Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 135, September 2019, Pages 88-91
Lung Cancer

Clinical significance of ROS1 5’ deletions in non-small cell lung cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.07.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • NSCLC patients with ROS1 fusions are eligible for first-line therapy with Crizotinib.

  • Diagnostic FISH criteria were mirrored from ALK, including tumors with 5’ deletions.

  • Response to Crizotinib in patients with ROS1 deletions has never been investigated.

  • We show that 5’ ROS1 deletions are linked with a chance of response to Crizotinib.

  • Confirmation of ROS1 fusions NGS is beneficial to define the ROS1 fusion partners.

Abstract

Objectives

Patients harboring rearrangements of the ROS1 gene are eligible for first-line therapy with Crizotinib, which represents the best available treatment option. Diagnostic criteria, based on break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization, were mirrored from ALK by analogy and include tumors with 5' deletions. However, the probability of response to Crizotinib in patients with 5' deletion in ROS1 is unknown given the rarity of this condition.

Materials and methods

We hereby describe clinical outcome of 8 NSCLC patients harboring a 5' deletion at FISH treated with Crizotinib

Results

Three out of 4 cases whose 5' deletion was confirmed by NGS as a ROS1/EZR fusion displayed an objective response to Crizotinib while a case with ROS1/SDC4 fusion did not. By contrast, among the 4 cases where NGS did not detect ROS1 gene fusions only 2 patients responded to crizotinib therapy with one also harboring a concomitant EML4-ALK rearrangement.

Conclusion

5' ROS1 deletions detected by FISH are associated with a high chance of response to Crizotinib in NSCLC, similarly to canonical ROS1 split-apart FISH rearrangements. However, the confirmation of the ROS1 gene fusion with at least another method, such as NGS, seems beneficial in order to define the ROS1 fusion partner and to avoid possible false positive results.

Introduction

The ROS1 gene is located on chromosome 6q22 and belongs to the insulin receptor family controlling proliferation through various cell pathways including STAT3 and PI3K/AKT/mTor. [1] Approximately 1–3% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor ROS1 gene fusions, mainly with the CD74, EZR and the SCD4 genes, that are oncogenic. [1,2] Given the high sequence homology between ALK and ROS1 genes, inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase (TKI) catalytic domain of ALK can be utilized successfully also in tumors harboring ROS1 fusions. Therefore the use of Crizotinib has been approved for first-line therapy of NSCLC patients with confirmed ROS1 rearrangement. [3] Several methods including next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be utilized to assess ROS1 fusions. [4] Break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) still represents the gold standard method for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements on histological and cytological material. [5] This test is based on two probes specific for the 6q22 region. [6] In case of translocation between ROS1 and a partner gene, the FISH will show at least one split and one merged signal. Conversely, in case of 5’ deletion at the 6q22 region the FISH will reveal at least one merged signal and one single signal referred to the 3’ residual probe. Both the latter conditions are generally diagnosed as positive for gene fusion and lead to therapy with a TKI. NGS technologies can detect ROS1 fusions using imbalance assays after retro-transcription of fusion RNA transcript to cDNA and can provide information regarding the partner of the fusion. [7]

Objective tumor response to TKI in case of 5’ deletion at FISH has been reported for ALK-positive patients but not for ROS1 so far. Therefore, we have investigated the clinical and molecular significance of ROS1 5’ deletions in a consecutive series of patients with advanced NSCLC submitted to Crizotinib treatment

Section snippets

Patients’ population

We retrospectively studied 8 patients with a diagnosis of advanced NSCLC with positive FISH result of 5’ ROS1 deletion at the Sant’Orsola University Hospital of Bologna. The 8 patients were selected from a pool of 485 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC, and from the total number of 18 patients with ROS1 rearrangements who presented ad our Institution between 2016 and 2018. Eligibility criteria were: i) diagnosis of 5’ ROS1 deletion by FISH; ii) availability in the samples of 50 ng of RNA

Methods

Samples consisted of small formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded biopsies in 5 cases and cytological smears obtained during bronchoscopy in 3 cases.

FISH assay was performed using the Zytolight SPEC ROS1 Dual Color Break Apart Probe (ZytoVision, Germany). This break-apart FISH test is based on a mixture of two probes hybridizing to the proximal (3’, green-labeled probe) and distal (5’, orange-labeled probe) to the ROS1 breakpoint cluster region. At least 50 non-overlapping tumor nuclei were

Results

The mean age of the 8 patients was 56,5 years (range 46–67), 5 were males and 3 females. At diagnosis, none of the patients presented with brain metastasis. 2 were in stage IIIB, 5 in stage IVA for bilateral lung nodules and pleural effusion, and one in stage IVB with multiple liver lesions. 5 patients were never-smokers, two light former smokers, one patient (case # 1) current heavy smoker (50 pack/year).

Both FISH and NGS analyses were successfully carried out in all patients. Table 1

Discussion

Consistently with previous reports, our NSCLC ROS1-positive patients were young and almost never/light smokers. All except one had no extra-thoracic disease and none had brain metastasis at diagnosis. The criteria for treating patients with ROS1 rearrangement with Crizotinib were mirrored from ALK by analogy. Therefore, patients with either split signals or 5’ deletions at FISH were considered candidate for Crizotinib. [9] To our knowledge, this is the first report on the efficacy of Crizotinib

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Pallotti Fund to M. Fiorentino.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text