Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Exosome-derived miR-339-5p mediates radiosensitivity by targeting Cdc25A in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract

Cancer cells associated with radioresistance are likely to give rise to local recurrence and distant metastatic relapse. However, it remains unclear whether specific miRNAs have direct roles in radioresistance and/or prognosis. In this study, we find that miR-339-5p promotes radiosensitivity, and is downregulated in radioresistant subpopulations of esophageal cancer cells. Notably, miR-339-5p was selectively secreted into blood via exosomes, and that higher serum miR-339-5p levels were positively associated with radiotherapy sensitivity and good survival. Moreover, miR-339-5p expression was downregulated in the T3/T4 stage compared with T1/T2 stage in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients (P = 0.04), and low miR-339-5p expression in tissue was significantly associated with poor overall survival (P = 0.036) and disease-free survival (P = 0.037). Overexpression of miR-339-5p enhanced radiosensitivity in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, miR-339-5p enhances radiosensitivity by targeting Cdc25A, and is transcriptionally regulated by Runx3. Correlations were observed between miR-339-5p levels and Cdc25A/Runx3 levels in tissue samples. Intriguingly, combined analysis of miR-339-5p expression with Runx3 increased the separation of the survival curves obtained for either gene alone in the TCGA datasets (P = 0.009). Overall, exosome-derived miR-339-5p mediates radiosensitivity through downregulation of Cdc25A, and predicts pathological response to preoperative radiotherapy in locally advanced ESCC, suggesting it could be a promising non-invasive biomarker for facilitating personalized treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, Luketich JD. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet. 2013;381:400–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies L, Lewis WG, Arnold DT, Escofet X, Blackshaw G, Gwynne S, et al. Prognostic significance of age in the radical treatment of oesophageal cancer with surgery or chemoradiotherapy: a prospective observational cohort study. Clin Oncol. 2010;22:578–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof M, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Zalcberg JR, Simes RJ, Barbour A, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:681–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawai T, Kochi M, Fujii M, Song K, Hagiwara K, Watanabe M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for stage II or III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:3301–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, Furukawa T, Ibuki Y, Yamakita I, et al. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on pathological tnm stage and their prognostic significance for surgically-treated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:5639–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pasquinelli AE. MicroRNAs and their targets: recognition, regulation and an emerging reciprocal relationship. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:271–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chowdhury D, Choi YE, Brault ME. Charity begins at home: non-coding RNA functions in DNA repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:181–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Majidinia M, Yousefi B. DNA damage response regulation by microRNAs as a therapeutic target in cancer. DNA Repair. 2016;47:1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng CJ, Bahal R, Babar IA, Pincus Z, Barrera F, Liu C, et al. MicroRNA silencing for cancer therapy targeted to the tumour microenvironment. Nature. 2015;518:107–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang P, Wang L, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, Yuan Y, Debeb BG, Chen D, et al. miR-205 acts as a tumour radiosensitizer by targeting ZEB1 and Ubc13. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Odenthal M, Bollschweiler E, Grimminger PP, Schroder W, Brabender J, Drebber U, et al. MicroRNA profiling in locally advanced esophageal cancer indicates a high potential of miR-192 in prediction of multimodality therapy response. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:2454–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Georges SA, Biery MC, Kim SY, Schelter JM, Guo J, Chang AN, et al. Coordinated regulation of cell cycle transcripts by p53-Inducible microRNAs, miR-192 and miR-215. Cancer Res. 2008;68:10105–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pichiorri F, Suh SS, Rocci A, De Luca L, Taccioli C, Santhanam R, et al. Downregulation of p53-inducible microRNAs 192, 194, and 215 impairs the p53/MDM2 autoregulatory loop in multiple myeloma development. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:367–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taneja N, Davis M, Choy JS, Beckett MA, Singh R, Kron SJ, et al. Histone H2AX phosphorylation as a predictor of radiosensitivity and target for radiotherapy. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2273–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Banath JP, Macphail SH, Olive PL. Radiation sensitivity, H2AX phosphorylation, and kinetics of repair of DNA strand breaks in irradiated cervical cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7144–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jansson MD, Damas ND, Lees M, Jacobsen A, Lund AH. miR-339-5p regulates the p53 tumor-suppressor pathway by targeting MDM2. Oncogene. 2015;34:1908–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Falck J, Mailand N, Syljuasen RG, Bartek J, Lukas J. The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature. 2001;410:842–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim S, Lee UJ, Kim MN, Lee EJ, Kim JY, Lee MY, et al. MicroRNA miR-199a* regulates the MET proto-oncogene and the downstream extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2). J Biol Chem. 2008;283:18158–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tellez CS, Juri DE, Do K, Picchi MA, Wang T, Liu G, et al. miR-196b Is epigenetically silenced during the premalignant stage of lung carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4741–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shen B, Zhang Y, Yu S, Yuan Y, Zhong Y, Lu J, et al. MicroRNA-339, an epigenetic modulating target is involved in human gastric carcinogenesis through targeting NOVA1. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:3205–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakakura C, Miyagawa K, Fukuda KI, Nakashima S, Yoshikawa T, Kin S, et al. Frequent silencing of RUNX3 in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas is associated with radioresistance and poor prognosis. Oncogene. 2007;26:5927–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Villarroya-Beltri C, Gutierrez-Vazquez C, Sanchez-Cabo F, Perez-Hernandez D, Vazquez J, Martin-Cofreces N, et al. Sumoylated hnRNPA2B1 controls the sorting of miRNAs into exosomes through binding to specific motifs. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kosaka N, Iguchi H, Yoshioka Y, Takeshita F, Matsuki Y, Ochiya T. Secretory mechanisms and intercellular transfer of microRNAs in living cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:17442–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Morgan MA, Lawrence TS. Molecular pathways: overcoming radiation resistance by targeting DNA damage response pathways. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2898–904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maier P, Hartmann L, Wenz F, Herskind C. Cellular pathways in response to ionizing radiation and their targetability for tumor Radiosensitization. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:E102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Long JM, Ray B, Lahiri DK. MicroRNA-339-5p down-regulates protein expression of beta-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) in human primary brain cultures and is reduced in brain tissue specimens of Alzheimer disease subjects. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:5184–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ueda R, Kohanbash G, Sasaki K, Fujita M, Zhu X, Kastenhuber ER, et al. Dicer-regulated microRNAs 222 and 339 promote resistance of cancer cells to cytotoxic T-lymphocytes by down-regulation of ICAM-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:10746–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Weber CE, Luo C, Hotz-Wagenblatt A, Gardyan A, Kordass T, Holland-Letz T, et al. miR-339-3p is a tumor suppressor in melanoma. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3562–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu ZS, Wu Q, Wang CQ, Wang XN, Wang Y, Zhao JJ, et al. MiR-339-5p inhibits breast cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro and may be a potential biomarker for breast cancer prognosis. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schwarzenbach H, Nishida N, Calin GA, Pantel K. Clinical relevance of circulating cell-free microRNAs in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:145–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nedaeinia R, Manian M, Jazayeri MH, Ranjbar M, Salehi R, Sharifi M, et al. Circulating exosomes and exosomal microRNAs as biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer gene Ther. 2017;24:48–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Challagundla KB, Wise PM, Neviani P, Chava H, Murtadha M, Xu T, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of microRNAs within the tumor microenvironment and neuroblastoma resistance to chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tanaka Y, Kamohara H, Kinoshita K, Kurashige J, Ishimoto T, Iwatsuki M, et al. Clinical impact of serum exosomal microRNA-21 as a clinical biomarker in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2013;119:1159–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Takeshita N, Hoshino I, Mori M, Akutsu Y, Hanari N, Yoneyama Y, et al. Serum microRNA expression profile: miR-1246 as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:644–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Melo SA, Sugimoto H, O’Connell JT, Kato N, Villanueva A, Vidal A, et al. Cancer exosomes perform cell-independent microRNA biogenesis and promote tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:707–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Prathipati P, Nandi SS, Mishra PKStemCell-DerivedExosomes. Autophagy, extracellular matrix turnover, and miRNAs in cardiac regeneration during stem cell therapy. Stem Cell Rev. 2017;13:79–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Phinney DG, Pittenger MF. Concise review: MSC-derived exosomes for cell-free therapy. Stem Cells. 2017;35:851–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Eriksson D, Stigbrand T. Radiation-induced cell death mechanisms. Tumour Biol: J Int Soc Oncodev Biol Med. 2010;31:363–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yamada C, Ozaki T, Ando K, Suenaga Y, Inoue K, Ito Y, et al. RUNX3 modulates DNA damage-mediated phosphorylation of tumor suppressor p53 at Ser-15 and acts as a co-activator for p53. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:16693–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Krishnan V, Ito Y. A regulatory role for RUNX1, RUNX3 in the maintenance of genomic integrity. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;962:491–510.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shimada Y, Imamura M, Wagata T, Yamaguchi N, Tobe T. Characterization of 21 newly established esophageal cancer cell lines. Cancer. 1992;69:277–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jorgensen S, Baker A, Moller S, Nielsen BS. Robust one-day in situ hybridization protocol for detection of microRNAs in paraffin samples using LNA probes. Methods. 2010;52:375–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Yutaka Shimada for the generous gifts of ESCC cell lines (KYSE series). This research was supported by National Key R&D program of China (2016YFC1302100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472791, 81372418), and CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine (2016-I2M-1-001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zefen Xiao, Zhouguang Hui or Zhihua Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, A., Zhou, X., Shi, X. et al. Exosome-derived miR-339-5p mediates radiosensitivity by targeting Cdc25A in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene 38, 4990–5006 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0771-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0771-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links