Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleR
Open Access

TCR-MHC/Peptide Interaction: Prospects for New Anti-tumoral Agents

ULRICH H. WEIDLE, GUY GEORGES and GEORG TIEFENTHALER
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics November 2014, 11 (6) 267-277;
ULRICH H. WEIDLE
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Penzberg, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GUY GEORGES
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Penzberg, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORG TIEFENTHALER
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Penzberg, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Tumor-related antigens can be presented as peptides forming complexes with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules that interact with T-cell receptors, thus generating an immunologic anti-tumor response. Unfortunately, however, this response can be decreased by many effectors and pathways. On the other hand, such peptide-MHC complexes are unique starting points for therapeutic intervention. We present strategies for eliciting an anti-tumoral response by T-cell receptor-based fusion proteins with interleukin (IL)2 and antibody constant region domains, superantigens, and T-cell recruiting antibodies, as well as using genetically modified autologous T-cells as effectors. Another strategy is to direct peptide-MHC complexes to tumors as fusion proteins with an antibody-derived targeting moiety. Finally, we describe T-cell receptor-mimicking antibodies and antibody conjugates as anti tumoral agents.

  • Antibody-MHC fusion proteins
  • chimeric antigen receptors
  • immunological synapse
  • T-cell receptor
  • T-cell receptor-based fusion proteins
  • review

Tumor-related antigens can be expressed by tumor cells either directly as plasma membrane-associated proteins (transmembrane or glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol-anchored) or as peptides complexed with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules (1). The latter consist of three non-covalently associated components: an MHC-I α-chain, a β2-microglobulin light chain and a peptide ligand comprising of 8-12 amino acids (2). Proteins from all cellular compartments can be degraded and processed into peptides by the proteasome and subsequently be transported into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where peptide MHC I (pMHC I) complexes are assembled to be finally integrated into the cell membrane for interaction with T-cell receptors (TCR) (3, 4). This process enables the immune system to eliminate tumor cells based on the cell surface presentation of cancer-related peptide antigens. Unfortunately, formation and surface expression of these complexes can be interfered with at many levels, such as down-regulation of MHC I molecule expression (5). Therefore, conservation and/or reconstitution of functional MHC-peptide complexes on the cell surface are paramount for the induction of a T-cell-based anti-tumoral response. In the following, we describe strategies for reconstituting and complementing this process using TCR-based fusion proteins, antibody-pMHC complexes, antibody-based TCR mimetics and genetically engineered T cells.

TCR Fusion Proteins

TCR-IL2 fusion protein ALT-801. The rationale for the design of ALT-801, a single-chain (sc) TCR-IL2 fusion protein (Figure 1A), was based on two observations. First, interleukin 2 (IL2) is a cytokine involved in the expansion of T-cells, natural killer (NK) cells and lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAK), thereby promoting anti-tumoral activity. Unfortunately, however, standard dose IL2 treatment induces acute toxicity partly due to vascular leak syndrome thus restricting its use to relatively healthy patients (7) and, as a consequence, argues for localized expression of IL2 at the tumor site. The second observation is a strong over-expression of p53 in most tumors compared to normal tissues (8). Specifically, the p53-derived antigenic peptide covering amino acids (aa) 264-272 is found in complex with MHC I molecules in several types of tumors (9). Consequently, ALT-801 was designed as a bi-functional fusion protein comprising IL2 linked to a soluble scTCR that recognizes peptide 264-272 of human p53 on cancer cells in the context of HLA-A*0201 (10). High in vivo efficacy of ALT-801 was demonstrated in p53+/HLA-A2+ human melanoma (A375), breast cancer (MDA-MB231) and pancreatic carcinoma (PANC-1) xenograft models (10-12). Based on these findings, ALT-801 was evaluated in a phase I study in patients with advanced malignancies (13). The serum half-life ranged between 2 and 5 h, depending on the dosing time and, thus, was significantly longer than that of unmodified IL2. Side-effects were similar to those observed after bolus treatment with IL2, but less severe. In addition, ALT-801 treatment induced an increase in serum interferon IFNγ. With respect to efficacy, 10 patients out of 26 showed stable disease for at least 11 weeks, while one complete response of a patient with metastatic melanoma was observed. ALT-801 was found to activate cluster of differentiation 4+ (CD4+) and CD8+ T-cells. In addition, these infiltrating T lymphocytes secrete IFNγ into the tumor microenvironment and, thus, can potentially repolarize tumor-associated macrophages by promoting the M2 phenotype and eradicating the M1 phenotype (www.altorbioscience.com). Additional clinical studies have been initiated to investigate the efficacy of ALT-801 in combination with cisplatin in patients with metastatic melanoma, with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with metastatic bladder cancer or as a monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (14) (www.altorbioscience.com). Similar to ALT-801, ALT-802 is a fusion protein consisting of the above-mentioned scTCR specific for p53 and the human immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 heavy chain constant region including the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region, which is able to mediate antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) (9). In a model of experimental non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) metastasis in nude mice, the fusion protein containing the heavy chain constant regions CH1-CH2-CH3 was more active than the CH2-CH3 containing version. Moreover, improved in vivo efficacy was observed when the treatment was combined with cisplatin (15). A clinical phase I study for this molecule is planned for treatment of p53+ NSCLC patients. Under preclinical development are p53scTCR molecules fused to an IL15 superagonist mutein complexed with IL15Ra-Fc possessing immunostimulatory activity (16, 17). In addition, non-p53 targeted effector molecules specific for tumor-associated antigens, such as melanoma antigen gene-3 (MAGE-3), glycoprotein 100 (gp100) and melanoma antigen recognized by T cell 1 (MART-1) are evaluated preclinically (www.altorbioscience.com).

Superantigen TCR fusion proteins. Superantigens (SAgs) are a group of antigens, which activate T-cells in an antigen-independent manner resulting in oligo- or polyclonal T-cell responses. In contrast to a normal antigen-specific T-cell response, which comprises 0.001% to 0.0001% of T-cells, up to 10-20% of TCRs are engaged by SAgs (18-20). SAgs are mostly expressed by pathogenic bacteria or viruses. In a first step, SAgs bind to MHC II molecules on antigen presenting cells (APC) outside the peptide binding groove and subsequently interact with defined classes of α- or β-variable domains of TCRs, depending on the respective SAg. Affinity of the SAg for the TCR correlates with the strength of T cell activation (21, 22). Secretion of cytokines upon SAg-induced TCR stimulation, with IFNγ as a prominent mediator, subsequently leads to macrophage activation which in turn overproduce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL1, IL6 and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) (21, 22), which can also eliminate antigen-negative tumor cell variants.

The basic idea for designing fusion proteins composed of an antibody-related moiety targeting the molecule to tumor cells and a SAg is the functional similarity to a genuine TCR-pMHC interaction, which results in an antigen-independent recruitment and activation of T-cells and, consequently, a polyclonal T-cell response. High affinity antibodies to the tumor antigen and low affinity interactions of TCR-pMHC in the micromolar range are characteristic features of these molecules. Thus, decoration of tumor cells with SAgs mimicking a bacterial infection induces an inflammatory response at the tumor site. In a seminal work, a recombinant fusion protein consisting of staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA) and a monovalent antigen binding fragment (Fab) of monoclonal antibody (mAb) C215 (Figure 1B), which is specific for human colon carcinoma cells was evaluated (23). SEA, in the context of the fusion protein, had a ≥10-fold reduced MHC II binding as compared to native SEA and the affinity of the Fab C215-SEA fusion protein was 100-fold stronger for the C215 tumor antigen than for MHC II. Functionally, the fusion protein was able to induce T cells to lyse C215+ MHC II-human colon carcinoma cells. In mice transplanted with B16 melanoma cells, which had been transfected with the C215 antigen, treatment with the fusion protein resulted in inhibition of tumor growth and long-term survival (23). The clinically most advanced SAg fusion protein is Naptumomab estafenatox (ANYARA, ABR-217620) (24), which is presently being tested in phase III studies in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by Active Biotech. This fusion protein is composed of a Fab fragment directed against the 5T4 oncofetal antigen (25, 26) and a SAg based on staphylococcal entertotoxin E (SEE) containing modifications that limit systemic, cytokine-induced toxicity and reduce immunogenicity. Basically, ANYARA was designed by reducing the affinity of ABR-214936 (5T4FabV13-SEAD277A), which was undergoing phase II studies to MHC II, by 100-fold to decrease potential systemic toxicity (24, 27). This resulted in a molecule that could be administered at doses in the microgram per kg/patient range as compared to the nanogram doses of the previous version. In addition, immunogenicity was reduced by creating a chimeric SAg (SEA/E120). Specifically, amino acid residues interacting with MHC II and TCR were engineered into the backbone of SEE. The resulting fusion molecule ABR-217620 interacts with TCR β variable chain family members 7-9 and binds to the 5T4 antigen on tumor cells (28). It both possesses a high affinity for tumor cells (Kd=1nM) and mimics a genuine TCR-pMHC contact in the 1 μM affinity range. ABR-217620 has insufficient affinity to allow a significant monomeric T-cell interaction, thus avoiding binding to, and blocking or triggering of, T cells as a monomeric target structure. A respective phase III