Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviews

Genomic Landscape of Liquid Biopsy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Personalized Medicine

NURBUBU T. MOLDOGAZIEVA, SERGEY P. ZAVADSKIY and ALEXANDER A. TERENTIEV
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics May 2021, 18 (3 Suppl) 369-383; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20266
NURBUBU T. MOLDOGAZIEVA
1Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nmoldogazieva@mail.ru
SERGEY P. ZAVADSKIY
2A.P. Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALEXANDER A. TERENTIEV
3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Advanced-stage HCC patients have poor survival rates and this requires the discovery of novel clear biomarkers for HCC early diagnosis and prognosis, identifying risk factors, distinguishing HCC from non-HCC liver diseases, and assessment of treatment response. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a novel minimally invasive approach to enable monitoring tumor progression, metastasis, and recurrence. Since the liquid biopsy analysis has relatively high specificity and low sensitivity in cancer early detection, there is a risk of bias. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies provide accurate and comprehensive gene expression and mutational profiling of liquid biopsies including cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and genomic components of extracellular vesicles (EVs) including micro-RNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs). Since HCC is a highly heterogeneous cancer, HCC patients can display various genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic patterns and exhibit varying sensitivity to treatment options. Identification of individual variabilities in genomic signatures in liquid biopsy has the potential to greatly enhance precision oncology capabilities. In this review, we highlight and critically discuss the latest progress in characterizing the genomic landscape of liquid biopsy, which can advance HCC personalized medicine.

  • Circulating tumor DNA
  • circulating tumor cells
  • exosomes
  • liquid biopsy
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • personalized medicine
  • review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of liver cancer, which represents the sixth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1). HCC early detection, surveillance status, and curative treatment are associated with significant improvements in patients’ overall survival (OS) (2). However, the HCC incidence rate is growing every year and its early diagnosis and accurate staging remain challenging (3). An additional challenge is HCC risk assessment and the prevention of cancer recurrence along with monitoring the patients’ postoperative status and treatment response (4).

From 70% to 90% of all HCC cases develop as a consequence of liver cirrhosis that, in turn, can be caused by inflammation associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), exposure to toxins such as alcohol abuse and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), congenital disorders, and metabolic syndrome (5). Since a large proportion of patients with HCC are accompanied by cirrhosis, it is considered as an important factor in liver injury, which leads to liver cancer. Therefore, the discovery of minimally invasive biomarkers that could enable precise HCC risk prediction and differentiating HCC from non-HCC diseases are important to identify the early stages of HCC (6).

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is the only biomarker recommended for clinical usage in HCC; however, it demonstrates relatively low sensitivity and specificity and limited diagnostic performance (7). Combined usage of AFP with its glycoform, AFP-L3, and with des-gamma carboxyprothrombin (DCP) significantly improves the performance of HCC detection. Other efficient candidate biomarkers and biomarker panels and models for detecting HCC at early stages are also being proposed (8, 9). With the progress in next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the development of multi-omics technologies, individual variability in gene expression patterns can be assessed (10). This is especially important in the case of HCC, cancer with a high degree of intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity and a variety of molecular subtypes (11-13). Multi-omics-based biomarker screening has a great potential in enabling personalized treatment or risk-stratified management of HCC patients (14-16).

Personalized medicine is an emerging field, which provides novel approaches to disease’s early diagnosis, prevention, prognosis, and treatment response based on individual variabilities in gene expression profiles, environmental factors, lifestyle, and diet (17). If a disease such as cancer has complex pathogenesis, patients can display various genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic patterns and can have different sensitivity to treatment options (18, 19). The whole-genome analysis enables identifying somatic mutations and gene amplification and greatly enhances precision oncology capabilities. This can be achieved through the usage of both inclusionary and exclusionary biomarkers that can improve the quality of patient care (20).

Recently, a new noninvasive approach, liquid biopsy, to detect and monitor tumors has been developed as an alternative approach to conventional tissue biopsy. A liquid biopsy enables repeated analysis of biomolecules collected from the blood circulation and other body fluids such as cerebrospinal or pleural fluids, saliva, and ascites (21). Such an approach allows analyzing cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and circulating non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) (22, 23). Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed that genomic profiling of liquid biopsy is a promising strategy in the identification of individual mutational patterns of HCC patients. However, the examination of liquid biopsy has relatively low sensitivity and high specificity in the early detection of HCC and there is a risk of bias (24-26). Therefore, accurate phenotyping and genotyping of liquid biopsy are of crucial importance.

Our review highlights and critically discusses the recent advancements in the identification of tumor-specific genomic signatures in ctDNA, CTCs, and exosomal ncRNAs as well as the assessment of their utility of HCC diagnosis and prognosis, and the prediction of treatment efficacy. We focus on the identification of individual variabilities in gene expression and mutational profiles of HCC patients with the use of liquid biopsy (with the exception of circulating, non-exosomal ncRNAs) for the development of personalized patient management and treatment strategies.

Genomic Signatures of Circulating Tumor DNA

Cell-free ctDNA is derived from small fragments of genomic DNA, which arise in the blood circulation due to cell death. ctDNA can be detected in more than 75% of advanced staged human malignancies including pancreatic, ovarian, colorectal, bladder, gastroesophageal, breast, melanoma, hepatocellular, and head and neck cancers, but in less than 50% of the primary brain, renal, prostate, or thyroid cancers (27). As Jiang et al. demonstrated the size distributions of plasma DNA fragments of HCC patients, HBV carriers with and without cirrhosis and healthy controls have a peak at 166 base pairs (bp) (28). However, a positive correlation has been observed between the proportion of cell-free DNA fragments of less than 150 bp and the tumor DNA concentration in plasma, no correlation if ctDNA length is between 150 and 180 bp, and a negative correlation if ctDNA length is >180 bp. The average fragment size of cell-free DNA was lower than that in tissue extracts indicating that ctDNA originates from tumor cells upon their apoptosis.

ctDNA in HCC diagnosis and prognosis. ctDNA has been identified with the use of deep sequencing in all stages of HCC to allow detection of somatic mutations in key genes, which drive hepatic carcinogenesis. Ng et al. showed that somatic mutations in HCC-associated genes are present in the ctDNA of 63% of patients and can be detected without prior knowledge of the mutations present in tissue biopsy in 27% (8/30) of patients (29). However, Howell et al. demonstrated high specificity, but low sensitivity of plasma ctDNA for detecting mutations in HCC tissue, since 71% of patients had mutations identified in HCC tissue DNA that were not detected in the matched ctDNA (30). They observed lower plasma ctDNA levels in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A as compared to BCLC stage B/C/D (median 122.89 ng/mL vs 168.21 ng/mL) HCC patients. 29 mutations in eight genes (21 unique mutations) were detected in 18/51 patients (35%); the most frequently mutated gene was ARID1A (11.7%), followed by CTNNB1 (7.8%) and TP53 (7.8%). Additionally, Liao et al. found that ctDNA with mutations in HCC driver genes such as TERT, CTNNB1, and TP53 can be detected in patients who suffered from vascular invasion predicting a shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) (31).

The ultra-deep sequencing of all exons in a targeted panel of 58 genes including frequent HCC driver genes revealed 21 somatic mutations in the tumor tissue of 75% of patients (32). 15 of 21 somatic mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressors (TERT promoter, TP53, CTNNB1, JAK1, AXIN1, and NTRK3) have been identified in plasma and serum of HCC patients, evidencing that ctDNA allows confidential detection of mutations characteristic for tumor tissue. Additionally, somatic copy number alterations (SCNA)-based machine learning and low-depth whole-genome sequencing of ctDNA in 384 plasma samples allowed early detection of HBV-related HCC and distinguishing cancer-free HBV patients (33).

Mutations in human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene promoter are the most prominent in HCC tumor tissue. A recent study showed that about 55% of 130 HCC patients are positive in ctDNA TERT promoter mutations, and this correlates with large tumor size and high DCP levels, followed by significantly shorter OS (34). Moreover, a triple diagnostic panel consisting of ctDNA TERT promoter mutations (C228T and C250T), miR-122, and AFP showed the best performance in distinguishing HBV-related HCC from non-HCC diseases such as chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and liver cirrhosis (35). Additionally, a positive correlation between the presence of TERT promoter mutation in plasma and an advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and vascular invasion has been observed in 42/95 HCC patients (36).

The exposure to dietary AFB1 induces DNA damage and mutations in TP53 gene (TP53 R249S). HBV exerts a synergistic effect with the AFB1 exposure to promote hepatocarcinogenesis (37). A somatic mutation in TP53 that causes the R249S substitution has been found in ctDNA of HCC patients with or without hepatectomy (38). In operable HCC, TP53 is the most common ctDNA mutant gene (50%), while R249S is the most recurrent mutation (19.2%) (39). HCC patients with a detectable mutation in postoperative plasma had a poor disease-free survival (DFS) than those without mutation (17.5 months vs 6.7 months), and postoperative ctDNA status can serve as an independent risk factor for the disease recurrence.

ctDNA epigenetic profiling also represents a promising approach for non-invasive cancer detection, since the inclusion of ctDNA methylation patterns enhances ctDNA diagnostic and prognostic value. For example, hypomethylation near HBV integration sites was detected in HCC patients, but not in patients with hepatitis or cirrhosis (40). Methylation profiles of tumor DNA and ctDNA have been shown to highly match each other, while diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of methylated ctDNA correlate with tumor stage and progression as well as treatment response. The methylated CpG island tandem amplification and sequencing (MCTA-Seq) showed that the liver is a major non-hematopoietic tissue contributing to plasma ctDNA level in healthy adults (41). A meta-analysis performed using both quantitative or qualitative analysis of ctDNA with the involvement of ctDNA methylation profiling and 33 papers with 4,113 patients showed that ctDNA displays promising diagnostic potential in HCC. However, ctDNA cannot serve as an independent tool for HCC detection being only complementary to AFP (42).

ctDNA in predicting treatment response. Curative treatment with the use of surgical resection, liver transplantation (LT), trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) are applicable only at the early stages of HCC and in less than 30% of cases (43, 44). However, ctDNA level can serve to predict patients’ survival and the disease recurrence in operable HCC. For example, Long et al. observed that the ctDNA-low and ctDNA-high HCC patients had median recurrence times of 19.5 months and 14.0 months, respectively (45). Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative ctDNA, tumor number and microvascular invasion were independent risk factors for recurrence in operable HCC.

About 70%-80% of HCC patients are diagnosed at the advanced stages and can receive only systemic therapy with the use of multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs), CDK4/6 inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (46-48). Selecting a treatment strategy is very complicated and dictates the necessity of biomarkers with clinical significance for predicting treatment efficacy and safety and for monitoring individual susceptibility to treatment. Targeted ultra-deep sequencing of 25 genes and Digital Droplet PCR of the TERT promoter in ctDNA have been exploited to identify predictors of primary resistance of advanced-staged HCC patients to systemic therapies. The most frequent mutations in the ctDNA of patients with advanced HCC were TERT promoter (51%), TP53 (32%), CTNNB1 (17%), PTEN (8%), AXIN1, ARID2, KMT2D, and TSC2 (6% each) (49). TP53 and CTNNB1 mutations were mutually exclusive. MKI-treated patients with mutations in genes encoding the components of phosphatidyl-inositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those without these mutations. Treatment with ICIs had no effects on PFS time of advanced-staged HCC patients with mutations in the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway.

Nakatsuka et al. found that significant increase in ctDNA levels associate with clinical stage, and a poor prognosis in HCC (50). Moreover, ctDNA levels increased significantly a few days after treatment with molecular-targeted agents such as lenvatinib, and there was a correlation between post-treatment ctDNA levels and therapeutic response. Furthermore, the rate of TERT mutations increased from 45% to 57% in post-treatment ctDNA, suggesting dynamic changes in mutation rate and their predictive roles in HCC treatment.

Dynamic quantitative and qualitative changes in ctDNA after treatment can also be observed with a serial assessment of ctDNA concentrations and mutational landscape. Ikeda et al. used serial NSG to identify mutational changes including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), amplifications, fusions, and specific insertions/deletions in genomic DNA and ctDNA after treatment with the pyrimidine antagonist capecitabine (51). The concordance levels between tissue DNA and ctDNA for the three most commonly altered genes, TP53, CTNNB1, and ARID1A, were 50.0%, 100.0%, and 90.0%, respectively. However, 4 of 5 patients with metabolic syndrome, 10 of 17 patients with HCV, and one patient with HBV had a TP53 mutation. Data on ctDNA mutational profiles implicated in HCC are summarized in Table I.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Findings on circulating tumor DNA mutational profiles in HCC patients.

Development of ctDNA tests. Frequently, ctDNA and tissue DNA show different mutational profiles. This can be explained by the facts that (i) tissue and blood samples are collected at different time points; (ii) ctDNA originates from multiple sites, while tissue DNA originates from the biopsied site; and (iii) ctDNA clones are suppressed during therapy. Dynamic changes in ctDNA SNVs and CNVs in long-term follow-up HCC patients correlated with tumor burden has been observed (52). The assessment of ctDNA mutational profile showed superior performance in combination with serum protein biomarkers such as AFP, AFP-L3%, and DCP, as well as tumor imaging for personalized tumor profiling and the assessment of OS and RFS after surgical resection and other adjuvant therapies (such as TACE, SIRT, and targeted treatment).

The use of combined detection of ctDNA alterations and protein biomarkers such as AFP is a feasible approach to identify early-stage HCC. The liquid biopsy assay, HCCscreen, for the early detection of the surface antigen of hepatitis B virus (HBsAg)-positive asymptomatic people with unknown HCC status has been developed by Qu et al. (53). The test has allowed identifying a total of 24 positive cases, among which four had confirmed HCC developed at a clinical follow-up for 6-8 months. The assay showed 100% sensitivity, 94% specificity and 17% positive predictive value in the validation cohort. Additionally, Kotoh et al. developed a sensitive methylated SEPT9 assay as a liquid biopsy test for HCC diagnosis with sensitivity and specificity of 63.2% and 90.0%, respectively (54). The assay identified the median copy number of methylated SEPT9 of 0.0, 2.0, and 6.4 in the healthy donors, chronic liver disease, and HCC groups, respectively, with significant differences among the groups.

Phenotyping and Genotyping of Circulating Tumor Cells

CTC isolation, enumeration and profiling. CTCs originate from primary tumor tissue or metastatic sites and can be detected in the peripheral blood. They represent intact and viable cells, which can be distinguished from normal cells by their physicochemical properties, genotype profiles, and cell surface antigens. Immunoaffinity enrichment methods enable the identification of CTC surface antigens such as epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) for CTC quantitative and qualitative assessment (55). For example, EpCAM-based immunomagnetic enrichment followed by multiparameter flow cytometric and immunocytochemical analysis has been developed for precise quantification of CTC number in cancer patients (56). Various anti-EpCAM and anti-ASGPR monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based platforms for phenotypic profiling and isolation of HCC-derived CTCs in HCC patients have been proposed (57, 58).

The CTCs have a short half-life, which varies from 1 to 2.4 h and during spreading in the bloodstream single CTCs spontaneously aggregate and disaggregate, while undergoing changes in their shape and size. CTCs experience dramatic phenotypic/genotypic modifications, being predominantly epithelial at tumor efferent vessels but further switching to mesenchymal phenotype through Smad2- and β-catenin-mediated signaling (59). The activation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) correlates with increased CTC number in hepatic veins and is associated with advanced-stage HCC and early tumor recurrence before the appearance of clinically detectable tumor nodules. Exploration of the relationship between the EMT process in CTCs and HCC progression allowed classifying CTCs into three subtypes: epithelial, mixed/hybrid, and mesenchymal CTCs (m-CTCs), which were found in about 53%, 83% and 57% of HCC patients, respectively (60). A CTC amount ≥2 per 5 ml has been found in 70.9% of 165 HCC patients, while m-CTCs were significantly correlated with high AFP levels, multiple tumors, advanced TNM and BCLC stage, and tumor earlier recurrence (61).

Since CTCs carry many tumor characteristics and their EMT phenotype correlates with cancer aggressiveness, early detection of CTCs and m-CTCs in the bloodstream of HCC patients provides an efficient tool for tumor monitoring and management. The prognostic significance of phenotypic/genotypic characterization of CTC subpopulations in cancer for accurate identification of tumor stage and size and the assessment of patients’ OS has been investigated in many studies. A meta-analysis of 5 studies including 339 patients revealed that the presence of CTCs in peripheral blood significantly increases the risk of HCC recurrence, while a meta-analysis of 18 studies including 1466 patients showed that CTC-positive HCC patients have shorter OS than that of CTC-negative patients (62).

The EMT activation in CTCs can be identified using the expression levels of epithelial markers, EpCAM and E-cadherin, and mesenchymal markers, N-cadherin and vimentin. During EMT, mesenchymal markers are overexpressed in m-CTCs and facilitate cancer cell migration, these correlate with portal vein thrombosis and metastasis (63). Additionally, high CTC amounts and a high percentage of m-CTCs are closely related to the expression of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), which is associated with a poor prognosis for HCC patients (64). Mixed CTCs can have a pivotal role in intrahepatic metastasis, while m-CTCs can be predictors of extrahepatic metastasis (65).

Different approaches for CTC isolation via targeting EMT markers have been proposed (66). In addition to CK19 and compared to EpCAM and vimentin, glypican-3 (GPC-3) has been proposed for CTCs separation, since a correlation between the positive count of CTCs using GPC-3 (≥5 CTC per 7.5 ml blood) and BCLC stage has been observed (67). Clinical significance of GPC-3-positive CTCs as a prognostic biomarker has been confirmed in multivariate analysis, which showed that preoperative GPC3-positive CTCs ≥5 indicate a poor prognosis, and therefore may be a useful biomarker for HCC patients’ outcome (68).

Qi et al. identified in HCC patients with a high CTC count and a high m-CTC percentage, 67 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in cancer cell adhesion and migration, apoptosis, and angiogenesis (69). One of the DEGs was BCAT1 that is involved in the resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs (70). Genetic analysis showed that CTCs derived from advanced-stage HCC tissues have HER-2 amplification and TP53 deletion. Using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-based SCNA profiling, tumor tissue origination was confirmed for 73% of CTCs from 75% of cancer patients (71).

Predictive value of CTCs. A high correlation between the characteristics of CTCs with those of HCC tissue suggests that CTCs have a potential for the assessment of post-surgical tumor recurrence and prognosis in HCC patients. Zhou et al. showed that CTC count ≥5 per 5 ml has more predictive value than AFP >400 μg/l and tumor diameter >5 cm (72). The authors found that preoperative CTC amount in the peripheral blood of HCC patients closely correlates with microvascular invasion, while surgical removal of the tumor decreases the CTC burden. CTC persistence at a high level (≥5 per 5 ml) after surgery suggested a risk of early recurrence, while CTCs <5 per 5 ml associated with longer OS and PFS.

Sun et al. observed that patients with a post-operative CTC amount ≥3 exhibit higher extrahepatic metastasis risk and shorter OS than those with lower CTC count (31.25 months vs not reached) (73). Low CTC count correlated with AFP levels ≤400 ng/ml, absence of vascular invasion, high differentiation, and early tumor stage in HCC patients during postoperative follow-up. In contrast, the postoperative early recurrence of HCC positively correlates with a higher number of CTCs, m-CTCs and mixed CTCs, while a significantly shorter postoperative RFS in patients positive for m-CTCs has been observed (74). The 1-year RFS of CTC-negative and CTC-positive patients after LT were 91.6% and 61.5%, while and OS rate was 91.7% and 88.5%, respectively (75). Therefore, the amount of CTCs can be useful in the evaluation of recurrence risk following LT, which is the most effective strategy for HCC treatment decreasing the CTC burden. A post-operative CTC number ≥1 per 5 ml has been proposed as a potential marker for predicting tumor recurrence after LT (76).

A recent study by Vogl et al. showed that the number of CTCs that are negative for CD45 and positive for ASGPR, CD146, and PD-L1 significantly decreases after intervention with micro-wave ablation, while no significant differences were observed in patients who received conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (C-TACE) (77). However, Chen et al. observed no relevance of dynamic changes of CTCs and their EMT phenotype to HCC recurrence after curative treatment (78). None of the total CTC or EMT markers correlated with clinical characteristics, such as age, sex, HBsAg, Child-Pugh score, BCLC stage, AFP level, tumor size, and vascular invasion. Nevertheless, Guo et al. showed that in EpCAM-positive HCC patients, low CTC levels correlate with treatment success and patients showed decreased CTC count after treatment with tumor resection, TACE and radiotherapy (79). On the contrary, patients with increased CTC levels showed disease progression and extrahepatic metastasis after curative surgical resection.

Rau et al. investigated the CTC count in HCC patients during longitudinal follow-up before and at different time points during systemic/targeted therapy. They showed that changes in the CTC count correlate with the patients’ treatment response in most cases and were particularly useful for monitoring HCC with low AFP levels (<100 ng/ml) (80). In patients with AFP<100 ng/ml who were originally treated with sorafenib alone, or who were afterwards enrolled in clinical trials with systemic therapy by ramucirumab and intravenous chemotherapy (IV-CT) or intra-arterial chemotherapy (IA-CT), CTC counts decreased and were consistent with the disease status. In patients with AFP >100 ng/ml who have a trend towards decreasing AFP levels, CTC counts remained low during the follow-up period and consistent with the clinical status of stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR). In patients with stable or increased AFP levels after treatment, the CTC amount increased as the disease progressed.

Genomic and Transcriptomic Profiling of Exosomal Non-coding RNAs

Extracellular vesicle biogenesis and regulation. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-derived membranous particles that are released from cells into the extracellular space. EVs are found in various body fluids and serve for intercellular communication by delivering their cargo molecules to other cells (81). EVs can be categorized into three types depending on the mode of biogenesis, which is an evolutionarily conserved process (82). The first type is exosomes (of about 30 to 100 nm in size) that are first formed by budding into the endosomes to create the multivesicular bodies (MVBs), which either fuse with the lysosomes or with the cell membrane (Figure 1). The second type is microvesicles (MVs) or ectosomes of about 100 nm to 1 μm in size; they arise by direct budding and shedding from the cell membrane. The third type is apoptotic bodies (APBs) of about 1-5 μm in size; these arise from cells by blebbing during apoptosis (83).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Components of liquid biopsy and biogenesis of exosomes from liver tumor cells. Circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells and exosomes carry many phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the tumor cells. Exosomes derived from tumor cells deliver their cargo molecules including micro-RNAs, long non-coding RNAs and circular RNAs to recipient cells. Biogenesis of exosomes proceeds through budding into early endosomes to give rise to late endosomes or the multivesicular bodies (MVBs), which further fuse either with the lysosomes or with the cell membrane.

Electron microscopy data demonstrate that exosomes are bilipid membranous vesicles that possess a nearly spherical shape and a concave cavity structure containing electron-dense and coated vesicles (84). Exosomes have irregular and diverse external morphologies, indicating the possible existence of subpopulations with specific functions. The exosomal content is modulated by changes in the intra- and extracellular microenvironment; therefore, the exosomes can serve as homeostasis sensors (85). Exosome ingredients include mRNAs, micro-RNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), proteins, lipids, and various metabolites. Exosomes can be internalized by neighboring or distant cells to regulate multiple target genes in the recipient cells and have been implicated in cell-to-cell communication, cell-microenvironment interaction and mediating cellular signaling and metabolism (86).

The content of exosomes derived from tumor cells can induce oncogenic reprogramming of target cells, which can enhance cell proliferation, tumor growth and metastasis (87). The characteristics and dynamic changes of the cargo molecules of exosomes directly reflect those in their parental tumor cells. This creates a basis for their usage in cancer diagnosis and prognosis, as well as prediction of individual responsiveness to anti-cancer therapy (88). To further facilitate investigations on exosomal markers including oncogenes and tumor suppressors, the manually curated and publicly available databases ExoCarta (http://www.exocarta.org) and Vesiclepedia (http://www.microvesicles.org) have been developed (89, 90).

Exosomal miRNAs and their target genes. miRNAs are small, 18- to 25-nucleotide (nt) endogenous cell-free, non-coding RNAs with the capability of post-transcriptional gene silencing (91). Exosomal miRNAs can be either downregulated or upregulated in HCC depending on the roles of their target genes in cancer growth. Therefore, some of them can function as oncogenes, whereas others can serve as tumor suppressors. For example, high-throughput sequencing of miRNAs and mRNA within the exosomes derived from Hep3B cells with EMT activation revealed 119 upregulated and 186 downregulated miRNAs along with 156 upregulated and 166 downregulated mRNAs. The most differentially expressed miRNA was miR-374a-5p that targets GADD45A encoding the growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible protein, GADD45-α (92).

The ability of exosomes to transfer miRNAs to cancer cells has been shown under both in vitro and in vivo conditions using normal hepatic stellate cell (HSC)-derived exosomes, which can be loaded by miR-335-5p that is taken up by HCC cells. These exosomes then supply miR-335-5p to the recipient HCC cells to induce the inhibition of cancer cell proliferation and invasion (93). Transferring HCC cell-derived exosomes that are enriched in miR-155 into new target cells, where miR-155 directly binds to 3’-untranslated regions (3’-UTR) of the PTEN gene can stimulate cancer cell proliferation (94). Exosomal miR-21 secreted from HCC cells can also directly target the PTEN gene leading to activation of phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1)/Akt signaling in normal HSCs. This converts HSCs to cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) that further promote the secretion of angiogenic cytokines including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 (MMP2 and MMP9, respectively) followed by cancer progression (95).

Xue et al. showed that 8 serum-derived exosomal miRNAs including miR-122, miR-125b, miR-145, miR-192, miR-194, miR-29a, miR-17-5p, and miR-106a demonstrate statistically significant differences between HCC and normal serum samples (96). The authors found a correlation between patients’ survival and exosomal levels of miR-106a that can function through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathways. The exosomal miR-638, miR-663a, miR-3648 and miR-4258 downregulated the expression of endothelial cell markers, E-cadherin, and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) (97).

Exosomal miR-93 is upregulated in HCC to promote cancer cell proliferation and invasion by directly targeting TP53INP1, TIMP2, and CDKN1A genes (98). miR-1290 is also overexpressed in HCC patient serum-derived exosomes and its delivery to human endothelial cells enhances their angiogenic ability. Targeting of SMEK1 by miR-1290 in endothelial cells diminishes the inhibition of VEGFR2 phosphorylation by SMEK1 to promote angiogenesis and tumor growth (99). Additionally, the higher serum exosomal miR-638 expression associates with tumor recurrence and correlates with tumor size, vascular infiltration and TNM stage in HCC patients (100).

Under in vivo conditions, mice treated with exosomes derived from the highly intrahepatic metastatic cell line HuH-7M exhibited increased tumorigenesis and liver metastases. Yang et al. reported that miR-92a-3p is an abundant miRNA in exosomes from highly-metastatic HCC cells and is enriched in the plasma of HCC patient-derived xenograft mice with high metastatic potential (101). The authors also showed that the E2F1 transcription factors and c-Myc proto-oncogene upregulate exosomal miR-92a-3p by directly binding to miR17HG. In turn, miR-92a-3p promotes EMT in recipient cancer cells via targeting PTEN and activating Akt/Snail signaling. Additionally, hypoxic conditions induce increased exosomal production by HCC cells to enhance EMT and cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Under hypoxic conditions, miR-1273f presents at higher levels and targets the LHX6 gene, promoting Wnt/β-catenin signaling (102). The acidic microenvironment triggers the activation of hypoxia-inducible factors-1α and -2α (HIF-1α and HIF-2α, respectively) and stimulates exosomal miR-21 and miR-10b expression, significantly promoting HCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion both in vivo and in vitro (103).

Roles of exosomal miRNAs in drug sensitivity. The exosomal miR-32-5p from the multidrug-resistant cell line Bel/5-FU has been shown to significantly increase in HCC to target the PTEN gene and activate the PI3K/Akt pathway; this induces multidrug resistance by promoting angiogenesis and activating EMT (104). In contrast, miR-744 is downregulated in HCC tissues, cell lines and exosomes; this promotes HepG2 cell proliferation and inhibits the chemosensitivity of HepG2 cells to sorafenib via targeting the PAX2 gene (105). However, several studies have reported on the ability of exosomal miRNAs to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy and systemic/targeted therapy. A recent study showed that treatment of HepG2 and Hep3B cells with human cerebral endothelial cell-derived exosomes carrying elevated miR-214 (hCEC-Exo-214) in combination with oxaliplatin or sorafenib, significantly reduces cancer cell viability and invasion, compared to monotherapy with either drug (106). This is achieved via targeting P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and splicing factor 3B subunit 3 (SF3B3) in HCC cells.

Additionally, exosomes from adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs) can effectively mediate miR-199a delivery to HCC cells. This sensitizes HCC cells to doxorubicin by targeting the MTOR gene and subsequently inhibiting the mTOR pathway (107). Exosomal miR-451a is down-regulated in HCC, while its overexpression induces apoptosis of HCC and endothelial cells via targeting the LPIN1 gene, which encodes lipin-1 phosphatidase phosphatase (108). The miR-451a from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes targets ADAM10 to suppress paclitaxel resistance, cell cycle transition, proliferation, migration, and invasion, and to promote HCC cell apoptosis (109) (Table II).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Exosomal micro-RNAs and their target genes implicated in HCC.

Exosomal lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA axes. lncRNAs are involved in the regulation of cell functioning due to their interaction with miRNAs to sponge them from their target mRNA; therefore, they can act as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) (110). For example, lncRNA H19 promotes proliferation and migration but inhibits apoptosis of HCC cells via sponging miR-520a-3p, thereby, upregulating the LIMK1 gene that encodes the LIM domain kinase 1 protein (111). Additionally, exosomal lncRNA ASMTL-AS1 can promote HCC malignancy via sponging miR-342-3p and transactivating c-Myc to promote oncogenic MAPK family Nemo-like kinase (NLK) expression and yes-associated protein 1 (YAP) activation (112).

In contrast, the transfer of exosomal lncRNA SENP3-EIF4A1 secreted by normal cells to HCC cells stimulates apoptosis and decreases the invasive, migratory and malignant properties of HCC cells (113). The inhibition of tumor growth under in vivo conditions was achieved through modulating the expression of the ZFP36 gene encoding zink-finger protein 36 homolog (ZFP36) via sponging miR-9-5p. A panel of differentially expressed serum exosomal lncRNAs including lnc-FAM72D-3, lnc-GPR89B-15, lnc-ZEB2-19 and lnc-EPC1-4 has been identified in HCC (114). Among them, the expression of lnc-GPR89B-15 and lnc-EPC1-4 correlated with that of AFP, while lnc-FAM72D-3 and lnc-EPC1-4 functioned as an oncogene and tumor suppressor, respectively.

Additionally, exosome-mediated transfer of lncRNAs such as linc-VLDLR and linc-ROR to cancer cells can be involved in tumor cell drug resistance. Exosomal linc-ROR acts via sponging miR-876-5p causing the release of forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) and decreasing cancer cell sensitivity to sorafenib (115). The exposure of HCC cells to diverse anti-cancer agents including sorafenib, camptothecin, and doxorubicin increased the expression of linc-VLDLR in HCC cells and HCC-derived extracellular vesicles. This caused increased linc-VLDLR expression in recipient cells and reduced chemotherapy-induced cell death (116).

Exosomal circRNA-miRNA-mRNA axes. One more type of ncRNAs is circRNAs that are well-expressed at low but stable levels in different species and exhibit cell-type, tissue-type and developmental-stage specificity and regulatory potency (117). Due to these features, exosomal circRNAs have a biomarker potential for early and minimally invasive cancer diagnosis and prognosis (118, 119).

Indeed, three isoforms of circPTGR1 are upregulated in serum exosomes from HCC patients and associate with the disease clinical stage and prognosis. The higher metastatic LM3 HCC cells have been shown to confer this potential on those with lower (97L) or no metastatic (HepG2) potential via exosomes containing circPTGR1 (120). This resulted in increased migratory and invasive capabilities of cancer cells via targeting miR449a and the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR or c-Met)-mediated pathway. Additionally, circRNA-100338 is highly expressed in both highly metastatic HCC cells and their secreted exosomes, suggesting that the metastatic ability of HCC cells could be enhanced by transferring exosomal circRNA-100338 to recipient cells (121).

In contrast, circRNA circ-0051443 is transmitted to HCC cells via exosomes to suppress their malignant behavior by promoting cell apoptosis and causing cell cycle arrest. Additionally, exosomal circ-0051443 decreases the weight and volume of the xenograft tumors in nude mice via BAK1 upregulation by targeting miR-331-3p (122). The higher level of circUHRF1 expression in human HCC tissues as compared to adjacent nontumor tissues associates with natural killer (NK) cell dysfunction and poor clinical prognosis. In the plasma of HCC patients, exosomal circUHRF1 inhibits NK cell-derived interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) secretion (123). Moreover, circUHRF1 targets miR-449c-5p to upregulate the expression of TIM-3 and may drive resistance to immunotherapy by immune checkpoint blockade with the use of anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) mAb in HCC patients. Data on lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA and circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory axes implicated in HCC are summarized in Table III.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Regulatory axes with the involvement of exosomal long non-coding RNAs/circular RNAs implicated in HCC.

Conclusion

In recent years, enormous progress has been achieved in non-invasive, liquid biopsy technologies, and cancer cell whole-genome analysis, which, if combined, can greatly enhance cancer early detection and monitoring. Genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic profiling of liquid biopsy components, ctDNA, CTCs, and exosomal ncRNAs (miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs) enables the identification of individual variabilities in gene expression and mutational patterns. This provides personalized patient follow-up and tailored treatment strategies.

Whereas ctDNA genomic and epigenomic profiling demonstrates the most significant potential in HCC diagnosis and prognosis and in predicting treatment response, there is only limited success in CTC and exosome phenotyping and genotyping so far. CTCs have many characteristics of the tumor tissue from which they originate and, therefore, their EMT phenotype allows assessment of cancer aggressiveness. However, there are still many challenges in CTC isolation and enumeration using intracellular and cell-surface antigens. Moreover, there are discrepancies in CTC number cut-offs and the unit volume of blood samples used by different groups; this makes it difficult to compare data from different studies to assess the CTC prognostic and predictive values. Additionally, there are only limited data on mutational profiles of CTCs in HCC patients.

EVs can give information about the properties of cancer tissue since their cargo molecules directly reflect characteristics and dynamic changes in their parental tumor cells. However, unlike non-exosomal circulating miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs, gene expression and mutational profiles of target genes of exosomal miRNAs and exosomal lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA and circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory axes are poorly studied. More comprehensive investigations and more data in this field are required to assess their utility in the management of HCC patients.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University Strategic Development Program under the Russian Academic Excellence Project 5-100.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Nurbubu T. Moldogazieva performed the literature search, wrote the draft and revised the manuscript. Sergey P. Zavadskiy contributed to writing the draft and figure preparation. Alexander A. Terentiev provided conceptualization and critically revised the manuscript. All Authors have read and agreed with the published version of the manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no competing interests.

  • Received April 7, 2021.
  • Revision received April 26, 2021.
  • Accepted April 27, 2021.
  • Copyright© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ferlay J,
    2. Colombet M,
    3. Soerjomataram I,
    4. Mathers C,
    5. Parkin DM,
    6. Piñeros M,
    7. Znaor A and
    8. Bray F
    : Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 144(8): 1941-1953, 2019. PMID: 30350310. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31937
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Kim DY and
    2. Han KH
    : Epidemiology and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 1(1): 2-14, 2012. PMID: 24159567. DOI: 10.1159/000339016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Prince D,
    2. Liu K,
    3. Xu W,
    4. Chen M,
    5. Sun JY,
    6. Lu XJ and
    7. Ji J
    : Management of patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 12: 1758835920970840, 2020. PMID: 33224278. DOI: 10.1177/1758835920970840
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Singal AG,
    2. Pillai A and
    3. Tiro J
    : Early detection, curative treatment, and survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. PLoS Med 11(4): e1001624, 2014. PMID: 24691105. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001624
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Llovet JM,
    2. Kelley RK,
    3. Villanueva A,
    4. Singal AG,
    5. Pikarsky E,
    6. Roayaie S,
    7. Lencioni R,
    8. Koike K,
    9. Zucman-Rossi J and
    10. Finn RS
    : Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 7(1): 6, 2021. PMID: 33479224. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-020-00240-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Trevisan França de Lima L,
    2. Broszczak D,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Bridle K,
    5. Crawford D and
    6. Punyadeera C
    : The use of minimally invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1874(2): 188451, 2020. PMID: 33065194. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188451
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Terentiev AA and
    2. Moldogazieva NT
    : Alpha-fetoprotein: a renaissance. Tumour Biol 34(4): 2075-2091, 2013. PMID: 23765762. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-013-0904-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Singh G,
    2. Yoshida EM,
    3. Rathi S,
    4. Marquez V,
    5. Kim P,
    6. Erb SR and
    7. Salh BS
    : Biomarkers for hepatocellular cancer. World J Hepatol 12(9): 558-573, 2020. PMID: 33033565. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i9.558
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Piñero F,
    2. Dirchwolf M and
    3. Pessôa MG
    : Biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response assessment. Cells 9(6): 1370, 2020. PMID: 32492896. DOI: 10.3390/cells9061370
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Oh S,
    2. Jo Y,
    3. Jung S,
    4. Yoon S and
    5. Yoo KH
    : From genome sequencing to the discovery of potential biomarkers in liver disease. BMB Rep 53(6): 299-310, 2020. PMID: 32475383.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Wu Y,
    2. Liu Z and
    3. Xu X
    : Molecular subtyping of hepatocellular carcinoma: A step toward precision medicine. Cancer Commun (Lond) 40(12): 681-693, 2020. PMID: 33290597. DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12115
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chan LK,
    2. Tsui YM,
    3. Ho DW and
    4. Ng IO
    : Cellular heterogeneity and plasticity in liver cancer. Semin Cancer Biol, 2021. PMID: 33647386. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.02.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Shimada S,
    2. Mogushi K,
    3. Akiyama Y,
    4. Furuyama T,
    5. Watanabe S,
    6. Ogura T,
    7. Ogawa K,
    8. Ono H,
    9. Mitsunori Y,
    10. Ban D,
    11. Kudo A,
    12. Arii S,
    13. Tanabe M,
    14. Wands JR and
    15. Tanaka S
    : Comprehensive molecular and immunological characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. EBioMedicine 40: 457-470, 2019. PMID: 30598371. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.058
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Moldogazieva NT,
    2. Mokhosoev IM,
    3. Zavadskiy SP and
    4. Terentiev AA
    : Proteomic profiling and artificial intelligence for hepatocellular carcinoma translational medicine. Biomedicines 9(2): 159, 2021. PMID: 33562077. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9020159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fujiwara N,
    2. Qian T,
    3. Koneru B and
    4. Hoshida Y
    : Omics-derived hepatocellular carcinoma risk biomarkers for precision care of chronic liver diseases. Hepatol Res 50(7): 817-830, 2020. PMID: 32323426. DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13506
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Liu XN,
    2. Cui DN,
    3. Li YF,
    4. Liu YH,
    5. Liu G and
    6. Liu L
    : Multiple “Omics” data-based biomarker screening for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 25(30): 4199-4212, 2019. PMID: 31435173. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i30.4199
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Precision medicine gets an edge. EBioMedicine 50: 1-2, 2019. PMID: 31852592. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.12.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Griffin AC,
    2. Topaloglu U,
    3. Davis S and
    4. Chung AE
    : From patient engagement to precision oncology: leveraging informatics to advance cancer care. Yearb Med Inform 29(1): 235-242, 2020. PMID: 32823322. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701983
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Schork NJ
    : Personalized medicine: Time for one-person trials. Nature 520(7549): 609-611, 2015. PMID: 25925459. DOI: 10.1038/520609a
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Saltz LB
    : Precision oncology giveth and precision oncology taketh away. Lancet Oncol 20(4): 464-466, 2019. PMID: 30857958. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30095-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Alix-Panabières C and
    2. Pantel K
    : Liquid biopsy: from discovery to clinical application. Cancer Discov 11(4): 858-873, 2021. PMID: 33811121. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1311
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Liskova A,
    2. Samec M,
    3. Koklesova L,
    4. Giordano FA,
    5. Kubatka P and
    6. Golubnitschaja O
    : Liquid biopsy is instrumental for 3PM dimensional solutions in cancer management. J Clin Med 9(9): 2749, 2020. PMID: 32854390. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092749
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Martins I,
    2. Ribeiro IP,
    3. Jorge J,
    4. Gonçalves AC,
    5. Sarmento-Ribeiro AB,
    6. Melo JB and
    7. Carreira IM
    : Liquid biopsies: applications for cancer diagnosis and monitoring. Genes (Basel) 12(3): 349, 2021. PMID: 33673461. DOI: 10.3390/genes12030349
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Chen VL,
    2. Xu D,
    3. Wicha MS,
    4. Lok AS and
    5. Parikh ND
    : Utility of liquid biopsy analysis in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma, determination of prognosis, and disease monitoring: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 18(13): 2879-2902.e9, 2020. PMID: 32289533. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Yin M,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Cao W and
    5. Zhong S
    : Diagnostic performance of blood-based liquid biopsies in hepatocellular carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 99(41): e22594, 2020. PMID: 33031312. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022594
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Jia S,
    2. Xie L,
    3. Li L,
    4. Qian Y,
    5. Wang J,
    6. Wang S,
    7. Zhang W and
    8. Qian B
    : Values of liquid biopsy in early detection of cancer: results from meta-analysis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn: 1-11, 2021. PMID: 33770449. DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1910025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Bettegowda C,
    2. Sausen M,
    3. Leary RJ,
    4. Kinde I,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Agrawal N,
    7. Bartlett BR,
    8. Wang H,
    9. Luber B,
    10. Alani RM,
    11. Antonarakis ES,
    12. Azad NS,
    13. Bardelli A,
    14. Brem H,
    15. Cameron JL,
    16. Lee CC,
    17. Fecher LA,
    18. Gallia GL,
    19. Gibbs P,
    20. Le D,
    21. Giuntoli RL,
    22. Goggins M,
    23. Hogarty MD,
    24. Holdhoff M,
    25. Hong SM,
    26. Jiao Y,
    27. Juhl HH,
    28. Kim JJ,
    29. Siravegna G,
    30. Laheru DA,
    31. Lauricella C,
    32. Lim M,
    33. Lipson EJ,
    34. Marie SK,
    35. Netto GJ,
    36. Oliner KS,
    37. Olivi A,
    38. Olsson L,
    39. Riggins GJ,
    40. Sartore-Bianchi A,
    41. Schmidt K,
    42. Shih lM,
    43. Oba-Shinjo SM,
    44. Siena S,
    45. Theodorescu D,
    46. Tie J,
    47. Harkins TT,
    48. Veronese S,
    49. Wang TL,
    50. Weingart JD,
    51. Wolfgang CL,
    52. Wood LD,
    53. Xing D,
    54. Hruban RH,
    55. Wu J,
    56. Allen PJ,
    57. Schmidt CM,
    58. Choti MA,
    59. Velculescu VE,
    60. Kinzler KW,
    61. Vogelstein B,
    62. Papadopoulos N and
    63. Diaz LA Jr.
    : Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med 6(224): 224ra24, 2014. PMID: 24553385. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Jiang P,
    2. Chan CW,
    3. Chan KC,
    4. Cheng SH,
    5. Wong J,
    6. Wong VW,
    7. Wong GL,
    8. Chan SL,
    9. Mok TS,
    10. Chan HL,
    11. Lai PB,
    12. Chiu RW and
    13. Lo YM
    : Lengthening and shortening of plasma DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(11): E1317-E1325, 2015. PMID: 25646427. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1500076112
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Ng CKY,
    2. Di Costanzo GG,
    3. Tosti N,
    4. Paradiso V,
    5. Coto-Llerena M,
    6. Roscigno G,
    7. Perrina V,
    8. Quintavalle C,
    9. Boldanova T,
    10. Wieland S,
    11. Marino-Marsilia G,
    12. Lanzafame M,
    13. Quagliata L,
    14. Condorelli G,
    15. Matter MS,
    16. Tortora R,
    17. Heim MH,
    18. Terracciano LM and
    19. Piscuoglio S
    : Genetic profiling using plasma-derived cell-free DNA in therapy-naïve hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a pilot study. Ann Oncol 29(5): 1286-1291, 2018. PMID: 29509837. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy083
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Howell J,
    2. Atkinson SR,
    3. Pinato DJ,
    4. Knapp S,
    5. Ward C,
    6. Minisini R,
    7. Burlone ME,
    8. Leutner M,
    9. Pirisi M,
    10. Büttner R,
    11. Khan SA,
    12. Thursz M,
    13. Odenthal M and
    14. Sharma R
    : Identification of mutations in circulating cell-free tumour DNA as a biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 116: 56-66, 2019. PMID: 31173963. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Liao W,
    2. Yang H,
    3. Xu H,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Ge P,
    6. Ren J,
    7. Xu W,
    8. Lu X,
    9. Sang X,
    10. Zhong S,
    11. Zhang H and
    12. Mao Y
    : Noninvasive detection of tumor-associated mutations from circulating cell-free DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients by targeted deep sequencing. Oncotarget 7(26): 40481-40490, 2016. PMID: 27248174. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9629
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Labgaa I,
    2. Villacorta-Martin C,
    3. D’Avola D,
    4. Craig AJ,
    5. von Felden J,
    6. Martins-Filho SN,
    7. Sia D,
    8. Stueck A,
    9. Ward SC,
    10. Fiel MI,
    11. Mahajan M,
    12. Tabrizian P,
    13. Thung SN,
    14. Ang C,
    15. Friedman SL,
    16. Llovet JM,
    17. Schwartz M and
    18. Villanueva A
    : A pilot study of ultra-deep targeted sequencing of plasma DNA identifies driver mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 37(27): 3740-3752, 2018. PMID: 29628508. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0206-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Tao K,
    2. Bian Z,
    3. Zhang Q,
    4. Guo X,
    5. Yin C,
    6. Wang Y,
    7. Zhou K,
    8. Wan S,
    9. Shi M,
    10. Bao D,
    11. Yang C and
    12. Xing J
    : Machine learning-based genome-wide interrogation of somatic copy number aberrations in circulating tumor DNA for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. EBioMedicine 56: 102811, 2020. PMID: 32512514. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hirai M,
    2. Kinugasa H,
    3. Nouso K,
    4. Yamamoto S,
    5. Terasawa H,
    6. Onishi Y,
    7. Oyama A,
    8. Adachi T,
    9. Wada N,
    10. Sakata M,
    11. Yasunaka T,
    12. Onishi H,
    13. Shiraha H,
    14. Takaki A and
    15. Okada H
    : Prediction of the prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma by TERT promoter mutations in circulating tumor DNA. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 36(4): 1118-1125, 2021. PMID: 32830343. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15227
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Trung NT,
    2. Hoan NX,
    3. Trung PQ,
    4. Binh MT,
    5. Van Tong H,
    6. Toan NL,
    7. Bang MH and
    8. Song LH
    : Clinical significance of combined circulating TERT promoter mutations and miR-122 expression for screening HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep 10(1): 8181, 2020. PMID: 32424223. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65213-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Oversoe SK,
    2. Clement MS,
    3. Pedersen MH,
    4. Weber B,
    5. Aagaard NK,
    6. Villadsen GE,
    7. Grønbæk H,
    8. Hamilton-Dutoit SJ,
    9. Sorensen BS and
    10. Kelsen J
    : TERT promoter mutated circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 55(12): 1433-1440, 2020. PMID: 33103505. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1837928
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Han C,
    2. Yu T,
    3. Qin W,
    4. Liao X,
    5. Huang J,
    6. Liu Z,
    7. Yu L,
    8. Liu X,
    9. Chen Z,
    10. Yang C,
    11. Wang X,
    12. Mo S,
    13. Zhu G,
    14. Su H,
    15. Li J,
    16. Qin X,
    17. Gui Y,
    18. Mo Z,
    19. Li L and
    20. Peng T
    : Genome-wide association study of the TP53 R249S mutation in hepatocellular carcinoma with aflatoxin B1 exposure and infection with hepatitis B virus. J Gastrointest Oncol 11(6): 1333-1349, 2020. PMID: 33457005. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-510
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Shen T,
    2. Li SF,
    3. Wang JL,
    4. Zhang T,
    5. Zhang S,
    6. Chen HT,
    7. Xiao QY,
    8. Ren WH,
    9. Liu C,
    10. Peng B,
    11. Ji XN,
    12. Yang Y,
    13. Lu PX,
    14. Chen TY,
    15. Yu L,
    16. Ji Y and
    17. Jiang DK
    : TP53 R249S mutation detected in circulating tumour DNA is associated with Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with or without hepatectomy. Liver Int 40(11): 2834-2847, 2020. PMID: 32594568. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14581
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. An Y,
    2. Guan Y,
    3. Xu Y,
    4. Han Y,
    5. Wu C,
    6. Bao C,
    7. Zhou B,
    8. Wang H,
    9. Zhang M,
    10. Liu W,
    11. Qiu L,
    12. Han Z,
    13. Chen Y,
    14. Xia X,
    15. Wang J,
    16. Liu Z,
    17. Huang W,
    18. Yi X and
    19. Huang J
    : The diagnostic and prognostic usage of circulating tumor DNA in operable hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Transl Res 11(10): 6462-6474, 2019. PMID: 31737198.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Dong P,
    3. Guo S,
    4. Tao C,
    5. Chen W,
    6. Zhao W,
    7. Wang J,
    8. Cheung R,
    9. Villanueva A,
    10. Fan J,
    11. Ding H,
    12. Schrodi SJ,
    13. Zhang D and
    14. Zeng C
    : Hypomethylation in HBV integration regions aids non-invasive surveillance to hepatocellular carcinoma by low-pass genome-wide bisulfite sequencing. BMC Med 18(1): 200, 2020. PMID: 32741373. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01667-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Ren J,
    3. Luo N,
    4. Guo H,
    5. Zheng Y,
    6. Li J,
    7. Tang F,
    8. Wen L and
    9. Peng J
    : Comprehensive DNA methylation analysis of tissue of origin of plasma cell-free DNA by methylated CpG tandem amplification and sequencing (MCTA-Seq). Clin Epigenetics 11(1): 93, 2019. PMID: 31234922. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-019-0689-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Chen P,
    3. Xie H and
    4. Cao P
    : Using circulating tumor DNA as a novel biomarker to screen and diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 9(4): 1349-1364, 2020. PMID: 31876977. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2799
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Marrero JA,
    2. Kulik LM,
    3. Sirlin CB,
    4. Zhu AX,
    5. Finn RS,
    6. Abecassis MM,
    7. Roberts LR and
    8. Heimbach JK
    : Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 68(2): 723-750, 2018. PMID: 29624699. DOI: 10.1002/hep.29913
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Ikeda K
    : Recent advances in medical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 49(1): 14-32, 2019. PMID: 30308081. DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13259
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Long G,
    2. Fang T,
    3. Su W,
    4. Mi X and
    5. Zhou L
    : The prognostic value of postoperative circulating cell-free DNA in operable hepatocellular carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 55(12): 1441-1446, 2020. PMID: 33119422. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1839127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Neureiter D,
    2. Stintzing S,
    3. Kiesslich T and
    4. Ocker M
    : Hepatocellular carcinoma: Therapeutic advances in signaling, epigenetic and immune targets. World J Gastroenterol 25(25): 3136-3150, 2019. PMID: 31333307. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i25.3136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chen S,
    2. Cao Q,
    3. Wen W and
    4. Wang H
    : Targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Challenges and opportunities. Cancer Lett 460: 1-9, 2019. PMID: 31207320. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.114428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. De Mattia E,
    2. Cecchin E,
    3. Guardascione M,
    4. Foltran L,
    5. Di Raimo T,
    6. Angelini F,
    7. D’Andrea M and
    8. Toffoli G
    : Pharmacogenetics of the systemic treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 25(29): 3870-3896, 2019. PMID: 31413525. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i29.3870
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. von Felden J,
    2. Craig AJ,
    3. Garcia-Lezana T,
    4. Labgaa I,
    5. Haber PK,
    6. D’Avola D,
    7. Asgharpour A,
    8. Dieterich D,
    9. Bonaccorso A,
    10. Torres-Martin M,
    11. Sia D,
    12. Sung MW,
    13. Tabrizian P,
    14. Schwartz M,
    15. Llovet JM and
    16. Villanueva A
    : Mutations in circulating tumor DNA predict primary resistance to systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 40(1): 140-151, 2021. PMID: 33097857. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-01519-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Nakatsuka T,
    2. Nakagawa H,
    3. Hayata Y,
    4. Wake T,
    5. Yamada T,
    6. Nishibatake Kinoshita M,
    7. Nakagomi R,
    8. Sato M,
    9. Minami T,
    10. Uchino K,
    11. Enooku K,
    12. Kudo Y,
    13. Tanaka Y,
    14. Kishikawa T,
    15. Otsuka M,
    16. Tateishi R and
    17. Koike K
    : Post-treatment cell-free DNA as a predictive biomarker in molecular-targeted therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 56(5): 456-469, 2021. PMID: 33712873. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-021-01773-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Ikeda S,
    2. Lim JS and
    3. Kurzrock R
    : Analysis of tissue and circulating tumor DNA by next-generation sequencing of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for targeted therapeutics. Mol Cancer Ther 17(5): 1114-1122, 2018. PMID: 29483209. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0604
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Cai Z,
    2. Chen G,
    3. Zeng Y,
    4. Dong X,
    5. Li Z,
    6. Huang Y,
    7. Xin F,
    8. Qiu L,
    9. Xu H,
    10. Zhang W,
    11. Su X,
    12. Liu X and
    13. Liu J
    : Comprehensive liquid profiling of circulating tumor DNA and protein biomarkers in long-term follow-up patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 25(17): 5284-5294, 2019. PMID: 31217202. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3477
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Qu C,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Wang P,
    4. Chen K,
    5. Wang M,
    6. Zeng H,
    7. Lu J,
    8. Song Q,
    9. Diplas BH,
    10. Tan D,
    11. Fan C,
    12. Guo Q,
    13. Zhu Z,
    14. Yin H,
    15. Jiang L,
    16. Chen X,
    17. Zhao H,
    18. He H,
    19. Wang Y,
    20. Li G,
    21. Bi X,
    22. Zhao X,
    23. Chen T,
    24. Tang H,
    25. Lv C,
    26. Wang D,
    27. Chen W,
    28. Zhou J,
    29. Zhao H,
    30. Cai J,
    31. Wang X,
    32. Wang S,
    33. Yan H,
    34. Zeng YX,
    35. Cavenee WK and
    36. Jiao Y
    : Detection of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in asymptomatic HBsAg-seropositive individuals by liquid biopsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116(13): 6308-6312, 2019. PMID: 30858324. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1819799116
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Kotoh Y,
    2. Suehiro Y,
    3. Saeki I,
    4. Hoshida T,
    5. Maeda M,
    6. Iwamoto T,
    7. Matsumoto T,
    8. Hidaka I,
    9. Ishikawa T,
    10. Takami T,
    11. Higaki S,
    12. Fujii I,
    13. Suzuki C,
    14. Shindo Y,
    15. Tokumitsu Y,
    16. Nagano H,
    17. Sakaida I and
    18. Yamasaki T
    : Novel liquid biopsy test based on a sensitive methylated SEPT9 assay for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Commun 4(3): 461-470, 2020. PMID: 32140662. DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1469
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Ferreira MM,
    2. Ramani VC and
    3. Jeffrey SS
    : Circulating tumor cell technologies. Mol Oncol 10(3): 374-394, 2016. PMID: 26897752. DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.01.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Magbanua MJM,
    2. Solanki TI,
    3. Ordonez AD,
    4. Hsiao F and
    5. Park JW
    : Enumeration of circulating tumor cells and disseminated tumor cells in blood and bone marrow by immunomagnetic enrichment and flow cytometry (IE/FC). Methods Mol Biol 1634: 203-210, 2017. PMID: 28819853. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7144-2_17
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Xia W,
    2. Li H,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Li M,
    5. Fan J,
    6. Sun W,
    7. Li N,
    8. Li R,
    9. Shao K and
    10. Peng X
    : In vivo coinstantaneous identification of hepatocellular carcinoma circulating tumor cells by dual-targeting magnetic-fluorescent nanobeads. Nano Lett 21(1): 634-641, 2021. PMID: 33264027. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Zhu L,
    2. Lin H,
    3. Wan S,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Wu L,
    6. Zhu Z,
    7. Song Y,
    8. Hu B and
    9. Yang C
    : Efficient isolation and phenotypic profiling of circulating hepatocellular carcinoma cells via a combinatorial-antibody-functionalized microfluidic synergetic-chip. Anal Chem 92(22): 15229-15235, 2020. PMID: 33124804. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03936
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Sun YF,
    2. Guo W,
    3. Xu Y,
    4. Shi YH,
    5. Gong ZJ,
    6. Ji Y,
    7. Du M,
    8. Zhang X,
    9. Hu B,
    10. Huang A,
    11. Chen GG,
    12. Lai PBS,
    13. Cao Y,
    14. Qiu SJ,
    15. Zhou J,
    16. Yang XR and
    17. Fan J
    : Circulating tumor cells from different vascular sites exhibit spatial heterogeneity in epithelial and mesenchymal composition and distinct clinical significance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 24(3): 547-559, 2018. PMID: 29070526. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1063
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Chen J,
    2. Cao SW,
    3. Cai Z,
    4. Zheng L and
    5. Wang Q
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotypes of circulating tumor cells correlate with the clinical stages and cancer metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Biomark 20(4): 487-498, 2017. PMID: 28869439. DOI: 10.3233/CBM-170315
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Ou H,
    2. Huang Y,
    3. Xiang L,
    4. Chen Z,
    5. Fang Y,
    6. Lin Y,
    7. Cui Z,
    8. Yu S,
    9. Li X and
    10. Yang D
    : Circulating tumor cell phenotype indicates poor survival and recurrence after surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 63(9): 2373-2380, 2018. PMID: 29926241. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5124-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Cui K,
    2. Ou Y,
    3. Shen Y,
    4. Li S and
    5. Sun Z
    : Clinical value of circulating tumor cells for the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 99(40): e22242, 2020. PMID: 33019399. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022242
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Court CM,
    2. Hou S,
    3. Winograd P,
    4. Segel NH,
    5. Li QW,
    6. Zhu Y,
    7. Sadeghi S,
    8. Finn RS,
    9. Ganapathy E,
    10. Song M,
    11. French SW,
    12. Naini BV,
    13. Sho S,
    14. Kaldas FM,
    15. Busuttil RW,
    16. Tomlinson JS,
    17. Tseng HR and
    18. Agopian VG
    : A novel multimarker assay for the phenotypic profiling of circulating tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 24(7): 946-960, 2018. PMID: 29624843. DOI: 10.1002/lt.25062
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Zhang Q,
    2. Xing W,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Hu J,
    5. Qi L and
    6. Xiang B
    : Circulating tumor cells undergoing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition: influence on prognosis in cytokeratin 19-positive hepatocellular carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther 14: 1543-1552, 2021. PMID: 33688202. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S298576
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Liu YK,
    2. Hu BS,
    3. Li ZL,
    4. He X,
    5. Li Y and
    6. Lu LG
    : An improved strategy to detect the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process in circulating tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Hepatol Int 10(4): 640-646, 2016. PMID: 27115761. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-016-9732-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Jia F,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Fang Z,
    4. Dong J,
    5. Shi F,
    6. Zhang W,
    7. Wang Z and
    8. Hu Z
    : Novel peptide-based magnetic nanoparticle for mesenchymal circulating tumor cells detection. Anal Chem 93(14): 5670-5675, 2021. PMID: 33788544. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00577
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Yi B,
    2. Wu T,
    3. Zhu N,
    4. Huang Y,
    5. Yang X,
    6. Yuan L,
    7. Wu Y,
    8. Liang X and
    9. Jiang X
    : The clinical significance of CTC enrichment by GPC3-IML and its genetic analysis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Nanobiotechnology 19(1): 74, 2021. PMID: 33726759. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-00818-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Hamaoka M,
    2. Kobayashi T,
    3. Tanaka Y,
    4. Mashima H and
    5. Ohdan H
    : Clinical significance of glypican-3-positive circulating tumor cells of hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A prospective study. PLoS One 14(5): e0217586, 2019. PMID: 31141571. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217586
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Qi LN,
    2. Xiang BD,
    3. Wu FX,
    4. Ye JZ,
    5. Zhong JH,
    6. Wang YY,
    7. Chen YY,
    8. Chen ZS,
    9. Ma L,
    10. Chen J,
    11. Gong WF,
    12. Han ZG,
    13. Lu Y,
    14. Shang JJ and
    15. Li LQ
    : Circulating tumor cells undergoing EMT provide a metric for diagnosis and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 78(16): 4731-4744, 2018. PMID: 29915159. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2459
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Luo L,
    2. Sun W,
    3. Zhu W,
    4. Li S,
    5. Zhang W,
    6. Xu X,
    7. Fang D,
    8. Grahn THM,
    9. Jiang L and
    10. Zheng Y
    : BCAT1 decreases the sensitivity of cancer cells to cisplatin by regulating mTOR-mediated autophagy via branched-chain amino acid metabolism. Cell Death Dis 12(2): 169, 2021. PMID: 33568627. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-021-03456-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Court CM,
    2. Hou S,
    3. Liu L,
    4. Winograd P,
    5. DiPardo BJ,
    6. Liu SX,
    7. Chen PJ,
    8. Zhu Y,
    9. Smalley M,
    10. Zhang R,
    11. Sadeghi S,
    12. Finn RS,
    13. Kaldas FM,
    14. Busuttil RW,
    15. Zhou XJ,
    16. Tseng HR,
    17. Tomlinson JS,
    18. Graeber TG and
    19. Agopian VG
    : Somatic copy number profiling from hepatocellular carcinoma circulating tumor cells. NPJ Precis Oncol 4: 16, 2020. PMID: 32637655. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-020-0123-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Zhou J,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Zhou H,
    4. Leng C,
    5. Hou B,
    6. Zhou C,
    7. Hu X,
    8. Wang J and
    9. Chen X
    : Preoperative circulating tumor cells to predict microvascular invasion and dynamical detection indicate the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 20(1): 1047, 2020. PMID: 33129301. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07488-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Sun YF,
    2. Wang PX,
    3. Cheng JW,
    4. Gong ZJ,
    5. Huang A,
    6. Zhou KQ,
    7. Hu B,
    8. Gao PT,
    9. Cao Y,
    10. Qiu SJ,
    11. Zhou J,
    12. Fan J,
    13. Guo W and
    14. Yang XR
    : Postoperative circulating tumor cells: An early predictor of extrahepatic metastases in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing curative surgical resection. Cancer Cytopathol 128(10): 733-745, 2020. PMID: 32501632. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Luo L,
    3. Cheng Y,
    4. He G,
    5. Peng B,
    6. Gao Y,
    7. Jiang ZS and
    8. Pan M
    : Correlation between postoperative early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and mesenchymal circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood. J Gastrointest Surg 22(4): 633-639, 2018. PMID: 29159757. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3619-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Chen Z,
    2. Lin X,
    3. Chen C,
    4. Chen Y,
    5. Zhao Q,
    6. Wu L,
    7. Wang D,
    8. Ma Y,
    9. Ju W,
    10. Chen M and
    11. He X
    : Analysis of preoperative circulating tumor cells for recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Ann Transl Med 8(17): 1067, 2020. PMID: 33145286. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-2751
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Wang PX,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Sun YF,
    4. Cheng JW,
    5. Zhou KQ,
    6. Wu SY,
    7. Hu B,
    8. Zhang ZF,
    9. Guo W,
    10. Cao Y,
    11. Huang XW,
    12. Zhou J,
    13. Fan J and
    14. Yang XR
    : Detection of circulating tumour cells enables early recurrence prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Int 41(3): 562-573, 2021. PMID: 33205544. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14734
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Vogl TJ,
    2. Riegelbauer LJ,
    3. Oppermann E,
    4. Kostantin M,
    5. Ackermann H,
    6. Trzmiel A,
    7. Stein S,
    8. Eichler K,
    9. Zharov VP,
    10. Roy D,
    11. Schnitzbauer AA,
    12. Strücker B,
    13. Pascher A,
    14. Bechstein WO and
    15. Juratli MA
    : Early dynamic changes in circulating tumor cells and prognostic relevance following interventional radiological treatments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One 16(2): e0246527, 2021. PMID: 33577574. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Li S,
    3. Li W,
    4. Yang R,
    5. Zhang X,
    6. Ye Y,
    7. Yu J,
    8. Ye L and
    9. Tang W
    : Circulating tumor cells undergoing EMT are poorly correlated with clinical stages or predictive of recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep 9(1): 7084, 2019. PMID: 31068623. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43572-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Guo W,
    2. Yang XR,
    3. Sun YF,
    4. Shen MN,
    5. Ma XL,
    6. Wu J,
    7. Zhang CY,
    8. Zhou Y,
    9. Xu Y,
    10. Hu B,
    11. Zhang X,
    12. Zhou J and
    13. Fan J
    : Clinical significance of EpCAM mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma by an optimized negative enrichment and qRT-PCR-based platform. Clin Cancer Res 20(18): 4794-4805, 2014. PMID: 25009297. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0251
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Rau KM,
    2. Liu CT,
    3. Hsiao YC,
    4. Hsiao KY,
    5. Wang TM,
    6. Hung WS,
    7. Su YL,
    8. Liu WC,
    9. Wang CH,
    10. Hsu HL,
    11. Chuang PH,
    12. Cheng JC and
    13. Tseng CP
    : Sequential circulating tumor cell counts in patients with locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: monitoring the treatment response. J Clin Med 9(1): 188, 2020. PMID: 32071283. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010188
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Fonseka P,
    2. Marzan AL and
    3. Mathivanan S
    : Introduction to the community of extracellular vesicles. Subcell Biochem 97: 3-18, 2021. PMID: 33779911. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-67171-6_1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Kang T,
    2. Atukorala I and
    3. Mathivanan S
    : Biogenesis of extracellular vesicles. Subcell Biochem 97: 19-43, 2021. PMID: 33779912. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-67171-6_2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Ibrahim SA and
    2. Khan YS
    : Histology, extracellular vesicles. 2021. PMID: 32965927.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Deng JH,
    2. Li ZJ,
    3. Wang ZX,
    4. Feng J,
    5. Huang XJ and
    6. Zeng ZM
    : Electron microscopy-based comparison and investigation of the morphology of exosomes derived from hepatocellular carcinoma cells isolated at different centrifugal speeds. Microsc Microanal 26(2): 310-318, 2020. PMID: 32051051. DOI: 10.1017/S1431927620000070
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Walsh SA,
    2. Hoyt BW,
    3. Rowe CJ,
    4. Dey D and
    5. Davis TA
    : Alarming cargo: the role of exosomes in trauma-induced inflammation. Biomolecules 11(4): 522, 2021. PMID: 33807302. DOI: 10.3390/biom11040522
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Marzan AL,
    2. Nedeva C and
    3. Mathivanan S
    : Extracellular vesicles in metabolism and metabolic diseases. Subcell Biochem 97: 393-410, 2021. PMID: 33779925. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-67171-6_15
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Lipinski S and
    2. Tiemann K
    : Extracellular vesicles and their role in the spatial and temporal expansion of tumor-immune interactions. Int J Mol Sci 22(7): 3374, 2021. PMID: 33806053. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073374
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Chitti SV and
    2. Nedeva C
    : Extracellular vesicles contain putative cancer biomarkers. Subcell Biochem 97: 363-374, 2021. PMID: 33779923. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-67171-6_13
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Keerthikumar S,
    2. Chisanga D,
    3. Ariyaratne D,
    4. Al Saffar H,
    5. Anand S,
    6. Zhao K,
    7. Samuel M,
    8. Pathan M,
    9. Jois M,
    10. Chilamkurti N,
    11. Gangoda L and
    12. Mathivanan S
    : ExoCarta: a web-based compendium of exosomal cargo. J Mol Biol 428(4): 688-692, 2016. PMID: 26434508. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Pathan M,
    2. Fonseka P,
    3. Chitti SV,
    4. Kang T,
    5. Sanwlani R,
    6. Van Deun J,
    7. Hendrix A and
    8. Mathivanan S
    : Vesiclepedia 2019: a compendium of RNA, proteins, lipids and metabolites in extracellular vesicles. Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1): D516-D519, 2019. PMID: 30395310. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1029
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Iwakawa HO and
    2. Tomari Y
    : The functions of MicroRNAs: mRNA decay and translational repression. Trends Cell Biol 25(11): 651-665, 2015. PMID: 26437588. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Lin Q,
    2. Zhou CR,
    3. Bai MJ,
    4. Zhu D,
    5. Chen JW,
    6. Wang HF,
    7. Li MA,
    8. Wu C,
    9. Li ZR and
    10. Huang MS
    : Exosome-mediated miRNA delivery promotes liver cancer EMT and metastasis. Am J Transl Res 12(3): 1080-1095, 2020. PMID: 32269736.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Wang F,
    2. Li L,
    3. Piontek K,
    4. Sakaguchi M and
    5. Selaru FM
    : Exosome miR-335 as a novel therapeutic strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 67(3): 940-954, 2018. PMID: 29023935. DOI: 10.1002/hep.29586
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Sun JF,
    2. Zhang D,
    3. Gao CJ,
    4. Zhang YW and
    5. Dai QS
    : Exosome-mediated MiR-155 transfer contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation by targeting PTEN. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 25: 218-228, 2019. PMID: 31645540. DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.918134
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Ren H,
    3. Dai B,
    4. Li J,
    5. Shang L,
    6. Huang J and
    7. Shi X
    : Hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomal miRNA-21 contributes to tumor progression by converting hepatocyte stellate cells to cancer-associated fibroblasts. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 37(1): 324, 2018. PMID: 30591064. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-018-0965-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Xue X,
    2. Zhao Y,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Qin L and
    5. Hu R
    : Development and validation of serum exosomal microRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem 120(1): 135-142, 2019. PMID: 30238497. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.27165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Yokota Y,
    2. Noda T,
    3. Okumura Y,
    4. Kobayashi S,
    5. Iwagami Y,
    6. Yamada D,
    7. Tomimaru Y,
    8. Akita H,
    9. Gotoh K,
    10. Takeda Y,
    11. Tanemura M,
    12. Murakami T,
    13. Umeshita K,
    14. Doki Y and
    15. Eguchi H
    : Serum exosomal miR-638 is a prognostic marker of HCC via downregulation of VE-cadherin and ZO-1 of endothelial cells. Cancer Sci 112(3): 1275-1288, 2021. PMID: 33426736. DOI: 10.1111/cas.14807
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Xue X,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Zhao Y,
    4. Hu R and
    5. Qin L
    : Exosomal miR-93 promotes proliferation and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma by directly inhibiting TIMP2/TP53INP1/CDKN1A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 502(4): 515-521, 2018. PMID: 29859935. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Wang Q,
    2. Wang G,
    3. Niu L,
    4. Zhao S,
    5. Li J,
    6. Zhang Z,
    7. Jiang H,
    8. Zhang Q,
    9. Wang H,
    10. Sun P,
    11. Xiang R,
    12. Chang A and
    13. Yang S
    : Exosomal MiR-1290 promotes angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting SMEK1. J Oncol 2021: 6617700, 2021. PMID: 33564307. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6617700
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Shi M,
    2. Jiang Y,
    3. Yang L,
    4. Yan S,
    5. Wang YG and
    6. Lu XJ
    : Decreased levels of serum exosomal miR-638 predict poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem 119(6): 4711-4716, 2018. PMID: 29278659. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.26650
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Yang B,
    2. Feng X,
    3. Liu H,
    4. Tong R,
    5. Wu J,
    6. Li C,
    7. Yu H,
    8. Chen Y,
    9. Cheng Q,
    10. Chen J,
    11. Cai X,
    12. Wu W,
    13. Lu Y,
    14. Hu J,
    15. Liang K,
    16. Lv Z,
    17. Wu J and
    18. Zheng S
    : High-metastatic cancer cells derived exosomal miR92a-3p promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of low-metastatic cancer cells by regulating PTEN/Akt pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 39(42): 6529-6543, 2020. PMID: 32917956. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-01450-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Min Z,
    3. Zhou Zhihang,
    4. Linhong M,
    5. Tao R,
    6. Yan L and
    7. Song H
    : Hypoxia-induced exosomes promote hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation and metastasis via miR-1273f transfer. Exp Cell Res 385(1): 111649, 2019. PMID: 31562861. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111649
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Tian XP,
    2. Wang CY,
    3. Jin XH,
    4. Li M,
    5. Wang FW,
    6. Huang WJ,
    7. Yun JP,
    8. Xu RH,
    9. Cai QQ and
    10. Xie D
    : Acidic microenvironment up-regulates exosomal miR-21 and miR-10b in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma to promote cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Theranostics 9(7): 1965-1979, 2019. PMID: 31037150. DOI: 10.7150/thno.30958
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Fu X,
    2. Liu M,
    3. Qu S,
    4. Ma J,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Shi T,
    7. Wen H,
    8. Yang Y,
    9. Wang S,
    10. Wang J,
    11. Nan K,
    12. Yao Y and
    13. Tian T
    : Exosomal microRNA-32-5p induces multidrug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma via the PI3K/Akt pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 37(1): 52, 2018. PMID: 29530052. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-018-0677-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. ↵
    1. Wang G,
    2. Zhao W,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Qiu G,
    5. Jiang Z,
    6. Wei G and
    7. Li X
    : Exosomal MiR-744 inhibits proliferation and sorafenib chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting PAX2. Med Sci Monit 25: 7209-7217, 2019. PMID: 31553714. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.919219
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    1. Semaan L,
    2. Zeng Q,
    3. Lu Y,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Zreik MM,
    6. Chamseddine MB,
    7. Chopp M,
    8. Zhang ZG and
    9. Moonka D
    : MicroRNA-214 enriched exosomes from human cerebral endothelial cells (hCEC) sensitize hepatocellular carcinoma to anti-cancer drugs. Oncotarget 12(3): 185-198, 2021. PMID: 33613846. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27879
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Lou G,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Xia C,
    4. Wang W,
    5. Qi J,
    6. Li A,
    7. Zhao L,
    8. Chen Z,
    9. Zheng M and
    10. Liu Y
    : MiR-199a-modified exosomes from adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve hepatocellular carcinoma chemosensitivity through mTOR pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 39(1): 4, 2020. PMID: 31898515. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-019-1512-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Zhao S,
    2. Li J,
    3. Zhang G,
    4. Wang Q,
    5. Wu C,
    6. Zhang Q,
    7. Wang H,
    8. Sun P,
    9. Xiang R and
    10. Yang S
    : Exosomal miR-451a functions as a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting LPIN1. Cell Physiol Biochem 53(1): 19-35, 2019. PMID: 31162914. DOI: 10.33594/000000118
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Xu Y,
    2. Lai Y,
    3. Cao L,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Chen G,
    6. Chen L,
    7. Weng H,
    8. Chen T,
    9. Wang L and
    10. Ye Y
    : Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomal microRNA-451a represses epithelial-mesenchymal transition of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by inhibiting ADAM10. RNA Biol: 1-16, 2020. PMID: 33206588. DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1851540
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Zhang W,
    3. Yang H,
    4. Xiang J,
    5. Wang X and
    6. Wang J
    : Integrative analysis of dysregulated lncRNA-associated ceRNA network reveals potential lncRNA biomarkers for human hepatocellular carcinoma. PeerJ 8: e8758, 2020. PMID: 32201648. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8758
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Wang D,
    2. Xing N,
    3. Yang T,
    4. Liu J,
    5. Zhao H,
    6. He J,
    7. Ai Y and
    8. Yang J
    : Exosomal lncRNA H19 promotes the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with Propofol via miR-520a-3p/LIMK1 axis. Cancer Med 9(19): 7218-7230, 2020. PMID: 32767662. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3313
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Ma D,
    2. Gao X,
    3. Liu Z,
    4. Lu X,
    5. Ju H and
    6. Zhang N
    : Exosome-transferred long non-coding RNA ASMTL-AS1 contributes to malignant phenotypes in residual hepatocellular carcinoma after insufficient radiofrequency ablation. Cell Prolif 53(9): e12795, 2020. PMID: 32722884. DOI: 10.1111/cpr.12795
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Pu J,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Yao T,
    5. Luo Z,
    6. Li W,
    7. Xu G,
    8. Liu J,
    9. Wei W and
    10. Deng Y
    : Exosome-transmitted long non-coding RNA SENP3-EIF4A1 suppresses the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY) 12(12): 11550-11567, 2020. PMID: 32602848. DOI: 10.18632/aging.103302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. ↵
    1. Yao Z,
    2. Jia C,
    3. Tai Y,
    4. Liang H,
    5. Zhong Z,
    6. Xiong Z,
    7. Deng M and
    8. Zhang Q
    : Serum exosomal long noncoding RNAs lnc-FAM72D-3 and lnc-EPC1-4 as diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY) 12(12): 11843-11863, 2020. PMID: 32554864. DOI: 10.18632/aging.103355
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. ↵
    1. Zhi Y,
    2. Abudoureyimu M,
    3. Zhou H,
    4. Wang T,
    5. Feng B,
    6. Wang R and
    7. Chu X
    : FOXM1-Mediated LINC-ROR regulates the proliferation and sensitivity to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 16: 576-588, 2019. PMID: 31082791. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.04.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. ↵
    1. Takahashi K,
    2. Yan IK,
    3. Wood J,
    4. Haga H and
    5. Patel T
    : Involvement of extracellular vesicle long noncoding RNA (linc-VLDLR) in tumor cell responses to chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Res 12(10): 1377-1387, 2014. PMID: 24874432. DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0636
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. ↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Yang L and
    3. Chen LL
    : The biogenesis, functions, and challenges of circular RNAs. Mol Cell 71(3): 428-442, 2018. PMID: 30057200. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Feng W,
    3. Kong M,
    4. Liu R,
    5. Wu A,
    6. Shen L,
    7. Tang Z and
    8. Wang F
    : Exosomal circRNAs: A new star in cancer. Life Sci 269: 119039, 2021. PMID: 33454367. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119039
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Dong Y,
    3. Gong A,
    4. Kong H,
    5. Gao J,
    6. Hao X,
    7. Liu Y,
    8. Wang Z,
    9. Fan Y,
    10. Liu C and
    11. Xu W
    : Exosomal circRNAs as novel cancer biomarkers: Challenges and opportunities. Int J Biol Sci 17(2): 562-573, 2021. PMID: 33613113. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.48782
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. ↵
    1. Wang G,
    2. Liu W,
    3. Zou Y,
    4. Wang G,
    5. Deng Y,
    6. Luo J,
    7. Zhang Y,
    8. Li H,
    9. Zhang Q,
    10. Yang Y and
    11. Chen G
    : Three isoforms of exosomal circPTGR1 promote hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via the miR449a-MET pathway. EBioMedicine 40: 432-445, 2019. PMID: 30630697. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.062
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  117. ↵
    1. Huang XY,
    2. Huang ZL,
    3. Huang J,
    4. Xu B,
    5. Huang XY,
    6. Xu YH,
    7. Zhou J and
    8. Tang ZY
    : Exosomal circRNA-100338 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via enhancing invasiveness and angiogenesis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 39(1): 20, 2020. PMID: 31973767. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-020-1529-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. ↵
    1. Chen W,
    2. Quan Y,
    3. Fan S,
    4. Wang H,
    5. Liang J,
    6. Huang L,
    7. Chen L,
    8. Liu Q,
    9. He P and
    10. Ye Y
    : Exosome-transmitted circular RNA hsa_circ_0051443 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Cancer Lett 475: 119-128, 2020. PMID: 32014458. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.01.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Zhang PF,
    2. Gao C,
    3. Huang XY,
    4. Lu JC,
    5. Guo XJ,
    6. Shi GM,
    7. Cai JB and
    8. Ke AW
    : Cancer cell-derived exosomal circUHRF1 induces natural killer cell exhaustion and may cause resistance to anti-PD1 therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer 19(1): 110, 2020. PMID: 32593303. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-020-01222-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Vol. 18, Issue 3 Suppl
May-June 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Genomics & Proteomics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genomic Landscape of Liquid Biopsy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Personalized Medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Genomics & Proteomics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Genomic Landscape of Liquid Biopsy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Personalized Medicine
NURBUBU T. MOLDOGAZIEVA, SERGEY P. ZAVADSKIY, ALEXANDER A. TERENTIEV
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics May 2021, 18 (3 Suppl) 369-383; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20266

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Genomic Landscape of Liquid Biopsy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Personalized Medicine
NURBUBU T. MOLDOGAZIEVA, SERGEY P. ZAVADSKIY, ALEXANDER A. TERENTIEV
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics May 2021, 18 (3 Suppl) 369-383; DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20266
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Genomic Signatures of Circulating Tumor DNA
    • Phenotyping and Genotyping of Circulating Tumor Cells
    • Genomic and Transcriptomic Profiling of Exosomal Non-coding RNAs
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma: MicroRNAs With Efficacy in Preclinical In Vivo Models
  • microRNAs Promoting Growth of Gastric Cancer Xenografts and Correlation to Clinical Prognosis
Show more Reviews

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Circulating tumor DNA
  • circulating tumor cells
  • Exosomes
  • liquid biopsy
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • personalized medicine
  • review
Cancer & Genome Proteomics

© 2023 Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Powered by HighWire