Research ArticleArticles
Open Access

Loss of F-Box and Leucine Rich Repeat Protein 5 (FBXL5) Expression Is Associated With Poor Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection: A Two-institute Study

YOON AH CHO, SUNG-EUN KIM, CHEOL KEUN PARK, HYUN HEE KOH, CHEOL-KEUN PARK and SANG YUN HA
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics May 2023, 20 (3) 298-307; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20382

Abstract

Background/Aim: Alteration of F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 5 (FBXL5), an iron-sensing ubiquitin ligase, might be related with carcinogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), by disturbing cellular iron homeostasis. However, the clinical implications of FBXL5 expression using patient samples need to be elucidated. Patients and Methods: We collected HCC tissue samples from two institutes: Samsung Medical Center (n=259) and Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital (n=115) and evaluated FBXL5 expression using immunohistochemistry. Using cut-off values determined by X-tile software, association between FBXL5 expression and several clinicopathological parameters was investigated. For external validation, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort was used. Results: The best cutoff value for FBXL5 IHC expression associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 5%. Low FBXL5 expression was found in 18.7% of the total 374 HCCs and was associated with non-viral etiology (p=0.019). Low FBXL5 expression was related with inferior disease-specific survival (DSS, p=0.002) and RFS (p=0.001) and also was an independent prognostic factor for DSS and RFS. In addition, cases with low FBLX5 mRNA levels showed inferior DSS and RFS (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively) compared to high FBLX5 mRNA levels in the TCGA cohort. Conclusion: Down-regulation of FBXL5 expression in HCCs might be associated with poor prognosis. FBXL5 might be a prognostic biomarker of HCCs and a potential therapeutic target in conjunction with iron homeostasis.

Key Words

Owing to high tumor recurrence, metastasis, and lack of treatment options, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) show poor prognosis (1). Advances in molecular biology techniques (2-7) and multiple clinical trials have led to the approval of multiple drugs, including multikinase inhibitors and immunotherapy, by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (8). However, the limited treatment effect of targeted therapy and immune inhibitors necessitates the investigation of novel therapeutic targets and reliable biomarkers for more effective HCC treatments (8, 9).

Disturbances in cellular iron homeostasis are known to be related to hepatocarcinogenesis (10). Individuals with hereditary hemochromatosis have a 200-fold greater risk of developing HCC than the general population (11). Excessive hepatic iron is a risk factor for HCC development in patients with various etiologies, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (12, 13), hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (14), hepatitis B virus infection (15, 16) and alcoholic cirrhosis (17).

F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 5 (FBXL5), along with iron regulatory protein 2 (IRP2), is known to be involved in regulating cellular iron levels (18). Previous studies using FBXL5 knockout mice revealed iron accumulation in the liver and steatohepatitis (18), higher HCC incidence, and increased tumor size compared to FBXL5 intact mice, indicating that deficiency of FBXL5 is involved in hepatic carcinogenesis (19). Alterations in iron metabolism-related proteins seem to be related with the prognosis of diverse cancers, such as prostate, breast, pancreatic and esophageal cancer, and renal cell carcinoma (20-24). However, FBXL5 expression and its clinical implications have not yet been reported in samples from patients with HCC.

In this study, we investigated FBXL5 expression in HCC patient samples collected from two institutes and evaluated its prognostic effect as well as its association with clinicopathological parameters.

Patients and Methods

Patients and samples. Samples were collected from two independent institutes under identical inclusion criteria: 1) no history of prior treatment for HCC before surgery, 2) histologically confirmed HCC, and 3) complete tumor resection with clear resection margins.

In Samsung Medical Center (SMC), Seoul, Republic of Korea, between July 2000 and May 2006, a total of 291 patients had curative resection for primary HCC. After excluding eight patients with preoperative local treatment, such as radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, or radiotherapy, and 24 patients with insufficient tissue on tissue microarray, 259 patients were included in this study. In Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital (HUMC), Anyang, Republic of Korea, 115 patients treated with surgical resection as first-line treatment for HCC between January 2011 and December 2015, satisfied all the inclusion criteria and were all selected.

All the included samples were histologically confirmed and showed negative resection margins. Curative resection was defined as the absence of residual tumor one month after surgery. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, 8th edition (25) and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification (26) were used for tumor staging. Definition for intrahepatic metastasis and multicentric occurrence were determined by previously reported criteria (27). All patients were followed-up every 3 months after the operation, with three-phase dynamic computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance imaging and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. Optimal treatment was administered when tumor recurrence was confirmed by these examinations. Patient death was established based on death certificates or telephone follow-up. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) or disease-specific survival (DSS) was defined as the difference between the date of surgery and the date of recurrence or HCC-related death, respectively, as previously described (28).

The Institutional Review Boards of SMC (2021-04-151) and HUMC (2021-09-008-001) approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent.

Immunohistochemical studies. Using tissue microarray consisting of two 2 mm cores of HCC tissue, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed as previously described (29). After antigen retrieval using 100 ml of ER1 buffer (Leica Biosystems, Melbourne, Australia), the sections were incubated with rabbit anti-FBXL5 antibody (ab140175, 1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, USA) for 60 min in a Bond-max autoimmunostainer (Leica Biosystems). Antigen-antibody chromogenic reactions were developed for 10 min using the BondTM Polymer Refine Detection Kit DS9800 (Vision Biosystems, Melbourne, Australia). Normal muscular tissue was used as a positive control. Immunostaining intensity was evaluated as negative, faint, moderate (light brown) and strong (dark brown), as previously described (30, 31). Representative pictures of each staining intensity are presented in Figure 1. Moderate to strong cytoplasmic intensity of FBXL5 IHC staining was considered positive, and the proportion of positive staining among the tumors was assessed.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Representative figures of FBXL5 immunohistochemistry. Tumor cells show cytoplasmic staining: negative (A), faint (B), moderate (C), and strong staining (D). The scale bar indicates 500 μm.

mRNA expression of FBXL5 using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. To investigate the relationship between mRNA expression of FBXL5 and various clinicopathological factors, public data from TCGA database were used. The association of FBXL5 expression with DSS and RFS was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier (KM)-plotter database in liver cancer (http://kmplot.com/analysis) (32).

Statistical analysis. The cut-off value of FBXL5 expression with the most significant difference in RFS was calculated using the X-tile bioinformatics software (Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA) (33). For analyzing the relationships between FBXL5 expression and clinicopathological parameters, Pearson’s chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, or Cochran Armitage test were used, as appropriate. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze survival rates, and differences were compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was applied for multivariate regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. The IBM SPSS software for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

FBXL5 IHC staining in HCC in conjunction with clinicopathologic features. FBXL5 IHC showed cytoplasmic expression, and its intensity and proportion of expression varied among the HCC cases. No staining or faint intensity of FBXL5 staining was considered negative (Figure 1A and B), whereas moderate to strong intensity of FBXL5 staining was considered positive (Figure 1C and D). The proportion of positive staining in HCCs ranged from 0 to 100%, with a mean of 56.59% and a median of 60.00%. Using X-tile analysis (33), the best cutoff value for FBXL5 IHC expression associated with RFS was 5%. Low FBXL5 IHC expression was observed in 18.7% of the 374 HCCs and was more frequently observed in HCC with non-viral etiology than in HCC with viral etiology (30% vs. 16.6%, p=0.019, Table I). This correlation was also significant when analyzed separately by institutes (Table II).

View this table:
Table I.

Clinicopathological features of the total 374 hepatocellular carcinoma cases associated with FBXL5 expression.

View this table:
Table II.

Clinicopathological characteristics of FBXL5 expression in the Samsung Medical Center and Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital cohort.

Impact of FBXL5 expression on the survival of HCC patients Patients with low expression of FBXL5 IHC showed shorter RFS (p=0.001, Figure 2A) and DSS (p=0.002, Figure 2B) in a total of 374 cases. This result was consistent when each cohort was analyzed separately (p<0.05, Figure 2C-F). In univariate analysis, low FBXL5 expression was an independent prognostic factor for DSS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.934, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.259-2.970, p=0.003] and RFS (HR=1.728, 95% CI=1.271-2.349, p<0.001) among tumor size, microvascular invasion, major portal invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, pathologic T stage, BCLC stage, serum albumin level, and serum AFP level (Table III). In multivariate analysis, low FBXL5 expression was an independent prognostic factor for DSS (HR=2.014, 95% CI=1.287-3.153, p=0.002) and RFS (HR=1.749, 95% CI=1.270-2.409, p=0.001) in the time-dependent Cox model, in addition to intrahepatic metastasis (Table III).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to FBXL5 expression in the total cohort (A-B). Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to FBXL5 expression in the Samsung Medical Center cohort (C-D). Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to FBXL5 expression in the Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital cohort (E-F).

View this table:
Table III.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of 374 hepatocellular carcinoma cases associated with FBXL5 expression.

When analyzing HCC patients of the TCGA data set using KM-plotter (using ‘autoselect best cut-off’), cases with low FBXL5 mRNA expression showed shorter RFS and DSS than those with high FBXL5 mRNA expression (Figure 3A and B; p<0.001 for RFS and DSS).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to FBXL5 mRNA expression of the TCGA dataset using KM-plotter (A-B).

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that low FBXL5 expression was associated with shorter RFS and DSS in a large cohort of HCC patients from two different institutes with long-term follow-up. In addition, low FBXL5 mRNA expression was associated with lower RFS and DSS in the TCGA dataset.

Iron is inevitable in many physiological phases, such as DNA synthesis and mitochondrial oxidative metabolism, and some cancers have alternative pathways to control cellular iron balance (19). An in vivo study revealed that cellular iron levels are regulated by FBXL5 and IRP2 (18). Under iron-replete conditions, ubiquitylation, and degradation of IRP2 are mediated by the SCFFBXL5 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, and FBXL5 is used as a substrate recognition component for IRP2. FBXL5 is stabilized when iron binds to the hemerythrin domain of FBXL5; otherwise, FBXL5 is unstable under iron-deficient conditions. FBXL5 controls IRP2 expression in an iron-dependent manner (34, 35). FBXL5 deficient mice show failure to sense increased cellular iron availability, leading to consecutive accumulation of IRP2 and aberrant expression of its target genes. In addition, FBXL5-null mice show early embryonic mortality due to extreme oxidative stress, suggesting that FBXL5 is an essential factor in cellular iron homeostasis during early embryogenesis (18, 36).

Previous studies using FBXL5 knockout mice revealed iron accumulation in the liver and steatohepatitis (18), higher HCC incidence, and bigger tumor size compared to FBXL5 intact mice, indicating that deficiency of FBXL5 is involved in hepatic carcinogenesis (19). In addition, hepcidin expression is down-regulated in FBXL5-deficient mice (18). FBXL5 also plays role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), in relation to Snail polyubiquitination, decreasing Snail protein stability (37, 38). One study showed microRNA miR-1306-3p targets FBXL5 and inhibits Snail degradation to promote EMT, leading to metastasis in HCC (39).

In this study, we first report that low expression of FBXL5 is related to inferior prognosis of HCC in cohorts from two institutes, as well as in the TCGA cohort. These results are consistent with previous in vivo mouse experiments, and our study provides clinical evidence suggesting that FBXL5 is a potential therapeutic target for HCC.

Interestingly, low FBXL5 expression was more frequently found in HCC with non-viral etiology than in those with viral etiology. The association between FBXL5 expression and specific etiology is provided in Table IV. There have been only a few studies on FBXL5 expression in specific liver diseases. It has been reported that FBXL5 depletion induced steatohepatitis (18) and hepatocellular carcinoma (19). Several studies have revealed FBXL5 mRNA or hepcidin levels are reduced in HCV patients (40-42), suggesting that HCV infection is associated with FBXL5 dysregulation. In this study, the frequency of low FBXL5 expression was 30.0% in HCC patients with non-viral etiology, 16.6% in those with viral etiology, and 14% in HCV patients. This discrepancy may be due to the relatively small number of patients with HCV infection in our cohort. Down-regulation of hepcidin expression is not a universal mechanism for hepatic iron overload in chronic liver diseases (43, 44). In addition, considering the association between low FBXL5 expression and non-viral etiology in our study, there may be other possible mechanisms causing iron overload in non-viral patients. However, further studies are needed to clarify the importance of FBXL5 in various liver diseases.

View this table:
Table IV.

The association between FBXL5 expression and etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in the total 374 hepatocellular carcinoma cases.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study revealed that low FBXL5 expression was more associated with non-viral etiology HCC and associated with poor DSS and RFS in two separate cohorts. In addition, the prognostic effect of FBXL5 expression was validated in an independent TCGA data set, which was composed of different ethnic groups. FBXL5 might be a prognostic biomarker of HCCs and a potential therapeutic target in conjunction with iron homeostasis.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HR20C0025), and an intramural grant from Samsung Medical Center (grant number: SMO1210411). The results published here are partly based on data generated by the TCGA Research Network (https://www.cancer.gov/tcga).

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    None of the Authors have any conflicts of interest to declare regarding this study.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conception and design: SYH; Acquisition of data: YAC, SEK, SYH; Analysis and interpretation of data: YAC, C-KP, HHK, CKP, SYH; Drafting the article: YAC, CKP, SYH. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Received January 25, 2023.
  • Revision received March 27, 2023.
  • Accepted April 3, 2023.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Villanueva A and
    2. Llovet JM
    : Targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 140(5): 1410-1426, 2011. PMID: 21406195. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network
    : Comprehensive and integrative genomic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 169(7): 1327-1341.e23, 2017. PMID: 28622513. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schulze K,
    2. Imbeaud S,
    3. Letouzé E,
    4. Alexandrov LB,
    5. Calderaro J,
    6. Rebouissou S,
    7. Couchy G,
    8. Meiller C,
    9. Shinde J,
    10. Soysouvanh F,
    11. Calatayud AL,
    12. Pinyol R,
    13. Pelletier L,
    14. Balabaud C,
    15. Laurent A,
    16. Blanc JF,
    17. Mazzaferro V,
    18. Calvo F,
    19. Villanueva A,
    20. Nault JC,
    21. Bioulac-Sage P,
    22. Stratton MR,
    23. Llovet JM and
    24. Zucman-Rossi J
    : Exome sequencing of hepatocellular carcinomas identifies new mutational signatures and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Genet 47(5): 505-511, 2015. PMID: 25822088. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3252
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hardy T and
    2. Mann DA
    : Epigenetics in liver disease: from biology to therapeutics. Gut 65(11): 1895-1905, 2016. PMID: 27624887. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311292
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Villanueva A,
    2. Portela A,
    3. Sayols S,
    4. Battiston C,
    5. Hoshida Y,
    6. Méndez-González J,
    7. Imbeaud S,
    8. Letouzé E,
    9. Hernandez-Gea V,
    10. Cornella H,
    11. Pinyol R,
    12. Solé M,
    13. Fuster J,
    14. Zucman-Rossi J,
    15. Mazzaferro V,
    16. Esteller M,
    17. Llovet JM and HEPTROMIC Consortium
    : DNA methylation-based prognosis and epidrivers in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 61(6): 1945-1956, 2015. PMID: 25645722. DOI: 10.1002/hep.27732
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wong CM,
    2. Tsang FH and
    3. Ng IO
    : Non-coding RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular functions and pathological implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(3): 137-151, 2018. PMID: 29317776. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Gao Q,
    2. Zhu H,
    3. Dong L,
    4. Shi W,
    5. Chen R,
    6. Song Z,
    7. Huang C,
    8. Li J,
    9. Dong X,
    10. Zhou Y,
    11. Liu Q,
    12. Ma L,
    13. Wang X,
    14. Zhou J,
    15. Liu Y,
    16. Boja E,
    17. Robles AI,
    18. Ma W,
    19. Wang P,
    20. Li Y,
    21. Ding L,
    22. Wen B,
    23. Zhang B,
    24. Rodriguez H,
    25. Gao D,
    26. Zhou H and
    27. Fan J
    : Integrated proteogenomic characterization of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 179(2): 561-577.e22, 2019. PMID: 31585088. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Luo XY,
    2. Wu KM and
    3. He XX
    : Advances in drug development for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical trials and potential therapeutic targets. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 40(1): 172, 2021. PMID: 34006331. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-021-01968-w
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Qin LX and
    2. Tang ZY
    : Recent progress in predictive biomarkers for metastatic recurrence of human hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of the literature. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 130(9): 497-513, 2004. PMID: 15205947. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-004-0572-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Farazi PA and
    2. DePinho RA
    : Hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis: from genes to environment. Nat Rev Cancer 6(9): 674-687, 2006. PMID: 16929323. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1934
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Niederau C,
    2. Fischer R,
    3. Pürschel A,
    4. Stremmel W,
    5. Häussinger D and
    6. Strohmeyer G
    : Long-term survival in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis. Gastroenterology 110(4): 1107-1119, 1996. PMID: 8613000. DOI: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8613000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Sorrentino P,
    2. D’Angelo S,
    3. Ferbo U,
    4. Micheli P,
    5. Bracigliano A and
    6. Vecchione R
    : Liver iron excess in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma developed on non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis. J Hepatol 50(2): 351-357, 2009. PMID: 19070395. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.09.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Valenti L,
    2. Fracanzani AL,
    3. Bugianesi E,
    4. Dongiovanni P,
    5. Galmozzi E,
    6. Vanni E,
    7. Canavesi E,
    8. Lattuada E,
    9. Roviaro G,
    10. Marchesini G and
    11. Fargion S
    : HFE genotype, parenchymal iron accumulation, and liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 138(3): 905-912, 2010. PMID: 19931264. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.11.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Chapoutot C,
    2. Esslimani M,
    3. Joomaye Z,
    4. Ramos J,
    5. Perney P,
    6. Laurent C,
    7. Fabbro-Peray P,
    8. Larrey D,
    9. Domergue J and
    10. Blanc F
    : Liver iron excess in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma developed on viral C cirrhosis. Gut 46(5): 711-714, 2000. PMID: 10764717. DOI: 10.1136/gut.46.5.711
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Martinelli AL,
    2. Filho AB,
    3. Franco RF,
    4. Tavella MH,
    5. Ramalho LN,
    6. Zucoloto S,
    7. Rodrigues SS and
    8. Zago MA
    : Liver iron deposits in hepatitis B patients: association with severity of liver disease but not with hemochromatosis gene mutations. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19(9): 1036-1041, 2004. PMID: 15304122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03410.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Mao W,
    2. Hu Y,
    3. Lou Y,
    4. Chen Y and
    5. Zhang J
    : Abnormal serum iron markers in chronic hepatitis B virus infection may be because of liver injury. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27(2): 130-136, 2015. PMID: 25419642. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000247
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Nahon P,
    2. Sutton A,
    3. Rufat P,
    4. Ziol M,
    5. Thabut G,
    6. Schischmanoff PO,
    7. Vidaud D,
    8. Charnaux N,
    9. Couvert P,
    10. Ganne-Carrie N,
    11. Trinchet JC,
    12. Gattegno L and
    13. Beaugrand M
    : Liver iron, HFE gene mutations, and hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 134(1): 102-110, 2008. PMID: 18061182. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.10.038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Moroishi T,
    2. Nishiyama M,
    3. Takeda Y,
    4. Iwai K and
    5. Nakayama KI
    : The FBXL5-IRP2 axis is integral to control of iron metabolism in vivo. Cell Metab 14(3): 339-351, 2011. PMID: 21907140. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.07.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Muto Y,
    2. Moroishi T,
    3. Ichihara K,
    4. Nishiyama M,
    5. Shimizu H,
    6. Eguchi H,
    7. Moriya K,
    8. Koike K,
    9. Mimori K,
    10. Mori M,
    11. Katayama Y and
    12. Nakayama KI
    : Disruption of FBXL5-mediated cellular iron homeostasis promotes liver carcinogenesis. J Exp Med 216(4): 950-965, 2019. PMID: 30877170. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20180900
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Xue D,
    2. Zhou CX,
    3. Shi YB,
    4. Lu H and
    5. He XZ
    : Decreased expression of ferroportin in prostate cancer. Oncol Lett 10(2): 913-916, 2015. PMID: 26622594. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3363
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pinnix ZK,
    2. Miller LD,
    3. Wang W,
    4. D’Agostino R Jr.,
    5. Kute T,
    6. Willingham MC,
    7. Hatcher H,
    8. Tesfay L,
    9. Sui G,
    10. Di X,
    11. Torti SV and
    12. Torti FM
    : Ferroportin and iron regulation in breast cancer progression and prognosis. Sci Transl Med 2(43): 43ra56, 2010. PMID: 20686179. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001127
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Toshiyama R,
    2. Konno M,
    3. Eguchi H,
    4. Asai A,
    5. Noda T,
    6. Koseki J,
    7. Asukai K,
    8. Ohashi T,
    9. Matsushita K,
    10. Iwagami Y,
    11. Yamada D,
    12. Asaoka T,
    13. Wada H,
    14. Kawamoto K,
    15. Gotoh K,
    16. Kudo T,
    17. Satoh T,
    18. Doki Y,
    19. Mori M and
    20. Ishii H
    : Association of iron metabolic enzyme hepcidin expression levels with the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. Oncol Lett 15(5): 8125-8133, 2018. PMID: 29731920. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8357
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Boult J,
    2. Roberts K,
    3. Brookes MJ,
    4. Hughes S,
    5. Bury JP,
    6. Cross SS,
    7. Anderson GJ,
    8. Spychal R,
    9. Iqbal T and
    10. Tselepis C
    : Overexpression of cellular iron import proteins is associated with malignant progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 14(2): 379-387, 2008. PMID: 18223212. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1054
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Park CK,
    2. Heo J,
    3. Ham WS,
    4. Choi YD,
    5. Shin SJ and
    6. Cho NH
    : Ferroportin and FBXL5 as prognostic markers in advanced stage clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 53(4): 1174-1183, 2021. PMID: 33735560. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Amin MB,
    2. Edge SB,
    3. Greene F,
    4. Byrd DR,
    5. Brookland RK,
    6. Washington MK,
    7. Gershenwald JE,
    8. Compton CC,
    9. Hess KR,
    10. Sullivan CD,
    11. Milburn Jessup J,
    12. Brierley JD,
    13. Gaspar LE,
    14. Schilsky RL,
    15. Balch CM,
    16. Winchester DP,
    17. Asare EA,
    18. Madera M,
    19. Gress DM and
    20. Meyer LR
    : AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th edn. New York, NY, USA, Springer, 2017.
  26. ↵
    1. Llovet JM,
    2. Brú C and
    3. Bruix J
    : Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19(3): 329-338, 1999. PMID: 10518312. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1007122
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Kumada T,
    2. Nakano S,
    3. Takeda I,
    4. Sugiyama K,
    5. Osada T,
    6. Kiriyama S,
    7. Sone Y,
    8. Toyoda H,
    9. Shimada S,
    10. Takahashi M and
    11. Sassa T
    : Patterns of recurrence after initial treatment in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 25(1): 87-92, 1997. PMID: 8985270. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.1997.v25.pm0008985270
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Ha SY,
    2. Kim JH,
    3. Yang JW,
    4. Kim J,
    5. Kim B and
    6. Park CK
    : The overexpression of CCAR1 in hepatocellular carcinoma associates with poor prognosis. Cancer Res Treat 48(3): 1065-1073, 2016. PMID: 26511806. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2015.302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Ha SY,
    2. Song DH,
    3. Lee JJ,
    4. Lee HW,
    5. Cho SY and
    6. Park CK
    : High expression of aldo-keto reductase 1B10 is an independent predictor of favorable prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut Liver 8(6): 648-654, 2014. PMID: 25287169. DOI: 10.5009/gnl13406
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Allred DC,
    2. Harvey JM,
    3. Berardo M and
    4. Clark GM
    : Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11(2): 155-168, 1998. PMID: 9504686.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Choudhury KR,
    2. Yagle KJ,
    3. Swanson PE,
    4. Krohn KA and
    5. Rajendran JG
    : A robust automated measure of average antibody staining in immunohistochemistry images. J Histochem Cytochem 58(2): 95-107, 2010. PMID: 19687472. DOI: 10.1369/jhc.2009.953554
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Menyhárt O,
    2. Nagy Á and
    3. Győrffy B
    : Determining consistent prognostic biomarkers of overall survival and vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. R Soc Open Sci 5(12): 181006, 2018. PMID: 30662724. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Camp RL,
    2. Dolled-Filhart M and
    3. Rimm DL
    : X-tile: a new bioinformatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res 10(21): 7252-7259, 2004. PMID: 15534099. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0713
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Salahudeen AA,
    2. Thompson JW,
    3. Ruiz JC,
    4. Ma HW,
    5. Kinch LN,
    6. Li Q,
    7. Grishin NV and
    8. Bruick RK
    : An E3 ligase possessing an iron-responsive hemerythrin domain is a regulator of iron homeostasis. Science 326(5953): 722-726, 2009. PMID: 19762597. DOI: 10.1126/science.1176326
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Vashisht AA,
    2. Zumbrennen KB,
    3. Huang X,
    4. Powers DN,
    5. Durazo A,
    6. Sun D,
    7. Bhaskaran N,
    8. Persson A,
    9. Uhlen M,
    10. Sangfelt O,
    11. Spruck C,
    12. Leibold EA and
    13. Wohlschlegel JA
    : Control of iron homeostasis by an iron-regulated ubiquitin ligase. Science 326(5953): 718-721, 2009. PMID: 19762596. DOI: 10.1126/science.1176333
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Ruiz JC,
    2. Walker SD,
    3. Anderson SA,
    4. Eisenstein RS and
    5. Bruick RK
    : F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 5 (FBXL5) is required for maintenance of cellular and systemic iron homeostasis. J Biol Chem 288(1): 552-560, 2013. PMID: 23135277. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.426171
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Viñas-Castells R,
    2. Frías Á,
    3. Robles-Lanuza E,
    4. Zhang K,
    5. Longmore GD,
    6. García de Herreros A and
    7. Díaz VM
    : Nuclear ubiquitination by FBXL5 modulates Snail1 DNA binding and stability. Nucleic Acids Res 42(2): 1079-1094, 2014. PMID: 24157836. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt935
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Muto Y,
    2. Nishiyama M,
    3. Nita A,
    4. Moroishi T and
    5. Nakayama KI
    : Essential role of FBXL5-mediated cellular iron homeostasis in maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Commun 8: 16114, 2017. PMID: 28714470. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16114
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. He ZJ,
    2. Li W,
    3. Chen H,
    4. Wen J,
    5. Gao YF and
    6. Liu YJ
    : miR-1306-3p targets FBXL5 to promote metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma through suppressing snail degradation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 504(4): 820-826, 2018. PMID: 30219228. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.059
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Nanba S,
    2. Ikeda F,
    3. Baba N,
    4. Takaguchi K,
    5. Senoh T,
    6. Nagano T,
    7. Seki H,
    8. Takeuchi Y,
    9. Moritou Y,
    10. Yasunaka T,
    11. Ohnishi H,
    12. Miyake Y,
    13. Takaki A,
    14. Nouso K,
    15. Iwasaki Y and
    16. Yamamoto K
    : Association of hepatic oxidative stress and iron dysregulation with HCC development after interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Pathol 69(3): 226-233, 2016. PMID: 26290259. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203215
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fujita N,
    2. Sugimoto R,
    3. Takeo M,
    4. Urawa N,
    5. Mifuji R,
    6. Tanaka H,
    7. Kobayashi Y,
    8. Iwasa M,
    9. Watanabe S,
    10. Adachi Y and
    11. Kaito M
    : Hepcidin expression in the liver: relatively low level in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Mol Med 13(1-2): 97-104, 2007. PMID: 17515961. DOI: 10.2119/2006-00057.Fujita
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Girelli D,
    2. Pasino M,
    3. Goodnough JB,
    4. Nemeth E,
    5. Guido M,
    6. Castagna A,
    7. Busti F,
    8. Campostrini N,
    9. Martinelli N,
    10. Vantini I,
    11. Corrocher R,
    12. Ganz T and
    13. Fattovich G
    : Reduced serum hepcidin levels in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 51(5): 845-852, 2009. PMID: 19729219. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.06.027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Britton LJ,
    2. Subramaniam VN and
    3. Crawford DH
    : Iron and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 22(36): 8112-8122, 2016. PMID: 27688653. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8112
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Tseng HH,
    2. Chang JG,
    3. Hwang YH,
    4. Yeh KT,
    5. Chen YL and
    6. Yu HS
    : Expression of hepcidin and other iron-regulatory genes in human hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical implications. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135(10): 1413-1420, 2009. PMID: 19387685. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-009-0585-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Reprints and Permissions
Loss of F-Box and Leucine Rich Repeat Protein 5 (FBXL5) Expression Is Associated With Poor Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection: A Two-institute Study
YOON AH CHO, SUNG-EUN KIM, CHEOL KEUN PARK, HYUN HEE KOH, CHEOL-KEUN PARK, SANG YUN HA
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics May 2023, 20 (3) 298-307; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20382
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords