Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReview

MicroRNAs Involved in Small-cell Lung Cancer as Possible Agents for Treatment and Identification of New Targets

ULRICH H. WEIDLE and ADAM NOPORA
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics September 2021, 18 (5) 591-603; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20283
ULRICH H. WEIDLE
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: weidle49{at}t-online.de
ADAM NOPORA
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: adam.nopora{at}roche.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Small-cell lung cancer, a neuro-endocrine type of lung cancers, responds very well to chemotherapy-based agents. However, a high frequency of relapse due to adaptive resistance is observed. Immunotherapy-based treatments with checkpoint inhibitors has resulted in improvement of treatment but the responses are not as impressive as in other types of tumor. Therefore, identification of new targets and treatment modalities is an important issue. After searching the literature, we identified eight down-regulated microRNAs involved in radiation- and chemotherapy-induced resistance, as well as three up-regulated and four down-regulated miRNAs with impacts on proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of small-cell lung cancer cells in vitro. Furthermore, one up-regulated and four down-regulated microRNAs with in vivo activity in SCLC cell xenografts were identified. The identified microRNAs are candidates for inhibition or reconstitution therapy. The corresponding targets are candidates for inhibition or functional reconstitution with antibody-based moieties or small molecules.

Key Words:
  • Apoptosis
  • invasion
  • proliferation
  • metastasis
  • chemoresistance
  • microRNA-based therapy
  • new treatment modalities
  • target identification
  • review

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an exceptionally lethal malignancy comprising 13-15% of all lung cancer (1), with 250,000 cases diagnosed annually worldwide (1). SCLC is highly sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, topoisomerase inhibitor etoposide, and to lurbinectidin, a recently approved DNA binder (2, 3). However, disease recurrence and metastasis to the brain, adrenal glands, bone and liver after treatment remains an issue (2). Inactivating mutations in retinoblastoma (RB) or TP53 are most commonly observed, however, these alterations are not druggable and, in contrast to non-small-cell lung cancer no tractable drivers or fusion proteins have been observed (4). Monoclonal antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab, directed against checkpoint inhibitors, have been approved as first-line treatment of SCLC together with chemotherapy and for treatment of relapsed disease (5). However, the therapeutic benefit is not as pronounced as observed with other types of tumor (5). Furthermore, SCLC subtypes have been identified based on differential expression of transcription factors achaete-scute homolog (ASCL1), neurogenic differentiation factor (NeuroD1), yes-associated protein (YAP1) and POU class 2 homeobox 3 (POU2F3) (6). These subtypes might respond to drugs with different vulnerability (6). Several agents targeting T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), or cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 are in phase III clinical studies or under Food and Drug Administration review (7). Nevertheless, there is an urgent need to identify new targets and treatment modalities for SCLC. Here, we focus on microRNAs (miRs) as therapeutic agents and as tools for identification of SCLC-related targets for therapeutic intervention.

MicroRNAs – Role in Oncology

miRs are synthesized by RNA polymersase II in the nucleus as precursor RNAs, processed and exported into the cytoplasm (8-10). One strand of a 22 nucleotides (nts) complex is maintained (guide strand), the other strand (passenger strand) is discarded (8-10). The guide strand binds to the 3’-untranslated region of corresponding mRNAs and induces their degradation or inhibits their translation (8-10). A single miR can interact with several different mRNAs and therefore can interfere with several pathways and has the potential to rewire oncogenic pathways (11). miRs can exert an oncogenic or tumor-suppressive role, depending on the context (12). A tumor-suppressive role is mediated by miR-16-1 and miR-15a by targeting anti-apoptotic protein BCL2 apoptosis regulator (BCL2). Their deletion in mice causes B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia corresponding to the disease in humans and its cytogenetic characteristics (13, 14). The oncogenic role of miRs was demonstrated by induction of hepatocellular carcinoma through liver-specific expression of miR-221 in transgenic mice (15). miRs can have an impact on all stages of carcinogenesis, including metastasis and anti-tumoral immune response (16). We recently summarized the impact of miRs on growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (17), pancreatic cancer (18), non-small-cell lung carcinoma (19), breast cancer (20) and prostate cancer (21). In this review, we focus on the role of miRs with respect to chemoresistance, tumor growth and metastasis of SCLC.

miRs Involved in Chemoresistance and Radioresistance of SCLC

All of the miRs discussed are down-regulated in SCLC-cancer related cell lines or clinical specimen in comparison to corresponding controls.

miR-7. miR-7 (Figure 1) affects the multidrug-resistance protein ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 1 (ABCC1) (22), inward-rectifier potassium ion channel 2.1 (KIR2.1) (23) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) (24).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

miRs involved in chemo- and radio-resistance of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cells. Downward arrows indicate down-regulation of miRs in SCLC in comparison to controls. ABCC1: ATB binding cassette subfamily C member; ADM: Adriamycin; ATG4A: autophagy-related protein 4; BMX: cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase BMX; CDDP: cisplatin; ETK: non-receptor tyrosine kinase Etk; H2AX: histone H2AX; HOXA1: homebox protein HOXA1; KIR2.1: inward rectifier ion channel 2.1; PARP1: poly (ADP ribose)-polymerase 1; TSPAN 12: tetraspanin 12; VP16: etoposide; WBP5: ww domain-binding protein 1; WRNIP1: ATPase WRNIP1; ZEB2: zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2.

ABCC1 expression is inversely correlated with miR-7 (22). ABCC1 is a transmembrane drug transporter containing three membrane-spanning domains and two cytosolic nucleotide-binding domains (25) and is expressed in many types of multidrug-resistant cancer (26). Overexpression of ABCC1 is predictive for resistance to chemotherapy in SCLC (27, 28). A low-level expression of miR-7 correlated with shorter overall survival in patients with SCLC (22). In the SCLC cell line H69AR, miR-7 down-regulation was shown to be responsible for resistance to adriamycin and etoposide (22, 29).

miR-7 also targets KIR2.1, a member of the classical inward rectifying potassium channel family (23, 30-32). KIR2.1 was up-regulated five-fold in H69AR cells in comparison to H69 SCLC cells (23). KIR2.1 induced resistance to apoptosis following exposure to chemotherapeutic drugs (23). Overexpression of KIR2.1 in H69 and H466 SCLC cells enhanced their growth in immuno-deficient mice (23). Up-regulation of miR-7 sensitized H69AR cells to adriamycin, cisplatin and etoposide (23). RAS-protein kinase C–mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) signaling was identified as an important inducer of KIR2.1, which was down-regulated by RAS-protein kinase C inhibitor staurosporine and MEK inhibitor UO126 (23).

PARP1 was identified as a target in doxorubicin-resistent SCLC cell line H69AR in comparison to H69 parental cells (24). PARP1 was resolved as a target of miR-7 (24, 34). Inhibition of miR-7 resulted in increased homologous repair in doxorubicin-resistant SCLC cells (24). miR-7 reduced expression of breast cancer susceptibility protein 1 (BRCA1) and repair protein RAD51 homolog1 (RAD51), and discrupted homologous recombination-based repair, leading to doxorubicin resistance by targeting PARP1 (24). PARP1 has a multi-faceted role in DNA repair and chromatin remodeling (35). PARP1 inhibitors are approved anticancer agents based on a synthetic-lethality based mode of action (36-38).

miR-22. miR-22 (Figure 1) was down-regulated in NCI-466 SCLC cells and inhibited radiosensitivity by targeting Werner helicase-interacting protein-1 (WRNIP1) (39). WRNIP1 is an ATPase which can protect replication forks and co-operates with RAD51 to safeguard the integrity and maintenance of the genome (40-42). Overexpression of miR-22 promoted apoptosis and inhibited migration of NCI-466 cells (39).

miR-24-3p. Autophagy is a strategy by which resistance to chemotherapy is conferred (43, 44). Etoposide- and cisplatin - resistant SCLC cells exhibited increased autophagy (45). miR-24-3p (Figure 1) was down-regulated in SCLC cells and expression of autophagy-related 4A cysteine peptidase (ATG4A) was blocked (45). Expression of miR-24-3p can suppress autophagy of SCLC cells by directly targeting ATG4A (45). It has been shown that inhibitors of autophagy can sensitize chemoresistant cells to anticancer therapy in clinical trials (45, 46).

miR-100. miR-100 (Figure 1) was shown to target homeobox transcription factor HOXA1, which was associated with poor prognosis in patients with SCLC, and its down-regulation mediated chemoresistance (47). HOXA1 was found to be expressed in 46% (29/63) of tumors from patients with SCLC. Expression of miR-100 in multidrug-resistant SCLC cell line H69AR reversed resistance to cisplatin and etoposide (47). HOXA1 is involved in progression and prognosis of several types of tumor. It mediates tumor proliferation and poor prognosis in gastric cancer via cyclin D1 (48); enhances proliferation, invasion and metastasis of prostate cancer cells (49); and correlates with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (50).

miR-138. miR-138 (Figure 1) was down-regulated in SCLC tissues and three corresponding cell lines (51). In NCI-H2081 SCLC cells, miR-138 reduced cell growth and inhibited cell-cycle progression (51). Histone H2A variant X (H2AX) was identified as a target of miR-138 (51). H2AX knockdown achieved a similar effect as observed for miR-138 overexpression, whilst its induction abolished miR-138- mediated SCLC cell growth and inhibition of cell-cycle progression (51). Expression of miR-138 was shown to confer SCLC cells with greater DNA-repair capacity and reduced their resistance to chemotherapeutic agents (51). H2AX is involved in double-stranded DNA repair, chromatin remodeling and contributes to nucleosome formation (52-55).

miR-200b. miR-200b (Figure 1) targets zinc finger E-box homeobox2 (ZEB2), which correlated with poor pathologic stage and shorter survival (35). ZEB2 was found to be expressed in 23.5% (16/68) of cases of SCLC (56). Inhibition of ZEB2 expression making use of small-interfering RNA (siRNA), sensitized SCLC-related cells to chemotherapeutic drugs by enhancing drug-induced apoptosis accompanied by S-phase arrest (56). ZEB2 is a transcription factor with eight zinc fingers and a homeodomain (57). ZEB2 has been identified as a regulator of nervous system development (58, 59). In cancer, ZEB2 plays an instrumental role in epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer-stem cell traits, apoptosis, survival, tumor recurrence and metastasis (60).

miR-335. miR-335 (Figure 1) was found to target WW domain-binding protein 5 (WBP5), expression of which was 10-fold increased in H69AR compared to H69 SCLC cells. WBP5 induced multidrug resistance by promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis in H69AR cells (61). Expression of WBP5 was associated with shorter survival in patients with SCLC (61). WW binding domains are typically 35-40 amino acids in length and can interact with a variety of different peptide ligands, including motifs with core proline-rich sequences (62). WBP5 was shown to be involved in multidrug resistance of SCLC through the Hippo pathway [WBP5-tyrosine kinase ABL-mammalian Ste-20-like kinase (MST2)-yes-associated protein1 (YAP1)] pathway (61). WBP5 can induce nuclear accumulation of YAP1, a transcription factor which induces genes involved in development and survival (63). Inhibition of YAP1 by verteporfin was shown to blunt multidrug resistance in H69AR cells (61). WBP5 can bind to ABL, an upstream activator of ser-thr kinase MST2 of the Hippo pathway (64,65). It was shown that WBP5 promotes tumor growth and resistance of H69 cells to adriamycin and cisplatin in nude mice (61).

miR-335 was also down-regulated in SCLC cell lines H69AR and H446DDP (66). Overexpression of miR-335 inhibited migration of H69AR and H446DDP cells in vitro and their tumor growth in vivo, whereas its inhibition resulted in opposite effects (66). PARP1 was identified as a direct target of miR-335 (66). Chemoradiosensitiviy of SCLC cells was increased by down-regulation of PARP1 and nuclear factor ĸB (66). Down-regulation of miR-335 resulted in resistance to adriamycin, cisplatin and etoposide in SCLC cell lines H69AR and H446DDP (66). PARP1 detects single-strand DNA breaks and recruits other enzymes involved in DNA repair (67, 68).

miR-495. miR-495 (Figure 1) was down-regulated in SCLC and inhibited chemoresistance by targeting endothelial tyrosine kinase/bone marrow X kinase (ETK/BMX) (69) and tetraspanin 12 (TSPN12) (70). Functional assays were performed in SCLC cell lines NCI-H446, NCI-H69 and their multidrug-resistant derivatives H446AR and H69AR (69, 70). miR-495 was expressed at a lower level in SCLC compared to normal lung tissues (69, 70).

miR-495 inhibited apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agents such as adriamycin, cisplatin and etoposide by targeting ETK/BMX (69). In nude mice, antagomirs directed against miR-495 induced rapid growth of xenografts derived from H69 and H446 cells (69). Down-regulation of miR-495 promoted proliferation, migration invasion and tumor growth of H446 and H69 SCLC in vitro and in vivo (69). ETK/BMX has been shown to mediate drug resistance in SCLC (71), to regulate the cytoskeleton and migration (72), and to up-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor (73). ETK/BMX has also been identified as a mediator of resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (74) and as a regulator of multiple tyrosine kinases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (75).

miR-495 was also found to target TSPAN12, which is related to resistance to cisplatin and etoposide (60). TSPAN12 promoted proliferation, migration and tumor growth in drug-resistant SCLC cells H466AR and H69AR (60). TSPAN12 belongs to the tetraspanin family of transmembrane receptors characterized by four transmembrane domains and two extracellular loops (76). Tetraspanins are involved in signaling platforms by forming tetrapanin-enriched microdomains (77). Tetraspanins can mediate tumor-promoting but also metastasis-inhibitory processes (78-80).

miRs Up-regulated in SCLC With Activity in Preclinical In Vitro Systems

miR-25. miR-25 (Figure 2) was up-regulated in SCLC cell lines and tissues (81). Down-regulation of miR-25 induced cell-cycle arrest and inhibited invasive capability of H510 SCLC cells (81). Overexpression of miR-25 reversed the effect of miR-25 down-regulation in H510 cells (81). miR-25 acted as an oncogene in SCLC cell lines (81). Cyclin E2 has been identified as a direct target of miR-25. These findings seem to be counterintuitive since cyclin E has been identified as a regulator of S-phase activity by binding to and activating cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and by phosphorylation of pocket proteins initiating a cascade of events that leads to the expression of S-phase-specific genes (82, 83). A role of cyclin E in DNA replication, control of genomic stability and regulation of the centrosome cycle has also been reported (82, 83). Cyclin E2 is aberrantly expressed in many types of tumors and is increased in cancer-derived cell lines (84). Overexpression of cyclin E in transgenic mice was shown to induce cancer by acting as a dominant oncogene (85). Due to its role in proliferation and apoptosis, cyclin E2 may be an important target for cancer therapy (86). However, it was shown that cyclin E is dispensable for the development of higher eukaryotes and for the division of eukaryotic cells (85). In any case, down-regulation of cyclin E2 in SCLC as reported in (81) might activate a novel tumor-promoting pathway which has to be resolved in further detail.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

miRs Up- and down-regulated in small-cell lung cancer with in vitro activity. Upward arrows indicate increased expression and downward arrows point to decreased expression of the corresponding miRs in comparison to control tissues. ACh: Acetyl-choline; APO: apoptosis; FLOT2: flotillin 2; PTPRN: protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N; INV: invasion; ITPKB: inositol-triphosphate-3 kinase B; MCL1: myeloid cell differentiation protein 1; PROL: proliferation; SLC7A5: solute carrier family 7A5; WWOX: WW containing oxidoreductase.

miR-134. In H69 SCLC cells, miR-134 (Figure 2) promoted growth, inhibited apoptosis and activated the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) pathway (87). WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) has been identified as a direct target of miR-134 (87). WWOX has two WW domains responsible for protein–protein interactions and a short dehydrogenase/reductase domain which catalyses conversion of low-molecular-weight ligands, most likely steroids (88). Ectopic expression of WWOX inhibited anchorage-dependent growth of MDA-MB-435 and T47D breast cancer cells and attenuates tumorigenicity of MDA-MB-435 cells in vivo (89). In lung cancer, WWOX gene restoration prevented tumor growth in vitro and in vivo (89). WWOX localizes to the Golgi apparatus and behaves as a tumor suppressor (90). WWOX is frequently down-regulated in human tumors (91, 92).

miR-375. miR-375 (Figure 2) was found to be up-regulated in lung adenocarcinoma and SCLC, and down-regulated in lung squamous cell carcinoma (93). miR-375 promoted proliferation of NCI-H82 SCLC cells (93). Inositol-triphosphate-3 kinase B (ITPKB) was identified as a target of miR-375 (93). ITPKB regulates inositol phosphate metabolism by phosphorylation of second messenger inositol-1,4,5 triphosphate (94, 95). ITPKB is associated with the Ca signaling pathway and is enriched at actin filaments and invaginations of the nuclear envelope (96). ITPKB also regulates immune functions and is required for B- and T-cell development (96). The role of miR-375 and down-regulation of ITPKB in SCLC remains to be investigated in further detail.

miRs Down-regulated in SCLC With Activity in Preclinical In Vitro Systems

miR-26a. Low level expression of miR-26a (Figure 2) was detected in SCLC cell lines NCI-H196, NCI-H466 and NCI-H1688 in comparison to MRC5 non-transformed control cells (97). Transfection of these cell lines with a miR-26a mimic suppressed proliferation, migration and colony formation (97). Myeloid cell leukemia protein 1 (MCL1) has been identified as a target of miR-26a (97). MCL1 is a member of the BCL2 family and plays a role in inhibition of apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (98, 99). Inhibition of MCL1 with small molecules has been pursued in several types of cancer, such as myeloma, follicular lymphoma and advanced SCLC in advanced clinical studies (100-102). MCL1 inhibition has been shown to be effective against a subset of SCLCs with high MCL1 and low B-cell lymphoma-extra large (BCL-XL) expression (101).

miR-126. miR-126 (Figure 2) inhibited proliferation of H69 SCLC cells by causing delay in the G1 phase of the cell-cycle (102). miR-126 has been identified as a direct target of solute carrier family 7, member 5 (SLC7A5) (102). Suppression of SLC7A5 by RNAi delayed SCLC cells in the G1 phase (103). SLC7A5 is part of cluster of differentiation 98 (CD98), and also referred to as large neutral amino acid transporter 1. The other component of CD98 is the CD98 heavy subunit protein encoded by the SCL3A2 gene. CD98 preferentially transports branched chain and aromatic amino acids and is overexpressed in several types of cancer (103-105). SCL7A5 can activate mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), which phosphorylates p70S6 kinase and eukaryotic translation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1), resulting in production of growth-promoting proteins (106). mTOR is activated in a large percentage of SCLCs and genetic alterations in the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase/AKT serine/threonine kinase 1/mTOR pathway have been identified in 36% of patients with SCLC (107).

miR-342. Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N (PTPRN), also known as islet antigen 2 (IA-2), was identified as a target of miR-342 (Figure 2) in SCLC cell lines NCI-H82 and NCI-345 (108). Down-regulation of PTPRN by siRNA suppressed SCLC growth as well as cell acetyl choline (ACh) content and secretion (109). ACh rescued the inhibitory effects of PTPRN siRNA and of miR-342 mimic on SCLC proliferation (109). ACh is an autocrine growth factor which facilitates SCLC growth (109). PTPRN is a transmembrane tyrosine receptor phosphatase and has an important role in secretion of hormones and neurotransmitters in SCLC cell lines, such as follicle-stimulating hormone, insulin, luteinizing hormone, dopamine, renin and norepinephrine (110, 111). PTPRN is highly expressed in tumors and cell lines of neuro-endocrine origin (112). It also has been identified as an auto-antigen that is reactive with sera of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (112).

miR-485-5p. miR-485-5p (Figure 2) was reduced in SCLC tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues (113). miR-485-5p inhibited proliferation, migration and invasion of NCI-H466 and NCI-485-5p SCLC cell lines (113). Flotillin 2 (FlOT2) has been identified as a target of miR-485-5p (113). FLOT2 was found to be up-regulated in SCLC tissues and correlated with worse prognosis (113). FLOT1 and -2 are lipid-raft marker proteins which assemble into heterotetramers, forming molecular scaffolds to regulate clustering at the plasma membrane (114, 115). They are involved in signal transduction, nerve regeneration, endocytosis and lymphocyte activation (114, 115). Up-regulation of FLOT2 is related to lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with solid tumors (116).

Dysregulated miRs With Activity in Preclinical In Vivo Models of SCLC

Up-regulated miRs

miR-665. Inhibition of miR-665 (Figure 3) attenuated proliferation, invasion and migration of NCI-H446 SCLC cells (117). In vivo, inhibition of miR-665 led to attenuation of tumor growth (117). Lethal giant larvae protein homolog-1 (LLGL1) was identified as a target of miR-665 (117). LLGL1 is part of the cytoskeletal network and is associated with non-muscle myosin II heavy chain (117). Overexpression of LLGL1 inhibited proliferation and migration, and increased cellular adhesion and apoptosis (118, 119). Loss of LLGL1 reduced cellular adhesion and dissemination in colorectal cancer, melanoma and gastric cancer; its reduced expression has been noted in lung squamous cell carcinoma (120-123).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

miRs Up- and down-regulated with activity in preclinical small-cell lung cancer-related in vivo models. Upward arrows: Up-regulated miRs; downward arrows: down-regulated miRs. APO: Apoptosis; BCL2: BCL2 apoptosis regulator; BM: bone metastasis; EMT: epithelial–mesenchymal transition; IGF-1R: insulin-like growth factor receptor 1; INV: invasion; IRF2: interferon regulatory factor 2; LLGL1: lethal giant larvae protein homolog 1; PROL: proliferation; RANK: receptor activator of NFĸB ligand; RANKL: RANK ligand; TGFβ1: transforming growth factor β1; TS: tumor suppressor.

Down-regulated miRs

miR-216a-5p. miR-216a-5p (Figure 3) reduced proliferation and migration of H69 SCLC cells (124). miR-216a-5p targeted BCL2 and modulated BCL2-like protein (BAX) and BCL2 antagonist of cell death (BAD) (124). In vivo inhibition of miR-216a-5p promoted tumor growth of H69-derived xenografts in mice, whereas a miR-216 mimic inhibited it (124). BCL2 is an anti-apoptotic protein which is expressed in SCLC (125, 126). BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax was shown to be active in preclinical SCLC-related in vitro and in vivo systems with high BCL2 expression (127). Venetoclax is approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic leukemia, and is also part of a combination therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (128). Currently clinical studies of treatment of relapsed or refractory SCLC with oral venetoclax in combination with irinotecan and venetoclax in combination with atezolizumab are underway (NCI04543916).

miR-335. Investigations into the role of miR-335 (Figure 3) were performed with SCLC cells lines SBC-3 and SBC-5. The latter gives rise to bone metastasis in immuno-deficient mouse models, SBC-3 does not. Reduced expression of miR-335 in SBC-5 in comparison to SBC-3 cells was observed (129). Overexpression of miR-335 in transfected SBC-5 cells reduced proliferation, migration and colony formation. Skeletal lesions from miR-335-transfected SBC-5 cells were not observed in immunodeficient mice (129). Insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF-1R) and osteoblast receptor activator of nuclear ĸB ligand (RANKL) were identified as targets for miR-335 (129). IGF-1R promotes proliferation, invasion, migration and inhibits apoptosis of tumor cells (130). IGF-1R knock-out mice exhibit reduced bone metastasis of breast cancer xenografts (131). Prerequisite for osteolytic metastases is the activation of osteoclasts. Osteoblasts secrete RANKL which interacts with osteoclast precursors displaying RANK receptor on their surface, resulting in their maturation into functional osteoclasts. Osteoblasts also produce osteoprotegerin, a soluble decoy receptor which can block RANK/RANKL signaling (132-134). miR-335 inhibits IGF-1R and RANKL, two validated mediators of bone metastasis.

miR-450. Down-regulation of miR-450 (Figure 3) correlated with reduced survival in patients with SCLC (135). miR-450 inhibited proliferation and invasion of H510A SCLC cells and growth as xenografts implanted into immunodeficient mice (135). Interferon regulatory factor 2 (IRF2) was identified as a target of miR-450 (135). Overexpression of IRF2 in H510A cells abrogated the inhibitory effects of miR-450 (136). IRF2 is a member of IRF protein family which possess an N-terminal DNA binding domain characterized by five well-conserved tryptophan-rich repeats recognizing IFN-stimulated response elements and a C-terminal region which mediates interactions with family members, transcription factors and co-factors conferring specific activities on each IRF (136, 137). IRF2 acts as an oncogene and is involved in regulation of histone 4 gene transcription (138, 139). Overexpression of IRF2 promotea the growth of pancreatic cancer cells (140). In colorectal cancer, IRF2 has been identified as a driver of immune suppression and immune therapy resistance (141).

miR-886-3p. miR-886-3p (Figure 3) was down-regulated in SCLC (141). In NCI-H446 and NCI-H1688, overexpression of miR-886-3p induced mesenchymal–epithelial transition, a change in cellular phenotype from spindle shape to round shape (141). Transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) has been identified as a target of miR-886-3p (141). miR-886-3p-mediated mesenchymal epithelial transition was induced by suppression of TGFβ (141). Intratumoral injection of a miR-886-3p conjugate to cholesterol resulted in necrosis of tumor tissue and suppression of intramuscular invasion (141). Suppression of lung cancer xenograft growth of NCI-H446 cells was observed after systemic delivery of a cholesterol conjugated miR-886-3p mimic after tail vein injection of tumor cells. Targeting EMT by either inhibition of TGFβ or by administration of miR-886-3p may be a concept for treatment of SCLC which has to be validated in further detail. EMT is a basic principle of tumor progression (142-144).

Conclusion

We identified miRs which affect chemoresistance and radioresistance, as well as in vitro and in vivo properties of SCLC cell lines. Up-regulated miRs are candidates for inhibition or reconstitution of the corresponding targets. Down-regulated miRs are candidates for reconstitution therapy or inhibition of the corresponding targets with small molecules or antibody-related entities.

Up-regulated miRs can be inhibited with miR antagonists, which are single-stranded RNAs composed of 12-25 nucleotides complementary to the corresponding mRNA or with RNA sponges (145, 146). The latter are composed of multiple miR-binding sites competing with binding of miRs to corresponding mRNA (145, 146). In the case of down-regulated miRs, reconstitution therapy is the indicated therapeutic intervention (147, 148) or re-expression of the corresponding targets, an approach which faces druggability issues due to nonspecific interactions.

Eight down-regulated miRs were found to mediate chemo/radioresistance (Figure 1). They are candidates for reconstitution therapy. PARP1 (miR-335) can be inhibited by several approved small molecules and is a validated target (35, 36). ETK (BMX) (miR-495), TSPAN12 (miR-495) and KIR2.1 (miR-7) are druggable with small molecules or antibody-derived entities. However, the role of the identified miRs in resistance of relapsed SCLC needs to be validated in more detail.

Three up-regulated and four down-regulated miRs affecting proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of SCLC cell lines in vitro were identified (Figure 2). MCL1, which is targeted by miR-26a, seems to be a promising target. MCL1 inhibition has been shown to be effective in a subset of preclinical SCLC-related in vitro models with high MCL1 and low BCL-xL expression (101). PTPRN (miR-342) and SCL7A5 (miR-126) are druggable targets and the corresponding miRs are candidates for miR-inhibitory agents. However, more target validation experiments are necessary to resolve the relevance of the latter targets.

Furthermore, one up-regulated and four down-regulated miRs with efficacy in preclinical SCLC-related in vivo models were identified (Figure 3). The down-regulated miRs are candidates for substitution therapy. BCL2 (miR-216-5p) is inhibited by venetoclax and it has been shown that venetoclax is effective in preclinical in vivo models with high BCL2 expression (127). miR-335 targets IGF-1R and RANKL, which mediate proliferation, invasion and bone metastasis of SCLC and both represent druggable targets (130, 132). miR-886-3p inhibits TGFβ1, a possible target for interfering with EMT (143, 144). For these miRs and corresponding targets, more target validation experiments in non-small-cell lung carcinoma-related systems are necessary in order to substantiate their role in SCLC.

Regarding miR-based therapy, many technical hurdles which are not discussed in detail here have been identified. Issues are targeting of miRs to tumor cells, efficacy of intracellular escape, removal by the reticulo-endothelial system, excretion by the kidneys, pharmaco-kinetic and pharmaco-dynamic issues, immunogenicity, toxicity and cytokine-release syndrome (149-154). Recently, the field has experienced several set-backs, mainly due to toxicity issues (155). It remains to be seen whether miRs are tools for further target identification and whether miR-based therapy is a viable strategy for treatment of SCLC.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    AN and UHW jointly designed and prepared the article.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    AN is and UHW was an employee of Roche.

  • Received June 16, 2021.
  • Revision received July 13, 2021.
  • Accepted July 15, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gazdar AF,
    2. Bunn PA and
    3. Minna JD
    : Small-cell lung cancer: what we know, what we need to know and the path forward. Nat Rev Cancer 17(12): 725-737, 2017. PMID: 29077690. DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2017.87
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Pietanza MC,
    2. Byers LA,
    3. Minna JD and
    4. Rudin CM
    : Small cell lung cancer: will recent progress lead to improved outcomes? Clin Cancer Res 21(10): 2244-2255, 2015. PMID: 25979931. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2958
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Farago AF,
    2. Drapkin BJ,
    3. Lopez-Vilarino de Ramos JA,
    4. Galmarini CM,
    5. Núñez R,
    6. Kahatt C and
    7. Paz-Ares L
    : ATLANTIS: a Phase III study of lurbinectedin/doxorubicin versus topotecan or cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine in patients with small-cell lung cancer who have failed one prior platinum-containing line. Future Oncol 15(3): 231-239, 2019. PMID: 30362375. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Gazdar AF and
    2. Minna JD
    : Small cell lung cancers made from scratch. J Exp Med 216(3): 476-478, 2019. PMID: 30760489. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20182216
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Iams WT,
    2. Porter J and
    3. Horn L
    : Immunotherapeutic approaches for small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 17(5): 300-312, 2020. PMID: 32055013. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-019-0316-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Rudin CM,
    2. Poirier JT,
    3. Byers LA,
    4. Dive C,
    5. Dowlati A,
    6. George J,
    7. Heymach JV,
    8. Johnson JE,
    9. Lehman JM,
    10. MacPherson D,
    11. Massion PP,
    12. Minna JD,
    13. Oliver TG,
    14. Quaranta V,
    15. Sage J,
    16. Thomas RK,
    17. Vakoc CR and
    18. Gazdar AF
    : Molecular subtypes of small cell lung cancer: a synthesis of human and mouse model data. Nat Rev Cancer 19(5): 289-297, 2019. PMID: 30926931. DOI: 10.1038/s41568-019-0133-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Dawkins JBN and
    2. Webster RM
    : The small-cell lung cancer drug market. Nat Rev Drug Discov 19(8): 507-508, 2020. PMID: 32235872. DOI: 10.1038/d41573-020-00057-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bartel DP
    : Metazoan MicroRNAs. Cell 173(1): 20-51, 2018. PMID: 29570994. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Li Z and
    2. Rana TM
    : Therapeutic targeting of microRNAs: current status and future challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13(8): 622-638, 2014. PMID: 25011539. DOI: 10.1038/nrd4359
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Rupaimoole R and
    2. Slack FJ
    : MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16(3): 203-222, 2017. PMID: 28209991. DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2016.246
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Peter ME
    : Targeting of mRNAs by multiple miRNAs: the next step. Oncogene 29(15): 2161-2164, 2010. PMID: 20190803. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2010.59
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Garzon R,
    2. Calin GA and
    3. Croce CM
    : MicroRNAs in Cancer. Annu Rev Med 60: 167-179, 2009. PMID: 19630570. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.053006.104707
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Calin GA,
    2. Cimmino A,
    3. Fabbri M,
    4. Ferracin M,
    5. Wojcik SE,
    6. Shimizu M,
    7. Taccioli C,
    8. Zanesi N,
    9. Garzon R,
    10. Aqeilan RI,
    11. Alder H,
    12. Volinia S,
    13. Rassenti L,
    14. Liu X,
    15. Liu CG,
    16. Kipps TJ,
    17. Negrini M and
    18. Croce CM
    : MiR-15a and miR-16-1 cluster functions in human leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(13): 5166-5171, 2008. PMID: 18362358. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800121105
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Calin GA,
    2. Dumitru CD,
    3. Shimizu M,
    4. Bichi R,
    5. Zupo S,
    6. Noch E,
    7. Aldler H,
    8. Rattan S,
    9. Keating M,
    10. Rai K,
    11. Rassenti L,
    12. Kipps T,
    13. Negrini M,
    14. Bullrich F and
    15. Croce CM
    : Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(24): 15524-15529, 2002. PMID: 12434020. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.242606799
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Callegari E,
    2. Elamin BK,
    3. Giannone F,
    4. Milazzo M,
    5. Altavilla G,
    6. Fornari F,
    7. Giacomelli L,
    8. D’Abundo L,
    9. Ferracin M,
    10. Bassi C,
    11. Zagatti B,
    12. Corrà F,
    13. Miotto E,
    14. Lupini L,
    15. Bolondi L,
    16. Gramantieri L,
    17. Croce CM,
    18. Sabbioni S and
    19. Negrini M
    : Liver tumorigenicity promoted by microRNA-221 in a mouse transgenic model. Hepatology 56(3): 1025-1033, 2012. PMID: 22473819. DOI: 10.1002/hep.25747
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Ali Syeda Z,
    2. Langden SSS,
    3. Munkhzul C,
    4. Lee M and
    5. Song SJ
    : Regulatory mechanism of MicroRNA expression in cancer. Int J Mol Sci 21(5): 1723, 2020. PMID: 32138313. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21051723
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Weidle UH,
    2. Schmid D,
    3. Birzele F and
    4. Brinkmann U
    : MicroRNAs involved in metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Target candidates, functionality and efficacy in animal models and prognostic relevance. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 17(1): 1-21, 2020. PMID: 31882547. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20163
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Weidle UH,
    2. Birzele F and
    3. Nopora A
    : Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: MicroRNAs affecting tumor growth and metastasis in preclinical in vivo models. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 16(6): 451-464, 2019. PMID: 31659100. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20149
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Weidle UH,
    2. Birzele F and
    3. Nopora A
    : MicroRNAs as potential targets for therapeutic intervention with metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 16(2): 99-119, 2019. PMID: 30850362. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20116
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Weidle UH,
    2. Dickopf S,
    3. Hintermair C,
    4. Kollmorgen G,
    5. Birzele F and
    6. Brinkmann U
    : The role of micro RNAs in breast cancer metastasis: Preclinical validation and potential therapeutic targets. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 15(1): 17-39, 2018. PMID: 29275360. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20062
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Weidle UH,
    2. Epp A,
    3. Birzele F and
    4. Brinkmann U
    : The functional role of prostate cancer metastasis-related Micro-RNAs. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 16(1): 1-19, 2019. PMID: 30587496. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20108
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Liu H,
    2. Wu X,
    3. Huang J,
    4. Peng J and
    5. Guo L
    : miR-7 modulates chemoresistance of small cell lung cancer by repressing MRP1/ABCC1. Int J Exp Pathol 96(4): 240-247, 2015. PMID: 26108539. DOI: 10.1111/iep.12131
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Liu H,
    2. Huang J,
    3. Peng J,
    4. Wu X,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Zhu W and
    7. Guo L
    : Upregulation of the inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir2.1 (KCNJ2) modulates multidrug resistance of small-cell lung cancer under the regulation of miR-7 and the Ras/MAPK pathway. Mol Cancer 14: 59, 2015. PMID: 25880778. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-015-0298-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Lai J,
    2. Yang H,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. Ruan M,
    5. Huang Y and
    6. Zhang Q
    : MiR-7-5p-mediated downregulation of PARP1 impacts DNA homologous recombination repair and resistance to doxorubicin in small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 19(1): 602, 2019. PMID: 31215481. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5798-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Zaman GJ,
    2. Versantvoort CH,
    3. Smit JJ,
    4. Eijdems EW,
    5. de Haas M,
    6. Smith AJ,
    7. Broxterman HJ,
    8. Mulder NH,
    9. de Vries EG and
    10. Baas F
    : Analysis of the expression of MRP, the gene for a new putative transmembrane drug transporter, in human multidrug resistant lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 53(8): 1747-1750, 1993. PMID: 8467491.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Robey RW,
    2. Pluchino KM,
    3. Hall MD,
    4. Fojo AT,
    5. Bates SE and
    6. Gottesman MM
    : Revisiting the role of ABC transporters in multidrug-resistant cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 18(7): 452-464, 2018. PMID: 29643473. DOI: 10.1038/s41568-018-0005-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Hsia TC,
    2. Lin CC,
    3. Wang JJ,
    4. Ho ST and
    5. Kao A
    : Relationship between chemotherapy response of small cell lung cancer and P-glycoprotein or multidrug resistance-related protein expression. Lung 180(3): 173-179, 2002. PMID: 12177731. DOI: 10.1007/s004080000091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Kuo TH,
    2. Liu FY,
    3. Chuang CY,
    4. Wu HS,
    5. Wang JJ and
    6. Kao A
    : To predict response chemotherapy using technetium-99m tetrofosmin chest images in patients with untreated small cell lung cancer and compare with p-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance related protein-1, and lung resistance-related protein expression. Nucl Med Biol 30(6): 627-632, 2003. PMID: 12900288. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8051(03)00058-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Mirski SE,
    2. Gerlach JH and
    3. Cole SP
    : Multidrug resistance in a human small cell lung cancer cell line selected in adriamycin. Cancer Res 47(10): 2594-2598, 1987. PMID: 2436751.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Raab-Graham KF,
    2. Radeke CM and
    3. Vandenberg CA
    : Molecular cloning and expression of a human heart inward rectifier potassium channel. Neuroreport 5(18): 2501-2505, 1994. PMID: 7696590. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199412000-00024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hibino H,
    2. Inanobe A,
    3. Furutani K,
    4. Murakami S,
    5. Findlay I and
    6. Kurachi Y
    : Inwardly rectifying potassium channels: their structure, function, and physiological roles. Physiol Rev 90(1): 291-366, 2010. PMID: 20086079. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00021.2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Pancrazio JJ,
    2. Viglione MP,
    3. Tabbara IA and
    4. Kim YI
    : Voltage-dependent ion channels in small-cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Res 49(21): 5901-5906, 1989. PMID: 2477149.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Giovannardi S,
    2. Forlani G,
    3. Balestrini M,
    4. Bossi E,
    5. Tonini R,
    6. Sturani E,
    7. Peres A and
    8. Zippel R
    : Modulation of the inward rectifier potassium channel IRK1 by the Ras signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 277(14): 12158-12163, 2002. PMID: 11809752. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110466200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Tsoukalas N,
    2. Aravantinou-Fatorou E,
    3. Baxevanos P,
    4. Tolia M,
    5. Tsapakidis K,
    6. Galanopoulos M,
    7. Liontos M and
    8. Kyrgias G
    : Advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC): new challenges and new expectations. Ann Transl Med 6(8): 145, 2018. PMID: 29862234. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.31
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Ray Chaudhuri A and
    2. Nussenzweig A
    : The multifaceted roles of PARP1 in DNA repair and chromatin remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18(10): 610-621, 2017. PMID: 28676700. DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2017.53
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Lord CJ,
    2. Tutt AN and
    3. Ashworth A
    : Synthetic lethality and cancer therapy: lessons learned from the development of PARP inhibitors. Annu Rev Med 66: 455-470, 2015. PMID: 25341009. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-050913-022545
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lord CJ and
    2. Ashworth A
    : PARP inhibitors: Synthetic lethality in the clinic. Science 355(6330): 1152-1158, 2017. PMID: 28302823. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam7344
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Slade D
    : PARP and PARG inhibitors in cancer treatment. Genes Dev 34(5-6): 360-394, 2020. PMID: 32029455. DOI: 10.1101/gad.334516.119
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Jiang W,
    2. Han X,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Wang L,
    5. Xu Z,
    6. Wei Q,
    7. Zhang W and
    8. Wang H
    : miR-22 enhances the radiosensitivity of small-cell lung cancer by targeting the WRNIP1. J Cell Biochem 120(10): 17650-17661, 2019. PMID: 31190355. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.29032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Kawabe Yi,
    2. Branzei D,
    3. Hayashi T,
    4. Suzuki H,
    5. Masuko T,
    6. Onoda F,
    7. Heo SJ,
    8. Ikeda H,
    9. Shimamoto A,
    10. Furuichi Y,
    11. Seki M and
    12. Enomoto T
    : A novel protein interacts with the Werner’s syndrome gene product physically and functionally. J Biol Chem 276(23): 20364-20369, 2001. PMID: 11301316. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.C100035200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kawabe Y,
    2. Seki M,
    3. Yoshimura A,
    4. Nishino K,
    5. Hayashi T,
    6. Takeuchi T,
    7. Iguchi S,
    8. Kusa Y,
    9. Ohtsuki M,
    10. Tsuyama T,
    11. Imamura O,
    12. Matsumoto T,
    13. Furuichi Y,
    14. Tada S and
    15. Enomoto T
    : Analyses of the interaction of WRNIP1 with Werner syndrome protein (WRN) in vitro and in the cell. DNA Repair (Amst) 5(7): 816-828, 2006. PMID: 16769258. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.04.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Leuzzi G,
    2. Marabitti V,
    3. Pichierri P and
    4. Franchitto A
    : WRNIP1 protects stalled forks from degradation and promotes fork restart after replication stress. EMBO J 35(13): 1437-1451, 2016. PMID: 27242363. DOI: 10.15252/embj.201593265
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Levy JMM,
    2. Towers CG and
    3. Thorburn A
    : Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 17(9): 528-542, 2017. PMID: 28751651. DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2017.53
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Yang ZJ,
    2. Chee CE,
    3. Huang S and
    4. Sinicrope FA
    : The role of autophagy in cancer: therapeutic implications. Mol Cancer Ther 10(9): 1533-1541, 2011. PMID: 21878654. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0047
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Pan B,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Song H,
    4. Xu Y,
    5. Wang R and
    6. Chen L
    : Mir-24-3p downregulation contributes to VP16-DDP resistance in small-cell lung cancer by targeting ATG4A. Oncotarget 6(1): 317-331, 2015. PMID: 25426560. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2787
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Amaravadi RK,
    2. Lippincott-Schwartz J,
    3. Yin XM,
    4. Weiss WA,
    5. Takebe N,
    6. Timmer W,
    7. DiPaola RS,
    8. Lotze MT and
    9. White E
    : Principles and current strategies for targeting autophagy for cancer treatment. Clin Cancer Res 17(4): 654-666, 2011. PMID: 21325294. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2634
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Xiao F,
    2. Bai Y,
    3. Chen Z,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Luo L,
    6. Huang J,
    7. Yang J,
    8. Liao H and
    9. Guo L
    : Downregulation of HOXA1 gene affects small cell lung cancer cell survival and chemoresistance under the regulation of miR-100. Eur J Cancer 50(8): 1541-1554, 2014. PMID: 24559685. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.01.024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Yuan C,
    2. Zhu X,
    3. Han Y,
    4. Song C,
    5. Liu C,
    6. Lu S,
    7. Zhang M,
    8. Yu F,
    9. Peng Z and
    10. Zhou C
    : Elevated HOXA1 expression correlates with accelerated tumor cell proliferation and poor prognosis in gastric cancer partly via cyclin D1. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 35: 15, 2016. PMID: 26791264. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-016-0294-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Liu G,
    3. Shen D,
    4. Ye H,
    5. Huang J,
    6. Jiao L and
    7. Sun Y
    : HOXA1 enhances the cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis of prostate cancer cells. Oncol Rep 34(3): 1203-1210, 2015. PMID: 26135141. DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4085
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Zha TZ,
    2. Hu BS,
    3. Yu HF,
    4. Tan YF,
    5. Zhang Y and
    6. Zhang K
    : Overexpression of HOXA1 correlates with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol 33(6): 2125-2134, 2012. PMID: 22864671. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-012-0472-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Yang H,
    2. Luo J,
    3. Liu Z,
    4. Zhou R and
    5. Luo H
    : MicroRNA-138 regulates DNA damage response in small cell lung cancer cells by directly targeting H2AX. Cancer Invest 33(4): 126-136, 2015. PMID: 25699650. DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2015.1006329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Matthaios D,
    2. Hountis P,
    3. Karakitsos P,
    4. Bouros D and
    5. Kakolyris S
    : H2AX a promising biomarker for lung cancer: a review. Cancer Invest 31(9): 582-599, 2013. PMID: 24164298. DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2013.849721
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kuo LJ and
    2. Yang LX
    : Gamma-H2AX - a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. In Vivo 22(3): 305-309, 2008. PMID: 18610740.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Podhorecka M,
    2. Skladanowski A and
    3. Bozko P
    : H2AX phosphorylation: Its role in DNA damage response and cancer therapy. J Nucleic Acids 2010: 920161, 2010. PMID: 20811597. DOI: 10.4061/2010/920161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Ivashkevich A,
    2. Redon CE,
    3. Nakamura AJ,
    4. Martin RF and
    5. Martin OA
    : Use of the γ-H2AX assay to monitor DNA damage and repair in translational cancer research. Cancer Lett 327(1-2): 123-133, 2012. PMID: 22198208. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Fang S,
    2. Zeng X,
    3. Zhu W,
    4. Tang R,
    5. Chao Y and
    6. Guo L
    : Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2) regulated by miR-200b contributes to multi-drug resistance of small cell lung cancer. Exp Mol Pathol 96(3): 438-444, 2014. PMID: 24769353. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2014.04.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Bürglin TR and
    2. Affolter M
    : Homeodomain proteins: an update. Chromosoma 125(3): 497-521, 2016. PMID: 26464018. DOI: 10.1007/s00412-015-0543-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Hegarty SV,
    2. Sullivan AM and
    3. O’Keeffe GW
    : Zeb2: A multifunctional regulator of nervous system development. Prog Neurobiol 132: 81-95, 2015. PMID: 26193487. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.07.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Epifanova E,
    2. Babaev A,
    3. Newman AG and
    4. Tarabykin V
    : Role of Zeb2/Sip1 in neuronal development. Brain Res 1705: 24-31, 2019. PMID: 30266271. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.09.034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Fardi M,
    2. Alivand M,
    3. Baradaran B,
    4. Farshdousti Hagh M and
    5. Solali S
    : The crucial role of ZEB2: From development to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer complexity. J Cell Physiol :, 2019. PMID: 30773635. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.28277
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Tang R,
    2. Lei Y,
    3. Hu B,
    4. Yang J,
    5. Fang S,
    6. Wang Q,
    7. Li M and
    8. Guo L
    : WW domain binding protein 5 induces multidrug resistance of small cell lung cancer under the regulation of miR-335 through the Hippo pathway. Br J Cancer 115(2): 243-251, 2016. PMID: 27336605. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.186
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Sudol M,
    2. Chen HI,
    3. Bougeret C,
    4. Einbond A and
    5. Bork P
    : Characterization of a novel protein-binding module—the WW domain. FEBS Lett 369(1): 67-71, 1995. PMID: 7641887. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00550-s
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Zanconato F,
    2. Cordenonsi M and
    3. Piccolo S
    : YAP/TAZ at the roots of cancer. Cancer Cell 29(6): 783-803, 2016. PMID: 27300434. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.05.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Liu W,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Xiao L,
    4. Bai Y,
    5. Qu A,
    6. Zheng Z and
    7. Yuan Z
    : Regulation of neuronal cell death by c-Abl-Hippo/MST2 signaling pathway. PLoS One 7(5): e36562, 2012. PMID: 22590567. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036562
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Harvey KF,
    2. Zhang X and
    3. Thomas DM
    : The Hippo pathway and human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 13(4): 246-257, 2013. PMID: 23467301. DOI: 10.1038/nrc3458
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Luo Y,
    2. Tong L,
    3. Meng H,
    4. Zhu W,
    5. Guo L,
    6. Wei T and
    7. Zhang J
    : MiR-335 regulates the chemo-radioresistance of small cell lung cancer cells by targeting PARP-1. Gene 600: 9-15, 2017. PMID: 27871924. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.11.031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Sachdev E,
    2. Tabatabai R,
    3. Roy V,
    4. Rimel BJ and
    5. Mita MM
    : PARP Inhibition in Cancer: An Update on Clinical Development. Target Oncol 14(6): 657-679, 2019. PMID: 31625002. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-019-00680-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. O’Connor MJ
    : Targeting the DNA Damage Response in Cancer. Mol Cell 60(4): 547-560, 2015. PMID: 26590714. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Wei T,
    2. Zhu W,
    3. Fang S,
    4. Zeng X,
    5. Huang J,
    6. Yang J,
    7. Zhang J and
    8. Guo L
    : miR-495 promotes the chemoresistance of SCLC through the epithelial-mesenchymal transition via Etk/BMX. Am J Cancer Res 7(3): 628-646, 2017. PMID: 28401017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Ye M,
    2. Wei T,
    3. Wang Q,
    4. Sun Y,
    5. Tang R,
    6. Guo L and
    7. Zhu W
    : TSPAN12 promotes chemoresistance and proliferation of SCLC under the regulation of miR-495. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 486(2): 349-356, 2017. PMID: 28302484. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.03.044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Guo L,
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Sun Y and
    4. Zhang F
    : Non-receptor tyrosine kinase Etk regulation of drug resistance in small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 46(3): 636-641, 2010. PMID: 20004564. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Abassi YA,
    2. Rehn M,
    3. Ekman N,
    4. Alitalo K and
    5. Vuori K
    : p130Cas Couples the tyrosine kinase Bmx/Etk with regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and cell migration. J Biol Chem 278(37): 35636-35643, 2003. PMID: 12832404. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M306438200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Chau CH,
    2. Chen KY,
    3. Deng HT,
    4. Kim KJ,
    5. Hosoya K,
    6. Terasaki T,
    7. Shih HM and
    8. Ann DK
    : Coordinating Etk/Bmx activation and VEGF upregulation to promote cell survival and proliferation. Oncogene 21(57): 8817-8829, 2002. PMID: 12483534. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. van Oosterwijk JG,
    2. Buelow DR,
    3. Drenberg CD,
    4. Vasilyeva A,
    5. Li L,
    6. Shi L,
    7. Wang YD,
    8. Finkelstein D,
    9. Shurtleff SA,
    10. Janke LJ,
    11. Pounds S,
    12. Rubnitz JE,
    13. Inaba H,
    14. Pabla N and
    15. Baker SD
    : Hypoxia-induced upregulation of BMX kinase mediates therapeutic resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Invest 128(1): 369-380, 2018. PMID: 29227282. DOI: 10.1172/JCI91893
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Chen S,
    2. Cai C,
    3. Sowalsky AG,
    4. Ye H,
    5. Ma F,
    6. Yuan X,
    7. Simon NI,
    8. Gray NS and
    9. Balk SP
    : BMX-mediated regulation of multiple tyrosine kinases contributes to castration resistance in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 78(18): 5203-5215, 2018. PMID: 30012673. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3615
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Serru V,
    2. Dessen P,
    3. Boucheix C and
    4. Rubinstein E
    : Sequence and expression of seven new tetraspans. Biochim Biophys Acta 1478(1): 159-163, 2000. PMID: 10719184. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00022-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Yáñez-Mó M,
    2. Barreiro O,
    3. Gordon-Alonso M,
    4. Sala-Valdés M and
    5. Sánchez-Madrid F
    : Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains: a functional unit in cell plasma membranes. Trends Cell Biol 19(9): 434-446, 2009. PMID: 19709882. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.06.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Hemler ME
    : Tetraspanin proteins promote multiple cancer stages. Nat Rev Cancer 14(1): 49-60, 2014. PMID: 24505619. DOI: 10.1038/nrc3640
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zöller M
    : Tetraspanins: push and pull in suppressing and promoting metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 9(1): 40-55, 2009. PMID: 19078974. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2543
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Sala-Valdés M,
    2. Ailane N,
    3. Greco C,
    4. Rubinstein E and
    5. Boucheix C
    : Targeting tetraspanins in cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets 16(10): 985-997, 2012. PMID: 22880813. DOI: 10.1517/14728222.2012.712688
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Zhao Z,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Wang C,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Jiang Y and
    6. Guo M
    : MicroRNA-25 regulates small cell lung cancer cell development and cell cycle through cyclin E2. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7(11): 7726-7734, 2014. PMID: 25550809.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Hwang HC and
    2. Clurman BE
    : Cyclin E in normal and neoplastic cell cycles. Oncogene 24(17): 2776-2786, 2005. PMID: 15838514. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208613
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Santamaria D and
    2. Ortega S
    : Cyclins and CDKS in development and cancer: lessons from genetically modified mice. Front Biosci 11: 1164-1188, 2006. PMID: 16146805. DOI: 10.2741/1871
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Gudas JM,
    2. Payton M,
    3. Thukral S,
    4. Chen E,
    5. Bass M,
    6. Robinson MO and
    7. Coats S
    : Cyclin E2, a novel G1 cyclin that binds Cdk2 and is aberrantly expressed in human cancers. Mol Cell Biol 19(1): 612-622, 1999. PMID: 9858585. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.19.1.612
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Möröy T and
    2. Geisen C
    : Cyclin E. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36(8): 1424-1439, 2004. PMID: 15147722. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.12.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Mazumder S,
    2. DuPree EL and
    3. Almasan A
    : A dual role of cyclin E in cell proliferation and apoptosis may provide a target for cancer therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 4(1): 65-75, 2004. PMID: 14965268. DOI: 10.2174/1568009043481669
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Chen T,
    2. Gao F,
    3. Feng S,
    4. Yang T and
    5. Chen M
    : MicroRNA-134 regulates lung cancer cell H69 growth and apoptosis by targeting WWOX gene and suppressing the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 464(3): 748-754, 2015. PMID: 26166818. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.07.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Pospiech K,
    2. Płuciennik E and
    3. Bednarek AK
    : WWOX Tumor suppressor gene in breast cancer, a historical perspective and future directions. Front Oncol 8: 345, 2018. PMID: 30211123. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Bednarek AK,
    2. Keck-Waggoner CL,
    3. Daniel RL,
    4. Laflin KJ,
    5. Bergsagel PL,
    6. Kiguchi K,
    7. Brenner AJ and
    8. Aldaz CM
    : WWOX, the FRA16D gene, behaves as a suppressor of tumor growth. Cancer Res 61(22): 8068-8073, 2001. PMID: 11719429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    1. Fabbri M,
    2. Iliopoulos D,
    3. Trapasso F,
    4. Aqeilan RI,
    5. Cimmino A,
    6. Zanesi N,
    7. Yendamuri S,
    8. Han SY,
    9. Amadori D,
    10. Huebner K and
    11. Croce CM
    : WWOX gene restoration prevents lung cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(43): 15611-15616, 2005. PMID: 16223882. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505485102
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Schrock MS and
    2. Huebner K
    : WWOX: a fragile tumor suppressor. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 240(3): 296-304, 2015. PMID: 25538133. DOI: 10.1177/1535370214561590
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Baryła I,
    2. Styczeń-Binkowska E and
    3. Bednarek AK
    : Alteration of WWOX in human cancer: a clinical view. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 240(3): 305-314, 2015. PMID: 25681467. DOI: 10.1177/1535370214561953
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Jin Y,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Huang W,
    5. Jiang H,
    6. Hou Y,
    7. Xu C,
    8. Zhai C,
    9. Gao X,
    10. Wang S,
    11. Wu Y,
    12. Zhu H and
    13. Lu S
    : The expression of miR-375 is associated with carcinogenesis in three subtypes of lung cancer. PLoS One 10(12): e0144187, 2015. PMID: 26642205. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Chamberlain PP,
    2. Sandberg ML,
    3. Sauer K,
    4. Cooke MP,
    5. Lesley SA and
    6. Spraggon G
    : Structural insights into enzyme regulation for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 3-kinase B. Biochemistry 44(44): 14486-14493, 2005. PMID: 16262249. DOI: 10.1021/bi051256q
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Irvine RF and
    2. Schell MJ
    : Back in the water: the return of the inositol phosphates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2(5): 327-338, 2001. PMID: 11331907. DOI: 10.1038/35073015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Sauer K and
    2. Cooke MP
    : Regulation of immune cell development through soluble inositol-1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate. Nat Rev Immunol 10(4): 257-271, 2010. PMID: 20336153. DOI: 10.1038/nri2745
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Yu JG,
    2. Ji CH and
    3. Shi MH
    : MicroRNA-26b suppresses tumorigenicity and promotes apoptosis in small cell lung cancer cells by targeting myeloid cell leukemia 1 protein. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 34(11): 593-605, 2018. PMID: 30392566. DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2018.06.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Quinn BA,
    2. Dash R,
    3. Azab B,
    4. Sarkar S,
    5. Das SK,
    6. Kumar S,
    7. Oyesanya RA,
    8. Dasgupta S,
    9. Dent P,
    10. Grant S,
    11. Rahmani M,
    12. Curiel DT,
    13. Dmitriev I,
    14. Hedvat M,
    15. Wei J,
    16. Wu B,
    17. Stebbins JL,
    18. Reed JC,
    19. Pellecchia M,
    20. Sarkar D and
    21. Fisher PB
    : Targeting Mcl-1 for the therapy of cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 20(10): 1397-1411, 2011. PMID: 21851287. DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2011.609167
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Perciavalle RM and
    2. Opferman JT
    : Delving deeper: MCL-1’s contributions to normal and cancer biology. Trends Cell Biol 23(1): 22-29, 2013. PMID: 23026029. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.08.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Xiang W,
    2. Yang CY and
    3. Bai L
    : MCL-1 inhibition in cancer treatment. Onco Targets Ther 11: 7301-7314, 2018. PMID: 30425521. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S146228
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Yasuda Y,
    2. Ozasa H,
    3. Kim YH,
    4. Yamazoe M,
    5. Ajimizu H,
    6. Yamamoto Funazo T,
    7. Nomizo T,
    8. Tsuji T,
    9. Yoshida H,
    10. Sakamori Y,
    11. Nakajima N,
    12. Menju T,
    13. Yoshizawa A,
    14. Date H and
    15. Hirai T
    : MCL1 inhibition is effective against a subset of small-cell lung cancer with high MCL1 and low BCL-XL expression. Cell Death Dis 11(3): 177, 2020. PMID: 32152266. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-2379-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Miko E,
    2. Margitai Z,
    3. Czimmerer Z,
    4. Várkonyi I,
    5. Dezso B,
    6. Lányi A,
    7. Bacsó Z and
    8. Scholtz B
    : miR-126 inhibits proliferation of small cell lung cancer cells by targeting SLC7A5. FEBS Lett 585(8): 1191-1196, 2011. PMID: 21439283. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.039
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Salisbury TB and
    2. Arthur S
    : The regulation and function of the L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) in cancer. Int J Mol Sci 19(8): 2373, 2018. PMID: 30103560. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082373
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Häfliger P and
    2. Charles RP
    : The L-type amino acid transporter LAT1-An emerging target in cancer. Int J Mol Sci 20(10): 2428, 2019. PMID: 31100853. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20102428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Lu X
    : The role of large neutral amino acid transporter (LAT1) in cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 19(11): 863-876, 2019. PMID: 31376820. DOI: 10.2174/1568009619666190802135714
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Nicklin P,
    2. Bergman P,
    3. Zhang B,
    4. Triantafellow E,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Nyfeler B,
    7. Yang H,
    8. Hild M,
    9. Kung C,
    10. Wilson C,
    11. Myer VE,
    12. MacKeigan JP,
    13. Porter JA,
    14. Wang YK,
    15. Cantley LC,
    16. Finan PM and
    17. Murphy LO
    : Bidirectional transport of amino acids regulates mTOR and autophagy. Cell 136(3): 521-534, 2009. PMID: 19203585. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Pardo OE,
    2. Arcaro A,
    3. Salerno G,
    4. Tetley TD,
    5. Valovka T,
    6. Gout I and
    7. Seckl MJ
    : Novel cross talk between MEK and S6K2 in FGF-2 induced proliferation of SCLC cells. Oncogene 20(52): 7658-7667, 2001. PMID: 11753643. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204994
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Cai T,
    3. Carmona GN,
    4. Abuhatzira L and
    5. Notkins AL
    : Small cell lung cancer growth is inhibited by miR-342 through its effect of the target gene IA-2. J Transl Med 14(1): 278, 2016. PMID: 27670444. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-1036-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Song P,
    2. Sekhon HS,
    3. Jia Y,
    4. Keller JA,
    5. Blusztajn JK,
    6. Mark GP and
    7. Spindel ER
    : Acetylcholine is synthesized by and acts as an autocrine growth factor for small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res 63(1): 214-221, 2003. PMID: 12517800.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  101. ↵
    1. Xie H,
    2. Notkins AL and
    3. Lan MS
    : IA-2, a transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase, is expressed in human lung cancer cell lines with neuroendocrine phenotype. Cancer Res 56(12): 2742-2744, 1996. PMID: 8665506.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. ↵
    1. Lan MS,
    2. Lu J,
    3. Goto Y and
    4. Notkins AL
    : Molecular cloning and identification of a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase, IA-2, from human insulinoma. DNA Cell Biol 13(5): 505-514, 1994. PMID: 8024693. DOI: 10.1089/dna.1994.13.505
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Hu YF,
    2. Zhang HL,
    3. Cai T,
    4. Harashima S and
    5. Notkins AL
    : The IA-2 interactome. Diabetologia 48(12): 2576-2581, 2005. PMID: 16273344. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-005-0037-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Gao F,
    2. Wu H,
    3. Wang R,
    4. Guo Y,
    5. Zhang Z,
    6. Wang T,
    7. Zhang G,
    8. Liu C and
    9. Liu J
    : MicroRNA-485-5p suppresses the proliferation, migration and invasion of small cell lung cancer cells by targeting flotillin-2. Bioengineered 10(1): 1-12, 2019. PMID: 30836864. DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2019.1586056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Gauthier-Rouvière C,
    2. Bodin S,
    3. Comunale F and
    4. Planchon D
    : Flotillin membrane domains in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 39(2): 361-374, 2020. PMID: 32297092. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09873-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Liu XX,
    2. Liu WD,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Zhu B,
    5. Shi X,
    6. Peng ZX,
    7. Zhu HC,
    8. Liu XD,
    9. Zhong MZ,
    10. Xie D,
    11. Zeng MS and
    12. Ren CP
    : Roles of flotillins in tumors. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 19(3): 171-182, 2018. PMID: 29504311. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1700102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Liu FT,
    2. Qu QG and
    3. Zhu ZM
    : Up-regulation of Flot-2 protein is related to lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in human solid tumors. Minerva Chir 72(2): 146-156, 2017. PMID: 27981826. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.16.07261-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Liu R,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Xu Z and
    4. Cui Y
    : [MiR-665 promotes the biological behavior of small cell lung cancer by targeting LLGL1]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 23(4): 223-232, 2020. PMID: 32222154. DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2020.104.03
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. ↵
    1. Tsuruga T,
    2. Nakagawa S,
    3. Watanabe M,
    4. Takizawa S,
    5. Matsumoto Y,
    6. Nagasaka K,
    7. Sone K,
    8. Hiraike H,
    9. Miyamoto Y,
    10. Hiraike O,
    11. Minaguchi T,
    12. Oda K,
    13. Yasugi T,
    14. Yano T and
    15. Taketani Y
    : Loss of Hugl-1 expression associates with lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. Oncol Res 16(9): 431-435, 2007. PMID: 18074678. DOI: 10.3727/000000007783980855
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. ↵
    1. Song J,
    2. Peng XL,
    3. Ji MY,
    4. Ai MH,
    5. Zhang JX and
    6. Dong WG
    : Hugl-1 induces apoptosis in esophageal carcinoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. World J Gastroenterol 19(26): 4127-4136, 2013. PMID: 23864775. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. ↵
    1. Schimanski CC,
    2. Schmitz G,
    3. Kashyap A,
    4. Bosserhoff AK,
    5. Bataille F,
    6. Schäfer SC,
    7. Lehr HA,
    8. Berger MR,
    9. Galle PR,
    10. Strand S and
    11. Strand D
    : Reduced expression of Hugl-1, the human homologue of Drosophila tumour suppressor gene lgl, contributes to progression of colorectal cancer. Oncogene 24(19): 3100-3109, 2005. PMID: 15735678. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kuphal S,
    2. Wallner S,
    3. Schimanski CC,
    4. Bataille F,
    5. Hofer P,
    6. Strand S,
    7. Strand D and
    8. Bosserhoff AK
    : Expression of Hugl-1 is strongly reduced in malignant melanoma. Oncogene 25(1): 103-110, 2006. PMID: 16170365. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Desuki A,
    2. Staib F,
    3. Gockel I,
    4. Moehler M,
    5. Lang H,
    6. Biesterfeld S,
    7. Maderer A,
    8. Galle PR,
    9. Berger MR and
    10. Schimanski CC
    : Loss of LLGL1 expression correlates with diffuse gastric cancer and distant peritoneal metastases. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019: 2920493, 2019. PMID: 31058107. DOI: 10.1155/2019/2920493
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. ↵
    1. Matsuzaki T,
    2. Takekoshi S,
    3. Toriumi K,
    4. Kitatani K,
    5. Nitou M,
    6. Imamura N,
    7. Ogura G,
    8. Masuda R,
    9. Nakamura N and
    10. Iwazaki M
    : Reduced expression of Hugl 1 contributes to the progression of lung squamous cell carcinoma. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 40(4): 169-177, 2015. PMID: 26662669.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  113. ↵
    1. Sun Y,
    2. Hu B,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Li Z,
    5. Wu J,
    6. Yang Y,
    7. Wei Y,
    8. Peng X,
    9. Chen H,
    10. Chen R,
    11. Jiang P,
    12. Fang S,
    13. Yu Z and
    14. Guo L
    : miR-216a-5p inhibits malignant progression in small cell lung cancer: involvement of the Bcl-2 family proteins. Cancer Manag Res 10: 4735-4745, 2018. PMID: 30425570. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S178380
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. ↵
    1. Ben-Ezra JM,
    2. Kornstein MJ,
    3. Grimes MM and
    4. Krystal G
    : Small cell carcinomas of the lung express the Bcl-2 protein. Am J Pathol 145(5): 1036-1040, 1994. PMID: 7977636.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Jiang SX,
    2. Sato Y,
    3. Kuwao S and
    4. Kameya T
    : Expression of bcl-2 oncogene protein is prevalent in small cell lung carcinomas. J Pathol 177(2): 135-138, 1995. PMID: 7490679. DOI: 10.1002/path.1711770206
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. ↵
    1. Lochmann TL,
    2. Floros KV,
    3. Naseri M,
    4. Powell KM,
    5. Cook W,
    6. March RJ,
    7. Stein GT,
    8. Greninger P,
    9. Maves YK,
    10. Saunders LR,
    11. Dylla SJ,
    12. Costa C,
    13. Boikos SA,
    14. Leverson JD,
    15. Souers AJ,
    16. Krystal GW,
    17. Harada H,
    18. Benes CH and
    19. Faber AC
    : Venetoclax is effective in small-cell lung cancers with high BCL-2 expression. Clin Cancer Res 24(2): 360-369, 2018. PMID: 29118061. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1606
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  117. ↵
    1. Lochmann TL,
    2. Bouck YM and
    3. Faber AC
    : BCL-2 inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy for small cell lung cancer. Oncoscience 5(7-8): 218-219, 2018. PMID: 30234143. DOI: 10.18632/oncoscience.455
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. ↵
    1. Gong M,
    2. Ma J,
    3. Guillemette R,
    4. Zhou M,
    5. Yang Y,
    6. Yang Y,
    7. Hock JM and
    8. Yu X
    : miR-335 inhibits small cell lung cancer bone metastases via IGF-IR and RANKL pathways. Mol Cancer Res 12(1): 101-110, 2014. PMID: 23966614. DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0136
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  119. ↵
    1. Riedemann J and
    2. Macaulay VM
    : IGF1R signalling and its inhibition. Endocr Relat Cancer 13 Suppl 1: S33-S43, 2006. PMID: 17259557. DOI: 10.1677/erc.1.01280
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  120. ↵
    1. Hiraga T,
    2. Myoui A,
    3. Hashimoto N,
    4. Sasaki A,
    5. Hata K,
    6. Morita Y,
    7. Yoshikawa H,
    8. Rosen CJ,
    9. Mundy GR and
    10. Yoneda T
    : Bone-derived IGF mediates crosstalk between bone and breast cancer cells in bony metastases. Cancer Res 72(16): 4238-4249, 2012. PMID: 22738911. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3061
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  121. ↵
    1. Weidle UH,
    2. Birzele F,
    3. Kollmorgen G and
    4. Rüger R
    : Molecular mechanisms of bone metastasis. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 13(1): 1-12, 2016. PMID: 26708594.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dougall WC
    : Molecular pathways: osteoclast-dependent and osteoclast-independent roles of the RANKL/RANK/OPG pathway in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 18(2): 326-335, 2012. PMID: 22031096. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2507
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  122. ↵
    1. Yin JJ,
    2. Pollock CB and
    3. Kelly K
    : Mechanisms of cancer metastasis to the bone. Cell Res 15(1): 57-62, 2005. PMID: 15686629. DOI: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290266
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. ↵
    1. Liu F,
    2. Yu X,
    3. Huang H,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Wang J,
    6. Zhang X and
    7. Lin Q
    : Upregulation of microRNA-450 inhibits the progression of lung cancer in vitro and in vivo by targeting interferon regulatory factor 2. Int J Mol Med 38(1): 283-290, 2016. PMID: 27246609. DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2612
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. ↵
    1. Yanai H,
    2. Negishi H and
    3. Taniguchi T
    : The IRF family of transcription factors: Inception, impact and implications in oncogenesis. Oncoimmunology 1(8): 1376-1386, 2012. PMID: 23243601. DOI: 10.4161/onci.22475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. ↵
    1. Taniguchi T,
    2. Ogasawara K,
    3. Takaoka A and
    4. Tanaka N
    : IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense. Annu Rev Immunol 19: 623-655, 2001. PMID: 11244049. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.623
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. ↵
    1. Nguyen H,
    2. Mustafa A,
    3. Hiscott J and
    4. Lin R
    : Transcription factor IRF-2 exerts its oncogenic phenotype through the DNA binding/transcription repression domain. Oncogene 11(3): 537-544, 1995. PMID: 7630638.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  127. ↵
    1. Vaughan PS,
    2. van der Meijden CM,
    3. Aziz F,
    4. Harada H,
    5. Taniguchi T,
    6. van Wijnen AJ,
    7. Stein JL and
    8. Stein GS
    : Cell cycle regulation of histone H4 gene transcription requires the oncogenic factor IRF-2. J Biol Chem 273(1): 194-199, 1998. PMID: 9417064. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.1.194
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  128. ↵
    1. Liao W,
    2. Overman MJ,
    3. Boutin AT,
    4. Shang X,
    5. Zhao D,
    6. Dey P,
    7. Li J,
    8. Wang G,
    9. Lan Z,
    10. Li J,
    11. Tang M,
    12. Jiang S,
    13. Ma X,
    14. Chen P,
    15. Katkhuda R,
    16. Korphaisarn K,
    17. Chakravarti D,
    18. Chang A,
    19. Spring DJ,
    20. Chang Q,
    21. Zhang J,
    22. Maru DM,
    23. Maeda DY,
    24. Zebala JA,
    25. Kopetz S,
    26. Wang YA and
    27. DePinho RA
    : KRAS-IRF2 axis drives immune suppression and immune therapy resistance in colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell 35(4): 559-572.e7, 2019. PMID: 30905761. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.02.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  129. ↵
    1. Shen J,
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Bi N,
    4. Song YM,
    5. Zhang FQ,
    6. Zhan QM and
    7. Wang LH
    : MicroRNA-886-3P functions as a tumor suppressor in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 19(12): 1185-1192, 2018. PMID: 30230945. DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1491505
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  130. ↵
    1. Santamaria PG,
    2. Moreno-Bueno G,
    3. Portillo F and
    4. Cano A
    : EMT: Present and future in clinical oncology. Mol Oncol 11(7): 718-738, 2017. PMID: 28590039. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  131. ↵
    1. Kalluri R and
    2. Weinberg RA
    : The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest 119(6): 1420-1428, 2009. PMID: 19487818. DOI: 10.1172/JCI39104
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. ↵
    1. Liu H,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Li J,
    4. Sun B,
    5. Qian H and
    6. Yin Z
    : The biological and clinical importance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in circulating tumor cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 141(2): 189-201, 2015. PMID: 24965746. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1752-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  133. ↵
    1. Nguyen DD and
    2. Chang S
    : Development of novel therapeutic agents by inhibition of oncogenic MicroRNAs. Int J Mol Sci 19(1): 65, 2017. PMID: 29280958. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19010065
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  134. ↵
    1. Ling H,
    2. Fabbri M and
    3. Calin GA
    : MicroRNAs and other non-coding RNAs as targets for anticancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12(11): 847-865, 2013. PMID: 24172333. DOI: 10.1038/nrd4140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. ↵
    1. Gambari R,
    2. Brognara E,
    3. Spandidos DA and
    4. Fabbri E
    : Targeting oncomiRNAs and mimicking tumor suppressor miRNAs: Νew trends in the development of miRNA therapeutic strategies in oncology (Review). Int J Oncol 49(1): 5-32, 2016. PMID: 27175518. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3503
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  136. ↵
    1. Broderick JA and
    2. Zamore PD
    : MicroRNA therapeutics. Gene Ther 18(12): 1104-1110, 2011. PMID: 21525952. DOI: 10.1038/gt.2011.50
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  137. ↵
    1. Juliano RL,
    2. Ming X and
    3. Nakagawa O
    : Cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides. Bioconjug Chem 23(2): 147-157, 2012. PMID: 21992697. DOI: 10.1021/bc200377d
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Malek A,
    2. Merkel O,
    3. Fink L,
    4. Czubayko F,
    5. Kissel T and
    6. Aigner A
    : In vivo pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and underlying mechanisms of various PEI(-PEG)/siRNA complexes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 236(1): 97-108, 2009. PMID: 19371615. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.01.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dowdy SF
    : Overcoming cellular barriers for RNA therapeutics. Nat Biotechnol 35(3): 222-229, 2017. PMID: 28244992. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3802
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bennett CF
    : Therapeutic antisense oligonucleotides are coming of age. Annu Rev Med 70: 307-321, 2019. PMID: 30691367. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-041217-010829
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Saliminejad K,
    2. Khorram Khorshid HR,
    3. Soleymani Fard S and
    4. Ghaffari SH
    : An overview of microRNAs: Biology, functions, therapeutics, and analysis methods. J Cell Physiol 234(5): 5451-5465, 2019. PMID: 30471116. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27486
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  138. ↵
    1. Lee SWL,
    2. Paoletti C,
    3. Campisi M,
    4. Osaki T,
    5. Adriani G,
    6. Kamm RD,
    7. Mattu C and
    8. Chiono V
    : MicroRNA delivery through nanoparticles. J Control Release 313: 80-95, 2019. PMID: 31622695. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  139. ↵
    1. Jones D
    : Setbacks shadow microRNA therapies in the clinic. Nat Biotechnol 36(10): 909-910, 2018. PMID: 30307922. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1018-909
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Vol. 18, Issue 5
September-October 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Genomics & Proteomics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MicroRNAs Involved in Small-cell Lung Cancer as Possible Agents for Treatment and Identification of New Targets
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Genomics & Proteomics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
MicroRNAs Involved in Small-cell Lung Cancer as Possible Agents for Treatment and Identification of New Targets
ULRICH H. WEIDLE, ADAM NOPORA
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Sep 2021, 18 (5) 591-603; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20283

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
MicroRNAs Involved in Small-cell Lung Cancer as Possible Agents for Treatment and Identification of New Targets
ULRICH H. WEIDLE, ADAM NOPORA
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Sep 2021, 18 (5) 591-603; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20283
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MicroRNAs – Role in Oncology
    • miRs Involved in Chemoresistance and Radioresistance of SCLC
    • miRs Up-regulated in SCLC With Activity in Preclinical In Vitro Systems
    • miRs Down-regulated in SCLC With Activity in Preclinical In Vitro Systems
    • Dysregulated miRs With Activity in Preclinical In Vivo Models of SCLC
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Deciphering the Role of miR-30a-5p and DLGAP1 Gene in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of FOXP3 rs3761548 With Cancer: Systematic Review and Two Approaches of X-chromosome Genotypic Meta-analysis
  • Bladder Cancer: Role of Circular RNAs in Oncogenesis, Tumor Suppression, and Therapeutic Target Identification
  • The Role of ER Stress and the Unfolded Protein Response in Cancer
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • apoptosis
  • invasion
  • proliferation
  • metastasis
  • chemoresistance
  • microRNA-based therapy
  • new treatment modalities
  • target identification
  • review
Cancer & Genome Proteomics

© 2025 Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Powered by HighWire