Abstract
Background: Signal-induced proliferation-associated gene 1 (SIPA1) codes for a GTPase-activating protein, known to be a negative regulator of Ras-related Protein (RAP) which belongs to the Ras superfamily. It has been implicated in certain malignancies, including leukemia, cervical cancer and breast cancer. However the role of this molecule in colorectal cancer remains unknown. The current study aimed to investigate the expression of SIPA1 in colorectal tumour tissues and its impact on the function of colorectal cancer cells. Materials and Methods: A total of 94 colorectal cancer tissues together with 80 normal background tissues were used to examine the expression of SIPA1 transcript and protein using real-time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemical methods, respectively. Any association with clinical and histopathological characteristics was then identified. Ribozyme transgenes targeting SIPA1 were prepared to knockdown the expression of SIPA1 in colorectal cancer cells. The impact on their functions was subsequently determined, using respective in vitro function assays. Results: An increased expression of SIPA1 was evident in colorectal cancer tissues compared with its expression in normal background tissues (p<0.001). In colorectal tumours, its expression appeared to be lower in poorly-differentiated samples and in patients who had lymphatic metastasis. Knockdown of SIPA1 in colorectal cancer cells resulted in reduced cell growth in vitro. The knockdown exhibited a contrasting effect on invasion and migration, both of which were increased in SIPA1-knockdown cells compared with the controls. Conclusion: SIPA1 is up-regulated in colorectal cancer. This suggests that SIPA1 plays diverse roles during disease progression as has contrasting effects on growth and motility of colorectal cancer cells.
Despite improvement in screening and prevention, colorectal cancer remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality in Europe and North America, accounting for a remarkable loss of lifes each year (1, 2). Research involving inbred transgenic mice suggests that metastatic probability is potentially related to the genetic variation located in the metastasis-efficiency modifier locus (3). Evidence from sequence analysis, as well as in vitro and in vivo experiments have all indicated that signal-induced proliferation-associated gene 1 (Sipa1) is a strong candidate gene, located at the Mtes1 locus. Genetic diversity in SIPA1 has been shown to be involved in the progression and metastasis of breast cancer, particularly being related to the aggressive characteristics of breast cancer cells (4). In humans, SIPA1, is localized at 11q13. There are three normal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified within regulatory or coding regions of SIPA1 (5). One is an A-to-G SNP (rs931127) located in the promoter region; rs3741378 is a C-to-T SNP that encodes for the replacement of a serine-to-phenylalanine amino acid in exon 3; rs746429 is a G-to-A SNP that encodes for a synonymous amino acid transformation in exon14 (4). During an analysis of 300 cases, the involvement of lymph nodes and lack of hormone receptor in tumours was associated with the variant alleles of these SNPs after age-adjustment (6). It has been proposed that SIPA1 possibly contributes to the aggressive behavior of cancer cells, with a potential implication for lymph node involvement (7-8). The product of SIPA1 gene is a mitogen-induced GTPase-activating protein (GAP), with shows specific GAP activities on Ras-related Protein 1 (RAP1) and Ras-related Protein 2 (RAP2). The RAP family is a subgroup of small GTPases making up the part of Ras superfamily. RAP1 has been indicated to be up-regualted in some types of solid tumours, and an increased expression of RAP1 is associated with invasion and migration of prostate cancer cells (9). As a negative regulator of RAP1 and RAP2, aberrant expression of SIPA1 has also been indicated in leukemia, cervical cancer and breast cancer (11-13). However, the role played by this particular GAP in colorectal cancer remains unknown. The present study aimed to examine its expression in colorectal cancer tissues and discover its impact on the function of human colorectal cancer cells.
Materials and Methods
Colorectal tissues and cell lines. Colorectal cancer tissues (n=94) and normal background tissues (n=80) were collected immediately after surgery from patients with colorectal cancer (with the local Research Ethic Committee approval) and stored at –80°C until use. Two human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines, HT115 and Caco-2 were obtained from the European Collection for Animal Cell Culture (ECACC, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK).
RNA extraction. RNA extraction kits, reverse transcription kits and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reation Mix were purchased from Promega (WI, USA) and Bio-Rad (CA, USA). Conventional PCR primers were designed using Beacon Designer (PREMIER Biosoft) and synthesized by Invitrogen (Paisley, Scotland, UK). Following the manufacturer’s protocol, total RNA was isolated using a standard guanidine isothiocyanate method. The concentration of RNA was determined using UV spectrophotometry at 260 and 280 nm. cDNA samples were synthesized in a total volume of 20 μl of reaction mixture. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate Dehydrogenase (GAPDH) primers were used as house keeping genes.
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR). Real-time quantitative PCR was used for verifying the level of mRNA expression of SIPA1 from the prepared cDNA samples. All colorectal cDNA samples were synchronously examined for SIPA1 along with an applicable set of plasmid standards. QPCR primers for SIPA1 were designed using the Beacon Design software (PREMIER Biosoft). Sequences of primers used in the current study are provided in Table I. Real-time PCR was carried out using IcyclerIQ™ (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK), following the cycling conditions: 94°C for 5 min, 80-90 cycles of: 94°C for 10 s, 55°C for 35 s and 72°C for 20 s.
Ribozyme transgene targeting human SIPA1. Anti-human SIPA1 hammerhead ribozymes were designed using the Zuker NA mFold program, on the basis of the secondary structure of SIPA1 mRNA (14). The ribozymes were synthesized using touchdown PCR and cloned into the pEF6/V5-His TOPO TA Expression plasmid vector (Invitrogen), according to the protocol provided. Ribozyme transgenes and empty plasmids were transfected into the two colorectal cell lines HT115 and Caco-2, respectively, utilizing an Easyjet Plus electroporator (EquiBio, Kent, UK). Following selection of cells using blasticidin, verified transfectants which had lost the expression of SIPA1 were used in the subsegment experiments.
In vitro cell growth assay. Cells were seeded into a 96-well plate at 2,500 cells/well, which were cultured using normal media (10% fetal cattle serum, 0.1% antibiotics). The cells were cultured in triplicate for 1, 3 and 5 days. After incubation the cells were fixed in 4% formalin and stained by 0.5% crystal violet (w/v). The stained crystal violet was then extracted using 10% (v/v) acetic acid, and the absorbance was determined using a spectrophotometer (Bio-Tek, ELx800), at a wavelength of 540 nm.
In vitro cell adhesion assay. A 96-well plate was pre-coated with 5 μg of Matrigel (CollaborativeResearch Products, Bedford, MA, USA) and allowed to air dry. Following rehydration using serum-free media, 40,000 cells were seeded into each well. After 40 min of incubation, non-adherent cells were washed-off using balanced salt solution. The adherent cells were then fixed with 4% formalin and stained using 0.5% crystal violet. The number of adherent cells was counted under a microscope.
In vitro invasion assay. Transwell inserts (with 8-μm pores) were pre-coated with 50 μg of Matrigel and air dried. Following rehydration, 40,000 cells were seeded into each insert. After incubation for 3 days, cells which had invaded through the matrix and adhered to the other side of the insert were fixed in 4% formalin, and stained with 0.5% (w/v) crystal violet. The number of invaded cells was then counted under a microscope.
In vitro wounding assay. Cells were seeded into a 24-well plate at a density of 200,000 per well and allowed to form a monolayer of cells. The monolayer of cells was then scraped to create a wound. Migration of the cells at wounding edges was monitored over a period of up to 18 hours. Optimas 6.0 Motion Analysis (Meyer Instruments, Houston, TX, USA) was used to track the leading edge of the cells, in order to measure the distance of the migration.
Immunohistochemical staining of SIPA1 protein. The frozen sections of colorectal tumors and adjacent background tissues were sectioned at a thickness of 6 μm using a cryostat (15). The samples were mounted onto Super Frost Plus microscope slides. After air-drying, the samples were fixed in a mixture of 50% acetone and 50% methanol and then air-dried once again. After rehydration and blocking with 0.6% solution of horse serum, the sections were probed with a rabbit polyclonal anti-SIPA1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., CA, USA) and subsequently a peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Sigma, Dorset, UK). Following the instructions, the avidin-biotin complex (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) was applied before staining with diaminobenzidine chromogenI. Nuclei were counterstained in Gill’s haematoxylin.
Data analysis. The relationship between SIPA1 expression and tumor grade, TNM staging and nodal status was respectively analysed using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Survival analysis curves were drawn using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using the Student’s t-test, and chi-square test, where appropriate. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p<0.05.
Results
SIPA1 expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma tissues. Transcript levels of SIPA1 were determined in the colorectal adenocarcinoma samples using quantitative real-time PCR. Increased levels of SIPA1 were shown in the tumours (p<0.01), in comparison with matched background tissues (Table II). Immunohistochemical staining of SIPA1 in the human colorectal adenocarcinoma tissues demonstrated the presence of this protein in the cytoplasm of tumour cells, normal epithelial cells and some stromal cells. More intense staining of SIPA1 was seen in the tumours compared with normal background tissues (Figure 1).
SIPA1 expression and histopathological characteristics of the disease. We also evaluated the relation of mRNA expression to histopathological features through quantitative analysis of SIPA1 transcript (Table II). The expression of SIPA1 appeared to be lower in poorly-differentiated tumours compared to well-differentiated and moderately-differentiated tumours. No statistical difference was evident between tumours of different sizes. Lower expression levels of SIPA1 were seen in tumours with lymphatic metastases (N2), compared to levels in tumours of lower lymph node involvement (N1), and in tumours without lymph node involvement (N0). Similarly, a decreased expression was seen in tumours categorized as Dukes’ C which had lymphatic metastases. In addition to this, analysis according to TNM staging showed that the lowest level of SIPA1 expression was seen in tumours with TNM3, although no statistical significance was seen in these comparisons.
Correlation between SIPA1 expression and clinical outcome. No difference was seen in the expression of SIPA1 in patients who had local recurrence, metastases or who had died from the disease, when compared to that of patients who had remained disease-free at the end of the follow-up period. The average SIPA1 transcript level of Dukes’ B group was used as a threshold. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that patients with a higher expression level of SIPA1 had lower survival, of 114.7 months (95% CI=87.8-141.6 months), compared to 135.0 months (95% CI=112.6-157.4) for patients with lower expression of SIPA1 (Figure 2).
SIPA1 knock-down on in vitro invasion, adhesion, migration and growth of colorectal cancer cell lines. To examine the function of SIPA1 in colorectal cancer cells, we established SIPA1-knockdown sublines of two colorectal cancer cell lines, named HT115 and Caco-2 respectively, using constructed ribozyme transgenes targeting human SIPA1. The knockdown of SIPA1 was verified using RT-PCR (Figure 3). The influence of SIPA1-knockdown on cellular functions was then determined. The effect on cell growth was firstly examined and reduced cell growth was seen of both HT115 and Caco-2 cells after knockdown of SIPA1 (p<0.05), compared to the controls (Figure 4E and 4F). Invasiveness is considered to be a vital capability for tumour cells to disseminate locally and develop a metastasis (16). We examined the influence of SIPA1 on the invasive nature of these colorectal cancer cells. Interestingly, knock-down of SIPA1 expression resulted in a dramatic increase of invasive ability of HT115 (p<0.01) and Caco-2 cells (Figure 4A and 4B). Compared to the effect on invasion, knockdown of SIPA1 exhibited a relatively weak impact on cell matrix adhesion. The number of cells adherent to Matrigel over a culture period of 40 min was slightly increased in SIPA1 knowdown of both HT115 and Caco-2 cell lines. Figure 4C shows adhesion of HT115 cells. SIPA1 knockdown resulted in increased migration of both HT115 and Caco-2 cell lines compared with the respective controls. The effect of SIPA1 knockdown on migration of Caco-2 cells is shown in Figure 4D.
Discussion
SIPA1 has been demonstrated to be a negative regulator for RAP GTPases. Members of the RAP family have been indicated in leukemia, as recently reviewed by Minato et al. (11). Knockdown of Sipa1 in mice results in an aberrant activation of RAP, leading to the development of chronic myeloproliferative disorders and leukemia (17-19). In addition to leukemia (19), up-regulation of Sipa1 has also been indicated in the disease progression of breast, prostatis and cervical cancer (9, 10, 13). In the current study, we examined the expression of SIPA1 in colorectal cancer using quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemical staining. Elevated transcript levels of SIPA1 were seen in the tumours compared to the background tissues. Except for this increased expression in colorectal tumours, no significant link was indentified between SIPA1 expression and the disease features, including TNM staging, local recurrence, metastasis and survival. SNPs of SIPA1 have been associated with aggressive disease behaviour in breast cancer (13). Whether SNPs of SIPA1 also occur in colorectal cancer is yet to be investigated. Although not reaching statistical significant levels, SIPA1 expression appeared to be lower in cancer cells with poorer differentiation and in tumours with lymphatic metastases. This is different from the finding in prostate cancer, in which increased expression of SIPA1 has been associated with lymphatic metastasis (9). It suggests that diverse and dynamic roles are played by this molecule in colorectal cancer.
We transfected anti-human SIPA1 hammerhead ribozymes into two colorectal tumor cell lines (HT115 and Caco-2), so as to deduce the role of SIPA1 through in vitro cell function assays. A resulting increase was seen in the invasiveness of colorectal cancer cells following the knockdown of SIPA1. Similarly, but to a less degree, migration of the colorectal cancer cells was increased after SIPA1 knockdown. It has been demonstrated that up-regulation of SIPA1 in prostate cancer cells, results in reduced cell adhesion but increased invasion via its effect upon RAP signalling (9). In contrast, abnormal activation of RAP1 has also been associated with increased cell migration and invasiveness of prostate cancer cells (12). However, whether and how RAP1 is actually involved in the promotory effect of SIPA1 knockdown, on the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells, warrants further investigations.
The present study has demonstrated that knockdown of SIPA1 had an inhibitory effect on the in vitro growth of colorectal cancer cells. RAP1 has been indicated in the regulation of type 2 receptor of Transforming growth factor β, sensitizing pancreatic cancer cells to inhibition by TGF-β (20). However, the exact mechanisms and pathways involved in the effects of SIPA1-knockdown are yet to be investigated.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that SIPA1 expression is increased in human colorectal cancer. Knockdown of SIPA1 expression enhances the capability of both HT115 and Caco-2 colorectal cancer cell lines to become invasive and migratory, but reduced their in vitro growth. It is concluded that SIPA1 may play an active role during the disease progression of colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Acknowledgments
The Authors acknowledge the support from the Albert Huang Foundation and Cancer Research Wales. Dr Ke Ji is a recipient of Cardiff University’s China Medical Scholarship.
- Received May 22, 2012.
- Revision received June 13, 2012.
- Accepted June 14, 2012.
- Copyright© 2012 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved