Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleR
Open Access

Molecular Basis of Lung Tropism of Metastasis

ULRICH H. WEIDLE, FABIAN BIRZELE, GWENDLYN KOLLMORGEN and RÜDIGER RÜGER
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics March 2016, 13 (2) 129-139;
ULRICH H. WEIDLE
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Penzberg, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FABIAN BIRZELE
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Penzberg, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GWENDLYN KOLLMORGEN
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Penzberg, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RÜDIGER RÜGER
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Penzberg, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ruediger.rueger{at}roche.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A predilection of metastasis to the lungs has been noted for several types of cancer. Herein, we summarize underlying mechanisms for lung tropism of metastasis. We discuss the identification of a gene signature in primary breast tumors predicting metastasis to the lungs, as well as functional validation of selected genes of the signature. We outline the contribution of pre- and metastatic niches, the role of exosomes, activation of disseminated, dormant tumor cells and selected tumor–stromal cell interactions to lung metastasis and colonization. We also refer to metastasis-mediating mechanisms based on alterations of the tumor cell cytoskeleton, as well as lung metastasis-suppressing mechanisms.

  • Lung metastasis and colonization
  • lung metastasis signature
  • metastatic niche
  • tumor cell–stromal cell interaction
  • review

Metastasis involves distinct steps, such as development of an aggressive tumor phenotype, intravasation, survival of tumor cells in transit, interaction with distant accomplices, extravasation, homing, formation of micrometastases, co-option of stroma in distant organs and finally their full colonization (1). The ‘seed-and soil’ hypothesis has postulated preferential colonization of pre-metastatic niches in distant organs (the ‘soil’) by circulating tumor cells (CTCs) derived from different tumor types (the ‘seed’) based on optimal interactions between tumor cells and the corresponding microenvironment (1, 2). Now, it has been confirmed that several types of tumors, such as breast cancer, melanoma, sarcoma and kidney cancer have a predilection for metastasis to the lungs. Other types of tumors such as colon, bladder, head-and-neck and pancreatic cancers, albeit not preferentially, also metastasize to the lungs (3,4). Early pre-clinical experiments in mice demonstrated preferential metastasis of lung-homing melanoma cells (5). After implantation of small tissue fragments derived from different organs, it was found that melanoma cells only metastasize to normal lung and ectopically placed lung tissue (5).

In order to metastasize, some of the cells that disseminate from the tumor eventually reach the bloodstream. During circulation the tumor cells reach the lung where they come into contact with as much as 100 m2 of vascular surface (6, 7). Tumor cells have a diameter five-times larger than that of pulmonary capillaries, which leads to them becoming stuck there and promotes tumor cell extravasion into the lung (1, 8). The lung capillaries are lined with endothelial cells that are surrounded by a basement membrane and adjacent alveolar cells. Traversing the basement membrane by CTCs requires expression of specific mediators of transendothelial migration. These anatomical constellations, in addition to genetically-based interactions discussed in more detail in the following text, contribute to the fact that the lungs are the second most common site for metastasis to occur. Targets discussed in this review, as well as molecular interactions between tumor cells, fibroblasts, macrophages and endothelial cells, are shown in Figure 1.

Niche

The concept that the formation and development of metastases is dependent on the formation of pre- and metastatic niches was solidified by experimental evidence (9-12). Generic as well as target organ-specific mediators are probably involved in niche formation. Potential pre- and metastatic niches in the lung are located around terminal bronchioles and bronchiolar veins (13). The concept of the pre-metastatic niche in the lung has been substantiated by studies with Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) and B16 melanoma tumor-bearing mice. The lungs of these mice showed an increased infiltration of myeloid cells expressing macrophage antigen 1 (MAC1, CD11b, integrin αM) compared to non tumor-bearing mice. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGFA), transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) secreted by the primary tumor activates lung endothelial cells to express and release S100 calcium-binding proteins A8 and A9 (S100A8 and S100A9). The inflammatory chemoattractants recruit MAC1+ myeloid cells to the pre-metastatic niche of the lung, but not to other organs such as kidney and liver (14-16). S100A8 also acts as a chemoattractant for tumor cells. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 (p38MAPK) signaling was a prerequisite for recruitment of both cell types. Lung colonization and recruitment of MAC1+ myeloid cells was inhibited by 90% using monoclonal antibodies directed against S100A8 and S100A9, pinpointing similar mechanisms involved in recruitment of these cells. There is evidence that the recruitment of myeloid and tumor cells is mediated by migration-stimulatory factors with specificity for the corresponding distant organ of the pre-metastatic site. The factor responsible for inducing S100A8 and S100A9 was identified as serum amyloid A3 through interaction with toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on macrophages and tumor cells (17-19). Further evidence for the importance of the interplay between tumor cells and stromal cells for niche formation and lung colonization was obtained with an LLC-carcinoma-based tail vein metastasis model (20). Lung colonization was strictly dependent on the interaction between tumor cell-secreted versican and TLR2 on host macrophages, resulting in secretion of TNFα.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Schematic overview of targets discussed in this review. Molecular interactions between tumor cells and endothelial cells, stromal cells (such as fibroblasts) and myeloid cells (such as macrophages) are shown. Ingenuity pathway analysis was used for designing the figure. CSF1: Colony-stimulating factor 1; CSF1R: colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor; CXCL1,2: C-X-C motif ligand 1,2; CXCR2: C-X-C chemokine receptor 2; EGF: epidermal growth factor; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; ID1/3: helix-loop-helix transcription factor modulator ID1/3; INTA4: integrin α4; INTB1,7: integrin β1,7; MENA INV: invasive splice variant of MENA; TNC: tenascin C; VCAM1: vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.

Recruitment of bone marrow-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells is a subsequent step in the evolution of a metastatic niche in the lungs. Modification of the extracellular matrix (ECM) by fibronectin and lysyl-oxidase secretion from activated fibroblasts facilitates engraftment of metastatic tumor cells to the niche for colonization with micrometastases (21). Finally, progression of the early metastatic niche to a niche supporting the progression of micrometastases to macrometastases is mediated by an angiogenic switch due to recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells (5, 22).

Exosomes

Exosomes have been shown to be involved in metastasis and creation of metastatic niches. Exosomes are small vesicles derived from the endocytic pathway and are abundantly secreted by tumor cells. They carry genomic and proteomic signatures characteristic of the tumor they are derived from. Exosomes have been associated with many steps of tumor pathogenesis (23-26). Most recently, a role in microRNA biogenesis has been associated with promotion of tumorigenesis (27). Additionally, exosome transfer from stromal cells to breast cancer cells, resulting in regulation of therapy resistance pathways, has been demonstrated (28).

In a rat model of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, it was shown that exosomes can act over long distances and create a metastatic environment for tumor cells which is dependent on tumor cell-expressed cluster of differentiation 44 variant 6 (CD44v6) (29). Pulmonary vascular destabilization is an early step facilitating lung metastasis (30). The role of exosomes in enhancing lung permeability in mice was shown with exosomes derived from highly (B16F10) and poorly (B16F0) metastatic melanoma cells after tail vein injection into mice by monitoring extravasated dextran (31). Only exosomes derived from the B16F10 cell line were able to enhance lung permeability. A 240-fold increase in tumor burden in the lungs was noted when exosomes derived from B16F10 cells were intravenously injected prior to implantation of B16F0 melanoma cells (31). Transcriptional profiling of lung tissue after injection of exosomes derived from B16F10 cells revealed 130 differentially expressed genes. Among the genes identified were genes involved in ECM remodeling and inflammation, heat-shock proteins and effectors of metastatic niche formation such as S100A8 and S100A9.

Dormancy

Disseminated tumor cells which have penetrated into the lung parenchyma can undergo dormancy because they are not adapted to the new microenvironment (32-34). At this stage, cell division and apoptosis occur at similar rates; therefore, micrometastatic lesions are not expanded. Micrometastases contain only a small number of dividing cells and are therefore resistant to antimitotic agents (35). These complex processes can be recapitulated in mouse models (36-39). B16 melanoma cells disseminated to the lungs can undergo a protracted state of senescence (36). The dormant state is due to lack of signaling by ECM components such as integrins and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) (8). An inhibitory effect on tumor cells is exerted by bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) derived from stromal cells acting as antagonists of wingless-type MMTV integration site family member (WNT) signaling (39). A number of pathways have been shown to activate dormant tumor cells in the lungs. One mechanism is based on activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) and downregulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 (40-42). For example, interaction of fibronectin (FN) with the uPAR-α5β1 complex was shown to activate ERK signaling and to down-regulate p38 (45). Additionally, DAN domain family member 5 (DAND5), an inhibitor of lung-derived BMP ligands, is able to activate dormant cancer cells in the lungs, resulting in outgrowth of metastases (40). A DAND5-linked tumor gene signature predicts metastatic relapse to the lungs (40). Finally, tenascin secreted by disseminated tumor cells or stromal cells can stimulate WNT and NOTCH signaling (41-43). Stroma-derived periostin can also recruit WNT ligands, thereby augmenting WNT signaling (44). Interaction of fibronectin with the uPAR–α5β1 complex was shown to activate ERK signaling and to down-regulate p38 (45). Activating interactions probably occur in the context of a metastatic niche (32) as described earlier.

Cytoskeleton

Alterations of the cytoskeleton have an impact on cell adhesion, migration and metastasis. MENA, one of the three members of the Ena/Vasp homology proteins, is a cytoplasmic protein which plays a role in extension of actin fibers and therefore acts as a cytoskeleton remodeling protein. Extension of actin fibers is normally inhibited by a capping protein which is removed by cleavage of the ends of the fibers by cofilin, permitting their elongation. During epithelial mesenchymal transition, a MENA splice variant (MENA INV), which contains exon 16, is expressed in tumor cells (46). This variant is especially active in promoting fiber elongation and growth of lamellopodia and filopodia, as well as acting as a mediator of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced cell motility and transendothelial invasiveness (47, 48). In xenograft models, carcinoma cells transfected with this variant exhibited a six-fold increase in lung metastasis. Possible involvement of MENA INV in metastasis to the lungs of defined types of human tumors needs to be investigated in more detail. Analysis of steady-state levels of RNA for MENA INV in comparison to MENA in tumor tissues versus corresponding normal tissues based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed no change of MENA INV RNA in invasive breast cancer, significant increase of MENA INV RNA in prostate adenocarcinoma and an inverse relationship in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) as shown in Figure 2. For further analysis, data correlating lung metastasis with MENA INV RNA should be generated in sub-groups of patients with known status of lung metastasis.

RhoC, a member of the Rho-family of small (21 kDa) Ca-dependent GTPases, functions as a regulator of the actin-based cytoskeleton and has been implicated in metastasis of cancer to the lungs (49, 50). This was strongly supported in a breast cancer metastasis model (PY-MT) that was deficient for RhoC. Although the tumors formed normally, there was almost no lung metastasis and impaired cell motility was observed in cells derived from the mammary tumors (49). Microarray profiling of selected melanoma cell lines has identified RhoC as a mediator of lung metastasis in mice (50). RhoC enhances metastasis when overexpressed, dominant negative RhoC inhibits metastasis. RhoC also increases the abundance and metastatic potential of breast cancer stem cells (51); is overexpressed in 90% of inflammatory breast carcinoma, the most lethal form of breast cancer (51); and has been implicated in metastasis of head-and-neck cancer (52).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Inclusion rate of MENA exon 11 in transcripts from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Cohorts for invasive breast carcinoma: 111 matched normal, 1046 tumor samples; prostate adenocarcinoma: 51 matched normal, 360 tumor samples; and renal clear cell carcinoma (RCC): 72 matched normal, 519 tumor samples. Expression was measured by whole-transcriptome sequencing and splice junction counts as derived from the Broad FIREHOSE portal were used to compute inclusion rates. The percentage of inclusion rate of exon 11 in MENA transcripts is shown and represents the percentage of reads indicating inclusion of exon 11 versus the percentage indicating a skipping event of exon 11. Boxes contain 50% of the samples within the box, while the whiskers include all other samples except for outliers. The inclusion rate was measured based on RNASeq splice junction data indicating inclusion of the exon versus splice junction counts indicating an exon skipping event. Normal tissue represents matched adjacent normal tissue of patients with cancer.

Integrin β1/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling has been shown to mediate tumor cell invasion and proliferation of cancer cells disseminated to the lungs by multiple pathways, including cytoskeletal signaling (53-55). From a mechanistic point of view, integrin β1 was shown to activate a dual kinase complex consisting of FAK and rouse sarcoma cellular homolog (SRC). This complex is able to bind and phosphorylate various adaptor proteins such as p130 crk-associated substrate (CAS) and paxillin, and is activated in many tumor cells, generating signals leading to tumor growth and metastasis (53-55). Neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated gene 9 (NEDD9), an adaptor protein which enhances focal contact formation and invasion, is amplified in an H-Ras-driven mouse melanoma model and in metastatic human melanomas (56). Ezrin, a cytoplasmic peripheral membrane protein acting as a cytoskeletal organizer has been identified as an important mediator of metastasis of pediatric sarcomas to the lungs (57, 58). In a pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma model, increased expression of the homeobox transcription factor six homeobox 1 (SIX1) was observed, which acted as an inducer of ezrin in lung metastatic variants (57). Up-regulation of ezrin has also been noted in metastatic osteosarcoma (58), underlining selective pressure for ezrin expression in pediatric sarcoma metastasis.

