Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleArticles
Open Access

Serum Exosomes Expressing CD9, CD63 and HER2 From Breast-Cancer Patients Decreased After Surgery of the Primary Tumor: A Potential Biomarker of Tumor Burden

SACHIKO INUBUSHI, TOMONARI KUNIHISA, MARINA KUNIYASU, SHOTARO INOUE, MAYUKO YAMAMOTO, YUJI YAMASHITA, MAYUKO MIKI, SACHIKO MIZUMOTO, MOTOI BABA, ROBERT M. HOFFMAN and HIROKAZU TANINO
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics November 2024, 21 (6) 580-584; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20474
SACHIKO INUBUSHI
1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sachiko_inubushi{at}people.kobe-u.ac.jp
TOMONARI KUNIHISA
1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARINA KUNIYASU
1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHOTARO INOUE
1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAYUKO YAMAMOTO
1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUJI YAMASHITA
1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAYUKO MIKI
1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SACHIKO MIZUMOTO
1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MOTOI BABA
1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERT M. HOFFMAN
2AntiCancer Inc, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
3Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROKAZU TANINO
4Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory and Breast Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Exosomes are extracellular vesicles produced by both normal and cancer cells. Previous research has demonstrated that circulating exosomes derived from cancer cells may create a niche for future metastasis, distant from the primary tumor. In the present report, circulating exosomes were captured and quantified based on exosome-surface proteins in pre- and post-operative serum of breast cancer patients, focusing on the exosome markers CD9 and CD63, as well as HER2, a therapeutic target for breast cancer. Materials and Methods: Eight breast cancer patients were recruited, and their pre- and post-operative serum samples were analyzed for CD63 and CD9; or CD9 and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), double-positive exosomes. An ExoCounter with antibody-conjugated beads was used to capture serum-derived exosomes. Sera from patients with tumors larger than 10 mm were used for analysis. The resected breast cancer was also histopathologically analyzed for the presence of HER2. Results: CD63 and CD9 double-positive serum exosomes and CD9 and HER2 double-positive serum exosomes decreased after surgery in breast-cancer patients whose tumors expressed HER2, as determined by histopathological analysis. Conclusion: Serum exosomes expressing CD9, CD63 and HER2 are candidate biomarkers of tumor burden in HER2-positive breast-cancer patients.

Key Words:
  • Exosomes
  • cancer cells
  • breast cancer
  • CD63
  • CD9
  • HER2
  • serum
  • mastectomy
  • tumor burden
  • biomarker

Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles surrounded by a lipid bilayer, approximately 30-150 nm in size, that are secreted by both normal and cancer cells and contain donor-cell-derived components both inside and on the surface (1, 2). Exosomes containing miRNA, mRNA and proteins, serve as mediators of intracellular communication (3-5). Cancer cells secrete exosomes into the tumor microenvironment, which are incorporated into cancer-associated cells (6). Exosomes secreted form cancer cells can also form a metastatic niche in distant organs (7, 8). Exosomes have also been found in various body fluids, including serum, urine, saliva, and tears (9-12). Exosomes in these body fluids are potential biomarkers for cancer diagnostics and treatment.

In the present study, we show that serum exosomes, expressing CD9, CD63 and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) on their surface and captured with specific antibodies, are reduced after surgery of the primary tumor, expressing HER2, of breast-cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

Clinical samples. The present study was approved by the Human Experimentation Committee of Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine and was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. The present study was also approved by the Human Experimentation Committee of Kobe University (B210056). All patients have provided written informed consent. Patients with a primary breast-tumor diameter greater than 10 mm were eligible for the present study. Post-operative serum was collected between 11-41 days after the date of surgery (Table I).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

HER2 status in 8 patients. Tumor size and number of lymph node metastases are also described.

All samples were stored at −80°C and thawed on ice before exosome analyses. Serum samples were visually checked for hemolysis, and only hemolysis-free samples were used. HER2 staining was performed using a Roshe test kit (Roshe Diagnostics GmcH, Mannnheim, Germany) in the pathology laboratory of Kobe University Hospital. HER2- immunohistochemistry (IHC) results were obtained from clinical pathology (13).

Preparation of HER2 antibody-conjugated nanobeads. Biotin labeling of HER2 antibody (sc-33684, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) was performed by binding to avidin-conjugated beads using the Biotin labeling kit-NH2 (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Avidin-conjugated beads were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Biotinylated HER2 antibody was conjugated to avidin-conjugated beads, washed with PBS which was replaced with HEPES buffer before use.

Exosome quantification with an ExoCounter. The quantification of exosomes by an ExoCounter was performed as described previously (14, 15) (Figure 1). The wells, in which discs with antibodies specific for CD63 or CD9 were conjugated, were washed three times with PBS-T (PBS containing 0.05% Tween20), injected with blocking solution (PBS-T containing 1% BSA), incubated at 37°C for 30 min, and then washed three times with PBS-T. A total of 400 μl of blood were drawn from the patients by venipuncture. Then, 10 μl of serum were diluted in 40 μl of PBS and placed into each well, incubated at 37°C for 2 h, and then washed three times with PBS-T. Then, 50 μl of specific antibody conjugated beads in buffer were applied to each well, incubated at 37°C for 90 min, and washed three times with PBS-T. The wells were then washed with deionized water. Beads bound to exosomes on a disc were counted with the ExoCounter. The assay kit for the ExoCounter was purchased from JVC KENWOOD (BX-EAK1JA, BX-EAK2JA, Kanagawa, Japan) (15).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Schematic of the ExoCounter. Illustration of exosomes labeled with nanobeads on a disc. Each exosome is separated into grooves on an optical disc coated with an antibody specific for exosomes. The exosomes are also recognized by a single bead labeled with another exosome-specific antibody. Theoretically, one exosome per bead can be counted.

Statistical analysis. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to determine the difference between the two groups. Statistical analyses were performed using Statcel 4 Software (OMS Publishing Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

Results

CD63 and CD9 double-positive exosomes in the serum of pre- and post-operative breast-cancer patients. CD63 and CD9 are exosome-marker proteins that are used for measuring the number of exosomes in serum. The number of exosomes that were positive for both CD63 and CD9 was measured with the ExoCounter. The number of CD63- and CD9-positive exosomes from the serum of post-operative breast-cancer patient was significantly reduced compared to pre-operative serum (p<0.05) as measured with the ExoCounter (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Pre- and post-operative CD63 and CD9 double-positive serum exosome quantification. The left figure is displayed as a box-and-whisker diagram. The horizontal line represents the median. Box height represents the interquartile range, between the 75th and 25th percentile of individual fold-change. Data were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test (p<0.05). In addition, the right figure shows a line graph of pre- and post-operative changes for each patient.

CD9 and HER2 double-positive serum exosomes decreased after mastectomy. HER2-positive (IHC 1+, 2+, 3+) breast-cancer patients had decreased CD9 and HER2 double-positive exosomes after mastectomy (p<0.05) as measured with the ExoCounter (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Pre- and post-operative CD9 and HER2 double-positive serum exosome quantification. CD9 and HER2 double-positive exosomes in the serum of breast-cancer patients (n=5) were quantitated pre- and post-operatively. Data were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test (p<0.05).

Discussion

Cancer cells secrete exosomes around the tumor and into the bloodstream and use them as mediators of intercellular communication (1, 3-5, 16, 17). Cancer-cell-derived exosomes also can form a niche in distant organs for future metastasis (7, 8, 18, 19). Thus, cancer-secreted exosomes could be used for diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of various cancers (20).

The present study analyzed pre- and post-operative serum exosomes of breast-cancer patients and the pathology of breast-cancer samples. The number of CD63 and CD9 double-positive exosomes in serum was significantly decreased after mastectomy. Previous reports have shown that CD9- and CD63- positive exosomes are highly associated with breast-cancer metastasis (21). There are also reports that there is a correlation between tumor volume and exosome volume (22), and we suggest that this is related to the postoperative decrease of CD9- and CD63- double-positive exosomes.

Breast-cancer patients expressing HER2 in their primary tumor, determined by histopathology, had decreased CD9 and HER2 double-positive exosomes after mastectomy. CD9 and HER2 double-positive exosome levels were unchanged pre and post-operatively in HER2-IHC-negative (o) breast-cancer samples.

We have reported that methionine restriction increases exosome secretion from cancer cells (23). This suggests that further research is needed on the effect of patient’s nutritional status on serum exosome levels.

Recently, micro-residual disease (MRD) analyses have been performed using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) (24), and the detection of exosomes in serum may also be useful to detect early recurrence of HER2-positive (IHC 1+, 2+, 3+) breast cancer. In addition, more than 80% of primary breast cancers are HER2-positive (IHC 1+, 2+, 3+), making HER2 on the surface of exosomes a promising target for detecting breast cancer (25).

Analysis of the number of exosomes that are positive for both CD63 and CD9, and the number of exosomes that are positive for both CD9 and HER2, are thus candidates as biomarkers for breast-cancer tumor burden. Further research is necessary.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Dr. Yasuaki Kabe for useful advice. The Authors thank Sysmex co. and JVC KENWOOD Co. for cooperation.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conception and design: SI, HT. Performed the experiments: SI. Sample collection: TK, MK, SI, MY, MO, YY, MM, SM, MB. Manuscript writing: SI and RMH. Approval of manuscript: All Authors.

  • Funding

    This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (21K07176, 24K02688).

  • Received June 21, 2024.
  • Revision received July 23, 2024.
  • Accepted August 18, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ratajczak J,
    2. Wysoczynski M,
    3. Hayek F,
    4. Janowska-Wieczorek A,
    5. Ratajczak MZ
    : Membrane-derived microvesicles: important and underappreciated mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Leukemia 20(9): 1487-1495, 2006. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404296
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Tan A,
    2. Rajadas J,
    3. Seifalian AM
    : Exosomes as nano-theranostic delivery platforms for gene therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(3): 357-367, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Hannafon BN,
    2. Ding WQ
    : Intercellular communication by exosome-derived microRNAs in cancer. Int J Mol Sci 14(7): 14240-14269, 2013. DOI: 10.3390/ijms140714240
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hong BS,
    2. Cho JH,
    3. Kim H,
    4. Choi EJ,
    5. Rho S,
    6. Kim J,
    7. Kim JH,
    8. Choi DS,
    9. Kim YK,
    10. Hwang D,
    11. Gho YS
    : Colorectal cancer cell-derived microvesicles are enriched in cell cycle-related mRNAs that promote proliferation of endothelial cells. BMC Genomics 10: 556, 2009. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-556
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Valadi H,
    2. Ekström K,
    3. Bossios A,
    4. Sjöstrand M,
    5. Lee JJ,
    6. Lötvall JO
    : Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol 9(6): 654-659, 2007. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1596
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Suetsugu A,
    2. Honma K,
    3. Saji S,
    4. Moriwaki H,
    5. Ochiya T,
    6. Hoffman RM
    : Imaging exosome transfer from breast cancer cells to stroma at metastatic sites in orthotopic nude-mouse models. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(3): 383-390, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hood JL,
    2. San RS,
    3. Wickline SA
    : Exosomes released by melanoma cells prepare sentinel lymph nodes for tumor metastasis. Cancer Res 71(11): 3792-3801, 2011. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4455
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Hoshino A,
    2. Costa-Silva B,
    3. Shen TL,
    4. Rodrigues G,
    5. Hashimoto A,
    6. Tesic Mark M,
    7. Molina H,
    8. Kohsaka S,
    9. Di Giannatale A,
    10. Ceder S,
    11. Singh S,
    12. Williams C,
    13. Soplop N,
    14. Uryu K,
    15. Pharmer L,
    16. King T,
    17. Bojmar L,
    18. Davies AE,
    19. Ararso Y,
    20. Zhang T,
    21. Zhang H,
    22. Hernandez J,
    23. Weiss JM,
    24. Dumont-Cole VD,
    25. Kramer K,
    26. Wexler LH,
    27. Narendran A,
    28. Schwartz GK,
    29. Healey JH,
    30. Sandstrom P,
    31. Labori KJ,
    32. Kure EH,
    33. Grandgenett PM,
    34. Hollingsworth MA,
    35. de Sousa M,
    36. Kaur S,
    37. Jain M,
    38. Mallya K,
    39. Batra SK,
    40. Jarnagin WR,
    41. Brady MS,
    42. Fodstad O,
    43. Muller V,
    44. Pantel K,
    45. Minn AJ,
    46. Bissell MJ,
    47. Garcia BA,
    48. Kang Y,
    49. Rajasekhar VK,
    50. Ghajar CM,
    51. Matei I,
    52. Peinado H,
    53. Bromberg J,
    54. Lyden D
    : Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature 527(7578): 329-335, 2015. DOI: 10.1038/nature15756
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Dimov I,
    2. Jankovic Velickovic L,
    3. Stefanovic V
    : Urinary exosomes. ScientificWorldJournal 9: 1107-1118, 2009. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2009.128
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Kang GY,
    2. Bang JY,
    3. Choi AJ,
    4. Yoon J,
    5. Lee WC,
    6. Choi S,
    7. Yoon S,
    8. Kim HC,
    9. Baek JH,
    10. Park HS,
    11. Lim HJ,
    12. Chung H
    : Exosomal proteins in the aqueous humor as novel biomarkers in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. J Proteome Res 13(2): 581-595, 2014. DOI: 10.1021/pr400751k
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ogawa Y,
    2. Kanai-Azuma M,
    3. Akimoto Y,
    4. Kawakami H,
    5. Yanoshita R
    : Exosome-like vesicles with dipeptidyl peptidase IV in human saliva. Biol Pharm Bull 31(6): 1059-1062, 2008. DOI: 10.1248/bpb.31.1059
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Inubushi S,
    2. Kawaguchi H,
    3. Mizumoto S,
    4. Kunihisa T,
    5. Baba M,
    6. Kitayama Y,
    7. Takeuchi T,
    8. Hoffman RM,
    9. Tanino H,
    10. Sasaki R
    : Oncogenic miRNAs identified in tear exosomes from metastatic breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res 40(6): 3091-3096, 2020. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14290
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Wolff AC,
    2. Hammond MEH,
    3. Allison KH,
    4. Harvey BE,
    5. Mangu PB,
    6. Bartlett JMS,
    7. Bilous M,
    8. Ellis IO,
    9. Fitzgibbons P,
    10. Hanna W,
    11. Jenkins RB,
    12. Press MF,
    13. Spears PA,
    14. Vance GH,
    15. Viale G,
    16. McShane LM,
    17. Dowsett M
    : Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol 36(20): 2105-2122, 2018. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8738
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kabe Y,
    2. Suematsu M,
    3. Sakamoto S,
    4. Hirai M,
    5. Koike I,
    6. Hishiki T,
    7. Matsuda A,
    8. Hasegawa Y,
    9. Tsujita K,
    10. Ono M,
    11. Minegishi N,
    12. Hozawa A,
    13. Murakami Y,
    14. Kubo M,
    15. Itonaga M,
    16. Handa H
    : Development of a highly sensitive device for counting the number of disease-specific exosomes in human sera. Clin Chem 64(10): 1463-1473, 2018. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.291963
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Ono M,
    2. Zhang H,
    3. Sone H,
    4. Itonaga M
    : Multiplex quantification of exosomes via multiple types of nanobeads labeling combined with laser scanning detection. Anal Chem 95(42): 15577-15584, 2023. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02374
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Al-Nedawi K,
    2. Meehan B,
    3. Micallef J,
    4. Lhotak V,
    5. May L,
    6. Guha A,
    7. Rak J
    : Intercellular transfer of the oncogenic receptor EGFRvIII by microvesicles derived from tumour cells. Nat Cell Biol 10(5): 619-624, 2008. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1725
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Skog J,
    2. Würdinger T,
    3. van Rijn S,
    4. Meijer DH,
    5. Gainche L,
    6. Sena-Esteves M,
    7. Curry WT Jr.,
    8. Carter BS,
    9. Krichevsky AM,
    10. Breakefield XO
    : Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol 10(12): 1470-1476, 2008. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1800
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Jung T,
    2. Castellana D,
    3. Klingbeil P,
    4. Cuesta Hernández I,
    5. Vitacolonna M,
    6. Orlicky DJ,
    7. Roffler SR,
    8. Brodt P,
    9. Zöller M
    : CD44v6 dependence of premetastatic niche preparation by exosomes. Neoplasia 11(10): 1093-1105, 2009. DOI: 10.1593/neo.09822
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. McCready J,
    2. Sims JD,
    3. Chan D,
    4. Jay DG
    : Secretion of extracellular hsp90alpha via exosomes increases cancer cell motility: a role for plasminogen activation. BMC Cancer 10: 294, 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-294
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Hoshino A,
    2. Kim HS,
    3. Bojmar L,
    4. Gyan KE,
    5. Cioffi M,
    6. Hernandez J,
    7. Zambirinis CP,
    8. Rodrigues G,
    9. Molina H,
    10. Heissel S,
    11. Mark MT,
    12. Steiner L,
    13. Benito-Martin A,
    14. Lucotti S,
    15. Di Giannatale A,
    16. Offer K,
    17. Nakajima M,
    18. Williams C,
    19. Nogués L,
    20. Pelissier Vatter FA,
    21. Hashimoto A,
    22. Davies AE,
    23. Freitas D,
    24. Kenific CM,
    25. Ararso Y,
    26. Buehring W,
    27. Lauritzen P,
    28. Ogitani Y,
    29. Sugiura K,
    30. Takahashi N,
    31. Alečković M,
    32. Bailey KA,
    33. Jolissant JS,
    34. Wang H,
    35. Harris A,
    36. Schaeffer LM,
    37. García-Santos G,
    38. Posner Z,
    39. Balachandran VP,
    40. Khakoo Y,
    41. Raju GP,
    42. Scherz A,
    43. Sagi I,
    44. Scherz-Shouval R,
    45. Yarden Y,
    46. Oren M,
    47. Malladi M,
    48. Petriccione M,
    49. De Braganca KC,
    50. Donzelli M,
    51. Fischer C,
    52. Vitolano S,
    53. Wright GP,
    54. Ganshaw L,
    55. Marrano M,
    56. Ahmed A,
    57. DeStefano J,
    58. Danzer E,
    59. Roehrl MHA,
    60. Lacayo NJ,
    61. Vincent TC,
    62. Weiser MR,
    63. Brady MS,
    64. Meyers PA,
    65. Wexler LH,
    66. Ambati SR,
    67. Chou AJ,
    68. Slotkin EK,
    69. Modak S,
    70. Roberts SS,
    71. Basu EM,
    72. Diolaiti D,
    73. Krantz BA,
    74. Cardoso F,
    75. Simpson AL,
    76. Berger M,
    77. Rudin CM,
    78. Simeone DM,
    79. Jain M,
    80. Ghajar CM,
    81. Batra SK,
    82. Stanger BZ,
    83. Bui J,
    84. Brown KA,
    85. Rajasekhar VK,
    86. Healey JH,
    87. de Sousa M,
    88. Kramer K,
    89. Sheth S,
    90. Baisch J,
    91. Pascual V,
    92. Heaton TE,
    93. La Quaglia MP,
    94. Pisapia DJ,
    95. Schwartz R,
    96. Zhang H,
    97. Liu Y,
    98. Shukla A,
    99. Blavier L,
    100. DeClerck YA,
    101. LaBarge M,
    102. Bissell MJ,
    103. Caffrey TC,
    104. Grandgenett PM,
    105. Hollingsworth MA,
    106. Bromberg J,
    107. Costa-Silva B,
    108. Peinado H,
    109. Kang Y,
    110. Garcia BA,
    111. O’Reilly EM,
    112. Kelsen D,
    113. Trippett TM,
    114. Jones DR,
    115. Matei IR,
    116. Jarnagin WR,
    117. Lyden D
    : Extracellular vesicle and particle biomarkers define multiple human cancers. Cell 182(4): 1044-1061.e18, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Nishida-Aoki N,
    2. Tominaga N,
    3. Takeshita F,
    4. Sonoda H,
    5. Yoshioka Y,
    6. Ochiya T
    : Disruption of circulating extracellular vesicles as a novel therapeutic strategy against cancer metastasis. Mol Ther 25(1): 181-191, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.10.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ferguson S,
    2. Weissleder R
    : Modeling EV kinetics for use in early cancer detection. Adv Biosyst 4(12): e1900305, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/adbi.201900305
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Inubushi S,
    2. Kunihisa T,
    3. Mizumoto S,
    4. Inoue S,
    5. Miki M,
    6. Suetsugu A,
    7. Tanino H,
    8. Hoffman RM
    : Methionine restriction increases exosome production and secretion in breast cancer cells. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 20(5): 412-416, 2023. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20393
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Panet F,
    2. Papakonstantinou A,
    3. Borrell M,
    4. Vivancos J,
    5. Vivancos A,
    6. Oliveira M
    : Use of ctDNA in early breast cancer: analytical validity and clinical potential. NPJ Breast Cancer 10(1): 50, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00653-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Horisawa N,
    2. Adachi Y,
    3. Takatsuka D,
    4. Nozawa K,
    5. Endo Y,
    6. Ozaki Y,
    7. Sugino K,
    8. Kataoka A,
    9. Kotani H,
    10. Yoshimura A,
    11. Hattori M,
    12. Sawaki M,
    13. Iwata H
    : The frequency of low HER2 expression in breast cancer and a comparison of prognosis between patients with HER2-low and HER2-negative breast cancer by HR status. Breast Cancer 29(2): 234-241, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-021-01303-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Genomics - Proteomics: 21 (6)
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Vol. 21, Issue 6
November-December 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Genomics & Proteomics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Serum Exosomes Expressing CD9, CD63 and HER2 From Breast-Cancer Patients Decreased After Surgery of the Primary Tumor: A Potential Biomarker of Tumor Burden
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Genomics & Proteomics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Serum Exosomes Expressing CD9, CD63 and HER2 From Breast-Cancer Patients Decreased After Surgery of the Primary Tumor: A Potential Biomarker of Tumor Burden
SACHIKO INUBUSHI, TOMONARI KUNIHISA, MARINA KUNIYASU, SHOTARO INOUE, MAYUKO YAMAMOTO, YUJI YAMASHITA, MAYUKO MIKI, SACHIKO MIZUMOTO, MOTOI BABA, ROBERT M. HOFFMAN, HIROKAZU TANINO
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Nov 2024, 21 (6) 580-584; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20474

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Serum Exosomes Expressing CD9, CD63 and HER2 From Breast-Cancer Patients Decreased After Surgery of the Primary Tumor: A Potential Biomarker of Tumor Burden
SACHIKO INUBUSHI, TOMONARI KUNIHISA, MARINA KUNIYASU, SHOTARO INOUE, MAYUKO YAMAMOTO, YUJI YAMASHITA, MAYUKO MIKI, SACHIKO MIZUMOTO, MOTOI BABA, ROBERT M. HOFFMAN, HIROKAZU TANINO
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Nov 2024, 21 (6) 580-584; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20474
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Serum Extracellular Vesicles Double-positive for CD9 and CD147 or for CD9 and CD63 Decrease After Surgical Resection in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Potential Biomarkers of Residual Tumor
  • MiR-575 in Exosomes of Vaginal Discharge Is Downregulated in Ovarian Cancer Patients
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Elevated Stanniocalcin-1 Expression in Uveal Melanoma Predicts Poor Patient Prognosis
  • C1orf50 Drives Malignant Melanoma Progression Through the Regulation of Stemness
  • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Knockout of LYVE1 In Human Tongue Cancer Cells Reveals Transcriptomic Changes in Metastasis-associated Pathways
Show more Articles

Keywords

  • exosomes
  • cancer cells
  • Breast cancer
  • CD63
  • CD9
  • HER2
  • serum
  • mastectomy
  • tumor burden
  • biomarker
Cancer & Genome Proteomics

© 2026 Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Powered by HighWire