study encompassing 513 RCC patients was concluded in January 2013 (www.activebiotech.com). In a hypothesis-generating subgroup analysis, there was a trend towards a survival benefit by ANYARA treatment for those 25% of patients with low/normal IL6 levels and anti-superantigen antibody. ImmTacs (Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs against cancer). One of the difficulties of targeting effector T-cells to tumors is immunological tolerance through deletion of T-cells with strong affinity to self-antigens (29). In addition, tumors often have a reduced density of MHC-peptide complexes on the tumor cell surface due to decreased MHC expression and/or antigen processing (30). A strategy to overcome these problems is to redirect T cells to tumors by using fusion molecules consisting of a T-cell recruiting domain and a soluble TCR-based targeting moiety (ImmTacs) (Figure 1C) (31, 32). The therapeutic potential of anti CD3 scFv fragments to function as such T cell recruiting elements was demonstrated in the context of bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) (33, 34). In addition, the targeting domain is a soluble, pMHC-specific, high-affinity (picomolar) monoclonal TCR-derived protein fragment. Antibody engineering techniques, such as the introduction of a disulfide bond into the soluble TCR (35) and phage-display optimisation of the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of the TCR, have allowed the stabilization and affinity maturation of the respective TCR from micromolar to the picomolar range (36-38). In contrast to antibody-based cancer therapeutics targeting membrane-associated or secreted antigens only, the ImmTac technology also allows targeting of intracellular tumor antigens. For example, many classical tumor antigens, such as New York-Esophageal Cancer-1 (NY-ESO-1), L Antigen-1 (LAGE-1) and human melanoma antigen A-3 (MAGE-3) (39) or tissue-specific antigens, such as gp100 and melanoma antigen A (MEL-A), are located intracellularly (40). The same holds true for tumor-related anti-apoptotic proteins, such as B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), p53, survivin and Wilms Tumor-1 (WT-1) (41). In addition, peptides derived from mutated inducible enzymes involved in cancer metabolism can be presented by MHC molecules (42). Importantly, in terms of translation into a clinical setting, patients have to be stratified with regard to their human leukocyte antigen (HLA) status.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Schematic and 3D representation of selected TCR-MHC targeting anti-tumor agents. Schematic representations are shown in the upper panel, the corresponding 3D representations are depicted in the lower panel. Structure models were generated based on available structure data of domains or entities. Structural data from the Protein DataBank (PDB, Nov. 2011) (129) were assembled and minimized using DiscoveryStudio40 (129). Ribbon representations display secondary structures where the N-terminal domain is placed on the top and the C-terminal domain on the bottom. A TCR assembly is composed of two chains, α and β, displayed in dark and light brown, respectively. The targeting antibody heavy and light chains are represented by dark and light blue ribbons, respectively. An MHC complex comprises a dark green α chain combined with the light green β2 microglobulin domain. Fusion linkers and additional disulfide bridges are shown on the schematic view in pink and orange, respectively. A. Model of the ALT-801 TCR-IL2 fusion molecule (pdbcode: 4P2R for TCR and 2GFB for IL2, displayed in red). B. Model of ABR-217620 comprising a targeting Fab-moiety and the Staphylococcal enterotoxin A shown in purple (pdbcode: 1VPO and 1LO5, respectively). C. Model of an ImmTAC comprising a soluble TCR (pdbcode: 2P5E) stabilized by a disulfide bridge and fused to an anti-CD3 scFv (pdbcode: 2FGW). D. Model of a scMHC (pdcode: 4MNQ) fused to an anti-IL2R Fv (pdcode 3NFP) stabilized with a disulfide bridge.

In practice, bi-specific TCR/anti-CD3 fusion molecules directed against NY-ESO-1, LAGE-1, gp100, MAGE-3 and MEL-A were generated and functionally evaluated (31, 32, 43). It was shown that these agents bound to human tumor cells and were able to activate CD8+ T-cells and that the specific T-cell activation potency correlated with the pMHC I affinity of the respective molecules. In addition, tumor cell lysis induced by such redirected T-cells was shown. In vivo, the ability of ImmTacs to inhibit tumor growth was demonstrated in tumor xenograft models using non-obese diabetic severe combined immune-deficient NOD-SCID, SCID-beige or NOD SCIDγ (NSG) mice engrafted subcutaneously with Mel 526, A375, SK-Mel-37 or J82 tumor cells. Here, unstimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used as effector cells (31, 32, 34). Remarkably, ImmTacs were able to induce tumor cell lysis at pMHC densities as low as 2-10 copies per cell. Clearly, the potential to target tumor cells with low expression levels of tumor antigens extends the therapeutic potential of engineered protein-based medicines. Finally, the anticipated dose for applications in humans will be probably below 10 mg (31). From a regulatory point of view it should be kept in mind that both tumor and T-cell targeting moieties are specific for the respective human gene products and, therefore, a species for target-related toxicity testing will not be available. On the other hand, immunogenicity of such fusion proteins is probably relatively low since the TCR moiety is fully human, the anti-CD3 scFv is derived from a humanized antibody, the engineered disulfide bond is buried within the protein and the mutations for affinity maturation are introduced into the CDRs.

Ab-MHC complexes. The efficacy of T-cells in clearing viral infections is well known (44). On the other hand, expression of tumor-specific MHC-peptide complexes on the surface of cancer cells can be affected by either down-regulation of MHC I expression or by alterations in the peptide-MHC processing and presentation pathway (30, 45-48). Several groups have shown previously that biotinylated MHC-peptide complexes multimerized by streptavidin or monomeric influenza matrix peptide complexes coupled chemically to tumor antigen-related antibodies were able to induce lysis of tumor cells coated with the respective complexes (49, 50-53). These approaches made use of antibodies or antibody Fab fragments and non site-specific chemical conjugation resulting in limited homogeneity of the produced conjugates and, consequently, variable tumor penetration due to their large size. These problems were addressed by fusing an antigen-specific moiety such as an antibody-derived scFv fragment directed against a tumor-related antigen to a sc MHC I molecule composed of β2 microglobulin and the three extracellular domains of the heavy chain of MHC I complexed with corresponding peptides (54). These virus- or tumor antigen-derived peptides can be loaded to the complexes as soluble peptides or can be genetically fused to the β2 microglobulin entity of the respective fusion proteins. In a proof-of-concept experiment, a sc HLA-A2 molecule, as described above, was genetically fused to a disulfide-bridged scFv domain of a humanized antibody directed against the interleukin 2 receptor α (IL2Rα) subunit, Tac (55) (Figure 1D). This fusion protein was produced in E. coli and functional proteins were generated by in vitro folding in the presence of HLA-A2 restricted peptides derived from the melanoma antigen gp100. Binding specificity was demonstrated by coating of Tac-expressing tumor cells with the fusion protein making them susceptible to specific lysis by HLA-A2-restricted gp100 peptide specific cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs). In vivo activity was demonstrated by monitoring the growth of the epidermoid carcinoma cell line ATAC4 in nude mice co-injected with specific CTLs (E:T ratio of 10:1) in the absence or presence of the fusion protein. In addition, these scAb-sc HLA-A2 complexes were further refined by fusing defined virus- or tumor antigen-derived peptides to the N-terminus via a flexible linker (56). These HLA-peptide complexes specifically activated CTLs directed against melanoma differentiation antigen gp100- or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-derived peptides. Similarly, scAb-sc HLA-A2 complexes targeted to the α-subunit of the IL2R or human mesothelin and loaded with peptides derived from melanoma differentiation antigen gp100 or EBV were evaluated in vivo after re-folding and loading with the corresponding peptide. In vivo efficacy was shown after intratumoral (i.t.) or intravenous (i.v.) injection of HLA-A2-restricted human CTLs for treatment of 40-50 mm3 ATAC4 or A431/K5 xenograft tumors (57). In these experiments, 100 μg of fusion protein per mouse was administered daily and in several nude mice complete remissions were observed. The technology was also applied to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing tumors. EGFR is an important mediator of tumor growth (58, 59) in many tumors and the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) cetuximab (C225) was approved for treatment of colorectal and head-and-neck cancer (60). A respective fusion protein consisting of sc HLA-A2 and scFv C225 was re-folded and loaded with peptides derived from gp100 or EBV (61). These fusion proteins were able to induce CTL-mediated lysis of EGFR-expressing tumor cells in vitro irrespective of the expression of peptide MHC on the tumor cells (61). In addition, the fusion proteins loaded with EBV-derived peptides were evaluated in Balb/c nude mice bearing established (50 mm3) A-431-derived xenograft tumors. Fusion proteins (50 or 150 μg) were injected i.v. every other day for a total of three administrations, followed 6 h later by injection of 3×106 EBV-specific CTLs i.v. or i.t.. Remarkably, up to 94% reduction in tumor volume was observed. A crucial aspect for future development of the sc HLA-A2 fusion molecules will be the stabilization of the complexes by genetically fusing the corresponding peptides to the N-terminus of β2 microglobulin as shown for the prototype targeting of CD25 on leukemic cells (56).

TCR-like antibodies. Peptides derived from tumor-associated antigens are presented on the surface of tumor cells in the context of MHC I molecules. Thus, depending on the tumor-specific expression of these antigens, tumor-related pMHC complexes are created, which can serve as possible targets for antibody-derived therapeutic moieties (62-66). One such target class are differentiation antigens with cell lineage restricted expression. Examples are melanoma-specific proteins like tyrosinase-derived antigens, gp100 and MART-1 (67-69), which are expressed on melanocytes, or cancer testis antigens, such as NY-ESO-1, which are found in tumor cells apart from spermatogenic cells in the testis (70, 71). Another target class are proteins, which are mutated in cancer, such as ras, raf, p53 or β-catenin, or are over-expressed in cancer due to gene amplification or other mechanisms, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (72-75).

Traditionally, new peptides have been identified by isolation of pMHC complexes from tumor-derived cell lines, elution of the MHC associated peptides and their subsequent identification by mass spectrometry (75). A new method for the identification of MHC-associated peptides makes use of the finding that in cell lines transfected with secreted HLA proteins these molecules are loaded with peptide and subsequently are secreted into the cell culture supernatant from which they can be purified. Peptides derived in such a way from tumor cell lines and corresponding normal cell lines can then be compared by mass spectrometry to identify specific tumor-associated peptide antigens (76, 77).

As a prerequisite for the generation of antibodies against pMHC complexes, procedures for the generation of their recombinant versions had to be established. This became possible by expressing the extracellular domains of HLA class I molecules and β2 microglobulin in E. coli as inclusion bodies and the subsequent refolding of those complexes in the presence of the corresponding peptides (78, 79). For the generation of pMHC specific antibodies, phage display libraries were an important tool to achieve this objective (80, 81). Thus, TCR-like antibodies were isolated from large libraries derived from naïve B-cells showing that the genetic information to generate these antibodies is present in the germline repertoire. In vivo, however, B-cells expressing these antibodies very likely are negatively selected (82, 83). In a similar approach, transgenic mice expressing an appropriate HLA molecule in the context of a murine MHC knock-out background were immunized with the desired pMHC complexes to establish a more focused library for a phage display approach (84, 85). Finally, standard hybridoma technology is also an option for generating TCR-like mabs. Originally, antigen-presenting cells expressing the appropriate HLA molecules and immunogenic peptides were used (86, 87). More recently, recombinantly-produced isolated MHC-peptide complexes were used as immunogens and high throughput screening was applied for the identification of hybridomas secreting TCR-like antibodies (88-90). In contrast to phage display-derived antibodies possessing affinities in the range of 50-300 nM, these hybridoma-derived TCR-like antibodies were reported to possess relatively high binding affinities in the low nanomolar range (1). One application of TCR-like antibodies is the quantification of specific pMHC complexes on the surface of tumor cells (91). In addition, cytotoxic properties can be conferred to TCR-like antibodies, e.g. by fusion with a truncated version of Pseudomonas exotoxin (92). The feasibility of such an approach was shown for molecules targeting melanoma antigens gp100 and MART-1 in the context of HLA-A2 (93), as well as for the breast and prostate antigen TCRγ alternative reading frame protein (TRAP) (94).

Several examples have demonstrated the potential of TCR-like antibodies to induce apoptosis specifically in tumor cells and to mediate ADCC and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) (62, 64, 76). Mimetic TCR (mTCR)-like antibodies were isolated and evaluated against various oncology-relevant target proteins, such as gp100, tyrosinase, MART-1 and -3 (melanoma), NY-ESO-1 (melanoma, breast, ovary and lung cancer), helicase p68 (breast cancer), HER2 (breast and ovarian cancer), TCR alternate reading frame protein 29 (TARP 29) (breast and prostate cancer), human chorionic gonadotropin β (hCGβ) (ovarian, breast, colon cancer), PR1, a peptide derived from human proteinase 3 (leukemia), Wilms tumor antigen 1 (WT-1) (leukemia and other neoplasms), mucin 1 (MUC-1) (adenocarcinomas) and telomerase (multiple tumors) (61, 64, 76). In the following we highlight properties of mTCR-like antibodies directed against pMHC complexes specific for MUC-1, p68 helicase, migration inhibitory factor (MIF), hCGβ and HER2 (95-98). Thus, mAb RL-4B specific for MHC/hCGβ was efficacious in vivo in breast cancer xenograft models MDA-MB231 (ca. 4,000 pMHC complexes per cell) and MCF-7 (ca. 500 pMHC complexes per cell) after i.p. injection (95). These cell lines express the highest and lowest number of pMHC complexes per cell among all tumor cell lines investigated, respectively. Interestingly, in vivo efficacy was only partly dependent on Fc-mediated effector functions like ADCC and/or CDC since bivalent Fab (Fab)2 fragments were also able to mediate in vivo efficacy, albeit to a lower extent (96, 98). In this context, an effector cell independent mechanism of induction of apoptosis was identified, which involved activation and phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) and/or c-jun NH2-terminal kinase (jnk), activation of caspase 3 and poly ADP-ribosepolymerase 1 (PARP-1) (95-98). With regard to tumor cell specificity, mTCR RL21A, which specifically recognizes the MIF/HLA-A2 complex, detected invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) but did not react with ductal carcinoma in situ, fibroadenoma, normal breast tissue, total white blood cells and a panel of normal tissues (97). The hCG-β/HLA-A2 specific antibody RL4B is specific for human primary breast tumor tissue but did not react, or reacted only weakly, with normal breast tissue from the same patient (95). Finally, mAb RL1B specific for HER2/HLA was able to suppress growth of HER2 low-expressing MDA-MB-231 xenograft tumors (98). Importantly, since this antibody does not interact with native HER2 it is also not adsorbed by shed HER2. From a regulatory point of view it should be stressed that the lack of a cross-reactive species for toxicity evaluation is a critical issue. Also, quantitation of pMHC complexes for specific targets is an unresolved issue, as well as the need for appropriate MHC I expression.

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) and T-cells redirected for universal cytokine signaling (TRUCKs). Based on encouraging results in malignant melanoma, adoptive immunotherapy, i.e. the reinfusion of cultivated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), has gained increasing attention (99). A further step was the modification and activation of T cells using chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), which are composed of an antigen-specific moiety and a module mediating T cell signaling. To generate CAR-bearing T cells, autologous T cells are transfected with expression constructs encoding the respective molecules and subsequently transfused into patients (100, 101). The efficacy of CARs was systematically improved by the introduction of protein domains, which are able to mediate co-stimulatory signals, and by adding domains that can trigger signaling pathways. This, in total, enhances proliferation, survival and cytokine production of T cells transfected with the respective expression constructs (102, 103). Additional therapeutic potential may be achieved by using T cells redirected for universal cytokine signaling (TRUCKs) (104). Here, the basic concept is to recruit a second wave of T cells in a locally restricted fashion to kill tumor cells, which are invisible to CARs, e.g. through down-regulation of the expression of antigens specifically recognized by CARs. Here, proof-of-concept experiments were performed with CAR expressing T cells producing IL12 conditionally following activation (105-107). IL12, in turn, is able to boost cytokine release, stimulate the growth of T cells and NK cells and revert the immune suppression induced by regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), dendritic cells or macrophages (108). This local production of IL12 appears to be particularly relevant due to the toxicity of IL12 after systemic administration (109-112). Two clinical trials evaluating TRUCKs are underway (114). In addition, the use of CAR-modified T cells has recently received increased attention due to convincing clinical results in hematolological tumors (112-116). For example, CD19 is a suitable target for CAR-modified T cells because it is expressed exclusively on B-cells and B-cell-derived malignancies. Here, complete remissions were achieved in patients with anti-CD19 CARs. However, acute toxicities due to increased levels of inflammatory cytokines were noted (111, 112). In addition, depletion of endogenous lymphocytes by chemotherapy or radiotherapy before infusion of anti-CD19 CAR-transduced T cells was shown to enhance the in vivo activity of such T cells (112, 114, 116). The profound antigen-specific activity of anti-CD19 CAR-bearing T cells was further demonstrated by the long-term eradication of CD19+ B-cells from treated patients (112). Importantly, especially robust and rapid anti-leukemic activity was demonstrated in heavily pretreated and chemotherapy refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL) patients using anti-CD19 CARs (116). Similarly, from 4 relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients, who all received conditioning myeloablation therapy prior to T cell infusion, one patient had a complete response and the other three patients had partial responses (117). It will be interesting to see whether targets, such as CD138, CD56 and CD38 for multiple myeloma (118) and Ley, CD33 and CD123 for acute myeloid leukemia (119-121), can be used for CAR-based therapies. Another pending issue is the optimization of CARs for successful treatment of solid tumors.

Conclusion

Certainly, cell-mediated immunity is central to anti-tumor responses exerted by the immune system, which can be induced e.g. by tumor-specific vaccination. However, functional and antigen specific pMHC/TCR interactions are an indispensible prerequisite for the successful recognition of tumor cells by immune effector cells. Thus, for example, prophylactic vaccination against virus-induced tumors is approved for prevention of infection with human papilloma virus and, as a consequence, virus-induced cervical carcinoma (122). For therapeutic vaccination, many different strategies have been followed (123). For example, peptide cocktails for treatment of RCC have induced promising clinical responses (124). Another approach to generate long-lasting anti-tumoral responses was to revert the inhibition of tumor cell-specific T cells by using appropriate monoclonal antibodies (125). Thus, impressive clinical results have been obtained using monoclonal antibodies directed against cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and programmed death receptor-1 ligand (PD-1L) (126, 127). Hopefully, strategies for the induction of anti-tumor responses, as described in this review, will result in approved therapies for the treatment of cancer in the near future.

  • Received September 17, 2014.
  • Revision received October 24, 2014.
  • Accepted October 27, 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wang JH,
    2. Reinherz EL
    : Structural basis of T cell recognition of peptides bound to MHC molecules. Mol Immunol 38: 1039–1049, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Stevanovic S
    : Antigen processing is predictable: From genes to T cell epitopes. Transpl Immunol 14: 171–174, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Wahl A,
    2. Weidanz J,
    3. Hildebrand W
    : Direct class I HLA antigen discovery to distinguish virus-infected and cancerous cells. Expert Rev Proteomics 3: 641–652, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Novellino L,
    2. Castelli C,
    3. Parmiani G
    : A listing of human tumor antigens recognized by T cells: March 2004 update. Cancer Immunol Immunother 54: 187–207, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Rosenberg SA
    : Progress in human tumour immunology and immunotherapy. Nature 411: 380–384, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mellman I,
    2. Coukos G,
    3. Dranoff G
    : Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature 480: 480–489, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Tarhini AA,
    2. Agarwala SS
    : Interleukin-2 for the treatment of melanoma. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 6: 1234–1239, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Hoffmann TK,
    2. Nakano K,
    3. Elder EM,
    4. Dworacki G,
    5. Finkelstein SD,
    6. Appella E,
    7. Whiteside TL,
    8. DeLeo AB
    : Generation of T cells specific for the wild-type sequence p53(264-272) peptide in cancer patients: implications for immunoselection of epitope loss variants. J Immunol 165: 5938–5944, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Zhu X,
    2. Belmont HJ,
    3. Price-Schiavi S,
    4. Liu B,
    5. Lee HI,
    6. Fernandez M,
    7. Wong RL,
    8. Builes J,
    9. Rhode PR,
    10. Wong HC
    : Visualization of p53(264-272)/HLA-A*0201 complexes naturally presented on tumor cell surface by a multimeric soluble single-chain T cell receptor. J Immunol 176: 3223–3232, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Wen J,
    2. Zhu X,
    3. Liu B,
    4. You L,
    5. Kong L,
    6. Lee HI,
    7. Han KP,
    8. Wong JL,
    9. Rhode PR,
    10. Wong HC
    : Targeting activity of a TCR/IL-2 fusion protein against established tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 57: 1781–1794, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Belmont HJ,
    2. Price-Schiavi S,
    3. Liu B,
    4. Card KF,
    5. Lee HI,
    6. Han KP,
    7. Wen J,
    8. Tang S,
    9. Zhu X,
    10. Merrill J,
    11. Chavillaz PA,
    12. Wong JL,
    13. Rhode PR,
    14. Wong HC
    : Potent antitumor activity of a tumor-specific soluble TCR/IL-2 fusion protein. Clin Immunol 121: 29–39, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Card KF,
    2. Price-Schiavi SA,
    3. Liu B,
    4. Thomson E,
    5. Nieves E,
    6. Belmont H,
    7. Builes J,
    8. Jiao JA,
    9. Hernandez J,
    10. Weidanz J,
    11. Sherman L,
    12. Francis JL,
    13. Amirkhosravi A,
    14. Wong HC
    : A soluble single-chain T cell receptor IL-2 fusion protein retains MHC-restricted peptide specificity and IL-2 bioactivity. Cancer Immunol Immunother 53: 345–3357, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Fishman MN,
    2. Thompson JA,
    3. Pennock GK,
    4. Gonzalez R,
    5. Diez LM,
    6. Daud AI,
    7. Weber JS,
    8. Huang BY,
    9. Tang S,
    10. Rhode PR,
    11. Wong HC
    : Phase I trial of ALT-801, an interleukin-2/T cell receptor fusion protein targeting p53 (aa264-272)/HLA-A*0201 complex, in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 17: 7765–7775, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Fishman MN,
    2. Thompson JA,
    3. Pennock GK,
    4. Gonzalez R,
    5. Diez LM,
    6. Daud AI,
    7. Weber JS,
    8. Huang BY,
    9. Tang S,
    10. Rhode PR,
    11. Wong HC
    : Phase I trial of ALT-801, an interleukin-2/T cell receptor fusion protein targeting p53 (aa264-272)/HLA-A*0201 complex, in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 17: 7765–7775, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Mosquera LA,
    2. Card KF,
    3. Price-Schiavi SA,
    4. Belmont HJ,
    5. Liu B,
    6. Builes J,
    7. Zhu X,
    8. Chavaillaz PA,
    9. Lee HI,
    10. Jiao JA,
    11. Francis JL,
    12. Amirkhosravi A,
    13. Wong RL,
    14. Wong HC
    : In vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel antibody-like single-chain TCR human IgG1 fusion protein. J Immunol 174: 4381–4388, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Steel JC,
    2. Waldmann TA,
    3. Morris JC
    : Interleukin-15 biology and its therapeutic implications in cancer. Trends Pharmacol Sci 33: 35–41, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Xu W,
    2. Jones M,
    3. Liu B,
    4. Zhu X,
    5. Johnson CB,
    6. Edwards AC,
    7. Kong L,
    8. Jeng EK,
    9. Han K,
    10. Marcus WD,
    11. Rubinstein MP,
    12. Rhode PR,
    13. Wong HC
    : Efficacy and mechanism-of-action of a novel superagonist interleukin-15: interleukin-15 receptor αSu/Fc fusion complex in syngeneic murine models of multiple myeloma. Cancer Res 73: 3075–3086, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Scherer MT,
    2. Ignatowicz L,
    3. Winslow GM,
    4. Kappler JW,
    5. Marrack P
    : Superantigens: bacterial and viral proteins that manipulate the immune system. Annu Rev Cell Biol 9: 101–128, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Johnson HM,
    2. Russell JK,
    3. Pontzer CH
    : Staphylococcal entero-toxin microbial superantigens. FASEB J 5: 2706–2712, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. ↵
    1. Kalland T,
    2. Hedlund G,
    3. Dohlsten M,
    4. Lando PA
    : Staphylococcal enterotoxin-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 174: 81–92, 1991.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Rosendahl A,
    2. Hansson J,
    3. Sundstedt A,
    4. Kalland T,
    5. Dohlsten M
    : Immune response during tumor therapy with antibody-superantigen fusion proteins. