Original Study
Tumor Vascularity in Renal Masses: Correlation of Arterial Spin-Labeled and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessments

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2015.08.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate potential correlations between perfusion using arterial spin-labeled (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-derived quantitative measures of vascularity in renal masses > 2 cm and to correlate these with microvessel density (MVD) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Patients and Methods

Informed written consent was obtained from all patients before imaging in this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, institutional review board-approved, prospective study. Thirty-six consecutive patients scheduled for surgery of a known renal mass > 2 cm underwent 3T ASL and DCE MRI. ASL perfusion measures (PASL) of mean, peak, and low perfusion areas within the mass were correlated to DCE-derived volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep), and fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space (Ve) in the same locations using a region of interest analysis. MRI data were correlated to MVD measures in the same tumor regions in ccRCC. Spearman correlation was used to evaluate the correlation between PASL and DCE-derived measurements, and MVD. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Histopathologic diagnosis was obtained in 36 patients (25 men; mean age 58 ± 12 years). PASL correlated with Ktrans (ρ = 0.48 and P = .0091 for the entire tumor and ρ = 0.43 and P = .03 for the high flow area, respectively) and Kep (ρ = 0.46 and P = .01 for the entire tumor and ρ = 0.52 and P = .008 for the high flow area, respectively). PASL (ρ = 0.66; P = .0002), Ktrans (ρ = 0.61; P = .001), and Kep (ρ = 0.64; P = .0006) also correlated with MVD in high and low perfusion areas in ccRCC.

Conclusion

PASL correlated with the DCE-derived measures of vascular permeability and flow, Ktrans and Kep, in renal masses > 2 cm in size. Both measures correlated to MVD in clear cell histology.

Introduction

Kidney cancer is among the 10 most common cancers in men and women with more than 65,000 new cases and > 13,000 deaths in the US in 2013.1 The 3 most common subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC), and chromophobe (chrRCC), which account for 60%-70%, 15%-20%, and 6%-11% of all RCCs, respectively.2, 3 Additionally, renal oncocytomas (ROs) and angiomyolipomas (AMLs) are benign masses that are also commonly observed in clinical practice.4 Evaluation of tumor vascularity with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as a method to characterize renal masses5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and response to treatment in metastatic RCC patients.12, 13, 14

Preliminary studies have shown that MRI can be used to differentiate among the most common histopathologic subtypes of RCC using multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI protocols consisting of images acquired before and after (typically 2-3 acquisitions) the administration of a bolus of a gadolinium-based contrast agent.10, 11, 15 A more comprehensive quantitative analysis of tumor vascularity can be achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) acquisitions with a higher temporal and lower spatial resolution with subsequent analysis of these imaging data sets with pharmacokinetic models such as the one proposed by Tofts and Kermode.16 Quantitative parametric maps can be then generated such as those for the volume transfer constant (Ktrans), the rate constant (Kep), and the fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular (Ve) and vascular (Vp) space.16, 17 However, direct measurement of tumor perfusion using DCE MRI is challenging because of the unknown relative contributions of blood flow and vascular permeability to tissue enhancement.18

Arterial spin-labeled (ASL) MRI provides a means to determine tissue perfusion (in mL per minute per 100 g of tissue) without injection of contrast agents.19, 20, 21, 22, 23 With ASL MRI, the arterial blood is used as an endogenous contrast, by virtue of magnetic labeling of the blood before entering the tissue of interest with radiofrequency pulses and gradient fields.24, 25 The tissue signal intensity difference between images acquired with and without arterial labeling is proportional to the perfusion in the tissue (ie, blood flow). Advantages of ASL MRI as a quantitative technique include the lack of contrast administration and the virtually negligible contribution of vascular permeability to the measurements of tissue perfusion.26 Furthermore, this technique has been validated in animals using microspheres27 and in the normal human brain using H2O15 positron emission tomography.28 In a previous study the feasibility of characterization of renal masses using a pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) acquisition at 1.5T was reported.5 However, the sensitivity of ASL MRI for detecting low levels of perfusion (ie, < 50 mL/100 g/min) in renal masses was limited.5

A noninvasive method to measure tumor vascularity in renal masses could be valuable, for example, in the longitudinal follow-up of small renal masses during active surveillance. However, despite the existing literature that has proposed DCE-MRI and ASL MRI approaches to measure tumor vascularity in RCC, these techniques provide different measures related to the intrinsic vascular characteristics of the tumor. Specifically, ASL MRI offers a measure of tissue perfusion whereas DCE-derived parametric maps such as Ktrans and Kep are a product of tumor vascular permeability and blood flow. To our knowledge, the potential relationship between these measurements and their correlation with tumor histology and vascularity measurements at pathology has not been reported. The latter would be particularly relevant in ccRCC because: (1) the known relationship between the molecular alterations in the Von Hippel–Lindau-hypoxia inducible factor pathway and tumor angiogenesis in this histologic subtype29; (2) the relationship between tumor vascularity and tumor aggressiveness and potential to metastasize30, 31, 32; and (3) the characteristic heterogeneity of ccRCC.33

The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate potential correlations between the measurements of tumor perfusion in renal masses > 2 cm in size using ASL MRI and the quantitative measures of vascularity derived from DCE MRI; and (2) to correlate these measures with microvessel density (MVD) in ccRCC.

Section snippets

Patient Population

The institutional review board approved this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before imaging. Between January 2012 and February 2014, 36 consecutive patients (25 men, 11 women; mean age ± SD, 58 ± 12 years) scheduled for surgical resection of a known renal mass participated in this study. Exclusion criteria comprised inability to undergo an MRI examination (eg, known unsafe indwelling device,

Results

Thirty-six patients with 36 masses were enrolled in this study. One patient with an LG ccRCC ended the MRI examination after the ASL acquisition and was excluded from the ASL/DCE correlation analysis. The mean maximum tumor diameter was 5.3 ± 2.4 cm and did not differ among different tumor types (P = .22; Table 1).

Discussion

The development of new blood vessels (ie, angiogenesis) has been linked to the ability of ccRCC, the most common malignant tumor of the kidney, to grow and metastasize.31, 32 A quantitative, noninvasive measure of tumor vascularity could have different clinical applications including the assessment of tumor biology in patients who undergo active surveillance. Similarly, the assessment of tumor vascularity with ASL and DCE MRI approaches appear to have promise in the assessment of tumor response

Conclusion

Arterial spin-labeled perfusion quantifications showed significant correlation with DCE-derived measures of tumor vascularity such as Ktrans and Kep. This correlation was, however, moderate, likely because of intrinsic differences in the vascular measures provided by these techniques. ASL and DCE-derived analyses correlated with histopathologic MVD measures, which supports the use of these techniques for the noninvasive assessment of tumor vascularity in vivo in renal masses > 2 cm in size.

Disclosure

Ivan Dimitrov is an employee of Phillip Healthcare. Naira Muradyan is an employee of iCAD. The remaining authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

NIH RO1 Grant R01CA154475.

References (50)

  • D.J. Waters et al.

    Unilateral simultaneous renal angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma

    J Urol

    (1986)
  • K.D. Mertz et al.

    Automated immunofluorescence analysis defines microvessel area as a prognostic parameter in clear cell renal cell cancer

    Hum Pathol

    (2007)
  • Cancer Facts & Figures 2013

    (2013)
  • J.C. Cheville et al.

    Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (2003)
  • S. Durinck et al.

    Spectrum of diverse genomic alterations define non-clear cell renal carcinoma subtypes

    Nat Genet

    (2015)
  • R.S. Lanzman et al.

    Arterial spin-labeling MR imaging of renal masses: correlation with histopathologic findings

    Radiology

    (2012)
  • V. Masarapu et al.

    Initial experience with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging to assess histology of renal masses

    Quant Imaging Med Surg

    (2013)
  • I. Pedrosa et al.

    Arterial spin labeling MR imaging for characterisation of renal masses in patients with impaired renal function: initial experience

    Eur Radiol

    (2012)
  • K. Sasiwimonphan et al.

    Small (<4 cm) renal mass: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma utilizing MR imaging

    Radiology

    (2012)
  • M. Scialpi et al.

    Small renal masses: assessment of lesion characterization and vascularity on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat suppression

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2000)
  • M.R. Sun et al.

    Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes–correlation with pathologic findings

    Radiology

    (2009)
  • H. Chandarana et al.

    Histogram analysis of whole-lesion enhancement in differentiating clear cell from papillary subtype of renal cell cancer

    Radiology

    (2012)
  • C. de Bazelaire et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging-measured blood flow change after antiangiogenic therapy with PTK787/ZK 222584 correlates with clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2008)
  • K.T. Flaherty et al.

    Pilot study of DCE-MRI to predict progression-free survival with sorafenib therapy in renal cell carcinoma

    Cancer Biol Ther

    (2008)
  • O.M. Hahn et al.

    Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging pharmacodynamic biomarker study of sorafenib in metastatic renal carcinoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • N. Campbell et al.

    MRI phenotype in renal cancer: is it clinically relevant?

    Top Magn Reson Imaging

    (2014)
  • P.S. Tofts et al.

    Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts

    Magn Reson Med

    (1991)
  • P.S. Tofts

    Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (1997)
  • D.L. Buckley

    Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI

    Magn Reson Med

    (2002)
  • D.A. Roberts et al.

    Renal perfusion in humans: MR imaging with spin tagging of arterial water

    Radiology

    (1995)
  • L. Maccotta et al.

    The efficiency of adiabatic inversion for perfusion imaging by arterial spin labeling

    NMR Biomed

    (1997)
  • D.C. Alsop et al.

    Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling

    Radiology

    (1998)
  • M. Fenchel et al.

    Perfusion MR imaging with FAIR true FISP spin labeling in patients with and without renal artery stenosis: initial experience

    Radiology

    (2006)
  • R.S. Lanzman et al.

    Quantification of renal allograft perfusion using arterial spin labeling MRI: initial results

    Eur Radiol

    (2010)
  • J.A. Detre et al.

    Perfusion imaging

    Magn Reson Med

    (1992)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Radiomics in Kidney Cancer: MR Imaging

      2019, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
    • Investigating the correlation of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast enhanced perfusion in primary tumor of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

      2018, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the previous studies [15,37], the correlation of TBF and DCE-MRI varied among different regions of tumor due to the heterogeneous vascularity within tumor. Study on HNSCC showed higher correlation level observed in peripheral (r = 0.70) and relatively lower correlation level in central (r = 0.65) [15], and another study on clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) showed that BF by ASL correlated with Ktrans of the entire tumor (r = 0.48) and that of high perfusion area (r = 0.43), respectively [37]. The heterogeneity of perfusion property observed among tumors indicates that the location of ROI drawn on tumor may impact the level of correlation detected.

    • Imaging of Solid Renal Masses

      2018, Urologic Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text