, B.; Glinka, A.; Niehrs, C. Rspo3 binds syndecan 4 and induces Wnt/PCP signaling via clathrin-mediated endocytosis to promote morphogenesis. Developmental. Cell 2011, 20, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Bhanot, P.; Brink, M.; Samos, C.H.; Hsieh, J.C.; Wang, Y.; Macke, J.P.; Andrew, D.; Nathans, J.; Nusse, R. A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature 1996, 382, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Flanagan, D.J.; Phesse, T.J.; Barker, N.; Schwab, R.H.; Amin, N.; Malaterre, J.; Stange, D.E.; Nowell, C.J.; Currie, S.A.; Saw, J.T.; et al. Frizzled7 functions as a Wnt receptor in intestinal epithelial Lgr5(+) stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 2015, 4, 759–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kim, M.; Lee, H.C.; Tsedensodnom, O.; Hartley, R.; Lim, Y.S.; Yu, E.; Merle, P.; Wands, J.R. Functional interaction between Wnt3 and Frizzled-7 leads to activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J. Hepatol. 2008, 48, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Matsumoto, K.; Miki, R.; Nakayama, M.; Tatsumi, N.; Yokouchi, Y. Wnt9a secreted from the walls of hepatic sinusoids is essential for morphogenesis, proliferation, and glycogen accumulation of chick hepatic epithelium. Dev. Biol. 2008, 319, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kaykas, A.; Yang-Snyder, J.; Heroux, M.; Shah, K.V.; Bouvier, M.; Moon, R.T. Mutant Frizzled 4 associated with vitreoretinopathy traps wild-type Frizzled in the endoplasmic reticulum by oligomerization. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Dufourcq, P.; Leroux, L.; Ezan, J.; Descamps, B.; Lamaziere, J.M.; Costet, P.; Basoni, C.; Moreau, C.; Deutsch, U.; Couffinhal, T.; et al. Regulation of endothelial cell cytoskeletal reorganization by a secreted frizzled-related protein-1 and frizzled 4- and frizzled 7-dependent pathway: Role in neovessel formation. Am. J. Pathol. 2008, 172, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kim, G.H.; Her, J.H.; Han, J.K. Ryk cooperates with Frizzled 7 to promote Wnt11-mediated endocytosis and is essential for Xenopus laevis convergent extension movements. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 182, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hering, H.; Sheng, M. Direct interaction of Frizzled-1, -2, -4, and -7 with PDZ domains of PSD-95. FEBS Lett. 2002, 521, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yao, R.; Natsume, Y.; Noda, T. MAGI-3 is involved in the regulation of the JNK signaling pathway as a scaffold protein for frizzled and Ltap. Oncogene 2004, 23, 6023–6030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. James, R.G.; Bosch, K.A.; Kulikauskas, R.M.; Yang, P.T.; Robin, N.C.; Toroni, R.A.; Biechele, T.L.; Berndt, J.D.; von Haller, P.D.; Eng, J.K.; et al. Protein kinase PKN1 represses Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in human melanoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 34658–34670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Nichols, A.S.; Floyd, D.H.; Bruinsma, S.P.; Narzinski, K.; Baranski, T.J. Frizzled receptors signal through G proteins. Cell Signal. 2013, 25, 1468–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Giles, R.H.; van Es, J.H.; Clevers, H. Caught up in a Wnt storm: Wnt signaling in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1653, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Polakis, P. Wnt signaling in cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Albuquerque, C.; Breukel, C.; van der Luijt, R.; Fidalgo, P.; Lage, P.; Slors, F.J.; Leitao, C.N.; Fodde, R.; Smits, R. The “just-right” signaling model: APC somatic mutations are selected based on a specific level of activation of the beta-catenin signaling cascade. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002, 11, 1549–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Su, L.K.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B.; Preisinger, A.C.; Moser, A.R.; Luongo, C.; Gould, K.A.; Dove, W.F. Multiple intestinal neoplasia caused by a mutation in the murine homolog of the APC gene. Science 1992, 256, 668–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Pollard, P.; Deheragoda, M.; Segditsas, S.; Lewis, A.; Rowan, A.; Howarth, K.; Willis, L.; Nye, E.; McCart, A.; Mandir, N.; et al. The Apc 1322T mouse develops severe polyposis associated with submaximal nuclear beta-catenin expression. Gastroenterology 2009, 136, 2204–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Meniel, V.; Song, F.; Phesse, T.; Young, M.; Poetz, O.; Parry, L.; Jenkins, J.R.; Williams, G.T.; Dunwoodie, S.L.; Watson, A.; et al. Cited1 deficiency suppresses intestinal tumorigenesis. PLoS Genet. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sansom, O.J.; Meniel, V.S.; Muncan, V.; Phesse, T.J.; Wilkins, J.A.; Reed, K.R.; Vass, J.K.; Athineos, D.; Clevers, H.; Clarke, A.R. Myc deletion rescues Apc deficiency in the small intestine. Nature 2007, 446, 676–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Suzuki, H.; Watkins, D.N.; Jair, K.W.; Schuebel, K.E.; Markowitz, S.D.; Chen, W.D.; Pretlow, T.P.; Yang, B.; Akiyama, Y.; Van Engeland, M.; et al. Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes allows constitutive WNT signaling in colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Caldwell, G.M.; Jones, C.; Gensberg, K.; Jan, S.; Hardy, R.G.; Byrd, P.; Chughtai, S.; Wallis, Y.; Matthews, G.M.; Morton, D.G. The Wnt antagonist sFRP1 in colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Cheng, Y.Y.; Yu, J.; Wong, Y.P.; Man, E.P.; To, K.F.; Jin, V.X.; Li, J.; Tao, Q.; Sung, J.J.; Chan, F.K.; et al. Frequent epigenetic inactivation of secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP2) by promoter methylation in human gastric cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2007, 97, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Mazieres, J.; He, B.; You, L.; Xu, Z.; Lee, A.Y.; Mikami, I.; Reguart, N.; Rosell, R.; McCormick, F.; Jablons, D.M. Wnt inhibitory factor-1 is silenced by promoter hypermethylation in human lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 4717–4720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, X.; Lu, Z.X.; Sheng, Y.H.; Wu, X.B.; Gao, J.; Zhao, W.H.; Tao, H.M. [Closed reduction and micro-incision for the treatment of distal tibia fractures]. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2010, 23, 717–718. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Vincan, E.; Darcy, P.K.; Smyth, M.J.; Thompson, E.W.; Thomas, R.J.; Phillips, W.A.; Ramsay, R.G. Frizzled-7 receptor ectodomain expression in a colon cancer cell line induces morphological change and attenuates tumor growth. Differentiation 2005, 73, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Vermeulen, L.; De Sousa, E.M.; van der Heijden, M.; Cameron, K.; de Jong, J.H.; Borovski, T.; Tuynman, J.B.; Todaro, M.; Merz, C.; Rodermond, H.; et al. Wnt activity defines colon cancer stem cells and is regulated by the microenvironment. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dimitriadis, A.; Vincan, E.; Mohammed, I.M.; Roczo, N.; Phillips, W.A.; Baindur-Hudson, S. Expression of Wnt genes in human colon cancers. Cancer Lett. 2001, 166, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Willert, J.; Epping, M.; Pollack, J.R.; Brown, P.O.; Nusse, R. A transcriptional response to Wnt protein in human embryonic carcinoma cells. BMC Dev. Biol. 2002, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Vincan, E.; Flanagan, D.J.; Pouliot, N.; Brabletz, T.; Spaderna, S. Variable FZD7 expression in colorectal cancers indicates regulation by the tumour microenvironment. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Vinson, C.R.; Adler, P.N. Directional non-cell autonomy and the transmission of polarity information by the frizzled gene of Drosophila. Nature 1987, 329, 549–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Adler, P.N.; Vinson, C.; Park, W.J.; Conover, S.; Klein, L. Molecular structure of frizzled, a Drosophila tissue polarity gene. Genetics 1990, 126, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Adell, T.; Nefkens, I.; Muller, W.E. Polarity factor 'Frizzled' in the demosponge Suberites domuncula: Identification, expression and localization of the receptor in the epithelium/pinacoderm(1). FEBS Lett. 2003, 554, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Minobe, S.; Fei, K.; Yan, L.; Sarras, M., Jr.; Werle, M. Identification and characterization of the epithelial polarity receptor "Frizzled" in Hydra vulgaris. Dev. Genes Evol. 2000, 210, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wang, Y.; Macke, J.P.; Abella, B.S.; Andreasson, K.; Worley, P.; Gilbert, D.J.; Copeland, N.G.; Jenkins, N.A.; Nathans, J. A large family of putative transmembrane receptors homologous to the product of the Drosophila tissue polarity gene frizzled. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 4468–4476. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Yang-Snyder, J.; Miller, J.R.; Brown, J.D.; Lai, C.J.; Moon, R.T. A frizzled homolog functions in a vertebrate Wnt signaling pathway. Curr. Biol. 1996, 6, 1302–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tanaka, S.; Akiyoshi, T.; Mori, M.; Wands, J.R.; Sugimachi, K. A novel frizzled gene identified in human esophageal carcinoma mediates APC/beta-catenin signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 10164–10169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wheeler, G.N.; Hoppler, S. Two novel Xenopus frizzled genes expressed in developing heart and brain. Mech. Dev. 1999, 86, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Abu-Elmagd, M.; Garcia-Morales, C.; Wheeler, G.N. Frizzled7 mediates canonical Wnt signaling in neural crest induction. Dev. Biol. 2006, 298, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Winklbauer, R.; Medina, A.; Swain, R.K.; Steinbeisser, H. Frizzled-7 signalling controls tissue separation during Xenopus gastrulation. Nature 2001, 413, 856–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hobmayer, E.; Hatta, M.; Fischer, R.; Fujisawa, T.; Holstein, T.W.; Sugiyama, T. Identification of a Hydra homologue of the beta-catenin/plakoglobin/armadillo gene family. Gene 1996, 172, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Technau, U.; Rudd, S.; Maxwell, P.; Gordon, P.M.; Saina, M.; Grasso, L.C.; Hayward, D.C.; Sensen, C.W.; Saint, R.; Holstein, T.W.; et al. Maintenance of ancestral complexity and non-metazoan genes in two basal cnidarians. Trends Genet. 2005, 21, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Lee, P.N.; Pang, K.; Matus, D.Q.; Martindale, M.Q. A WNT of things to come: Evolution of Wnt signaling and polarity in cnidarians. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 17, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wikramanayake, A.H.; Hong, M.; Lee, P.N.; Pang, K.; Byrum, C.A.; Bince, J.M.; Xu, R.; Martindale, M.Q. An ancient role for nuclear beta-catenin in the evolution of axial polarity and germ layer segregation. Nature 2003, 426, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hobmayer, B.; Rentzsch, F.; Kuhn, K.; Happel, C.M.; von Laue, C.C.; Snyder, P.; Rothbacher, U.; Holstein, T.W. WNT signalling molecules act in axis formation in the diploblastic metazoan Hydra. Nature 2000, 407, 186–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Guder, C.; Pinho, S.; Nacak, T.G.; Schmidt, H.A.; Hobmayer, B.; Niehrs, C.; Holstein, T.W. An ancient Wnt-Dickkopf antagonism in Hydra. Development 2006, 133, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Guder, C.; Philipp, I.; Lengfeld, T.; Watanabe, H.; Hobmayer, B.; Holstein, T.W. The Wnt code: Cnidarians signal the way. Oncogene 2006, 25, 7450–7460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Vincan, E. Frizzled/WNT signalling: The insidious promoter of tumour growth and progression. Front. Biosci. 2004, 9, 1023–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Sumanas, S.; Strege, P.; Heasman, J.; Ekker, S.C. The putative wnt receptor Xenopus frizzled-7 functions upstream of beta-catenin in vertebrate dorsoventral mesoderm patterning. Development 2000, 127, 1981–1990. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  108. Korinek, V.; Barker, N.; Moerer, P.; van Donselaar, E.; Huls, G.; Peters, P.J.; Clevers, H. Depletion of epithelial stem-cell compartments in the small intestine of mice lacking Tcf-4. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  109. van de Wetering, M.; Sancho, E.; Verweij, C.; de Lau, W.; Oving, I.; Hurlstone, A.; van der Horn, K.; Batlle, E.; Coudreuse, D.; Haramis, A.P.; et al. The beta-catenin/TCF-4 complex imposes a crypt progenitor phenotype on colorectal cancer cells. Cell 2002, 111, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gregorieff, A.; Pinto, D.; Begthel, H.; Destree, O.; Kielman, M.; Clevers, H. Expression pattern of Wnt signaling components in the adult intestine. Gastroenterology 2005, 129, 626–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Yu, H.; Ye, X.; Guo, N.; Nathans, J. Frizzled 2 and frizzled 7 function redundantly in convergent extension and closure of the ventricular septum and palate: Evidence for a network of interacting genes. Development 2012, 139, 4383–4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Kibar, Z.; Vogan, K.J.; Groulx, N.; Justice, M.J.; Underhill, D.A.; Gros, P. Ltap, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Strabismus/Van Gogh, is altered in the mouse neural tube mutant Loop-tail. Nat. Genet. 2001, 28, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Curtin, J.A.; Quint, E.; Tsipouri, V.; Arkell, R.M.; Cattanach, B.; Copp, A.J.; Henderson, D.J.; Spurr, N.; Stanier, P.; Fisher, E.M.; et al. Murdoch. Mutation of Celsr1 disrupts planar polarity of inner ear hair cells and causes severe neural tube defects in the mouse. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Paudyal, A.; Damrau, C.; Patterson, V.L.; Ermakov, A.; Formstone, C.; Lalanne, Z.; Wells, S.; Lu, X.; Norris, D.P.; Dean, C.H.; et al. The novel mouse mutant, chuzhoi, has disruption of Ptk7 protein and exhibits defects in neural tube, heart and lung development and abnormal planar cell polarity in the ear. BMC Dev. Biol. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zarbalis, K.; May, S.R.; Shen, Y.; Ekker, M.; Rubenstein, J.L.; Peterson, A.S. A focused and efficient genetic screening strategy in the mouse: Identification of mutations that disrupt cortical development. PLoS Biol. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Muncan, V.; Sansom, O.J.; Tertoolen, L.; Phesse, T.J.; Begthel, H.; Sancho, E.; Cole, A.M.; Gregorieff, A.; de Alboran, I.M.; Clevers, H.; et al. Rapid loss of intestinal crypts upon conditional deletion of the Wnt/Tcf-4 target gene c-Myc. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26, 8418–8426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Greenow, K.R.; Clarke, A.R.; Jones, R.H. Chk1 deficiency in the mouse small intestine results in p53-independent crypt death and subsequent intestinal compensation. Oncogene 2009, 28, 1443–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Huang, H.C.; Klein, P.S. The Frizzled family: Receptors for multiple signal transduction pathways. Genome Biol. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. de Lau, W.; Peng, W.C.; Gros, P.; Clevers, H. The R-spondin/Lgr5/Rnf43 module: Regulator of Wnt signal strength. Genes Dev. 2014, 28, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Linker, C.; Lesbros, C.; Gros, J.; Burrus, L.W.; Rawls, A.; Marcelle, C. beta-Catenin-dependent Wnt signalling controls the epithelial organisation of somites through the activation of paraxis. Development 2005, 132, 3895–3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Wu, J.; Klein, T.J.; Mlodzik, M. Subcellular localization of frizzled receptors, mediated by their cytoplasmic tails, regulates signaling pathway specificity. PLoS Biol. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Sato, T.; van Es, J.H.; Snippert, H.J.; Stange, D.E.; Vries, R.G.; van den Born, M.; Barker, N.; Shroyer, N.F.; van de Wetering, M.; Clevers, H. Paneth cells constitute the niche for Lgr5 stem cells in intestinal crypts. Nature 2011, 469, 415–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Flanagan, D.; Phesse, T.; Vincan, E.; Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. Unpublished data. 2016.
  124. Zhang, Z.; Rankin, S.A.; Zorn, A.M. Different thresholds of Wnt-Frizzled 7 signaling coordinate proliferation, morphogenesis and fate of endoderm progenitor cells. Dev. Biol. 2013, 378, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Assou, S.; Le Carrour, T.; Tondeur, S.; Strom, S.; Gabelle, A.; Marty, S.; Nadal, L.; Pantesco, V.; Reme, T.; Hugnot, J.P.; et al. A meta-analysis of human embryonic stem cells transcriptome integrated into a web-based expression atlas. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 961–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Dormeyer, W.; van Hoof, D.; Braam, S.R.; Heck, A.J.; Mummery, C.L.; Krijgsveld, J. Plasma membrane proteomics of human embryonic stem cells and human embryonal carcinoma cells. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 2936–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Melchior, K.; Weiss, J.; Zaehres, H.; Kim, Y.M.; Lutzko, C.; Roosta, N.; Hescheler, J.; Muschen, M. The WNT receptor FZD7 contributes to self-renewal signaling of human embryonic stem cells. Biol. Chem. 2008, 389, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Fernandez, A.; Huggins, I.J.; Perna, L.; Brafman, D.; Lu, D.; Yao, S.; Gaasterland, T.; Carson, D.A.; Willert, K. The WNT receptor FZD7 is required for maintenance of the pluripotent state in human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 1409–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Janda, C.Y.; Waghray, D.; Levin, A.M.; Thomas, C.; Garcia, K.C. Structural basis of Wnt recognition by Frizzled. Science 2012, 337, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Umbhauer, M.; Djiane, A.; Goisset, C.; Penzo-Mendez, A.; Riou, J.F.; Boucaut, J.C.; Shi, D.L. The C-terminal cytoplasmic Lys-thr-X-X-X-Trp motif in frizzled receptors mediates Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Embo. J. 2000, 19, 4944–4954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Djiane, A.; Riou, J.; Umbhauer, M.; Boucaut, J.; Shi, D. Role of frizzled 7 in the regulation of convergent extension movements during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis. Development 2000, 127, 3091–3100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  132. Weeraratna, A.T.; Jiang, Y.; Hostetter, G.; Rosenblatt, K.; Duray, P.; Bittner, M.; Trent, J.M. Wnt5a signaling directly affects cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma. Cancer Cell 2002, 1, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Van Raay, T.J.; Moore, K.B.; Iordanova, I.; Steele, M.; Jamrich, M.; Harris, W.A.; Vetter, M.L. Frizzled 5 signaling governs the neural potential of progenitors in the developing Xenopus retina. Neuron 2005, 46, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Ohba, S.; Lanigan, T.M.; Roessler, B.J. Leptin receptor JAK2/STAT3 signaling modulates expression of Frizzled receptors in articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010, 18, 1620–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Bhat, V.; Sun, Y.J.; Weger, S.; Raouf, A. Notch-Induced Expression of FZD7 Requires Noncanonical NOTCH3 Signaling in Human Breast Epithelial Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2016, 25, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Sweetman, D.; Goljanek, K.; Rathjen, T.; Oustanina, S.; Braun, T.; Dalmay, T.; Munsterberg, A. Specific requirements of MRFs for the expression of muscle specific microRNAs, miR-1, miR-206 and miR-133. Dev. Biol. 2008, 321, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Goljanek-Whysall, K.; Pais, H.; Rathjen, T.; Sweetman, D.; Dalmay, T.; Munsterberg, A. Regulation of multiple target genes by miR-1 and miR-206 is pivotal for C2C12 myoblast differentiation. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 3590–3600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Ashton, G.H.; Morton, J.P.; Myant, K.; Phesse, T.J.; Ridgway, R.A.; Marsh, V.; Wilkins, J.A.; Athineos, D.; Muncan, V.; Kemp, R.; et al. Focal adhesion kinase is required for intestinal regeneration and tumorigenesis downstream of Wnt/c-Myc signaling. Developmental Cell 2010, 19, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Liu, S.; Sun, X.; Wang, M.; Hou, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Cao, X.; Chen, P.; Chen, X.; et al. A microRNA 221- and 222-mediated feedback loop maintains constitutive activation of NFkappaB and STAT3 in colorectal cancer cells. Gastroenterology 2014, 147, 847–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Chung, H.K.; Chen, Y.; Rao, J.N.; Liu, L.; Xiao, L.; Turner, D.J.; Yang, P.; Gorospe, M.; Wang, J.Y. Transgenic Expression of miR-222 disrupts intestinal epithelial regeneration by targeting multiple genes including Frizzled-7. Mol. Med. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Li, Z.; Chen, P.; Su, R.; Li, Y.; Hu, C.; Wang, Y.; Arnovitz, S.; He, M.; Gurbuxani, S.; Zuo, Z.; et al. Overexpression and knockout of miR-126 both promote leukemogenesis. Blood 2015, 126, 2005–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Groden, J.; Thliveris, A.; Samowitz, W.; Carlson, M.; Gelbert, L.; Albertsen, H.; Joslyn, G.; Stevens, J.; Spirio, L.; Robertson, M.; et al. Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell 1991, 66, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Nishisho, I.; Nakamura, Y.; Miyoshi, Y.; Miki, Y.; Ando, H.; Horii, A.; Koyama, K.; Utsunomiya, J.; Baba, S.; Hedge, P. Mutations of chromosome 5q21 genes in FAP and colorectal cancer patients. Science 1991, 253, 665–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell 1996, 87, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Moser, A.R.; Pitot, H.C.; Dove, W.F. A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Science 1990, 247, 322–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Shibata, H.; Toyama, K.; Shioya, H.; Ito, M.; Hirota, M.; Hasegawa, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Takano, H.; Akiyama, T.; Toyoshima, K.; et al. Rapid colorectal adenoma formation initiated by conditional targeting of the Apc gene. Science 1997, 278, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Sansom, O.J.; Reed, K.R.; Hayes, A.J.; Ireland, H.; Brinkmann, H.; Newton, I.P.; Batlle, E.; Simon-Assmann, P.; Clevers, H.; Nathke, I.S.; et al. Loss of Apc in vivo immediately perturbs Wnt signaling, differentiation, and migration. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 1385–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Barker, N.; Ridgway, R.A.; van Es, J.H.; van de Wetering, M.; Begthel, H.; van den Born, M.; Danenberg, E.; Clarke, A.R.; Sansom, O.J.; Clevers, H. Crypt stem cells as the cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. Nature 2009, 457, 608–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Harada, N.; Tamai, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Sauer, B.; Takaku, K.; Oshima, M.; Taketo, M.M. Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the beta-catenin gene. Embo. J. 1999, 18, 5931–5942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Ireland, H.; Kemp, R.; Houghton, C.; Howard, L.; Clarke, A.R.; Sansom, O.J.; Winton, D.J. Inducible Cre-mediated control of gene expression in the murine gastrointestinal tract: Effect of loss of beta-catenin. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, 1236–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Clevers, H.; Nusse, R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell 2012, 149, 1192–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Vincan, E.; Barker, N. The upstream components of the Wnt signalling pathway in the dynamic EMT and MET associated with colorectal cancer progression. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2008, 25, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Faux, M.C.; Ross, J.L.; Meeker, C.; Johns, T.; Ji, H.; Simpson, R.J.; Layton, M.J.; Burgess, A.W. Restoration of full-length adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) protein in a colon cancer cell line enhances cell adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Dow, L.E.; O’Rourke, K.P.; Simon, J.; Tschaharganeh, D.F.; van Es, J.H.; Clevers, H.; Lowe, S.W. Apc Restoration promotes cellular differentiation and reestablishes crypt homeostasis in colorectal cancer. Cell 2015, 161, 1539–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Aguilera, O.; Fraga, M.F.; Ballestar, E.; Paz, M.F.; Herranz, M.; Espada, J.; Garcia, J.M.; Munoz, A.; Esteller, M.; Gonzalez-Sancho, J.M. Epigenetic inactivation of the Wnt antagonist DICKKOPF-1 (DKK-1) gene in human colorectal cancer. Oncogene 2006, 25, 4116–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Seshagiri, S.; Stawiski, E.W.; Durinck, S.; Modrusan, Z.; Storm, E.E.; Conboy, C.B.; Chaudhuri, S.; Guan, Y.; Janakiraman, V.; Jaiswal, B.S.; et al. Recurrent R-spondin fusions in colon cancer. Nature 2012, 488, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Chartier, C.; Raval, J.; Axelrod, F.; Bond, C.; Cain, J.; Dee-Hoskins, C.; Ma, S.; Fischer, M.M.; Shah, J.; Wei, J.; et al. Therapeutic targeting of tumor-derived R-spondin attenuates beta-catenin signaling and tumorigenesis in multiple cancer types. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Vincan, E.; Darcy, P.K.; Farrelly, C.A.; Faux, M.C.; Brabletz, T.; Ramsay, R.G. Frizzled-7 dictates three-dimensional organization of colorectal cancer cell carcinoids. Oncogene 2007, 26, 2340–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Qi, J.; Yu, Y.; Akilli Ozturk, O.; Holland, J.D.; Besser, D.; Fritzmann, J.; Wulf-Goldenberg, A.; Eckert, K.; Fichtner, I.; Birchmeier, W. New Wnt/beta-catenin target genes promote experimental metastasis and migration of colorectal cancer cells through different signals. Gut 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Brabletz, T.; Jung, A.; Reu, S.; Porzner, M.; Hlubek, F.; Kunz-Schughart, L.A.; Knuechel, R.; Kirchner, T. Variable beta-catenin expression in colorectal cancers indicates tumor progression driven by the tumor environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10356–10361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Thiery, J.P.; Acloque, H.; Huang, R.Y.; Nieto, M.A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 2009, 139, 871–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Vincan, E.; Brabletz, T.; Faux, M.C.; Ramsay, R.G. A human three-dimensional cell line model allows the study of dynamic and reversible epithelial-mesenchymal and mesenchymal-epithelial transition that underpins colorectal carcinogenesis. Cells Tissues Organs 2007, 185, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Christofori, G. New signals from the invasive front. Nature 2006, 441, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Ueno, K.; Hazama, S.; Mitomori, S.; Nishioka, M.; Suehiro, Y.; Hirata, H.; Oka, M.; Imai, K.; Dahiya, R.; Hinoda, Y. Down-regulation of frizzled-7 expression decreases survival, invasion and metastatic capabilities of colon cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 101, 1374–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Zhang, H.; Hao, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Yin, S.; Sun, C.; Ma, M.; Huang, Y.; Xi, J.J. Genome-wide functional screening of miR-23b as a pleiotropic modulator suppressing cancer metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Wong, C.M.; Fan, S.T.; Ng, I.O. beta-Catenin mutation and overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma: Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance. Cancer 2001, 92, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Merle, P.; de la Monte, S.; Kim, M.; Herrmann, M.; Tanaka, S.; Von Dem Bussche, A.; Kew, M.C.; Trepo, C.; Wands, J.R. Functional consequences of frizzled-7 receptor overexpression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2004, 127, 1110–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Pez, F.; Lopez, A.; Kim, M.; Wands, J.R.; Caron de Fromentel, C.; Merle, P. Wnt signaling and hepatocarcinogenesis: Molecular targets for the development of innovative anticancer drugs. J. Hepatol. 2013, 59, 1107–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Shen, Q.; Fan, J.; Yang, X.R.; Tan, Y.; Zhao, W.; Xu, Y.; Wang, N.; Niu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhou, J.; et al. Serum DKK1 as a protein biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A large-scale, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13, 817–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wei, W.; Chua, M.S.; Grepper, S.; So, S.K. Soluble Frizzled-7 receptor inhibits Wnt signaling and sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells towards doxorubicin. Mol. Cancer 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Song, J.; Gao, L.; Yang, G.; Tang, S.; Xie, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, J.; Gou, Y.; et al. MiR-199a regulates cell proliferation and survival by targeting FZD7. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Burke, Z.D.; Reed, K.R.; Phesse, T.J.; Sansom, O.J.; Clarke, A.R.; Tosh, D. Liver zonation occurs through a beta-catenin-dependent, c-Myc-independent mechanism. Gastroenterology 2009, 136, 2316–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Cadoret, A.; Ovejero, C.; Saadi-Kheddouci, S.; Souil, E.; Fabre, M.; Romagnolo, B.; Kahn, A.; Perret, C. Hepatomegaly in transgenic mice expressing an oncogenic form of beta-catenin. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 3245–3249. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  174. TCGA. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature 2014, 513, 202–209. [Google Scholar]
  175. Wang, K.; Yuen, S.T.; Xu, J.; Lee, S.P.; Yan, H.H.; Shi, S.T.; Siu, H.C.; Deng, S.; Chu, K.M.; Law, S.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing and comprehensive molecular profiling identify new driver mutations in gastric cancer. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Radulescu, S.; Ridgway, R.A.; Cordero, J.; Athineos, D.; Salgueiro, P.; Poulsom, R.; Neumann, J.; Jung, A.; Patel, S.; Woodgett, J.; et al. Acute WNT signalling activation perturbs differentiation within the adult stomach and rapidly leads to tumour formation. Oncogene 2013, 32, 2048–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Nojima, M.; Suzuki, H.; Toyota, M.; Watanabe, Y.; Maruyama, R.; Sasaki, S.; Sasaki, Y.; Mita, H.; Nishikawa, N.; Yamaguchi, K.; et al. Frequent epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes and constitutive activation of Wnt signaling in gastric cancer. Oncogene 2007, 26, 4699–4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Wang, W.; Zhao, L.; Ma, Q.; Wang, Q.; Chu, P.K.; Zhang, Y. The role of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in the effect of implant topography on MG63 differentiation. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 7993–8002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Asad, M.; Wong, M.K.; Tan, T.Z.; Choolani, M.; Low, J.; Mori, S.; Virshup, D.; Thiery, J.P.; Huang, R.Y. FZD7 drives in vitro aggressiveness in Stem-A subtype of ovarian cancer via regulation of non-canonical Wnt/PCP pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Kakiuchi, M.; Nishizawa, T.; Ueda, H.; Gotoh, K.; Tanaka, A.; Hayashi, A.; Yamamoto, S.; Tatsuno, K.; Katoh, H.; Watanabe, Y.; et al. Recurrent gain-of-function mutations of RHOA in diffuse-type gastric carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 583–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Fukuda, T.; Chen, L.; Endo, T.; Tang, L.; Lu, D.; Castro, J.E.; Widhopf, G.F.; Rassenti, L.Z.; Cantwell, M.J.; Prussak, C.E.; et al. Antisera induced by infusions of autologous Ad-CD154-leukemia B cells identify ROR1 as an oncofetal antigen and receptor for Wnt5a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 3047–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Saitoh, T.; Mine, T.; Katoh, M. Frequent up-regulation of WNT5A mRNA in primary gastric cancer. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2002, 9, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Smith, K.; Bui, T.D.; Poulsom, R.; Kaklamanis, L.; Williams, G.; Harris, A.L. Up-regulation of macrophage wnt gene expression in adenoma-carcinoma progression of human colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 1999, 81, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Kirikoshi, H.; Sekihara, H.; Katoh, M. Up-regulation of Frizzled-7 (FZD7) in human gastric cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2001, 19, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. To, K.F.; Chan, M.W.; Leung, W.K.; Yu, J.; Tong, J.H.; Lee, T.L.; Chan, F.K.; Sung, J.J. Alterations of frizzled (FzE3) and secreted frizzled related protein (hsFRP) expression in gastric cancer. Life Sci. 2001, 70, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Schmuck, R.; Warneke, V.; Behrens, H.M.; Simon, E.; Weichert, W.; Rocken, C. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of side population of gastric cancer cell lines. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 1792–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Geng, Y.; Lu, X.; Wu, X.; Xue, L.; Wang, X.; Xu, J. MicroRNA-27b suppresses Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric tumorigenesis through negatively regulating Frizzled7. Oncol Rep. 2016, 35, 2441–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Zeng, Y.A.; Nusse, R. Wnt proteins are self-renewal factors for mammary stem cells and promote their long-term expansion in culture. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6, 568–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Veeck, J.; Niederacher, D.; An, H.; Klopocki, E.; Wiesmann, F.; Betz, B.; Galm, O.; Camara, O.; Durst, M.; Kristiansen, G.; et al. Aberrant methylation of the Wnt antagonist SFRP1 in breast cancer is associated with unfavourable prognosis. Oncogene 2006, 25, 3479–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Ai, L.; Tao, Q.; Zhong, S.; Fields, C.R.; Kim, W.J.; Lee, M.W.; Cui, Y.; Brown, K.D.; Robertson, K.D. Inactivation of Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF1) expression by epigenetic silencing is a common event in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Liu, C.C.; Prior, J.; Piwnica-Worms, D.; Bu, G. LRP6 overexpression defines a class of breast cancer subtype and is a target for therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5136–5141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Yang, L.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Wu, J.; Yuan, Y.C.; Deng, X.; Chen, L.; Kim, C.C.; Lau, S.; et al. FZD7 has a critical role in cell proliferation in triple negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2011, 30, 4437–4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Simmons, G.E., Jr.; Pandey, S.; Nedeljkovic-Kurepa, A.; Saxena, M.; Wang, A.; Pruitt, K. Frizzled 7 expression is positively regulated by SIRT1 and beta-catenin in breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Chakrabarti, R.; Wei, Y.; Hwang, J.; Hang, X.; Andres Blanco, M.; Choudhury, A.; Tiede, B.; Romano, R.A.; DeCoste, C.; Mercatali, L.; et al. DeltaNp63 promotes stem cell activity in mammary gland development and basal-like breast cancer by enhancing Fzd7 expression and Wnt signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Su, H.Y.; Lai, H.C.; Lin, Y.W.; Chou, Y.C.; Liu, C.Y.; Yu, M.H. An epigenetic marker panel for screening and prognostic prediction of ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Su, H.Y.; Lai, H.C.; Lin, Y.W.; Liu, C.Y.; Chen, C.K.; Chou, Y.C.; Lin, S.P.; Lin, W.C.; Lee, H.Y.; Yu, M.H. Epigenetic silencing of SFRP5 is related to malignant phenotype and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer through Wnt signaling pathway. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Matei, D.; Graeber, T.G.; Baldwin, R.L.; Karlan, B.Y.; Rao, J.; Chang, D.D. Gene expression in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Oncogene 2002, 21, 6289–6298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Shinohara, A.; Yokoyama, Y.; Wan, X.; Takahashi, Y.; Mori, Y.; Takami, T.; Shimokawa, K.; Tamaya, T. Cytoplasmic/nuclear expression without mutation of exon 3 of the beta-catenin gene is frequent in the development of the neoplasm of the uterine cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 2001, 82, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Lee, E.J.; Jo, M.; Rho, S.B.; Park, K.; Yoo, Y.N.; Park, J.; Chae, M.; Zhang, W.; Lee, J.H. Dkk3, downregulated in cervical cancer, functions as a negative regulator of beta-catenin. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Ramachandran, I.; Thavathiru, E.; Ramalingam, S.; Natarajan, G.; Mills, W.K.; Benbrook, D.M.; Zuna, R.; Lightfoot, S.; Reis, A.; Anant, S.; et al. Wnt inhibitory factor 1 induces apoptosis and inhibits cervical cancer growth, invasion and angiogenesis in vivo. Oncogene 2012, 31, 2725–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Chung, M.T.; Sytwu, H.K.; Yan, M.D.; Shih, Y.L.; Chang, C.C.; Yu, M.H.; Chu, T.Y.; Lai, H.C.; Lin, Y.W. Promoter methylation of SFRPs gene family in cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009, 112, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Deng, B.; Zhang, S.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, F.; Guo, K. Down-regulation of Frizzled-7 expression inhibits migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cervical cancer cell lines. Med. Oncol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Deng, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wen, F.; Miao, Y.; Guo, K. MicroRNA-142-3p inhibits cell proliferation and invasion of cervical cancer cells by targeting FZD7. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 8065–8073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Chien, A.J.; Moore, E.C.; Lonsdorf, A.S.; Kulikauskas, R.M.; Rothberg, B.G.; Berger, A.J.; Major, M.B.; Hwang, S.T.; Rimm, D.L.; Moon, R.T. Activated Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in melanoma is associated with decreased proliferation in patient tumors and a murine melanoma model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1193–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Biechele, T.L.; Camp, N.D.; Fass, D.M.; Kulikauskas, R.M.; Robin, N.C.; White, B.D.; Taraska, C.M.; Moore, E.C.; Muster, J.; Karmacharya, R.; et al. Chemical-genetic screen identifies riluzole as an enhancer of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in melanoma. Chem. Biol. 2010, 17, 1177–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Atkinson, J.M.; Rank, K.B.; Zeng, Y.; Capen, A.; Yadav, V.; Manro, J.R.; Engler, T.A.; Chedid, M. Activating the Wnt/beta-Catenin Pathway for the Treatment of Melanoma––Application of LY2090314, a Novel Selective Inhibitor of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Spranger, S.; Bao, R.; Gajewski, T.F. Melanoma-intrinsic beta-catenin signalling prevents anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2015, 523, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Anastas, J.N.; Kulikauskas, R.M.; Tamir, T.; Rizos, H.; Long, G.V.; von Euw, E.M.; Yang, P.T.; Chen, H.W.; Haydu, L.; Toroni, R.A.; et al. WNT5A enhances resistance of melanoma cells to targeted BRAF inhibitors. J. Clin. Invest. 2014, 124, 2877–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Clarke, T.K.; Dempster, E.; Docherty, S.J.; Desrivieres, S.; Lourdsamy, A.; Wodarz, N.; Ridinger, M.; Maier, W.; Rietschel, M.; Schumann, G. Multiple polymorphisms in genes of the adrenergic stress system confer vulnerability to alcohol abuse. Addict. Biol. 2012, 17, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Tiwary, S.; Xu, L. FRIZZLED7 is required for tumor inititation and metastatic growth of melanoma cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Koesters, R.; Ridder, R.; Kopp-Schneider, A.; Betts, D.; Adams, V.; Niggli, F.; Briner, J.; von Knebel Doeberitz, M. Mutational activation of the beta-catenin proto-oncogene is a common event in the development of Wilms' tumors. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 3880–3882. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  212. Dekel, B.; Metsuyanim, S.; Schmidt-Ott, K.M.; Fridman, E.; Jacob-Hirsch, J.; Simon, A.; Pinthus, J.; Mor, Y.; Barasch, J.; Amariglio, N.; et al. Multiple imprinted and stemness genes provide a link between normal and tumor progenitor cells of the developing human kidney. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 6040–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Pode-Shakked, N.; Harari-Steinberg, O.; Haberman-Ziv, Y.; Rom-Gross, E.; Bahar, S.; Omer, D.; Metsuyanim, S.; Buzhor, E.; Jacob-Hirsch, J.; Goldstein, R.S.; et al. Resistance or sensitivity of Wilms’ tumor to anti-FZD7 antibody highlights the Wnt pathway as a possible therapeutic target. Oncogene 2011, 30, 1664–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Pecina-Slaus, N.; Pavelic, K.; Pavelic, J. Loss of heterozygosity and protein expression of APC gene in renal cell carcinomas. J. Mol. Med. 1999, 77, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Zang, T.; Zhuang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Xin, D.; Guo, Y. Expression of beta-catenin in renal cell carcinoma. Chin. Med. J. 2001, 114, 152–154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  216. Sansom, O.J.; Griffiths, D.F.; Reed, K.R.; Winton, D.J.; Clarke, A.R. Apc deficiency predisposes to renal carcinoma in the mouse. Oncogene 2005, 24, 8205–8210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Kawamoto, K.; Hirata, H.; Kikuno, N.; Tanaka, Y.; Nakagawa, M.; Dahiya, R. DNA methylation and histone modifications cause silencing of Wnt antagonist gene in human renal cell carcinoma cell lines. Int. J. Cancer 2008, 123, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Xu, R.; Zeng, S.; Xie, W.; Sun, C.; Chen, Y.L.; Chen, M.J.; Zhang, L. The expression and function of Frizzled-7 in human renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2016, 18, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Zeng, Z.Y.; Zhou, Y.H.; Zhang, W.L.; Xiong, W.; Fan, S.Q.; Li, X.L.; Luo, X.M.; Wu, M.H.; Yang, Y.X.; Huang, C.; et al. Gene expression profiling of nasopharyngeal carcinoma reveals the abnormally regulated Wnt signaling pathway. Hum. Pathol. 2007, 38, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Frierson, H.F., Jr.; El-Naggar, A.K.; Welsh, J.B.; Sapinoso, L.M.; Su, A.I.; Cheng, J.; Saku, T.; Moskaluk, C.A.; Hampton, G.M. Large scale molecular analysis identifies genes with altered expression in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 161, 1315–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Rhee, C.S.; Sen, M.; Lu, D.; Wu, C.; Leoni, L.; Rubin, J.; Corr, M.; Carson, D.A. Wnt and frizzled receptors as potential targets for immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oncogene 2002, 21, 6598–6605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Ding, L.; Getz, G.; Wheeler, D.A.; Mardis, E.R.; McLellan, M.D.; Cibulskis, K.; Sougnez, C.; Greulich, H.; Muzny, D.M.; Morgan, M.B.; et al. Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 2008, 455, 1069–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Nakashima, T.; Liu, D.; Nakano, J.; Ishikawa, S.; Yokomise, H.; Ueno, M.; Kadota, K.; Huang, C.L. Wnt1 overexpression associated with tumor proliferation and a poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Oncol Rep. 2008, 19, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Yardy, G.W.; Brewster, S.F. Wnt signalling and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005, 8, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Pearson, H.B.; Phesse, T.J.; Clarke, A.R. K-ras and Wnt signaling synergize to accelerate prostate tumorigenesis in the mouse. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Balciunaite, G.; Keller, M.P.; Balciunaite, E.; Piali, L.; Zuklys, S.; Mathieu, Y.D.; Gill, J.; Boyd, R.; Sussman, D.J.; Hollander, G.A. Wnt glycoproteins regulate the expression of FoxN1, the gene defective in nude mice. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 1102–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Sandberg, C.J.; Altschuler, G.; Jeong, J.; Stromme, K.K.; Stangeland, B.; Murrell, W.; Grasmo-Wendler, U.H.; Myklebost, O.; Helseth, E.; Vik-Mo, E.O.; et al. Comparison of glioma stem cells to neural stem cells from the adult human brain identifies dysregulated Wnt-signaling and a fingerprint associated with clinical outcome. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319, 2230–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Kierulf-Vieira, K.S.; Sandberg, C.J.; Grieg, Z.; Gunther, C.C.; Langmoen, I.A.; Vik-Mo, E.O. Wnt inhibition is dysregulated in gliomas and its re-establishment inhibits proliferation and tumor sphere formation. Exp. Cell Res. 2016, 340, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Phesse, T.J.; Buchert, M.; Stuart, E.; Flanagan, D.J.; Faux, M.; Afshar-Sterle, S.; Walker, F.; Zhang, H.H.; Nowell, C.J.; Jorissen, R.; et al. Partial inhibition of gp130-Jak-Stat3 signaling prevents Wnt-beta-catenin-mediated intestinal tumor growth and regeneration. Sci. Signal. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Sansom, O.J.; Meniel, V.; Wilkins, J.A.; Cole, A.M.; Oien, K.A.; Marsh, V.; Jamieson, T.J.; Guerra, C.; Ashton, G.H.; Barbacid, M.; et al. Loss of Apc allows phenotypic manifestation of the transforming properties of an endogenous K-ras oncogene in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 14122–14127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Faller, W.J.; Jackson, T.J.; Knight, J.R.; Ridgway, R.A.; Jamieson, T.; Karim, S.A.; Jones, C.; Radulescu, S.; Huels, D.J.; Myant, K.B.; et al. mTORC1-mediated translational elongation limits intestinal tumour initiation and growth. Nature 2015, 517, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. van Es, J.H.; van Gijn, M.E.; Riccio, O.; van den Born, M.; Vooijs, M.; Begthel, H.; Cozijnsen, M.; Robine, S.; Winton, D.J.; Radtke, F.; et al. Notch/gamma-secretase inhibition turns proliferative cells in intestinal crypts and adenomas into goblet cells. Nature 2005, 435, 959–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Phesse, T.J.; Clarke, A.R. Normal stem cells in cancer prone epithelial tissues. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 100, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Visvader, J.E. Cells of origin in cancer. Nature 2011, 469, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Brabletz, T.; Jung, A.; Spaderna, S.; Hlubek, F.; Kirchner, T. Opinion: Migrating cancer stem cells––An integrated concept of malignant tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Gurney, A.; Axelrod, F.; Bond, C.J.; Cain, J.; Chartier, C.; Donigan, L.; Fischer, M.; Chaudhari, A.; Ji, M.; Kapoun, A.M.; et al. Wnt pathway inhibition via the targeting of Frizzled receptors results in decreased growth and tumorigenicity of human tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11717–11722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Tai, D.; Wells, K.; Arcaroli, J.; Vanderbilt, C.; Aisner, D.L.; Messersmith, W.A.; Lieu, C.H. Targeting the Wnt signaling pathway in cancer therapeutics. Oncologist 2015, 20, 1189–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Fzd7 receptor complexes and signalling output. (A) Fzd7 (Fz7) can associate with Lrp5/6 to transmit canonical Wnt signaling from ligands including Wnt3. However RNF43/ZNRF3 ubiquitylates Fzd7 and targets it for internalisation and protesomal degradation, thus resulting in turn-over of the receptor complex and low canonical Wnt signaling; (B) In the presence of Lgr4/5, and RSPO it is RNF43/ZNRF3 which is internalised and degraded and thus Fzd7/Lrp5/6 remains on the cell surface to transmit Wnt signalling and canonical signalling output is high; (C) Fzd7 can associate with Ror2 or Ryk to transmit non-canonical Wnt signals from ligands including Wnt5 or Wnt 11, either via PCP or Ca2+; (D) Fzd7 can associate with G Protein α (GP α) to transmit signals from Wnt8 via the PCP pathway; (E) Fzd7 can associate with Syndican4 (Sdc4) and R-Spo to transmit Wnt5a signals via internalisation of the whole receptor complex and ligand which then activates PCP signaling.
Figure 1. Fzd7 receptor complexes and signalling output. (A) Fzd7 (Fz7) can associate with Lrp5/6 to transmit canonical Wnt signaling from ligands including Wnt3. However RNF43/ZNRF3 ubiquitylates Fzd7 and targets it for internalisation and protesomal degradation, thus resulting in turn-over of the receptor complex and low canonical Wnt signaling; (B) In the presence of Lgr4/5, and RSPO it is RNF43/ZNRF3 which is internalised and degraded and thus Fzd7/Lrp5/6 remains on the cell surface to transmit Wnt signalling and canonical signalling output is high; (C) Fzd7 can associate with Ror2 or Ryk to transmit non-canonical Wnt signals from ligands including Wnt5 or Wnt 11, either via PCP or Ca2+; (D) Fzd7 can associate with G Protein α (GP α) to transmit signals from Wnt8 via the PCP pathway; (E) Fzd7 can associate with Syndican4 (Sdc4) and R-Spo to transmit Wnt5a signals via internalisation of the whole receptor complex and ligand which then activates PCP signaling.
Cancers 08 00050 g001
Table 1. List of proteins which are shown to associate with Fzd7.
Table 1. List of proteins which are shown to associate with Fzd7.
ProteinTissue/CellsInteraction InterfaceBiological ProcessWnt Pathway ActivationReference
Wg293T cellsCRDSegment polarityβ-catenin[61]
Wnt2b293T cellsCRDIntestinal stem cell nicheβ-catenin[62]
Wnt3a293T, Huh7 & HepG2 cellsCRDIntestinal stem cell niche, HCC cell proliferation and migrationβ-catenin[62,63]
Wnt5aMouse fibroblasts (L cells)CRDCell migrationPCP & Calcium[20]
Wnt7aSkeletal muscleCRDSatellite stem cell maintenancePCP[21]
Wnt8bXenopusCRDXenopus developmentβ-catenin & PCP[22]
Wnt9bEmbryonic chicken liverCRDHepatocyte morphogenesis and maturationβ-catenin[64]
Wnt11Human embryonic stem cells, embryonic chickCRDMesoderm lineage specification, neural crest migrationPCP & Calcium[23,24]
Fzd1293T cells7TM domainOligomerisation in ERNot determined[65]
Fzd2293T cells7TM domainOligomerisation in ERNot determined[65]
Fzd4293T cells7TM domainOligomerisation in ERNot determined[65]
Fzd7293T cells7TM domainOligomerisation in ERNot determined[65]
Fzd9293T cells7TM domainOligomerisation in ERNot determined[65]
R-Spo3XenopusCo-localiseReceptor complex endocytosis during GastrulationPCP[60]
Ror2L cellsCRDCell migrationPCP[20]
Lgr4LS174T cellsCo-localiseWnt signal potentiationβ-catenin[55]
sFRP1CHO cellsCRDCell migrationPCP[66]
RykXenopusCo-localiseConvergent extensionPCP[67]
Sdc4XenopusCo-localiseReceptor complex endocytosis during GastrulationPCP[60]
PSD-95Yeast two-hybrid screenPDZ domainNot determinedNot determined[68]
Magi3Yeast two-hybrid screen, HEK293 cellsC-terminalNot determinedPCP[69]
Sap97Yeast two-hybrid screenC-terminalNot determinedNot determined[68]
DvlXenopusC-terminal (PDZ domain)Convergent extensionβ-catenin & PCP[20,22,67]
PI3KSkeletal muscleNot determinedSatellite stem cell expansion and myofibre hypertrophyPCP[21]
PKN1293T & A375 cellsPlasma membraneInhibits β-catenin phosphorylationβ-catenin[70]
G-Proteins (Gpa1/Gαs)Yeast two-hybrid screenC-terminalNot determinedMAPK[71]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Phesse, T.; Flanagan, D.; Vincan, E. Frizzled7: A Promising Achilles’ Heel for Targeting the Wnt Receptor Complex to Treat Cancer. Cancers 2016, 8, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers8050050

AMA Style

Phesse T, Flanagan D, Vincan E. Frizzled7: A Promising Achilles’ Heel for Targeting the Wnt Receptor Complex to Treat Cancer. Cancers. 2016; 8(5):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers8050050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Phesse, Toby, Dustin Flanagan, and Elizabeth Vincan. 2016. "Frizzled7: A Promising Achilles’ Heel for Targeting the Wnt Receptor Complex to Treat Cancer" Cancers 8, no. 5: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers8050050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop