Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleArticles
Open Access

Localization of EGFR Mutations in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Tissues Using Mutation-specific PNA-DNA Probes

HAJIME SHIGETO, HARUO MIYATA, TADASHI ASHIZAWA, AKIRA IIZUKA, YASUFUMI KIKUCHI, CHIKAKO HOZUMI, CHIE MAEDA, KEN YAMAGUCHI, SHOHEI YAMAMURA and YASUTO AKIYAMA
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics July 2023, 20 (4) 375-382; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20389
HAJIME SHIGETO
1Health and Medical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Kagawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HARUO MIYATA
2Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TADASHI ASHIZAWA
2Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIRA IIZUKA
2Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUFUMI KIKUCHI
2Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIKAKO HOZUMI
2Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIE MAEDA
2Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEN YAMAGUCHI
3Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHOHEI YAMAMURA
1Health and Medical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Kagawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUTO AKIYAMA
2Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: y.akiyama{at}scchr.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schematic of the procedure for measuring positive staining based on our in-house developed algorithm using the Winroof imaging software. Area A was rated as the area staining positively with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) or antibody to cytokeratin. Area B was rated as the area staining positively for mutation-specific peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-DNA probes. Finally, the ratio of B to A was calculated. The difference in the ratio between DAPI staining and anti-cytokeratin antibody staining was statistically evaluated.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Comparison of mutation-specific peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-positive rate among epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer tissues in 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-positive area. Tissues from tumors developing from four non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines were stained with each EGFR mutation-specific PNA probe and DAPI. The PNA-positive rate in DAPI-stained cancer tissues was determined. The positive rate of staining for each PNA probe in three EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer tissues was compared with that in A549 tumors without EGFR mutation and statistically evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Statistically significantly different at: *p<0.05 and **p<0.001. Magnification: 200×. Green color in images: PNA-DNA probe; cyan color: DAPI.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Comparison of mutation-specific peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-positive rate among epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer tissues in cytokeratin-positive area. Tissues from tumors developing from four non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines were stained with each EGFR mutation-specific PNA probe and anti-cytokeratin. The PNA-positive rate in cytokeratin-stained cancer tissues was determined. The positive rate of staining for each PNA probe in three EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer tissues was compared with that in A549 tumors without EGFR mutations and statistically evaluated by the Mann-Whitney U-test. **Statistically significantly different at p<0.001. Magnification: 200×. Green color in images: PNA-DNA probe; orange color: cytokeratin.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Comparison of the cytokeratin-positive rate among non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines in the peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-DNA probe and cytokeratin staining experiments. Each panel shows the cytokeratin-positive rate in four lung cancer tissues stained with each PNA-DNA probe. Each column shows the mean±standard deviation from images of 10 areas in the stained slides. The positive rate of cytokeratin staining was compared among tissues from tumors developing from four non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Magnification: 200×.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Staining with peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-DNA probe in normal human lung tissues and comparison of PNA-DNA probe staining with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-specific antibody (Ab) staining in four lung cancer tissues. A: Images of hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and EGFR mutation-specific PNA probe staining in normal human lung tissues. Magnification: 200×. B: Comparison of EGFR mutation (L858R)-specific PNA probe staining of non-small-cell lung cancer tissues with EGFR L858R monoclonal antibody staining. Green color in images: PNA-DNA probe; orange color: cytokeratin. Magnification: 200×.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Correlation analysis of the positive rates of peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-DNA probe staining and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (L858R)-specific antibody staining in NCI-H1975 tumor tissue. The positive rates of PNA-DNA probe and anti-EGFR L858R from 10 images were plotted. Correlation between the staining ability of the PNA-DNA probe and anti-EGFR L858R was statistically evaluated using Pearson correlation analysis. Magnification: 200×.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table I.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Genomics - Proteomics: 20 (4)
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Vol. 20, Issue 4
July-August 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Genomics & Proteomics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Localization of EGFR Mutations in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Tissues Using Mutation-specific PNA-DNA Probes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Genomics & Proteomics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Localization of EGFR Mutations in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Tissues Using Mutation-specific PNA-DNA Probes
HAJIME SHIGETO, HARUO MIYATA, TADASHI ASHIZAWA, AKIRA IIZUKA, YASUFUMI KIKUCHI, CHIKAKO HOZUMI, CHIE MAEDA, KEN YAMAGUCHI, SHOHEI YAMAMURA, YASUTO AKIYAMA
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Jul 2023, 20 (4) 375-382; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20389

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Localization of EGFR Mutations in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Tissues Using Mutation-specific PNA-DNA Probes
HAJIME SHIGETO, HARUO MIYATA, TADASHI ASHIZAWA, AKIRA IIZUKA, YASUFUMI KIKUCHI, CHIKAKO HOZUMI, CHIE MAEDA, KEN YAMAGUCHI, SHOHEI YAMAMURA, YASUTO AKIYAMA
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Jul 2023, 20 (4) 375-382; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20389
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1 Genotypes to Bladder Cancer Susceptibility
  • CD84 as a Prognostic Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer: Interconnections With PDL1, CD74, and Immune Tolerance Mechanisms
  • Serum Proteomic Signatures of Pregnancy-associated Breast Cancer
Show more Articles

Keywords

  • PNA-DNA probe
  • EGFR mutation
  • tumor heterogeneity
  • multicolor immunofluorescence
  • image analysis software
Cancer & Genome Proteomics

© 2026 Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Powered by HighWire