Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells

Abstract

Cultured human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines are an invaluable resource because they provide a uniform and stable genetic system for functional analyses and therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, these dividing cells, like other cells, probably undergo spontaneous mutation at a rate of 10−9 per nucleotide. Because each mutant has only a few progeny, the overall biological properties of the cell culture are not altered unless a mutation provides a survival or growth advantage. Clonal evolution that leads to emergence of a dominant mutant genotype may potentially affect cellular phenotype as well. We assessed the genomic fidelity of paired early- and late-passage hESC lines in the course of tissue culture. Relative to early-passage lines, eight of nine late-passage hESC lines had one or more genomic alterations commonly observed in human cancers, including aberrations in copy number (45%), mitochondrial DNA sequence (22%) and gene promoter methylation (90%), although the latter was essentially restricted to 2 of 14 promoters examined. The observation that hESC lines maintained in vitro develop genetic and epigenetic alterations implies that periodic monitoring of these lines will be required before they are used in in vivo applications and that some late-passage hESC lines may be unusable for therapeutic purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Comparison of copy number status between early- and late-passage hESC lines.
Figure 2: Gene promoter methylation in cultured hESCs.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matsuzaki, H. et al. Genotyping over 100,000 SNPs on a pair of oligonucleotide arrays. Nat. Methods 1, 109–111 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maitra, A. et al. The Human MitoChip: a high-throughput sequencing microarray for mitochondrial mutation detection. Genome Res. 14, 812–819 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Toyooka, K.O. et al. Establishment and validation of real-time polymerase chain reaction method for CDH1 promoter methylation. Am. J. Pathol. 161, 629–634 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hodgson, J.G., Chin, K., Collins, C. & Gray, J.W. Genome amplification of chromosome 20 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 78, 337–345 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahlamaki, E.H. et al. Frequent amplification of 8q24, 11q, 17q, and 20q-specific genes in pancreatic cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 35, 353–358 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fearon, E.R. & Vogelstein, B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 61, 759–767 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Popescu, N.C. & Zimonjic, D.B. Chromosome-mediated alterations of the MYC gene in human cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 6, 151–159 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fliss, M.S. et al. Facile detection of mitochondrial DNA mutations in tumors and bodily fluids. Science 287, 2017–2019 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y. et al. Muscle-specific mutations accumulate with aging in critical human mtDNA control sites for replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4022–4027 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Baylin, S.B. & Herman, J.G. DNA hypermethylation in tumorigenesis: epigenetics joins genetics. Trends Genet. 16, 168–174 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Toyota, M. et al. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8681–8686 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Reddy, J. et al. Differential methylation of genes that regulate cytokine signaling in lymphoid and hematopoietic tumors. Oncogene 24, 732–736 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shivapurkar, N. et al. Aberrant methylation of trail decoy receptor genes is frequent in multiple tumor types. Int. J. Cancer 109, 786–792 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dammann, R. et al. Epigenetic inactivation of a RAS association domain family protein from the lung tumour suppressor locus 3p21.3. Nat. Genet. 25, 315–319 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burbee, D.G. et al. Epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A in lung and breast cancers and malignant phenotype suppression. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 93, 691–699 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfeifer, G.P. et al. Methylation of the RASSF1A gene in human cancers. Biol. Chem. 383, 907–914 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Draper, J.S. et al. Recurrent gain of chromosomes 17q and 12 in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 53–54 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brimble, S.N. et al. Karyotypic stability, genotyping, differentiation, feeder-free maintenance, and gene expression sampling in three human embryonic stem cell lines derived prior to August 9, 2001. Stem Cells Dev. 13, 585–597 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Buzzard, J.J., Gough, N.M., Crook, J.M. & Colman, A. Karyotype of human ES cells during extended culture. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 381–382 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosler, E.S. et al. Long-term culture of human embryonic stem cells in feeder-free conditions. Dev. Dyn. 229, 259–274 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rugg-Gunn, P.J., Ferguson-Smith, A.C. & Pedersen, R.A. Epigenetic status of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 37, 585–587 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang, J. et al. Whole genome DNA copy number changes identified by high density oligonucleotide arrays. Hum. Genomics 1, 287–299 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Livak, K.J. & Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−ΔΔC(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sait, S.N. et al. Double minute chromosomes in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: identification of new amplification regions by fluorescence in situ hybridization and spectral karyotyping. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 34, 42–47 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cutler, D.J. et al. High-throughput variation detection and genotyping using microarrays. Genome Res. 11, 1913–1925 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Herman, J.G., Graff, J.R., Myohanen, S., Nelkin, B.D. & Baylin, S.B. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9821–9826 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Gearhart and C. Dang for comments and suggestions and J. LaDuca for carrying out FISH analysis. A.C. is supported by the Henry J. Knott Professorship in Genetic Medicine. A.M. is supported by the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center at Johns Hopkins and a grant from the Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund. A.C. and D.E.A. are supported by the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center grant to Johns Hopkins University. A.F.G. is supported by the National Cancer Institute Early Detection and Research Network. The work related to lines BG01, 02 and 03 was partially supported by a grant from the US National Institutes of Health to BresaGen. The work related to lines SA001 and SA002/2.5 was partially supported by a grant from the US National Institutes of Health to Cellartis AB. A.C. is a paid member of the Affymetrix Scientific Advisory Board. The terms of this arrangement are being managed by Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mahendra Rao or Aravinda Chakravarti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

T.C.S. and S.N.B. are employed by BresaGen; their research is partially funded by BresaGen; and they may own stock options in BresaGen. J.C., S.A. and A. Colman are employed by ES Cell International; their research is partially funded by ES Cell International; and they may own stock options in ES Cell International.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Comparison of copy number status between earlier and later passage hESC lines. (PDF 292 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Confirmation of array-based copy number alterations in hESC lines. (PDF 157 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Summary of SNP changes during cell culture of hES cells. (PDF 8 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

H1 has both reduced heterozygous calls, and reduced overall call rates in the deleted region on chromosome 18. (PDF 11 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Summary of Q-MSP data. (PDF 13 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 9 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maitra, A., Arking, D., Shivapurkar, N. et al. Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 37, 1099–1103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1631

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1631

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing