Loss of tight junction plaque molecules in breast cancer tissues is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer
Introduction
Tight junctions are directly involved in paracellular sealing and in membrane domain differentiation [1], [2]. The Tight junction is a region where the plasma membrane of adjacent cells forms a series of contacts that appear to completely occlude the extracellular space thereby creating an intercellular barrier and intramembrane diffusion fence [3]. Tight junctions in endothelial cells function as a barrier through which molecules and inflammatory cells can pass and in epithelial cells the tight junction functions in an adhesive manner and can prevent cell dissociation [4], [5]. An important step in the formation of cancer metastases is the interaction with and penetration of the vascular endothelium by dissociated cancer cells. Tight junctions are therefore the first barrier that cancer cells must overcome in order to metastasise. We have previously demonstrated that tight junctions of vascular endothelium function in vivo as a barrier between blood and tissues against metastatic cancer cells [6].
The tight junction structure can be separated into three regions of molecules: (i) transmembrane region includes those molecules that mechanically confer adhesiveness to the cell by (usually) homotypic bonding to the same molecule on adjacent cells. These include Occludin, Claudins (−1 to −26) and junctional adhesion molecules (JAM) −1, −2 and −3. (ii) The plaque or peripheral region of the tight junction includes those molecules that anchor the transmembrane molecules to the tight junction structure and link them to the cell cytoskeleton and signalling pathways; essentially controlling the tight junction structure and function. The Zonula Occludens (ZO) family of MAGUK proteins, including MUPP-1 falls into this category. (iii) The third region is composed of associated molecules, that is, those molecules that often have other roles in the cell, but are known associates of the tight junction, where they function as part of the signalling/control mechanism for the structure (such as AF6, α-catenin and ponsin).
Cell adhesion to adjacent cells and the extracellular matrix is key not only to the organisation of epithelium into a tissue, but also to the regulation of cellular processes such as gene expression, differentiation, motility and growth [7]. Cell adhesion molecules, transmembrane receptors and cytoskeletal factors, all of which are organised into multimolecular complexes, and the activation of signalling pathways, mediate these regulatory functions. Studies suggest that some of the cell adhesion and cytoskeletal proteins may serve an additional and important function, namely, suppression of the malignant phenotype of cells during tumorigenesis [7].
Early studies demonstrated a correlation between the reduction of tight junctions and tumour differentiation and experimental evidence has emerged to place tight junctions on the frontline as the structure that cancer cells must overcome in order to metastasise [8], [9], [10], [11]. Although a considerable body of work exists on tight junctions and their role in a number of diseases, it is only in the last few years that their possible role in tumorigenesis has been studied. To date, most of the work has concentrated on cell lines and, to a limited degree, on colorectal and pancreatic cancers, with only a few studies carried out on breast cancer tissues – which have concentrated on Claudin-1 (SEMP-1), claudin-7 and ZO-1 expression.
It has been shown that Claudin-1 appears to be absent in some breast cancer cell lines, that also have little/no Occludin or ZO-1 [12]. Paraffin-embedded breast cancer samples immunohistochemically-stained for ZO-1 have been examined. It has been found that staining is reduced or lost in 69% of the cancers examined and that ZO-1 staining has a positive correlation with tumour differentiation. Genetic changes in the ZO-1 gene may account for these changes [13]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that loss of claudin-7 correlates with histological grade in both ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast [14]. Such findings suggest that the loss of claudin-7 may aid in tumour cell dissemination and augment the cell’s metastatic potential.
Such (albeit) limited evidence, along with work carried out on other types of cancer, indicates that tight junctions may play a key role in breast cancer cell tumorigenesis. In this report, we have examined the role of tight junction molecules in human breast cancer and examined the correlations between levels of plaque proteins, ZO-1, -2, -3 and MUPP-1, and patient prognosis in primary breast cancer tumours.
Section snippets
Tissue collection and preparation
Breast tissue samples (tumour and matched background samples, Table 1) were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen before processing; a portion of each sample was used for quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, a portion for immunohistochemical analysis and another portion for routine histological examination. The clinical details of the cohort have been documented elsewhere in [15].
RNA was isolated from tissue samples using standard RNA-zol procedures. For reverse
Distribution and expression of tight junction molecules in tumour and background cancer tissues
We firstly carried out an immunohistological study to assess the location, distribution and the degree of staining of the tight junction plaque proteins, ZO-1, ZO-2 and ZO-3, using matched tumour and background tissues. In normal mammary tissues, the location of these molecules appeared as strong staining at the apical part of the epithelial cells and in blood vessels in the luminal face of the structure (Fig. 1). However, the staining was reduced for all three proteins in the tumour sections
Discussion
From this study, we have shown that ZO-1 and MUPP-1 are closely associated with a poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Both these tight junction plaque/peripheral proteins are reduced in tumours with high differentiation grades, with increased TNM and NPI status and with metastatic disease. Both ZO-2 and ZO-3 were also reduced with increased tumour grade, and ZO-3 was also reduced with NPI and TNM status. Conversely, ZO-3 was the only molecule to show reduced expression in lobular
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the support of Cancer Research UK and the Cardiff Partnership Fund (CPF) for this work.
References (29)
- et al.
Occludin and claudins in tight-junction strands: leading or supporting players
Trend Cell Biol
(1999) - et al.
Ectodomain shedding of nectin-1alpha by SF/HGF and TPA in MDCK cells
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
(2002) - et al.
Localization of 7H6 tight junction-associated antigen along the cell border of vascular endothelial cells correlates with paracellular barrier function against ions, large molecules, and cancer cells
Exp Cell Res
(1996) - et al.
Loss of the tight junction MAGUK ZO-1 in breast cancer: relationship to glandular differentiation and loss of heterozygosity
Am J Pathol
(1998) - et al.
Characterization of ZO-2 as a MAGUK family member associated with tight as well as adherens junctions with a binding affinity to occludin and alpha catenin
J Biol Chem
(1999) - et al.
Protein interactions at the tight junction. Actin has multiple binding partners, and ZO-1 forms independent complexes with ZO-2 and ZO-3
J Biol Chem
(1999) - et al.
Multi-PDZ domain protein 1 (MUPP1) is concentrated at tight junctions through its possible interaction with claudin-1 and junctional adhesion molecule
J Biol Chem
(2002) - et al.
Zonula occludens-1 is a scaffolding protein for signaling molecules. Galpha (12) directly binds to the Src homology 3 domain and regulates paracellular permeability in epithelial cells
J Biol Chem
(2002) - et al.
Organization and expression of the human zo-2 gene (tjp-2) in normal and neoplastic tissues
Biochim Biophys Acta
(2000) - et al.
Tumor-conditioned medium increases macromolecular permeability of endothelial cell monolayer
Cancer Lett
(1995)