Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Comparison of the reference model and models with added biomarkers. A three-biomarker model including NT-3, GPNMB, and MSLN with age as the reference model showed the highest prediction of survival (AUC=0.792, p=0.004).
- Figure 2.
Comparison of the reference model and models with added biomarkers. A three-biomarker model including NT-3+GPNMB+MSLN with age+CA-125+HE4 as the reference model showed the highest prediction of survival (AUC=0.825, p=0.003).
- Figure 3.
Comparison of the reference model and models with added biomarkers. A three-biomarker model including CCL28+TCL1A+GPNMB with Stage I+II vs. III+IV+age as the reference model showed the highest prediction of survival (AUC=0.899, p=0.048).
- Figure 4.
Comparison of the reference model and models with added biomarkers. The model including stage I+II vs. III+CCL28+GPNMB1 with age as the reference model showed the highest prediction of survival (AUC=0.864, p<0.001).
- Figure 5.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival in patients in terms of CA125 and HE4 levels. Patients with both values above the median are shown in red, and patients with one or both biomarkers below the median are shown in blue.
Tables
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.