Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies
Open Access

Effects of Isthmus Topography on the Molecular Characteristics of BRAF-mutant Papillary Thyroid Cancer

CHI-YU KUO, SHEENA YI-HSIN CHENG, YI-CHIUNG HSU and SHIH-PING CHENG
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics May 2026, 23 (3) 470-482; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20585
CHI-YU KUO
1Department of Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
2School of Medicine, College of Medicine, MacKay Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHEENA YI-HSIN CHENG
3University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YI-CHIUNG HSU
4Department of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
5Center for Astronautical Physics and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
6Department of Medical Research, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHIH-PING CHENG
1Department of Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
2School of Medicine, College of Medicine, MacKay Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
7Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, MacKay Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: t119{at}mmu.edu.tw
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Previous studies suggest that thyroid cancers in the isthmus are associated with more aggressive behavior and unfavorable patient outcomes compared to lobar tumors. This study aimed to characterize the molecular features of isthmus thyroid cancer.

Materials and Methods: Transcriptomic and proteomic data were retrieved from the Cancer Genome Atlas. We performed 1:2 propensity score matching based on age, sex, tumor subtype, size, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, and stage, matching 15 papillary thyroid cancers with the BRAF V600E mutation located in the isthmus to 30 tumors in the unilateral lobar area.

Results: Despite balanced oncogenic drivers, BRAF-mutant isthmus tumors exhibited significantly lower BRAF-RAS scores and higher ERK output scores. Additionally, these tumors had a slightly elevated DNA methylation-based stemness index. Principal component analysis revealed distinct gene expression patterns between the two groups. Differential expression and gene set enrichment analysis indicated enrichment in extracellular matrix remodeling, cell adhesion pathways, and TGF-β signaling. Notable upregulated genes included oligoadenylate synthases, TNR, HAS3, and LIF. Hierarchical proteomic clustering highlighted increased co-expression of several oncoproteins and DNA damage response markers in isthmus tumors.

Conclusion: BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancers in the isthmus display distinct molecular characteristics, including increased ERK signaling activity. These findings suggest that topographical location independently influences tumor biology and may account for the more aggressive clinical behavior of isthmus tumors at the molecular level.

Keywords:
  • BRAF mutation
  • isthmus
  • papillary thyroid cancer
  • propensity score matching
  • The Cancer Genome Atlas

Introduction

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy, with its incidence continuously rising (1). Most thyroid cancers are well-differentiated, including papillary, follicular, and oncocytic types. Papillary thyroid cancer accounts for about 90% of newly diagnosed cases. Recent advances in molecular pathogenesis reveal that these tumors arise from acquired driver mutations that constitutively activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway (2). Specifically, thyroid tumorigenesis primarily results from clonal, mutually exclusive mutations in either the BRAF or RAS oncogenes, while a subset of tumors arises from gene rearrangements involving receptor tyrosine kinases (2). During disease progression, additional genetic alterations, such as disruption of p53 function and mutations in the TERT promoter, lead to more advanced and less differentiated thyroid cancer (3).

The thyroid is a butterfly-shaped gland composed of two lobes connected by a narrow strip of tissue called the isthmus. Due to the small volume of tissue in the isthmus, thyroid nodules in this area are uncommon. In a retrospective review of patients with thyroid nodules from six referral centers, only 6% were found in the isthmus (4). A study of 1,973 patients with papillary thyroid cancer revealed that 181 (9%) had tumors located in the isthmus (5). Despite their rarity, thyroid cancers in the isthmus were associated with a higher risk of persistent disease after treatment and shorter disease-free survival (6). This raises an intriguing hypothesis that tumor biology may be influenced by the anatomical topography of the thyroid gland.

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is a landmark project that comprehensively maps the genomic profiles of over 20,000 primary cancer samples across more than 30 different cancer types. Recently, researchers from Washington University analyzed TCGA data and found that patients with isthmus thyroid cancers were generally younger and had a higher prevalence of BRAF mutations, along with higher ERK scores, as expected (7). However, this analysis did not account for potential baseline clinicopathological differences. To explore whether isthmus tumors have distinct molecular characteristics compared to lobar tumors, we conducted an extended analysis following propensity score matching. The aim of this study was to investigate whether unique molecular signatures exist in the isthmus.

Materials and Methods

Data sources. Demographic, clinical, pathological, transcriptomic, and proteomic data from the TCGA papillary thyroid cancer (THCA) databases were downloaded from the Genomic Data Commons data portal of the National Cancer Institute (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) or obtained from the initial global analysis publication (8). Primary tumor location and transcriptome data from Illumina HiSeq 2000 RNA sequencing were available for 501 patients. Of these, 372 had proteomics data obtained from the M.D. Anderson Reverse Phase Protein Array Core. Two patients diagnosed with poorly differentiated oncocytic carcinoma and follicular carcinoma were excluded from further analysis.

Five genetic ancestral groups (Europeans, East Asians, Africans, Native/Latin Americans, and South Asians), derived from single nucleotide polymorphism array genotyping and exome sequencing data, were identified in our recent analysis (9). We categorized the oncogenic drivers of the study cohort into BRAF V600E mutation, RAS mutations, fusions, and other mutations or copy number alterations. The mutation status of the TERT promoter was retrieved from our previous study (10).

The thyroid differentiation score (TDS) from the initial TCGA analysis is based on the expression levels of 16 genes associated with thyroid metabolism and function, where higher values indicate a more differentiated tumor status (8). The BRAF-RAS score (BRS) is a 71-gene expression metric that classifies thyroid tumors as either BRAF-like or RAS-like (8). The BRS ranges from −1 to +1, with negative scores indicating a BRAF V600E-like signature and positive scores indicating a RAS mutation-like expression. The ERK output score is derived from prior research that identified 52 genes with rapidly changing expression following MEK inhibition in tumors with the BRAF V600E mutation, reflecting the transcriptional output of the ERK pathway (11). A higher ERK output score indicates increased ERK signaling activity. Additionally, researchers from TCGA evaluated cancer stemness across 33 tumor types and developed stemness indices based on mRNA expression (mRNAsi) and DNA methylation (mDNAsi) (12). Higher values of these indices are associated with biological processes active in cancer stem cells and tumor dedifferentiation, as indicated by histopathological grade.

According to the initial global analysis publication, tumor purity was determined using the ABSOLUTE algorithm, which estimates the fraction of cancer cells based on somatic DNA alterations (13). Since transcriptional profiles are derived from bulk tumor samples, stromal and immune scores have been developed to quantify the presence of stromal and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment (14). The Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumours using Expression data (ESTIMATE) score is calculated by summing the stromal and immune scores, which reflect the total levels of stromal cells and immune cell infiltration in tumor tissues. A high ESTIMATE score implies lower tumor purity. Additionally, we employed several deconvolution algorithms to estimate the fractions of specific cell types. xCell uses curated gene signatures for 64 immune and stromal cell types and applies a spillover compensation approach to provide relative enrichment scores (15). Estimating the Proportions of Immune and Cancer cells (EPIC) infers the proportions of major immune populations using predefined expression profiles (16). Furthermore, Microenvironment Cell Populations-counter (MCP-counter) utilizes specific marker genes to quantify the relative abundance of key immune and stromal cell populations (17).

Propensity score matching. To minimize bias from confounding variables related to tumor location, we performed propensity score matching using a 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching algorithm without replacement. Propensity scores were estimated using a logistic regression model that included age, sex, tumor subtype, tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging. Matching was carried out using the logit of the propensity score as the distance metric, with a caliper width of 0.2 standard deviations of the logit. Since TERT promoter mutation status was missing for a subset of patients, we created a binary indicator for missing TERT promoter mutations and included it in the propensity score model to ensure balanced covariate availability between matched groups. Covariate balance before and after matching was evaluated using standardized mean differences, with values less than 0.1 considered indicative of adequate balance. The optmatch package (version 0.10.8) in R was utilized for the propensity score matching process.

Principal component analysis. After propensity score matching, dimension reduction was performed using principal component analysis (PCA) to highlight strong patterns of gene expression. The transcriptome data were transformed into an orthogonal basis, with the first few principal components capturing the greatest variance. The prcomp() function in R version 4.5.0 was used with the top 500 most variable genes, and a scatter plot was created for visualization.

Identification of differentially expressed genes. Differentially expressed genes were identified using the Bioconductor package DESeq2 (version 1.50.2) in R, incorporating tumor purity as a covariate. The Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied to adjust p-Values for multiple testing, setting the false discovery rate (q-Value) at 5%. Gene Ontology categories of the differentially expressed genes were analyzed using Enrichr, a free web tool for functional enrichment analysis (18).

Gene set enrichment analysis. To address the limitations of overrepresentation analysis, such as neglecting network structures and overlooking genes that exhibit trends without significant changes, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was employed to eliminate arbitrary cutoffs and improve signal detection (19). Classic GSEA was conducted using GSEA v4.4.0 with MSigDB v2025.1 databases, including Hallmark, the Pathway Interaction Database (PID), and Reactome collections. Gene sets containing fewer than 15 or more than 500 genes were excluded. When multiple probes mapped to the same gene symbol, expression values were collapsed to a single gene using the maximum probe value. Genes were ranked based on the signal-to-noise ratio derived from phenotype labels. Statistical significance was determined using 1,000 phenotype-based permutations. Enrichment significance was assessed through normalized enrichment scores and false discovery rate q-Values. The top pathways with the highest normalized enrichment scores were identified to provide insights into biological processes.

Hierarchical cluster analysis. For the propensity-matched cases with available proteomics data, unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed on Z-score transformed data using average linkage and Pearson correlation (20). A clustered heatmap of the most variable proteins was generated for visual interpretation.

Statistical analysis. To compare categorical variables between groups, we used Fisher’s exact test or the chi-square test. For continuous variables, medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) are reported, and differences were assessed using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test or the Mann-Whitney U test (21). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Study cohort characteristics. Of the 499 patients with data on primary tumor location and transcriptome, 22 had tumors located in the isthmus, 214 in the right thyroid lobe, 177 in the left thyroid lobe, and 86 had tumors in both lobes (Table I). Patients with isthmus tumors were more likely to have the tall-cell subtype (p=0.009), to be younger at diagnosis (p=0.036), and to be male (p=0.031). They also had a higher likelihood of having African genetic ancestry and a lower likelihood of having East Asian genetic ancestry (p=0.045). Furthermore, isthmus tumors were less likely to exhibit extrathyroidal extension (p<0.001) but more likely to present with lymph node metastasis (p=0.014). There was no significant difference in tumor size or TNM stages. The frequency of BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations was higher in isthmus tumors, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. For isthmus tumors, the prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation was 68% (p=0.318), and the prevalence of the TERT promoter mutation was 21% (p=0.442).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological features of the study cohort with papillary thyroid cancer.

To minimize bias from confounding factors at clinical presentation, propensity score matching was applied to isthmus tumors and those in the unilateral lobar group. Since the BRAF V600E mutation is the most prevalent genetic alteration in papillary thyroid cancer and oncogenic drivers predominantly influence gene expression (22), our analysis focused on 15 isthmus tumors with the BRAF V600E mutation, excluding other less common oncogenic drivers. A 1:2 matching identified 30 lobar tumors with comparable clinicopathological features (Table II). We verified that all matched covariates achieved an acceptable balance and conducted sensitivity analyses using alternative caliper widths and reduced covariate sets, which yielded consistent results. These 45 cases were subjected to further analyses.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Clinicopathological features of BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancer after propensity score matching.

Differentiation and ERK signaling. As shown in Figure 1, there was no difference in TDS between isthmus and lobar tumors (median: −0.76 versus −0.72, p=0.501). Notably, isthmus tumors had significantly lower BRS (median: −0.90; IQR=−0.76 to −0.96) compared to lobar tumors (median: −0.74; IQR=−0.63 to −0.89; p=0.013). ERK output scores were significantly higher in isthmus tumors (median: 18.0; IQR=15.5 to 28.6) than in lobar tumors (median: 12.3; IQR=1.7 to 18.8; p=0.023). These results indicate that BRAF-mutant isthmus tumors exhibit a more pronounced BRAF-like signature and higher ERK signaling activity.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Comparisons of the thyroid differentiation score (TDS), BRAF-RAS score (BRS), ERK output score, and DNA methylation-based stemness index (mDNAsi) between BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancers located in the isthmus and lobar regions. Horizontal bars indicate median values. *p<0.05; ns, Not significant (Mann-Whitney U-test).

Isthmus and lobar tumors had similar tumor purity (p=0.522), stromal (p=0.163) and immune (p=0.427) scores, as well as ESTIMATE scores (p=0.324). We examined cell type distributions using three deconvolution algorithms and found no significant differences in the proportions of specific immune and stromal cells between tumors located in the isthmus and those in the lobar regions (Figure 2). These findings suggest that tumor location is not significantly associated with stromal cell composition or immune cell infiltration. The mRNAsi values were similar between the two groups (p=0.665); however, isthmus tumors had slightly higher mDNAsi (median: 0.12; IQR=0.11 to 0.13) compared to lobar tumors (median: 0.11; IQR=0.10 to 0.12; p=0.036).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Estimated proportions of immune and stromal cells in BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancers in the isthmus compared to those in the lobar regions. Representative cell types are derived from deconvolution algorithms of xCell (A), EPIC (B), and MCP-counter (C). Horizontal bars indicate median values. ns, Not significant (Mann-Whitney U-test).

Overrepresentation analysis. Principal component analysis revealed that the two groups exhibited distinct yet partially overlapping gene expression patterns (Figure 3A). DESeq2 identified 124 differentially expressed transcripts with a q-value below 0.05 (Figure 3B). Gene Ontology analysis of the differentially expressed genes using Enrichr indicated that the most enriched cellular component was the collagen-containing extracellular matrix (Figure 3C). The top molecular function identified was adenylyltransferase activity, which included OAS1, OAS3, and OASL, all of which were upregulated in isthmus tumors. The most enriched biological process was interleukin-27-mediated signaling, which also included the oligoadenylate synthases. Representative protein-coding genes with the highest fold changes are listed in Table III. Among the upregulated genes, several are recognized for their roles in extracellular matrix remodeling, such as tenascin R (TNR), ovochymase 1 (OVCH1), and hyaluronan synthase 3 (HAS3). Additionally, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is involved in strong pro-tumor cytokine signaling, which helps maintain cancer stemness in solid tumors (23). The upregulation of LIF was accompanied by the downregulation of several differentiation or organization markers, including PRLHR, AZGP1, HOXC8, and MEGF11. This is consistent with the increased mDNAsi, suggesting a further loss of differentiation in isthmus tumors.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Principal component analysis and differential gene expression analysis for BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancers in the isthmus versus lobar regions. (A) Principal component analysis of gene expression for the two groups. Each dot or triangle represents a sample, while the circles indicate 95% confidence ellipses. (B) Volcano plot illustrating the relationship between gene expression fold change and significance. Red dots indicate differential expression with an absolute fold change greater than 2 and a q-Value of less than 0.05. (C) Top Gene Ontology categories for differentially expressed genes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Top ten differentially expressed genes ranked by fold change in BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancer located in the isthmus.

Gene set enrichment analysis. In Figure 4, we present the most positively enriched pathways identified through gene set enrichment analysis. Interestingly, the Hallmark, PID, and Reactome databases all highlight dysregulated processes related to cell-cell adhesion and polarity in the isthmus. TGF-β signaling downregulates E-cadherin, and the reduction of E-cadherin, along with tight junction components, results in a loss of epithelial integrity, facilitating cancer cell migration and invasion. These findings are consistent with the differentially expressed genes, which involve the extracellular matrix and cell junction assembly. Additionally, a significant positive enrichment of the p53 pathway was observed in the Hallmark collection. This correlates with the upregulation of APOBEC3A, a potent cytidine deaminase associated with kataegis (localized clusters of hypermutation) and break-associated “mutation showers,” which may contribute to genomic instability. The upregulation of certain stress-responsive genes, such as GPR37 and HSPA6, further reflects this trend.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Gene set enrichment analysis of BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancers in the isthmus compared to those in the lobar regions. The top enriched pathways from the Hallmark, Pathway Interaction Database (PID), and Reactome databases, along with the corresponding enrichment plots, are presented.

Proteomics clustering. Among the propensity-matched cases, data from 6 isthmus tumors and 22 lobar tumors were available for proteomics analysis. As illustrated in Figure 5, the protein expression profiles of isthmus tumors were closely clustered in the unsupervised hierarchical analysis, corroborating the results of the principal component analysis of mRNA profiles. Of note, several oncoproteins exhibited increased co-expression in the isthmus tumors, including ABL1 (CABL), MAPK1 (ERK2), ETS1, and LCK. Additionally, increased protein abundance was observed in molecules associated with DNA damage response and apoptosis, including BID, BAX, and phosphorylated CHK1 (Ser345). Downregulation of NOTCH1 and upregulation of SERPINE1 (PAI1) were also prominent. These alterations may be linked to enhanced ERK signaling activity in isthmus tumors.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Clustered heatmap of proteomics data for BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancers in the isthmus compared to those in the lobar regions. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using average linkage and Pearson correlation.

Discussion

A few discrepancies were noted between our findings and the previous report (7). Before propensity score matching, we observed significant differences in sex, age, histological subtype, and lymph node metastasis, while the previous report found no statistical significance in these variables. The primary reason for the discrepancies may be that the previous report grouped unilateral lobar tumors and bilateral tumors together as non-isthmus tumors. This could introduce biases, as basic demographics such as age and sex clearly differ between unilobar and bilateral tumors. Although both the Washington University group and our study did not detect a statistical difference in the frequency of BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations, the nearly double prevalence of TERT promoter mutations in isthmus tumors necessitates matched-pair analysis to avoid biased comparisons.

After propensity score matching, both groups exhibited identical distributions of oncogenic drivers and TERT promoter mutations. An interesting finding in this study is that lower BRS and higher ERK output scores were still evident in isthmus tumors. This is supported by the distinct grouping of gene expression observed in the principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering of proteomics data. Although we did not observe differences in TDS after propensity matching, it is noteworthy that isthmus tumors had slightly higher mDNAsi. ERK signaling is well known to promote cancer stemness across various cancers, including thyroid cancer (24). Recent evidence suggests that STAT3 overexpression increases stemness-related gene expression in thyroid cancer cells (25). In this context, it is noteworthy that PTPRT, which dephosphorylates STAT3, was downregulated in isthmus tumors (Table III). The reduced expression of PTPRT may lead to unchecked STAT3 signaling, coupled with the upregulation of LIF, which activates the JAK/STAT3 pathway for stem cell maintenance (23). These aberrant signaling pathways may exacerbate malignant tumor phenotypes in isthmus tumors and provide plausible mechanisms that explain the molecular differences in tumors located in different regions, despite balanced oncogenic drivers.

Our analysis revealed that many differentially expressed genes are associated with the extracellular matrix, while the top enriched pathways involve cell adhesion and extracellular matrix interactions. This is in agreement with clinical observations that loco-regional and distant metastases are more common in isthmus tumors, even among very low-risk or low-risk patients (26). A meta-analysis of 11 retrospective studies indicates that isthmus tumors are linked to a higher risk of central lymph node metastasis (27). However, our deconvolution analysis did not detect differences in the fractions of endothelial cells, specifically microvascular and lymphatic endothelial cells (p=0.109 and 0.166, respectively; data not shown). Overall lymphatic vessel density has been shown to predict nodal metastasis (28). Consistently, a recent study of the Afirma database indicated that isthmus tumors are more likely to harbor BRAF V600E mutations and ALK/NTRK/RET fusions, along with higher ERK activity and follicular mesenchymal transition scores (29). However, the downregulation of immune response regulation observed in the Afirma study was not replicated in the present study. For instance, while IGHG4 was downregulated in the isthmus tumors (Table III), the distribution of B cells was similar between the two groups. A plausible explanation is that the relative immune coldness may result from the higher frequency of BRAF V600E mutations rather than the isthmus location itself. Another possibility is that heightened cancer stemness promotes immune suppression.

Differences in the embryological origins of the isthmus and thyroid lobes have been proposed to explain the aggressive behavior of isthmus tumors (7). Alternatively, we suggest a biomechanical explanation. The thyroid gland is attached to the trachea by the suspensory ligament, also known as Berry’s ligament. During swallowing, the up-and-down movement of the trachea pulls on Berry’s ligament and the nearby isthmus, placing the isthmus under greater stretch tension than the lobar tissue located farther from the trachea. A previous study found that simulated microgravity-related shear stress increased the number of vimentin-positive thyroid cancer cells and elevated levels of extracellular matrix proteins and TGF-β1 (30). TGF-β1 can upregulate the expression of hyaluronan synthases and promote hyaluronan synthesis (31), which alters the stiffness of the extracellular matrix and may enhance stemness and metastasis. Further research is needed to determine whether the molecular characteristics of isthmus tumors are influenced by biomechanical factors such as mechanosensation and mechanotransduction.

A limitation of this study is the absence of an external validation cohort and the relatively small sample size after matching, necessitating cautious interpretation of these findings. Additionally, some information, such as the secretome, is not included in this multifaceted analysis. Current large-scale workflows may not effectively capture extracellular components. For instance, the secretion of sialyl-fibronectin by thyroid tumors correlates with reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and improved prognosis (32). Despite these limitations, our convergence of transcriptome and proteomic analyses may provide deeper insights into the molecular characteristics of isthmus tumors, rather than simply relying on clinicopathological comparisons. In thyroid cancer, disturbances in antioxidative stress defense, mismatch repair, non-homologous end-joining, and DNA damage response pathways contribute to both the initiation and progression of the malignant process (33). We recently proposed that the upregulation of TIMELESS may serve as a protective mechanism against accumulating DNA repair deficiencies during dedifferentiation in thyroid cancer (34). Notably, this study found that oligoadenylate synthases and stress-responsive genes such as GPR37 and HSPA6 were upregulated in isthmus tumors, consistent with the increased DNA damage response and apoptosis observed in the proteomic analysis. Following the DNA damage response, ERK can be activated to mediate anti-apoptotic effects and promote cell survival (35). Accordingly, the increased ERK activity in isthmus tumors may reflect a complex adaptive response to genomic instability and cellular stress, potentially offering novel therapeutic options for radioiodine-refractory tumors.

Conclusion

In this study, we employed propensity score matching to control for baseline clinicopathological differences and utilized a multi-omics approach to characterize BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancer located in the isthmus. Our findings indicate that isthmus tumors represent a molecularly distinct subgroup, characterized by heightened ERK pathway signaling and more pronounced BRAF-like molecular characteristics. While we propose a biomechanical hypothesis involving chronic stretch tension from tracheal movement as a potential explanation for these molecular differences, the precise mechanisms underlying the topographical influence on tumor biology warrant further investigation.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grants from the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan (NSTC-112-2314-B-195-009-MY3) and MacKay Memorial Hospital (MMH-11507 and MMH-E-115-08).

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Chi-Yu Kuo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing - Original Draft. Sheena Yi-Hsin Cheng: Methodology, Data Curation, Writing - Review & Editing. Yi-Chiung Hsu: Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – Review & Editing. Shih-Ping Cheng: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

    No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this manuscript.

  • Received December 20, 2025.
  • Revision received February 8, 2026.
  • Accepted February 9, 2026.
  • Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Li M,
    2. Dal Maso L,
    3. Pizzato M,
    4. Vaccarella S
    : Evolving epidemiological patterns of thyroid cancer and estimates of overdiagnosis in 2013-17 in 63 countries worldwide: a population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 12(11): 824-836, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00223-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Landa I,
    2. Cabanillas ME
    : Genomic alterations in thyroid cancer: biological and clinical insights. Nat Rev Endocrinol 20(2): 93-110, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41574-023-00920-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Toda S,
    2. Saito N,
    3. Kadoya M,
    4. Okubo Y,
    5. Yamazaki H,
    6. Suganuma N,
    7. Iwasaki H,
    8. Masudo K,
    9. Hoshino D
    : Association of BRAF or TERT promoter mutations and advanced papillary thyroid carcinoma. Anticancer Res 44(7): 3141-3147, 2024. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17128
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Jasim S,
    2. Baranski TJ,
    3. Teefey SA,
    4. Middleton WD
    : Investigating the effect of thyroid nodule location on the risk of thyroid cancer. Thyroid 30(3): 401-407, 2020. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2019.0478
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Lee YS,
    2. Jeong JJ,
    3. Nam KH,
    4. Chung WY,
    5. Chang HS,
    6. Park CS
    : Papillary carcinoma located in the thyroid isthmus. World J Surg 34(1): 36-39, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0298-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Campennì A,
    2. Ruggeri RM,
    3. Siracusa M,
    4. Giacoppo G,
    5. La Torre F,
    6. Saccomanno A,
    7. Alibrandi A,
    8. Dionigi G,
    9. Tuccari G,
    10. Baldari S,
    11. Giovanella L
    : Isthmus topography is a risk factor for persistent disease in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol 185(3): 397-404, 2021. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-21-0328
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Smith ER,
    2. Frye CC,
    3. Pandian TK,
    4. Gillanders WE,
    5. Olson JA,
    6. Brown TC,
    7. Jasim S
    : Molecular characteristics of isthmus papillary thyroid cancers: Supporting evidence for unfavorable clinical behavior. Am J Surg 228: 146-150, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network
    : Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell 159(3): 676-690, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.050
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chi SY,
    2. Hsu YC,
    3. Cheng SP
    : Effect of genetic ancestry on phenotypes and genotypes in papillary thyroid cancer. OMICS 29(4): 117-124, 2025. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2024.0189
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Chien MN,
    2. Yang PS,
    3. Hsu YC,
    4. Liu TP,
    5. Lee JJ,
    6. Cheng SP
    : Transcriptome analysis of papillary thyroid cancer harboring telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation. Head Neck 40(11): 2528-2537, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/hed.25385
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Pratilas CA,
    2. Taylor BS,
    3. Ye Q,
    4. Viale A,
    5. Sander C,
    6. Solit DB,
    7. Rosen N
    : (V600E)BRAF is associated with disabled feedback inhibition of RAF-MEK signaling and elevated transcriptional output of the pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(11): 4519-4524, 2009. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900780106
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Malta TM,
    2. Sokolov A,
    3. Gentles AJ,
    4. Burzykowski T,
    5. Poisson L,
    6. Weinstein JN,
    7. Kamińska B,
    8. Huelsken J,
    9. Omberg L,
    10. Gevaert O,
    11. Colaprico A,
    12. Czerwińska P,
    13. Mazurek S,
    14. Mishra L,
    15. Heyn H,
    16. Krasnitz A,
    17. Godwin AK,
    18. Lazar AJ, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network,
    19. Stuart JM,
    20. Hoadley KA,
    21. Laird PW,
    22. Noushmehr H,
    23. Wiznerowicz M
    : Machine learning identifies stemness features associated with oncogenic dedifferentiation. Cell 173(2): 338-354.e15, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Carter SL,
    2. Cibulskis K,
    3. Helman E,
    4. McKenna A,
    5. Shen H,
    6. Zack T,
    7. Laird PW,
    8. Onofrio RC,
    9. Winckler W,
    10. Weir BA,
    11. Beroukhim R,
    12. Pellman D,
    13. Levine DA,
    14. Lander ES,
    15. Meyerson M,
    16. Getz G
    : Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat Biotechnol 30(5): 413-421, 2012. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2203
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Yoshihara K,
    2. Shahmoradgoli M,
    3. Martínez E,
    4. Vegesna R,
    5. Kim H,
    6. Torres-Garcia W,
    7. Treviño V,
    8. Shen H,
    9. Laird PW,
    10. Levine DA,
    11. Carter SL,
    12. Getz G,
    13. Stemke-Hale K,
    14. Mills GB,
    15. Verhaak RG
    : Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat Commun 4: 2612, 2013. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3612
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Aran D,
    2. Hu Z,
    3. Butte AJ
    : xCell: digitally portraying the tissue cellular heterogeneity landscape. Genome Biol 18(1): 220, 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1349-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Racle J,
    2. de Jonge K,
    3. Baumgaertner P,
    4. Speiser DE,
    5. Gfeller D
    : Simultaneous enumeration of cancer and immune cell types from bulk tumor gene expression data. Elife 6: e26476, 2017. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.26476
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Becht E,
    2. Giraldo NA,
    3. Lacroix L,
    4. Buttard B,
    5. Elarouci N,
    6. Petitprez F,
    7. Selves J,
    8. Laurent-Puig P,
    9. Sautès-Fridman C,
    10. Fridman WH,
    11. de Reyniès A
    : Estimating the population abundance of tissue-infiltrating immune and stromal cell populations using gene expression. Genome Biol 17(1): 218, 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-1070-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Kuleshov MV,
    2. Jones MR,
    3. Rouillard AD,
    4. Fernandez NF,
    5. Duan Q,
    6. Wang Z,
    7. Koplev S,
    8. Jenkins SL,
    9. Jagodnik KM,
    10. Lachmann A,
    11. McDermott MG,
    12. Monteiro CD,
    13. Gundersen GW,
    14. Ma’ayan A
    : Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res 44(W1): W90-W97, 2016. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw377
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Subramanian A,
    2. Tamayo P,
    3. Mootha VK,
    4. Mukherjee S,
    5. Ebert BL,
    6. Gillette MA,
    7. Paulovich A,
    8. Pomeroy SL,
    9. Golub TR,
    10. Lander ES,
    11. Mesirov JP
    : Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(43): 15545-15550, 2005. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Hsu YC,
    2. Lee JJ,
    3. Chien MN,
    4. Chen MJ,
    5. Leung CH,
    6. Cheng SP
    : Is papillary thyroid microcarcinoma a biologically different disease? A propensity score-matched analysis. J Surg Oncol 120(6): 1023-1030, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/jso.25670
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Yildiz G,
    2. Ayyildiz FA
    : Evaluation of the relationship between hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score and mortality in COPD exacerbation. Int J Gerontol 18(2): 108-112, 2024. DOI: 10.6890/IJGE.202404_18(2).0009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Cheng SP,
    2. Hsu YC,
    3. Liu CL,
    4. Liu TP,
    5. Chien MN,
    6. Wang TY,
    7. Lee JJ
    : Significance of allelic percentage of BRAF c.1799T > A (V600E) mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21 Suppl 21(S4): 619-626, 2014. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3723-5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Chang CY,
    3. Yang X,
    4. Zhou F,
    5. Liu J,
    6. Feng Z,
    7. Hu W
    : Leukemia inhibitory factor, a double-edged sword with therapeutic implications in human diseases. Mol Ther 31(2): 331-343, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.12.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Gianì F,
    2. Vella V,
    3. Tumino D,
    4. Malandrino P,
    5. Frasca F
    : The possible role of cancer stem cells in the resistance to kinase inhibitors of advanced thyroid cancer. Cancers (Basel) 12(8): 2249, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082249
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Lu Y,
    3. Li W,
    4. Liu P,
    5. Xu X
    : Acquired resistance to vemurafenib restrains thyroid cancer stem cell self-renewal by suppressing STAT3 activation. Cell Signal 133: 111845, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2025.111845
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Campennì A,
    2. Giovanella L,
    3. Siracusa M,
    4. Stipo ME,
    5. Alibrandi A,
    6. Cucinotta M,
    7. Ruggeri RM,
    8. Baldari S
    : Is malignant nodule topography an additional risk factor for metastatic disease in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer? Thyroid 24(11): 1607-1611, 2014. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2014.0217
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Lyu YS,
    2. Pyo JS,
    3. Cho WJ,
    4. Kim SY,
    5. Kim JH
    : Clinicopathological significance of papillary thyroid carcinoma located in the isthmus: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 45(9): 2759-2768, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06178-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Marini A,
    2. Chatzoglou T,
    3. Ntritsos G,
    4. Zakopoulou R,
    5. Iliou K,
    6. Kitsoulis P,
    7. Papanikolaou G,
    8. Asimakopoulos A,
    9. Varvarousis D
    : The prognostic role of lymphatic vessel density in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Diagn Progn 5(5): 542-551, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10468
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Jasim S,
    2. Golding A,
    3. Bimston D,
    4. Alshalalfa M,
    5. Chen Y,
    6. Jiang R,
    7. Hao Y,
    8. Huang J,
    9. Klopper JP,
    10. Kloos RT,
    11. Brown TC
    : Cytologic and molecular assessment of isthmus thyroid nodules and carcinomas. Thyroid 35(3): 255-264, 2025. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2024.0254
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Grimm D,
    2. Kossmehl P,
    3. Shakibaei M,
    4. Schulze-Tanzil G,
    5. Pickenhahn H,
    6. Bauer J,
    7. Paul M,
    8. Cogoli A
    : Effects of simulated microgravity on thyroid carcinoma cells. J Gravit Physiol 9(1): P253-P256, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Wang F,
    2. Chang HM,
    3. Yi Y,
    4. Li H,
    5. Leung PCK
    : TGF-β1 promotes hyaluronan synthesis by upregulating hyaluronan synthase 2 expression in human granulosa-lutein cells. Cell Signal 63: 109392, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109392
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Miyake R,
    2. Takeyama H,
    3. Manome Y,
    4. Koyama M,
    5. Tabei I,
    6. Shioya H,
    7. Kazama T,
    8. Nogi H
    : Thyroid cancer with autocrine sialyl-fibronectin depletion has a poor prognosis due to EMT progression. Anticancer Res 44(10): 4561-4568, 2024. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17285
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Arczewska KD,
    2. Sys D,
    3. Nilsen HL,
    4. Piekiełko-Witkowska A
    : DNA damage and repair in thyroid physiology and disease. Endocr Rev 47(1): 121-157, 2026. DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnaf035
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Lee JJ,
    2. Hsu YC,
    3. Kuo CY,
    4. Huang SY,
    5. Chang SC,
    6. Cheng SP
    : A TIMELESS link to dedifferentiation in thyroid cancer. J Endocrinol 267(1): e250136, 2025. DOI: 10.1530/JOE-25-0136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Tang D,
    2. Wu D,
    3. Hirao A,
    4. Lahti JM,
    5. Liu L,
    6. Mazza B,
    7. Kidd VJ,
    8. Mak TW,
    9. Ingram AJ
    : ERK activation mediates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis after DNA damage independently of p53. J Biol Chem 277(15): 12710-12717, 2002. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111598200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Genomics - Proteomics: 23 (3)
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Vol. 23, Issue 3
May-June 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Genomics & Proteomics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of Isthmus Topography on the Molecular Characteristics of BRAF-mutant Papillary Thyroid Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Genomics & Proteomics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effects of Isthmus Topography on the Molecular Characteristics of BRAF-mutant Papillary Thyroid Cancer
CHI-YU KUO, SHEENA YI-HSIN CHENG, YI-CHIUNG HSU, SHIH-PING CHENG
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics May 2026, 23 (3) 470-482; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20585

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Effects of Isthmus Topography on the Molecular Characteristics of BRAF-mutant Papillary Thyroid Cancer
CHI-YU KUO, SHEENA YI-HSIN CHENG, YI-CHIUNG HSU, SHIH-PING CHENG
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics May 2026, 23 (3) 470-482; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20585
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrated Proteomics Reveal ALDH1A1 as an Oncogenic Driver and Regulatory Hub in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • LGALS3BP Links Centrosomes and Mitochondria to Maintain Energetic Fitness and Restrain Compensatory Lipid Catabolic Reprogramming in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Proteomic Profiling Reveals HECTD4-dependent Regulation of Protein Ubiquitination and Signaling Pathways in Prostate Cancer
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • BRAF mutation
  • isthmus
  • papillary thyroid cancer
  • propensity score matching
  • The Cancer Genome Atlas
Cancer & Genome Proteomics

© 2026 Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Powered by HighWire