Skip to main content
Log in

Relevance of the hydrolysis and protein binding of melphalan to the treatment of multiple myeloma

  • Original Articles
  • Hydrolysis, Protein Binding, Melphalan, Multiple Myeloma
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Experiments to determine the hydrolysis and protein binding of melphalan (l-phenylalanine mustard, l-PAM) were carried out in vitro for therapeutic concentrations of the drug: the decrease in l-PAM concentration in plasma and whole blood during 24 h incubation at 37°C was only 5% due to hydrolysis. Serum protein binding was about 90%, whereby 60% and 20% of this binding was due to interactions with albumin and acid α-acid glycoprotein, respectively. Immunoglobulins did not participate in the binding of l-PAM. The covalently bound part of l-PAM in serum was 30% in the concentration range of 1–30 μg/ml. The binding of dihydroxymelphalan (DOH) in serum did not exceed 20%. Glucocorticoids used in combination with l-PAM for treating multiple myeloma did not influence its protein binding. Our study with 35 sera from 15 patients with multiple myeloma shows that high levels of paraproteins do not increase but may decrease the binding of l-PAM, resulting in an elevated concentration of free drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberts DS, Chang SY, Chen H-SG, Moon TE, Evans TL, Furner RL, Himmelstein K, Gross JF (1979a) Kinetics of intravenous melphalan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 26: 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alberts DS, Chang SY, Chen H-SG, Evans TL, Moon TE (1979b) Oral melphalan kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 26: 737–745

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexanian R, Haut A, Khan AU, Lane M, McKelvey EM, Migliore PJ, Stuckey WJ, Wilson HE (1969) Treatment for multiple myeloma. J Am Med Assoc 208: 1680–1685

    Google Scholar 

  4. Begleiter A, Lam H-YP, Grover J, Froese E, Goldenberg GJ (1979) Evidence for active transport of melphalan by two amino acid carriers in L5178Y lymphoblasts in vitro. Cancer Research 39: 353–359

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang SY, Alberts DS, Farquhar D, Melnick LR, Walson PD, Salmon SE (1978b) Hydrolysis and protein binding of melphalan. J Pharm Sci 67: 682–684

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chirigos MA, Mead JAR (1964) Experiments on determination of melphalan by fluorescence. Interaction with protein and various solutions. Anal Biochem 7: 259–268

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohn P (1957) The distribution of radioactivity in tissues of the rat following the administration of a nitrogen mustard derivative. Br J Cancer 1: 258–267

    Google Scholar 

  8. Israili ZH, El-Attar H (1983) Binding of some acidic drugs to α-acid glycoprotein. Clin Pharmacol Ther 33: 255

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jusko WJ, Gretch M (1976) Plasma and tissue protein binding of drugs in pharmacokinetics. Drug Metabol Rev 5 (1): 43–140

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kurz H (1969) Einfluß der Proteinbinding auf die Verteilung von Arzneimitteln nach schneller und langsamer Injektion. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 263: 233

    Google Scholar 

  11. Loos U, Musch E, Engel M, Hartlapp JH, Hügl E, Dengler HJ (1987) Pharmacokinetics of melphalan during intermittent therapy of multiple myeloma. Submitted for publication Eur J Clin Pharmacol

  12. Milner AN, Klatt O, Young SE, Stehlin JS, Jr (1965) The biochemical mechanism of action of 1-phenylalanine mustard, I. distribution of 1-phenylalanine mustard-h3 in tumor bearing rats. Cancer Res 25: 259–264

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ohnhaus EE (1979) Arzneimittelwechselwirkungen durch Beeinflussung der Plasmaeiweißbindung. Internist 20: 225–228

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osterheld HKO, Musch E, von Unruh GE, Loos U, Rauschecker H, Mühlenbruch BJ (1988) Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for melphalan and its hydrolysis products in blood and plasma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 21: 156–162

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piafsky KM, Borga O (1977) Plasma protein binding of basic drugs: II. Importance of α-acid glycoprotein for interindividual variations. Clin Pharmacol Ther 22: 545–549

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tattersall MHN, Jarman M, Newlands ES, Holyhead L, Milstead RAV, Weinberg A (1978) Pharmaco-kinetics of melphalan following oral or intravenous administration in patients with malignant disease. Eur J Cancer 14: 507–513

    Google Scholar 

  17. Urien S, Albengres E, Zini R, Tillement JP (1982) Evidence for binding of certain acidic drugs to α-acid glycoprotein. Biochem Pharmacol 31: 3687–3689

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wilkinson GR (1983) Plasma and tissue binding considerations in drug disposition. Drug Metabol Rev 14 (3): 427–465

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the Ministry of Science and Research, Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, FRG

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gera, S., Musch, E., Osterheld, H.K.O. et al. Relevance of the hydrolysis and protein binding of melphalan to the treatment of multiple myeloma. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 23, 76–80 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00273521

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00273521

Keywords

Navigation