Lung Metastasis Modifier Genes

Patients with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer very frequently experience relapse with lung metastasis. Retinoic acid receptor responder 3 (RARRES3) was identified as a suppressor of breast cancer metastasis to lung based on regulation of adhesion to lung parenchyma and differentiation (59). In MDA-MB-231-LM2 breast cancer cells, RARRES3 prevents metastasis to the lungs (59). Reduced expression of RARRES3 in a sub-group of patients with breast cancer allows identification of those who are more likely to develop lung metastasis (59). RARRES3 exhibits phospholipase A1/2 catalytic activity which stimulates proliferation, whereas the competence for adhesion to the lung parenchyma is mediated by a domain independent of the enzymatic activity. RARRES3 can be induced by retinoic acid. Therefore, use of retinoic acid in the adjuvant setting might be an option to induce RARRES3-based metastasis-suppressive function.

Signal-induced proliferation-associated gene 1 (SIPA) was identified as a candidate modifier of metastasis to the lungs (60). SIPA1 is a GTPase activating protein that modulates the activity of RAS-related protein (RAP) 1. SIPA1 overexpression increases metastatic capacity as shown with spontaneous metastasis assays of transfectants, and overexpression of SIPA1 is associated with metastatic progression of several human cancer types (60). Interestingly, a polymorphism in SIPA1 due to a nonsynonymous amino acid substitution hindering the RAP-GTPase function attenuates pulmonary metastasis (60).

ECM and Lung Metastasis

The ECM plays a key role for metastasis of breast cancer to the lungs in early stages of metastasis and in the context of the metastatic niche (61). Herein we highlight the role of tenascin C and periostin in metastasis of breast cancer cells to the lungs. A correlation between expression of tenascin C and breast cancer metastasis has been reported (62). Periostin knock-out mice develop polyoma middle T antigen (PY-MT)-driven mammary tumors, however, lung metastasis is significantly diminished compared to PY-MT-driven tumors in wild-type mice (63). A bi-phasic role for tenascin C in lung colonization of breast cancer cells has been identified (62). Ablation of tenascin C in disseminated cells early in the metastatic process inhibits the outgrowth of lung metastases, whereas late inhibition does not affect progression from micro- to macrometastasis. This indicates the essential role of cancer cell-derived tenascin C for metastatic outgrowth until the tumor stroma takes over as a source for tenascin C, emphasizing the role of tenascin C as a ‘seed’ and ‘soil-intrinsic’ prometastatic factor. Periostin and tenascin C can enhance WNT and NOTCH signaling support for metastasis-initiating cells by activating developmental pathways increasing the viability of these cells. The role of the microenvironment is underlined by the fact periostin as well as TNFα can be produced by transforming growth factor β3 (TGFβ3)-stimulated myofibroblasts (63). Periostin can bind to stromal WNT and present WNT to stem-like, metastasis-initiating cells and is also able to bind to tenascin C, anchoring it to ECM components such as fibronectin and type I collagen. Tenascin C can also increase the concentration of growth factors such as EGF and fibroblast growth factor and interact with fibronectin, heparin-sulfate proteoglycans, fibrinogen, integrins, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and EGF receptor (EGFR). Tenascin C was shown to activate NOTCH signaling by means of musashi, an RNA-binding protein, which acts through repression of translation of the NOTCH inhibitor mNumb (64). Furthermore, tenascin C mediates induction of leucine-repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LRG5), a target of the WNT pathway and a marker of stem cells (65).

Identification of a Gene-based Signature Mediating Metastasis to the Lungs

Several classes of genes involved in tumorigenesis and metastasis have been identified (3, 4, 66) which play a role in tumor initiation, tumor progression, metastasis initiation, metastatic progression and metastatic virulence. Genes involved in metastatic virulence confer a selective advantage on tumor cells in distant organs, but not for the pathogenesis of the primary tumor. Virulence genes can promote intra- and extravasation, survival in the circulation, adaptation to survival and colonization in the parenchyma of distant organs, and emergence from dormancy. Some of the genes as outlined above have overlapping functions and therefore can be assigned to several categories.

In the following, we focus on genes promoting lung metastasis. It was demonstrated that clusters of CTCs are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis (67). Making use of mammary fat pad implantation of breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231-2M2 tagged with green fluorescent protein or mCherry, it was shown that CTC clusters consisting of two to 50 cells have a 23- to 50-fold increased metastatic potential to the lungs. In mouse models, knock-down of the cell junction component plakoglobin abrogates CTC cluster formation and lung metastasis. Moreover, presence of CTC clusters in patients with breast- and prostate cancer correlates with a poor prognosis (67).

Transcriptional profiling and subsequent validation experiments making use of metastasizing versus non-metastasizing breast cancer cell lines have revealed several genes involved in the process of lung metastasis (68-70). Based on this approach, the lung metastasis gene-expression signature (LMS) was identified, which correlates with worse prognosis and survival in patients with LMS-expressing primary breast tumors (68-70). Part of the LMS are genes such as broad-specificity ligand of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-family, epiregulin (EREG), chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 1 (CXCL1), MMP1 and -2, cell adhesion molecule secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1), interleukin 13 decoy receptor IL13A2, transcriptional inhibitor of cell differentiation (ID1), prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase (PTSG2/COX2) and angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4). Some of the identified genes, such as SPARC, VCAM1, IL13RA2 and MMP2 are generally restricted to aggressive lung cancer metastatic cell lines (68). Expression of others, such as EREG, MMP1, PTSG2, CXCL1 and ID1 are not restricted to lung metastatic cell populations but their levels increase with metastatic propensity. It was shown that lung versus bone tropism of metastasis of breast cancer cell lines rely on different transcriptional programs (69).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

RNA steady-state levels for helix-loop-helix transcription factor modulator ID1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1) and tenascin C (TNC) in invasive breast carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma and clear cell renal carcinoma (RCC) in comparison to corresponding normal tissues. Invasive breast carcinoma: 111 matched normal, 1,046 tumor samples; prostate adenocarcinoma: 51 matched normal, 360 tumor samples; and RCC: 72 matched normal, 519 tumor samples. Expression was measured by whole-transcriptome sequencing and values provided represent normal read counts (log2) as derived from the Broad FIREHOSE portal. The red lines indicate low versus higher expression. Expression data are shown as box plots. The line in the middle of the box represents the data median. The rectangles show the upper and lower 25% quartile, therefore 50% of the data points are included in the rectangle, while the whiskers include all other samples except for outliers.

Tumors which carry the LMS are larger at diagnosis in comparison to LMS-negative tumors (70). A marked rise in metastasis has been observed for LMS-positive breast tumors which reached 2 cm in diameter, pointing to a mechanistic link between expression of the gene signature, associated tumor growth and metastatic recurrence. Transfection experiments have validated several genes of the LMS as being drivers of lung metastasis of breast cancer cell lines, especially when expressed in combination (68).

Selected genes will be discussed in more detail in the following sections. It is noteworthy that some of the identified genes, such as EREG, PTGS2, MMP1 and ANGPTL4, cooperate in remodeling the vasculature of mammary tumors and their metastases (68). ANGPTL4, a gene induced by TGFβ signaling, was shown to disrupt vascular endothelial cell–cell junctions and mediate retention of disseminated tumor cells in the lungs (71). As shown in Figure 3, TCGA-based analysis of steady-state levels of RNA for tenascin C, VCAM1 and ID1 in breast cancer, RCC and prostate cancer did not reveal up-regulation of the corresponding RNAs by comparison with matching normal tissues, with the exception of VCAM1 in RCC. The latter finding is probably due to the high vascularization of RCC. To obtain more conclusive data, analysis of patient subgroups and status of lung metastasis have to be performed.

ID Genes

ID genes (ID1 to ID4) and their gene products control differentiation by antagonizing the DNA-binding activities of helix-loop-helix transcription factors (72-74). ID1 was identified as part of the LMS (68). Rare ID1-expressing tumor cells were detected in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but not in other sub-types of breast cancer (75). Regardless of the sub-type; however, ID1 is expressed in endothelial cells of the breast cancer stroma. ID1 expression was found to be enriched in TNBC metastases (75). The functional properties of ID1/ID3 were investigated in a transgenic model of WNT-driven breast cancer resembling TNBC and in a xenograft model with 2M2-4175 cells, a subpopulation of MDA-MB-231 cells, which metastasize to the lungs. As revealed by knock-down experiments, ID1/3 are required for initiation of primary tumor formation and for sustained proliferation during early stages of metastatic colonization after extravasation into the lung parenchyma (75). These properties of ID1/ID3 were mediated both individually as well as in combination. In metastatic foci, coincidence of ID1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression within tumor cell nuclei was detected (75).

VCAM1

VCAM1 was identified as part of the LMS. The impact of VCAM1 with respect to metastasis is due to facilitation of transendothelial migration of tumor cells into the lungs (76). VCAM1 is expressed on endothelial cells and can initiate transendothelial migration by its clustering and binding to integrins such as α4β1 (very late antigen-4, VLA-4) or α4β7 (77). This results in activation of GTPase ras-related c3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC1), which induces rearrangement of the cytoskeletal network by remodeling the tight junctions between vascular endothelial cells, thus facilitating transendothelial migration (77, 78) based on recruitment of ezrin to the cytoplasmic tail of VCAM1. In addition, it was observed that VCAM1 expressed on breast cancer cells is able to bind to α4β1 on metastasis-associated macrophages, resulting in phosphoinosite-3 kinase (PI3K)-mediated growth and survival (68).

A clinical correlation between VCAM1 expression in breast cancer cells and relapse in the lungs has been found (79). The prosurvival function of juxtacrine activation of the VCAM1-ezrin-PI3K/akt8 virus oncogene cellular homolog (AKT) pathway can be blocked by antibodies directed against α4-integrin (68). Natalizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against α4-integrin (76, 80), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease. Antibodies disrupting α4β1–VCAM1 interaction might be useful for treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Colony-stimulating Factor-1 (CSF1) as a Mediator of Lung Metastasis

The role of CSF1 in tumor growth and metastasis was investigated in transgenic mice with mammary tumors induced by PY-MT (81). CSF1 was expressed in the mammary epithelium of PY-MT transgenic mice with Csf1 null mutation and wild-type transgenic mice. Tumors in CSF1-expressing mice were shown to recruit macrophages and exhibited a highly invasive phenotype with carcinoma cells invading the stroma and metastasizing to the lungs. In contrast, tumors in Csf1 knock-down mice were encapsulated, did not break through the basement membrane and did not metastasize to the lungs. Accelerated progression to the late stage of carcinoma was also observed in CSF1-expressing transgenic mice. The underlying mechanism was shown to be based on reciprocal interactions between tumor cells and macrophages (10, 82-84). EGF released by macrophages was shown to induce CSF1 secretion by tumor cells and recruit macrophages by interaction with CSF1R (10, 84). Invasion and metastasis is driven by interaction between stromal EGF and EGFR expressed on tumor cells. Increased expression of CSF1 and CSF1R correlates with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer (85). As shown in Figure 4, steady-state levels for EGF, EGFR, CSF1 and CSF1R were analyzed in invasive breast cancer, RCC and prostate cancer. Significant up-regulation of CSF1R was noted in RCC, CSF1 was slightly increased in tumor tissue. In invasive breast carcinoma and prostate adenocarcinoma, no change for these components was observed between tumor tissues and normal tissues. In RCC, EGF was down-regulated, but no significant change was observed in invasive breast carcinoma and prostate adenocarcinoma. In prostate adenocarcinoma and RCC, no changes were observed for EGFR, which was surprisingly found to be down-regulated in invasive breast carcinoma tissues. For further analysis, patient stratification according to status of lung cancer metastasis and RNA expression of CSF1, CSF1R, EGF and EGFR is still required.

CXCL1/2–S100A8/9 Survival Axis

An important driving mechanism for growth, metastasis to the lungs and resistance to chemotherapy was discovered making use of two experimental systems (86). The first was a syngeneic transplant system of cell lines derived from PY-MT-driven mammary tumors and the second one an orthotopic fat pad xenograft model based on LM2-4175 lung metastatic breast cancer cells. It was demonstrated that metastasis and chemoresistance are based on an endothelial carcinoma–myeloid signaling network. Tumor-cell survival-promoting chemokine CXCL1 (87) secreted by tumor cells is able to recruit CD11+Gr+ myeloid cells into the primary tumor and to disseminated tumor cells in the lung parenchyma based on interaction with CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) on myeloid cells (88). Secreted S100 A8/9 derived from the myeloid cells acts as a survival signal for tumor cells in the primary tumor and in the lung parenchyma (89). CXCL1 has emerged among a set of genes whose expression is related to progression and recurrence of breast cancer in the lungs (68). In situ hybridization has revealed that the CXCL1 gene is amplified in 7.5% of primary and 19% of breast cancer metastases (86). The survival pathway mediated by CXCL1 was shown to be amplified by TNFα secreted from endothelial cells after treatment with chemotherapeutic agents due to activation of nuclear factor-κB signaling by TNFα (86). It was shown that CXCR2 blockers can break this cycle, augmenting the efficacy of chemotherapy against tumors and their metastases. CXCR2 antagonists are currently in clinical trials in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases (90) and might also be an option for treatment of breast cancer in combination with chemotherapy.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

RNA steady-state levels for colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) and its receptor CSF1R, and for epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor EGFR in invasive breast carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma and clear cell renal carcinoma (RCC) in comparison to corresponding normal tissues. Invasive breast carcinoma: 111 matched normal, 1,046 tumor samples; prostate adenocarcinoma: 51 matched normal, 360 tumor samples; and RCC: 72 matched normal, 519 tumor samples. Expression was measured by whole-transcriptome sequencing and values provided represent normal read counts (log2) as derived from the Broad FIREHOSE portal. The red lines indicate low versus higher expression. Expression data are shown as box plots. The line in the middle of the box represents the data median. The rectangles show the upper and lower 25% quartile, therefore 50% of the data points are included in the rectangle, while the whiskers include all other samples except for outliers.

Concluding Remarks

Most pre-clinical studies addressing the issue of lung tropism of metastasis have focused on breast cancer and its sub-types, fewer studies have investigated melanoma and pediatric sarcoma. It remains to be investigated in more detail which targets are involved in mediating organ tropism of metastasis specifically to the lungs and those which have a general propensity to drive metastasis of different types of tumors to a broader range of distant organs. As outlined, lung tropism of breast cancer seems to rely on a gene signature (LMS) identified in corresponding primary tumors which does not correlate with metastasis to the bones. Targeting generic drivers of metastasis might be more effective than targeting mediators of dissemination into and colonization of distinct organs because blocking metastasis to defined organs might activate pathways promoting homing to other organs. Prevention of formation of a pre-metastatic niche based on gene signatures predicting metastasis to the lungs might be an effective strategy. However, in order to achieve this objective, reliable markers for the metastatic potential of the corresponding primary tumor should be available and the targets mediating formation of the pre-metastatic niche should be defined and validated in more detail. As outlined previously, targeting of clustered CTCs based on their overexpression of plakoglobin, might be an effective strategy for intervention in metastasis to the lungs and possibly other organs. Since dormant disseminated tumor cells in the lungs are critically dependent on survival pathways, interference with corresponding pathways may improve the efficacy of adjuvant therapy. Inhibition of developmental pathways such as WNT and NOTCH signaling, or reactivation of BMP4 signaling are possible options in this context. However, routine procedures for detection of dormant metastatic tumor cells in the lungs of patients are not yet established. Since colonization and growth of disseminated tumor cells in the lung parenchyma is triggered by tumor cell–stroma interactions, interference with these types of interactions seems to be a promising avenue. Treatment of established lung metastases is hampered by their resistance to chemotherapy. Identification of specific and homogeneously expressed targets on metastases of the lung and identification of pathways for resistance to chemotherapy might lead to new and more effective approaches.

  • Received October 29, 2015.
  • Revision received December 11, 2015.
  • Accepted December 17, 2015.
  • Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. aLngley RR,
    2. Fidler IJ
    : The seed and soil hypothesis revisited: the role of tumor-stroma interactions in metastasis to different organs. Int J Cancer 128: 2527-2535, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Paget S
    : The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. Cancer Metastasis Rev 8: 98-101,1989.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Chiang AC,
    2. Massague J
    : Molecular basis of metastasis. N Engl J Med 359: 2814-2823, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Nguyen DX,
    2. Bos PD,
    3. Massague J
    : Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 274-284, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kinsey DL
    : An experimental study of preferential metastasis. Cancer 13: 674-676, 1990.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Mac Donald IC,
    2. Groom AC,
    3. Chambers AF
    : Cancer spread and micrometastasis development: quantitative approaches for in vivo models. Bioessays 24: 885-893, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Stott SL,
    2. Hsu CH,
    3. Tsukrov DI,
    4. Yu M,
    5. Miyamoto DT,
    6. Waltman BA,
    7. Rothenberg SM,
    8. Shah AM,
    9. Smes ME,
    10. Korir GK,
    11. Floyd FP Jr.,
    12. Gilman AJ,
    13. Lord JB,
    14. Winokur D,
    15. Springer S,
    16. Irimia D,
    17. Nagrath S,
    18. Sequist LV,
    19. Lee RJ,
    20. Isselbacher KJ,
    21. Mahaswaran S,
    22. Haber DA,
    23. Toner M
    : Isolation of circulating tumor cells using a microvortex-generating herringbone-chip. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 18392-18397, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Levitzki MG
    : Pulmonary Physiol, Second Edition. Mac Graw-Hill, New York: 8th edition, p. 83, 1986.
  9. ↵
    1. Peinado H,
    2. Lavotshkin S,
    3. Lyden D
    : The secreted factors responsible for pre-metastatic niche formation: old sayings and new soughts. Sem Cancer Biol 21: 139-146, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Psaila B,
    2. Lynden D
    : The metastatic niche: adapting the foreign soil. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 285-293, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Barcellos-Hoff MH,
    2. Lyden D,
    3. Wang TC
    : The evolution of the cancer niche during multistage carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 13: 511-518, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Psaila B,
    2. Kaplan RN,
    3. Port ER,
    4. Lyden D
    : Priming of the “soil” for breast cancer metastasis: the pre-metastatic niche. Breast Dis 26: 65-74, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kaplan RN,
    2. Riba RD,
    3. Zacharoulis S,
    4. Bramley AH,
    5. Vincent L,
    6. Costa C,
    7. MacDonald DD,
    8. Jin DK,
    9. Shido K,
    10. Kerns SA,
    11. Zhu Z,
    12. Hicklin D,
    13. Wu Y,
    14. Port JL,
    15. Altorki N,
    16. Port ER,
    17. Ruggero D,
    18. Shmelkov SV,
    19. Jensen KK,
    20. Rafii S,
    21. Leyden D
    : VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature 438: 820-827, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Hiratsuka S,
    2. Watanabe A,
    3. Aburatani H,
    4. Maru Y
    : Tumor-mediated up-regulation of chemoattractants and recruitment of myeloid cells predetermines metastasis. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1369-1375, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Heizmann CW,
    2. Fritz G,
    3. Schäfer BW
    : S100 proteins: structure, functions and pathology. Front Biosci 7: 1356-1368, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Donato R,
    2. Cannon BR,
    3. Sorci G,
    4. Riuzzi F,
    5. Hsu K,
    6. Weber DJ,
    7. Geczy CL
    : Functions of S100 proteins. Curr Mol Med 13: 24-57, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Hiratsuka S,
    2. Watanabe A,
    3. Sakari Y,
    4. Akashi-Takamura S,
    5. Isibashi S,
    6. Mijake K,
    7. Shibuya M,
    8. Akira S,
    9. Abrutani H,
    10. Maru Y
    : The S100A8-serum amyloid A3-TLR4 paracrine cascade establishes a pre-metastatic phase. Nat Cell Biol 10: 1349-1355, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Peinado H,
    2. Rafii S,
    3. Lyden D
    : Inflammation joins the ‘niche’. Cancer Cell 14: 347-349, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Janzen V,
    2. Scadden DT
    : Stem cells, good, bad and reformable. Nature 441: 418-419, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kim S,
    2. Takahashi H,
    3. Lin WW,
    4. Descargues P,
    5. Grivennikov S,
    6. Kim Y,
    7. Luo JL,
    8. Karin M
    : Carcinoma-produced factors activate myeloid cells through TLR2 to stimulate metastasis. Nature 457: 102-106, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Erler JT,
    2. Bennewith KL,
    3. Cox TR,
    4. Lang C,
    5. Bird D,
    6. Koong A,
    7. Le QT,
    8. Giacca AJ
    : Hypoxia-induced lysyl oxidase is a critical mediator of bone marrow cell recruitment to form the premetastatic niche. Cancer Cell 15: 35-44, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Gao D,
    2. Nolan DJ,
    3. Mellick AS,
    4. Bambino K,
    5. MacDonnell K,
    6. Mittal V
    : Endothelial progenitor cells control the angiogenic switch in mouse lung metastasis. Science 319: 195-198, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Thery C,
    2. Zitvogel L,
    3. Amigorema S
    : Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol 2: 569-579, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Henderson MC,
    2. Azorsa DO
    : The genomic and proteomic content of cancer cell-derived exosomes. Front Oncol 2: 38, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Christianson HC,
    2. Svensson KJ,
    3. van Kuppervelt TH,
    4. Li HP,
    5. Belting M
    : Cancer cell exosomes depend on cell-surface heparin sulphate proteoglycans for their internalization and functional activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 17380-17385, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Johnstone RM
    : Exosomes biological significance: A concise review. Blood Cells Mol Dis 36: 315-321, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Melo SA,
    2. Sugimoto H,
    3. O'Connell JT,
    4. Kato N,
    5. Villanueva A,
    6. Vidal A,
    7. Qiu L,
    8. Vitkin E,
    9. Perelman LT,
    10. Melo CA,
    11. Lucci A,
    12. Calin GA,
    13. Kalluri R
    : Cancer exosomes perform cell-independent microRNA biogenesis and promote tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 26: 707-721, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Boelens MC,
    2. Wu TH,
    3. Nabet BY,
    4. Xu B,
    5. Qiu Y,
    6. Yoon T,
    7. Azzam DJ,
    8. Twyman-Saint Victor C,
    9. Wiemann BJ,
    10. Ishwaran H,
    11. Ter Brugge PJ,
    12. Jonkers J,
    13. Slingerland J,
    14. Minn AJ
    : Exosome transfer from stromal to breast cancer cells regulates therapy resistance pathways. Cell 159: 499-513, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Jung T,
    2. Castellana D,
    3. Klingbeil P,
    4. Cuesta Hernandez I,
    5. Vitacolonna M,
    6. Orlicky DJ,
    7. Roffler SR,
    8. Brodt P,
    9. Zöller M
    : CD44v6 dependance of premetastatic niche preparation by exosomes. Neoplasia 11: 1093-1105, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Huang Y,
    2. Song N,
    3. Ding Y,
    4. Yuan S,
    5. Li X,
    6. Cai H,
    7. Shi H,
    8. Luo Y
    : Pulmonary vascular destabilization in the premetastatic phase facilitating lung metastasis. Cancer Res 69: 7529-7537, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Peinado H,
    2. Aleckovic M,
    3. Lavotshin S,
    4. Matei I,
    5. Costa-Silva B,
    6. Moreno-Bueno G,
    7. Hergueta-Redondo M,
    8. Williams C,
    9. Garcia-Santos G,
    10. Ghajar C,
    11. Nitadori-Hoshino A,
    12. Hoffman C,
    13. Badal K,
    14. Garcia BA,
    15. Callahan MK,
    16. Yuan J,
    17. Martins VR,
    18. Skog J,
    19. Kaplan RN,
    20. Brady MS,
    21. Wolchok JD,
    22. Chapman PB,
    23. Kang Y,
    24. Bromberg J,
    25. Leyden D
    : Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through EMT. Nat Med 18: 883-891, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Giancotti FG
    : Mechanisms governing metastatic dormancy and reactiviation. Cell 155: 750-764, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wan L,
    2. Pantel K,
    3. Kang Y
    : Tumor metastasis: moving new biological insights into the clinic. Nat Med 19: 1450-1464, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Bednarz-Knoll N,
    2. Alix Panabieres C,
    3. Pantel K
    : Plasticity of disseminating cancer cells in patients with epithelial malignancies. Cancer Metastasis Rev 31: 673-687, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Klauber-De More N,
    2. Van zee KJ,
    3. Linkiv I,
    4. Borgen PI,
    5. Gerald WL
    : Biological behaviour of human breast cancer micrometastasis. Clin Cancer Res 7: 2434-2439, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Cameron MD,
    2. Schmidt EE,
    3. Kerkvliet N,
    4. Nadkarni KV,
    5. Morris VL,
    6. Groom AC,
    7. Chambers AF,
    8. MacDonald IC
    : Temporal progression of metastasis in lung: cell survival, dormancy, and location dependence of metastatic inefficiency. Cancer Res 60: 2541-2546, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Luzzi KJ,
    2. MacDonald IC,
    3. Schmidt EE,
    4. Kerkvliet N,
    5. Morris VL,
    6. Chambers AF,
    7. Groom AC
    : Multistep nature of metastatic inefficiency: dormancy of solitary cells after successful extravasation and limited survival in early micrometastasis. Am J Pathol 153: 865-873, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kang Y,
    2. Pantel K
    : Tumor cell dissemination: emerging biological insights from animal models and cancer patients. Cancer Cell 23: 573-581, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Aguirre Ghiso JA,
    2. Kovalski K,
    3. Ossowski L
    : Tumor dormancy induced by downregulation of urokinase receptor in human carcinoma involves integrin and MAPK signalling. J Cell Biol 147: 89-104, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Gao H,
    2. Chakraborty G,
    3. Lee-Lim AP,
    4. Mo Q,
    5. Decker M,
    6. Vonica A,
    7. Shen R,
    8. Brogi E,
    9. Brivanlou AH,
    10. Giancotti FG
    : The BMP inhibitor Coco reactivates breast cancer cells at lung metastatic sites. Cell 150: 764-779, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Quail DF,
    2. Joyce JA
    : Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med 19: 1423-1437, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Hanahan D,
    2. Coussens LM
    : Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 21: 309-322, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Sosa MS,
    2. Avivar-Valderas A,
    3. Bragado P,
    4. Wen HC,
    5. Aguirre-Ghiso JA
    : ERK1/2 and p38α/signalling in tumor quiescence: opportunities to control dormant residual disease. Clin Cancer Res 17: 5850-5857, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Ouyang G
    : Periostin: a bridge between cancer stem cells and their metastatic niche. Cancer Stem Cell 10: 111-112, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Aguirre-Ghiso JA,
    2. Liu D,
    3. Mignatti A,
    4. Kovalski K,
    5. Ossowski L
    : Urokinase receptor and fibronectin regulate the ERK (MAPK) to p38 (MAPK) activivity ratios that determine carcinoma cell proliferation or dormancy in vivo. Mol Biol Cell 12: 863-879, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Gurzu S,
    2. Ciortea D,
    3. Ember I,
    4. Jung I
    : The possible role of Mena protein and its splicing-derived variants in embryogenesis, carcinogenesis, and tumor invasion: a systematic review of the literature. Biomed Res Int 2013: 365192, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Philippar U,
    2. Roussos ET,
    3. Oser M,
    4. Yamaguchi H,
    5. Kim HD,
    6. Giampieri S,
    7. Wang Y,
    8. Goswami S,
    9. Wyckoff JB,
    10. Lauffenburger DA,
    11. Sahai E,
    12. Condeelis JS,
    13. Gertler FB
    : A Mena invasion isoform potentiates EGF-induced carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis. Dev Cell 15: 813-828, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Roussos ET,
    2. Balsamo M,
    3. Alford SK,
    4. Wyckoff JB,
    5. Gligorijevic B,
    6. Wang Y,
    7. Pozzuto M,
    8. Stobezki R,
    9. Goswami S,
    10. Segall JE,
    11. Lauffenburger DA,
    12. Bresnick AR,
    13. Gertler FB,
    14. Condeelus JS
    : Mena invasive (MenaINV) promotes multicellular streaming motility and transendothelial migration in a mouse model of breast cancer. J Cell Sci 124: 2120-2131, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Hakem A,
    2. Sanchez-Sweatman O,
    3. You-Ten A,
    4. Duncan G,
    5. Wakeham A,
    6. Khokha R,
    7. Mak TW
    : RhoC is dispensable for embryogenesis and tumor initiation but essential for metastasis. Genes Dev 19: 1974-1979, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Clark EA,
    2. Golub TR,
    3. Lander ES,
    4. Hynes RO
    : genomic analysis of metastasis reveals an essential role for RhoC. Nature 406: 532-535, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Rosenthal DT,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Bao I,
    4. Zhu L,
    5. Wu Z,
    6. Toy K,
    7. Kleer CG,
    8. Merajver SD
    : RhoC impacts the metastatic potential and abundance of breast cancer stem cells. PloS One 7: e40979, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Islem M,
    2. Lin G,
    3. Brenner JC,
    4. Pan Q,
    5. Merajver SD,
    6. Hou Y,
    7. Kumar P,
    8. Teknos TN
    : RhoC expression and head and neck cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer Res 7: 1771-1780, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Shibue T,
    2. Weinberg RA
    : Integrin beta 1-focal adhesion kinase signalling directs the proliferation of metastatic cancer cells disseminated into the lungs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 10290-10295, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tilghman RW,
    2. Parsons JT
    : Focal adhesion kinase as a regulator of cell tension in the progression of cancer. Sem Cancer Biol 18: 45-52, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Mitra SK,
    2. Schlaepfer DD
    : Integrin-regulated FAK-SRC signalling in normal and cancer cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18: 516-523, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Kim M,
    2. Gans JD,
    3. Nogueira C,
    4. Wang A,
    5. Paik JH,
    6. feng B,
    7. Brennan C,
    8. Hahn WC,
    9. Cordon-Cardo C,
    10. Wagner SN,
    11. Flotte TJ,
    12. Duncan LM,
    13. Granter SR,
    14. Chin L
    : Comparative oncogenomics identifies NEDD9 as a melanoma metastasis gene. Cell 125: 1269-1281, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Khan J,
    3. Khanna C,
    4. Helman L,
    5. Meltzer PS,
    6. Merlino G
    : Expression profiling identifies the cytoskeletal organizer ezrin and the developmental homeoprotein Six-1 as key metastatic regulators. Nat Med 10: 175-181, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Khanna C,
    2. Wan X,
    3. Bose S,
    4. Cassaday R,
    5. Olomu O,
    6. Mendoza A,
    7. Yeung C,
    8. Gorlick R,
    9. Hewitt SM,
    10. Helman LJ
    : The membrane-cytoskeleton linker ezrin is necessary for osteosarcoma metastasis. Nat Med 10: 182-186, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Morales M,
    2. Arenas EJ,
    3. Urosevic J,
    4. Guiu M,
    5. Fernandez E,
    6. Planet E,
    7. Fenwick RB,
    8. Fernandez-Ruiz S,
    9. Salvatella X,
    10. Reverter D,
    11. Carracedo A,
    12. Massague J,
    13. Gomis RR
    : RARRES3 suppresses breast cancer lung metastasis by regulating adhesion and differentiation. EMBO Mol Med 6: 865-881, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Park YG,
    2. Zhao X,
    3. Lesueur F,
    4. Lowy DR,
    5. Lancaster M,
    6. Pharaoh P,
    7. Qian X,
    8. Hunter KW
    : Sipa1 is a candidate for underlying the metastasis efficacy modifier locus Mtes1. Nat Genet 37: 1055-1062, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Oskarsson T,
    2. Massague J
    : Extracellular matrix players in metastatic niches. EMBO J 31: 254-256, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Oskarsson T,
    2. Acharyya S,
    3. Zhang XH,
    4. Vanharanta S,
    5. Tavazooie SF,
    6. Morris PG,
    7. Downey RJ,
    8. Manova-Todorova K,
    9. Brogi E,
    10. Massague J
    : Breast cancer cells produce tenascin C as a metastatic niche component to colonize the lungs. Nat Med 17: 867-874, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Malanchi I,
    2. Santamaria-Martinez A,
    3. Susanto E,
    4. Peng H,
    5. Lehr HA,
    6. Delaloye JF,
    7. Huelsken J
    : Interactions between cancer stem cells and their niche govern metastatic colonization. Nature 481: 85-89, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Okano H,
    2. Imai T,
    3. Okabe M
    : Musashi: a translational regulator of cell fate. J Cell Sci 115: 1355-1359, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Carmon KS,
    2. Lin Q,
    3. Gong X,
    4. Thomas A,
    5. Lin Q
    : LGR5 interacts and cointernalizes with WNT receptors to modulate Wnt/β-catenin signalling. Mol Cell Biol 32: 2054-2064, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Vanharanta S,
    2. Massague J
    : Origin of metastatic traits. Cancer Cell 24: 410-421, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Aceto N,
    2. Bardia A,
    3. Miyamoto DT,
    4. Donaldson MC,
    5. Wittner BS,
    6. Spencer JA,
    7. Yu M,
    8. Pely A,
    9. Engstrom A,
    10. Zhu H,
    11. Brannigan BW,
    12. Kapur R,
    13. Stott SL,
    14. Shiola T,
    15. Ramaswamy S,
    16. Ting DT,
    17. Lin CP,
    18. Toner M,
    19. Haber DA,
    20. Maheswaran S
    : Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis. Cell 158: 1110-1122, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Minn AJ,
    2. Gupta GP,
    3. Siegel PM,
    4. Bos PD,
    5. Shu W,
    6. Giri DD,
    7. Viale A,
    8. Olshen AB,
    9. Gerald WL,
    10. Massague J
    : Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature 436: 518-524, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Minn AJ,
    2. Kang Y,
    3. Serganova I,
    4. Gupta GP,
    5. Giri DD,
    6. Doubrovin M,
    7. Ponomarev V,
    8. Gerald WL,
    9. Blasberg R,
    10. Massague J
    : Distinct organ-specific metastatic potential of individual breast cancer cells and primary tumors. J Clin Invest 115: 44-55, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Minn AJ,
    2. Gupta GP,
    3. Padua D,
    4. Bos P,
    5. Nguyen DX,
    6. Nuyten D,
    7. Kreike B,
    8. Zhang Y,
    9. Wang Y,
    10. Ishwaran H,
    11. Foekens JA,
    12. van de Vijver M,
    13. Massague J
    : Lung metastasis genes couple breast tumor size and metastatic spread. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 6740-6745, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Padua D,
    2. Zhang XH,
    3. Wang Q,
    4. Nadal C,
    5. Gerald WL,
    6. Gomis RR,
    7. Massague J
    : TGFbeta primes breast tumors for lung metastasis seeding through angiopoietin-like 4. Cell 133: 66-77, 2008 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Perk J,
    2. Iavarone A,
    3. Benezra R
    : ID family of helix-loop-helix proteins in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 603-614, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lyden D,
    2. Young AZ,
    3. Zagzag D,
    4. Yan W,
    5. Gerald W,
    6. O'Reilly R,
    7. Bader BL,
    8. Hynes RO,
    9. Zhang Y,
    10. Manova K,
    11. Benezra R
    : ID1 and ID3 are required for neurogenesis, angiogenesis and vascularization of tumor xenografts. Nature 401: 670-677, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Shaked Y,
    2. Ciarocchi A,
    3. Franco M,
    4. Lee CR,
    5. Man S,
    6. Cheung AM,
    7. Hicklin DJ,
    8. Chaplin D,
    9. Foster FS,
    10. Benezra R,
    11. Kerbel RS
    : Therapy-induced acute recruitment of circulating endothelial progenitor cells to tumors. Science 313: 1785-1787, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Gupta GP,
    2. Perk J,
    3. Acharyya S,
    4. de Candia P,
    5. Mittal V,
    6. Todorova-Manova K,
    7. Gerald WL,
    8. Brogi E,
    9. Benezra R,
    10. Massague J
    : ID genes mediate tumor reinitiation during breast cancer lung metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 19506-19511, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Chen Q,
    2. Massague J
    : Molecular pathways: VCAM-1 as a potential therapeutic target in metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 18: 5520-5525, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Elices MJ,
    2. Osborn L,
    3. Takada J,
    4. Crouse C,
    5. Luhowskyi S,
    6. Hemler ME,
    7. Lobb R
    : VCAM-1 on activated endothelium interacts with the leukocyte integrin VLA-4 at a distant site from the VLA4/Fibronectin binding site. Cell 60: 577-584, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. van Wetering S,
    2. van den Berk N,
    3. van Bruul JD,
    4. Mul FP,
    5. Lommerse I,
    6. Mous R,
    7. ten Kloster JP,
    8. Zwaginga JJ,
    9. Hordijk PL
    : VCAM-1 mediated RAC signalling controls endothelial cell–cell contacts and leukocyte transmigration. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285: C343-352, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Chen Q,
    2. Zhang XH,
    3. Massague J
    : Macrophage binding to receptor VCAM-1 transmits survival signals in breast cancer cells that invade the lungs. Cancer Cell 20: 538-549, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Yednock TA,
    2. Cannon C,
    3. Fritz LC,
    4. Sanchez-Madrid F,
    5. Steinman L,
    6. Karin N
    : Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antibodies against alpha4 beta 1 integrin. Nature 356: 63-66, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Lin EY,
    2. Nguyen AV,
    3. Russell RG,
    4. Pollard JW
    : Colony-stimulating factor 1 promotes progression of mammyry tumors to malignancy. J Exp Med 193: 727-740, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Wyckoff J,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Lin EY,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Pixley F,
    6. Stanley ER,
    7. Graf T,
    8. Pollard JW,
    9. Segall J,
    10. Condeelia J
    : A paracrine loop betwwen tumor cells and macrophages is required for tumor cell migration in mammary tumors. Cancer Res 64: 7022-7029, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wang W,
    2. Goswami S,
    3. Sahai E,
    4. Wyckoff JB,
    5. Segall JE,
    6. Condeelis JS
    : Tumor cells caught in the act of invading: their strategy for enhanced cell motility. Trends Cell Biol 15: 138-145, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Joyce JA,
    2. Pollard JW
    : Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 239-252, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Lin EY,
    2. Gouon-Evans V,
    3. Nguyen AV,
    4. Pollard JW
    : Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 7: 147-162, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Achaaryya S,
    2. Oskarsson T,
    3. Vaharanta S,
    4. Malladi S,
    5. Kim J,
    6. Morris PG,
    7. Manova-Todorova K,
    8. Leversha M,
    9. Hogg N,
    10. Seshan VE,
    11. Norton L,
    12. Brogi E,
    13. Massague J
    : A CXCL1 paracrine network links cancer chemoresistance and metastasis. Cell 150: 165-178, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Balkwil F
    : Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 540-550, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Gabrilovich DJ,
    2. Nagaraj S
    : Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 162-174, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Gebhardt C,
    2. Nemeth J,
    3. Angel P,
    4. Hess J
    : S100A8 and S100A9 in inflammation and cancer. Biochem Pharmacol 72: 1622-1631, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Chapman RW,
    2. Phillips JE,
    3. Hipkin RW,
    4. Curran AK,
    5. Lundell D,
    6. Fine JS
    : CXCR2 antagonists for the treatment of pulmonary disease. Pharmacol Ther 121: 55-68, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Vol. 13, Issue 2
March-April 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Genomics & Proteomics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Basis of Lung Tropism of Metastasis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Genomics & Proteomics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Molecular Basis of Lung Tropism of Metastasis
ULRICH H. WEIDLE, FABIAN BIRZELE, GWENDLYN KOLLMORGEN, RÜDIGER RÜGER
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Mar 2016, 13 (2) 129-139;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Molecular Basis of Lung Tropism of Metastasis
ULRICH H. WEIDLE, FABIAN BIRZELE, GWENDLYN KOLLMORGEN, RÜDIGER RÜGER
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Mar 2016, 13 (2) 129-139;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Niche
    • Exosomes
    • Dormancy
    • Cytoskeleton
    • Lung Metastasis Modifier Genes
    • ECM and Lung Metastasis
    • Identification of a Gene-based Signature Mediating Metastasis to the Lungs
    • ID Genes
    • VCAM1
    • Colony-stimulating Factor-1 (CSF1) as a Mediator of Lung Metastasis
    • CXCL1/2–S100A8/9 Survival Axis
    • Concluding Remarks
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Pericytes in the Premetastatic Niche
  • Surgical Resection and Outcome of Synchronous and Metachronous Primary Lung Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Lung metastasis and colonization
  • lung metastasis signature
  • metastatic niche
  • tumor cell–stromal cell interaction
  • review
Cancer & Genome Proteomics

© 2025 Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Powered by HighWire