Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research Article

Ionizing Radiation Affects Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signalling and Metalloproteinase Secretion in Glioma Cells

MARIA MARTINOU, EFSTATHIA GIANNOPOULOU, GEORGIA MALATARA, ANDREAS A. ARGYRIOU, HARALABOS P. KALOFONOS and DIMITRIOS KARDAMAKIS
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics January 2011, 8 (1) 33-38;
MARIA MARTINOU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EFSTATHIA GIANNOPOULOU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORGIA MALATARA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDREAS A. ARGYRIOU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HARALABOS P. KALOFONOS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DIMITRIOS KARDAMAKIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The effect of different doses of X(-)rays on apoptosis, proliferation, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-2) expression was investigated in a human glioblastoma cell line. Materials and Methods: The cell line LN18 was irradiated at room temperature with doses ranging from 0.5 to 15 Gy using 6 MV X(-)rays. Apoptosis was assessed using the annexin V binding assay, proliferation by the methyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay and MMP-2 secretion with zymography. The levels of phosphorylated (pEGFR) were estimated using a commercially available ELISA kit. Results: Cell proliferation decreased in a dose-dependent manner, while apoptosis was increased after radiation. Doses below 2 Gy did not affect proliferation or apoptosis. MMP-2 levels were increased 48 h after radiation in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, EGFR signaling was significantly activated 15 min after radiation in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusion: Ionizing radiation activates EGFR signalling and enhances MMP-2 secretion, suggesting that the molecular pathways involved may contribute to the invasiveness and malignant behaviour of glioma cells and help to explain the response of gliomas to ionizing radiation.

  • Gliomas
  • ionizing radiation
  • EGFR
  • MMPs

Malignant glioma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system (CNS) and is a challenging disease to treat since despite multimodal therapy protocols, the outcome of GBM remains dismal (1). The current standard treatment for managing GBM includes maximally safe surgical resection, followed by fractionated radiation therapy in combination with chemotherapy (temozolomide) (2). Since total surgical excision is almost impossible to achieve because of tumor invasiveness into the surrounding brain, radiotherapy remains an important treatment modality (3, 4).

However, one of the major problems associated with treatment failure is the radioresistance of gliomas (5). The response of tumor cells to radiation is complicated, with reports suggesting that glioblastoma cells may express sensitivity or resistance to both high and low doses (6, 7). This discrepancy may reflect differential triggering or induction of repair mechanisms (8, 9). The introduction of highly conformal techniques in radiotherapy redefines the role of low doses of radiation in the therapy of gliomas (10).

The resistance of glioma cells has been considered to reflect an intrinsic biological property of these cells regarding their ability to invade (3). Invasion of the tumor cells involves degradation of the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) of the brain, including activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Levels of MMPs are elevated types in many tumor and are believed to play an important role in cellular invasion and metastasis, thus contributing to tumor aggressiveness (11, 12). In particular, the increased expression and activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 has been proposed as being correlated with an increased grade of glioma malignancy (13-18). Furthermore, glioma invasiveness might also be related to genetic events. Mutation of tumor suppressor genes phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and protein 53 (p53) as well as the overexpression of oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in up to 50% of gliomas cells (19, 20) seems to in turn activate invasiveness-related signal transduction pathways, such as Ras (RAT sarcoma)/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) (21, 22). The latter pathway is regulated by PTEN, which has been shown to inhibit cell migration, spreading, and focal adhesion (13-25).

Using an in vivo choriallantoic membrane model of angiogenesis and C6 rat glioma cells, our group has previously demonstrated that X-rays have an initial inhibitory effect on angiogenesis through ECM rearrangement. Subsequently the cells induced angiogenesis when they were inoculated into radiated tissue. This effect could be in part attributed to the increased release of MMP-2 from cells, as well as to the radiation-induced increase in the levels of integrin subunit aν (26, 27).

The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of different doses of radiation on proliferation, apoptosis, EGFR activation and MMP-2 secretion in glioblastoma cells.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and radiation. The LN18 glioblastoma cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with 2 mM L-glutamine and supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2.5 μg/ml amphoterecin B, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin and 50 μg/ml gentamycin (all Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) at 37°C, 5% CO2 and 100% humidity. The cells were exposed to different doses of radiation ranging from 0.5 to 15 Gy comitted through a 6 MV linear accelerator source (SL75 Philips, 6 MV; Medical Systems, Crawley, West Sussex, UK).

Cell proliferation assay. To determine whether radiation affects the proliferation of LN18 cells, the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-dimethyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) a may was used, as previously described (28). The proliferation assay was performed in medium with 5% FBS, 48 h after radiation.

Apoptosis assay. Apoptosis was detected using the annexin V/propidium iodide detection assay as previously described (28). The cells were exposed to different doses of radiation and 24 h later cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (EPICS-XL; Coulter, Miami, FL, USA) using XL-2 software, according to the manufacturer's instructions (rh Annexin V/FITC kit; Bender MedSystems GmbH, Vienna, Austria). The experiments were performed in medium with 5% FBS.

EGFR phosphorylation. The levels of phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR) were determined using an ELISA kit system (Bender MedSystems GmbH), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly the cells were seeded in 100 mm petri-dishes at a density of 106 cells per dish in medium with 5% FBS. The medium was replaced by serum-free medium after cell attachment. Twenty-four hours later the cells were exposed to radiation as described above. The supernatant was removed 15 min later and the cells were collected with a scraper. Lysis of the cells was followed by adding receptor binding buffer.

The samples were transferred onto a 96-microwell plate coated with a monoclonal antibody to human active EGFR and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The microwells were emptied and washed three times with washing buffer. An anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody (horseradish peroxidase conjugated) was added and the samples were incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The microwells were washed four times and a suitable substrate solution was added to each sample for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by adding a stop solution and the samples were immediately measured on a microplate reader (Magellan 2; Sunrise, Tecan, Switzerland) at a wavelength of 450 nm. The results were normalized by measuring the quantity of total proteins using a Bradford assay (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

LN18 cell proliferation 48 h after radiation. Mean±SEM of the number of cells, for three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 (unpaired t-test) compared to untreated cells.

Zymography assay. The release of MMP-2 into the culture medium of the LN18 cells was measured by zymography as previously described (24). In brief, the LN18 cells were plated in 24-well plates at a density of 3×104 cells per well in medium with 5% FBS. The cells were treated as described above for the proliferation studies. After 48 h, 50 μl of the medium from each group were diluted with 2× Laemmli sample buffer without β-mercaptoethanol. The samples were analysed in 10% SDS-PAGE gels containing 0.1% gelatin. Following electrophoresis, the gels were washed four times in 2.5% Triton-X 100 for 15 min at room temperature and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in developing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 200 mM NaCl and 10 mM CaCl2). The gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R (Applichem) for 4 h at room temperature, de-stained in methanol acetic acid-water (4.5:1:4.5 v/v) for 2 h and photographed using a digital camera.

Statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were computed for all the variables. Differences between groups and controls were tested by unpaired t-test. Each experiment included at least triplicate measurements for each condition tested unless otherwise indicated. All the results are expressed as mean±the standard error of the mean (SEM) from at least three independent experiments.

Results

Cell proliferation. Following cell exposure to radiation doses ranging from 0.5 to 15 Gy, a statistically significant and dose-dependent reduction in the cell number was observed. More specifically, the p-values were 0.049, 0.006, 0.002, 0.006 and <0.0001 for the radiation doses of 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2 and 15 Gy respectively, compared to the unirradiated cells. A reduction in cell number was also observed even at the radiation dose of 0.5 Gy, although it was not statistically significant (Figure 1).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Effect of radiation on LN18 cell apoptosis. A: Cells were irradiated and 24 h later stained with annexin/propidium iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry. C, Untreated LN18 cells; 1, 2, 5 and 15 Gy: LN18 cells radiated with 1, 2, 5 and 15 Gy. B: Percentage change compared to the control of annexin+ cells ±SEM, for three independent experiments. **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 (unpaired t-test) compared to untreated cells.

Apoptosis assay. Apoptosis was induced at doses ranging from 1 to 15 Gy in a manner proportional to the arrest of proliferation (Figure 2). The p-values were <0.001 for the doses of 1, 2, 5 and 0.002 for 15 Gy, respectively.

EGFR phosphorylation. In contrast to the results obtained for cell proliferation and apoptosis, the EGFR proliferation pathway was activated at 2 and 15 Gy (p-values of 0.007 and 0.04, respectively) (Figure 3).

Zymography assay. A dose-dependent increase of MMP-2 secretion in the supernatant medium was detected 48 h after cell irradiation (Figure 4). The p-values were compared to unirradiated cells <0.01 at the 1 Gy dose, 0.01 at 2 Gy and <0.001 at 5 Gy and 15 Gy. This increase was in line with the activation of the EGFR pathway.

Discussion

Radiation-induced cell and tissue effects following relatively high dose exposure have been previously demonstrated in several experimental models. However, over the last two decades, research has been focused on the investigation of the effect of low doses irradiation, mainly because of the development and application of refined and sensitive analytical procedures (30). According to the definition by Beauchesne et al. and Short et al., doses below 1 Gy are regarded as `low', whereas doses over 5 Gy are `high' (8, 31). The study of low-dose irradiation for the treatment of cancer seems very attractive, since the biological and health effects of low doses are thus far conflictingly addressed. Some data support the hypothesis that low doses activate defense mechanisms, including DNA repair mechanisms and elimination of potentially mutant cells by apoptosis, senescence, or lack of repair (32), through intracellular and intercellular signaling and trigger adaptive responses. Short et al. have shown that glioblastoma cells lines commonly show an increase in radiosensitivity to low acute doses, suggesting that in a clinical setting very low doses per fraction could produce increased tumor cell kill (31).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Effect of radiation on pEGFR levels. Cells were collected 15 min after irradiation with 2 or 15 Gy. Percentage change compared to control pEGFR/mg of total protein±SEM for three independent experiments, *p<0.05 and ** p<0.01.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Effect of radiation on MMP-2 secretion from LN18 cells. A: Zymography assay 48 h after irradiation. Representative gel of three independent experiments. B: Densitometric quantification of the corresponding MMP-2 bands. Mean±SEM of the % change compared to the control. Error bars: SEM for three independent experiments, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001.

To assess this controversial and debatable effect of low doses of radiation and to possibly provide new information on the topic, we analyzed the impact of different doses of X rays on apoptosis, proliferation and EGFR expression in a single glioblastoma cell line. The use of a single cell line represents a notable methodological limitation of the current study. However, the LN18 cell line has been extensively used in previous radiation research regarding activation of EGFR and MMP expression (19, 33).

The main finding was that low doses of ionizing radiation activated EGFR signalling and MMP secretion in the glioma cells. Recent studies regarding the role of MMP in tumor progression revealed a more complicated and important role of MMP besides ECM degradation. MMP proteolysis regulates cell signaling that controls homeostasis of the extracellular microenvironment (34). While research on the therapeutic manipulations of MMP-2 and MMP-9 appears to have a solid rationale (15, 17, 18), the use of MMP inhibitors in clinical trials has failed so far (35). Many factors may have contributed to this failure. These inhibitors were tested in patients with advanced disease despite the fact that the experiments in animals showed benefits at the early stage of the disease (36). The tested MMP inhibitors were broad-spectrum drugs without being specific for a single MMP. Furthermore, some patients developed severe side-effects that forced dose reduction below the minimal inhibitory concentration (37-39). Although the clinical trials failed, third-generation MMP inhibitors are being developed (36). In addition to tumor radioresistance, the efficacy of radiation in treating gliomas has lately been questioned even more due to ionizing radiation enhancement of glioma cell invasiveness through the induction of MMP-2 expression in PTEN mutated glioma cell lines (19). In line with this view, the current results demonstrated potential enhancement of LN18 glioma cell invasiveness through increased MMP-2 levels, with doses of radiation as low as 1 Gy.

EGFR has been found in various studies to be activated by the irradiation of various cancer cells, including gliomas (40, 41), thus contributing to radioresistance, while in a recent study, high EGFR expression predicted benefit from radiotherapy (42). In agreement with the previous studies, the present data clearly demonstrated the enhancement of the aggressive behavior of LN18 by ionizing radiation even at extremely low doses of radiation.

Since both MMP-2 and EGFR expression in glioma cells were enhanced after radiation, an increase in cell proliferation would also be expected. In contrast, in the current study, a quite significant arrest of proliferation was observed even when small doses of radiation were applied. Furthermore, a significant induction of apoptosis was observed throughout the whole range of radiation doses used and in a manner proportional to the arrest of proliferation. These data were in line with previous results from our group in the in vivo choriallantoic membrane model of angiogenesis, where radiation induced tumor angiogenesis although it had also caused extensive damage to vessels (26). It seems that a cell population in the glioma culture is resistant to radiation, or alternatively, this population might be able to repair radiation-induced damage and become more aggressive.

In summary, doses of ionizing radiation ranging from 0.5 to 15 Gy can reduce cell proliferation in the short term, even for highly radioresistant tumors, such as gliomas. These findings may have important implications in experimental and clinical situations and warrant further evaluation firstly in animal models and subsequently in the clinical setting in patients suffering from these highly malignant tumors.

  • Received July 19, 2010.
  • Revision received November 19, 2010.
  • Accepted November 22, 2010.
  • Copyright © The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Barker FG 2nd.,
    2. Prados MD,
    3. Chang SM,
    4. Gutin PH,
    5. Lamborn KR,
    6. Larson DA,
    7. Malec MK,
    8. McDermott MW,
    9. Sneed PK,
    10. Wilson CB
    : Radiation response and survival time in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg 84: 442-448, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Argyriou AA,
    2. Antonacopoulou A,
    3. Iconomou G,
    4. Kalofonos HP
    : Treatment options for malignant gliomas, emphasizing towards new molecularly targeted therapies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 69: 199-210, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Taghian A,
    2. DuBois W,
    3. Budach W,
    4. Baumann M,
    5. Freeman J,
    6. Suit H
    : In vivo radiation sensitivity of glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32: 99-104, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Onda K,
    2. Davis RL,
    3. Shibuya M,
    4. Wilson CB,
    5. Hoshino T
    : Correlation between the bromodeoxyuridine labelling index and the MIB-1 and Ki-67 proliferating cell indices in cerebral gliomas. Cancer 74: 1921-1926, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Davis FG,
    2. Freels S,
    3. Grutsch J,
    4. Barlas S,
    5. Brem S
    : Survival rates in patients with primary malignant brain tumors stratified by patient age and tumor histological type: an analysis based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, 1973-1991. J Neurosurg 88: 1-10, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Jiang H,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Li W,
    4. Ma K,
    5. Cai L,
    6. Wang G
    : Low-dose radiation does not induce proliferation in tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Radiat Res 170: 477-487, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Williams JR,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Zhou H,
    4. Gridley DS,
    5. Koch CJ,
    6. Slater JM,
    7. Little JB
    : Overview of radiosensitivity of human tumor cells to low-dose-rate irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72: 909-917, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Beauchesne PD,
    2. Bertrand S,
    3. Branche R,
    4. Linke SP,
    5. Revel R,
    6. Dore JF,
    7. Pedeux RM
    : Human malignant glioma cell lines are sensitive to low radiation doses. Int J Cancer 105: 33-40, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Joiner MC,
    2. Lambin P,
    3. Malaise EP,
    4. Robson T,
    5. Arrand JE,
    6. Skov KA,
    7. Marples B
    : Hypersensitivity to very-low single radiation doses: its relationship to the adaptive response and induced radioresistance. Mutat Res 358: 171-183, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Brada M
    : Radiotherapy in malignant glioma. Ann Oncol 17(Suppl 10): x183-x185, 2006.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Basset P,
    2. Okada A,
    3. Chenard MP,
    4. Kannan R,
    5. Stoll I,
    6. Anglard P,
    7. Bellocq JP,
    8. Rio MC
    : Matrix metalloproteinases as stromal effectors of human carcinoma progression: therapeutical implications. Matrix Biol 15: 535-541, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Rao JS
    : Molecular mechanisms of glioma invasiveness: the role of proteases. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 489-501, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Rooprai HK,
    2. Rucklidge GJ,
    3. Panou C,
    4. Pilkington GJ
    : The effects of exogenous growth factors on matrix metalloproteinase secretion by human brain tumour cells. Br J Cancer 82: 52-55, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Uhm JH,
    2. Dooley NP,
    3. Villemure JG,
    4. Yong VW
    : Glioma invasion in vitro: regulation by matrix metalloprotease-2 and protein kinase C. Clin Exp Metastasis 14: 421-433, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Nakano A,
    2. Tani E,
    3. Miyazaki K,
    4. Yamamoto Y,
    5. Furuyama J
    : Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metallo-proteinases in human gliomas. J Neurosurg 83: 298-307, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Argyriou AA,
    2. Giannopoulou E,
    3. Kalofonos HP
    : Angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic molecularly targeted therapies in malignant gliomas. Oncology 77: 1-11, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Wild-Bode C,
    2. Weller M,
    3. Wick W
    : Molecular determinants of glioma cell migration and invasion. J Neurosurg 94: 978-984, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Lampert K,
    2. Machein U,
    3. Machein MR,
    4. Conca W,
    5. Peter HH,
    6. Volk B
    : Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in human brain tumors. Am J Pathol 153: 429-437, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Park CM,
    2. Park MJ,
    3. Kwak HJ,
    4. Lee HC,
    5. Kim MS,
    6. Lee SH,
    7. Park IC,
    8. Rhee CH,
    9. Hong SI
    : Ionizing radiation enhances matrix metalloproteinase-2 secretion and invasion of glioma cells through Src/Epidermal growth factor receptor–mediated p38/Akt and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathways. Cancer Res 66: 8511-8519, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Chakravarti A,
    2. Dicker A,
    3. Mehta M
    : The contribution of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling pathway to radioresistance in human gliomas: a review of preclinical and correlative clinical data. Int J Radiat Oncol Bio Phys 58: 927-931, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Gunther W,
    2. Skaftnesmo KO,
    3. Arnold H,
    4. Terzis AJ
    : Molecular approaches to brain tumour invasion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145: 1029-1036, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Mischel PS,
    2. Cloughesy TF
    : Targeted molecular therapy of GBM. Brain Pathol 13: 52-61, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Li J,
    2. Yen C,
    3. Liaw D,
    4. Podsypanina K,
    5. Bose S,
    6. Wang SI,
    7. Puc J,
    8. Miliaresis C,
    9. Rodgers L,
    10. Parsons R
    : PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science 275: 1943-1947, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Lu Y,
    2. Lin YZ,
    3. LaPushin R,
    4. Cuevas B,
    5. Fang X,
    6. Yu SX,
    7. Davies MA,
    8. Khan H,
    9. Furui T,
    10. Mills GB
    : The PTEN/MMAC1/TEP tumor suppressor gene decreases cell growth and induces apoptosis and anoikis in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 18: 7034-7045, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Tamura M,
    2. Gu J,
    3. Matsumoto K,
    4. Aota S,
    5. Parsons R,
    6. Yamada KM
    : Inhibition of cell migration, spreading, and focal adhesion by tumor suppressor PTEN. Science (Wash) 280: 1614-1617, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Giannopoulou E,
    2. Katsoris P,
    3. Hatziapostolou M,
    4. Kardamakis D,
    5. Kotsaki E,
    6. Polytarchou C,
    7. Parthymou A,
    8. Papaioannou S,
    9. Papadimitriou E
    : X-rays modulate extracellular matrix in vivo. Int J Cancer 94: 690-698, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Parthymou A,
    2. Kardamakis D,
    3. Pavlopoulos I,
    4. Papadimitriou E
    : Irradiated C6 glioma cells induce angiogenesis in vivo and activate endothelial cells in vitro. Int J Cancer 110: 807-814, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Giannopoulou E,
    2. Antonacopoulou A,
    3. Floratou K,
    4. Papavassiliou AG,
    5. Kalofonos HP
    : Dual targeting of EGFR and HER-2 in colon cancer cell lines. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 63: 973-981, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Giannopoulou E,
    2. Papadimitriou E
    : Amifostine has antiangiogenic properties in vitro by changing the redox status of human endothelial cells. Free Radic Res 37: 1191-1199, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Feinendegen LE,
    2. Pollycove M,
    3. Sondhaus CA
    : Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems. Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med 2: 143-171, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Short SC,
    2. Mitchell SA,
    3. Boulton P,
    4. Woodcock M,
    5. Joiner MC
    : The response of human glioma cell lines to low-dose radiation exposure, Int J Radiat Biol 75: 1341-1348, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Tubiana M
    : Can we reduce the incidence of second primary malignancies occurring after radiotherapy? A critical review. Radiother Oncol 91: 4-15, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Combs SE,
    2. Schulz-Ertner D,
    3. Roth W,
    4. Herold-Mende C,
    5. Debus J,
    6. Weber KJ
    : In vitro responsiveness of glioma cell lines to multimodality treatment with radiotherapy, temozolomide, and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition with cetuximab. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68: 873-882, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Overall CM,
    2. Kleifeld O
    : Validating matrix metalloproteinases as drugs targets and anti-targets for cancer therapy. Nature Rev 6: 227-239, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Overall CM
    : Dilating the degradome: matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) cuts to the heart of the matter. Biochem J 383(Pt 3): e5-7, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Overall CM,
    2. Kleifeld O
    : Towards third-generation matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors for cancer therapy. Br J Cancer 4: 941-946, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Bramhall SR,
    2. Hallissey MT,
    3. Whiting J,
    4. Scholefield J,
    5. Tierney G,
    6. Stuart RC,
    7. Hawkins RE,
    8. McCulloch P,
    9. Maughan T,
    10. Brown PD,
    11. Baillet M,
    12. Fielding JW
    : Marimastat as maintenance therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 86: 1864-1870, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bramhall SR,
    2. Schulz J,
    3. Nemunaitis J,
    4. Brown PD,
    5. Baillet M,
    6. Buckels JA
    : A double-blind placebo-controlled, randomised study comparing gemcitabine and marimastat with gemcitabine and placebo as first-line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 87: 161-167, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. King J,
    2. Zhao J,
    3. Clingan P,
    4. Morris D
    : Randomised double-blind placebo control study of adjuvant treatment with the metalloproteinase inhibitor, Marimastat in patients with inoperable colorectal hepatic metastases: significant survival advantage in patients with musculoskeletal side-effects. Anticancer Res 23: 639-645, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Dent P,
    2. Yacoub A,
    3. Contessa J,
    4. Caron R,
    5. Amorino G,
    6. Valerie K,
    7. Hagan MP,
    8. Grant S,
    9. Schmidt-Ullrich R
    : Stress and radiation-induced activation of multiple intracellular signalling pathways. Radiat Res 159: 283-300, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Schmidt-Ullrich RK,
    2. Contessa JN,
    3. Lammering G,
    4. Amorino G,
    5. Lin PS
    : ERBB receptor tyrosine kinases and cellular radiation responses. Oncogene 22: 5855–5865, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Suwinski R,
    2. Jaworska M,
    3. Nikiel B,
    4. Grzegorz W,
    5. Bankowska-Wozniak M,
    6. Wojciech M,
    7. Krzysztof S,
    8. Dariusz L
    : Predicting the effect of accelerated fractionation in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancer based on molecular marker profiles: data from a randomized clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(2): 438-446, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Vol. 8, Issue 1
January-February 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Genomics & Proteomics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ionizing Radiation Affects Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signalling and Metalloproteinase Secretion in Glioma Cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Genomics & Proteomics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Ionizing Radiation Affects Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signalling and Metalloproteinase Secretion in Glioma Cells
MARIA MARTINOU, EFSTATHIA GIANNOPOULOU, GEORGIA MALATARA, ANDREAS A. ARGYRIOU, HARALABOS P. KALOFONOS, DIMITRIOS KARDAMAKIS
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Jan 2011, 8 (1) 33-38;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Ionizing Radiation Affects Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signalling and Metalloproteinase Secretion in Glioma Cells
MARIA MARTINOU, EFSTATHIA GIANNOPOULOU, GEORGIA MALATARA, ANDREAS A. ARGYRIOU, HARALABOS P. KALOFONOS, DIMITRIOS KARDAMAKIS
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Jan 2011, 8 (1) 33-38;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar
Cancer & Genome Proteomics

© 2026 Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Powered by HighWire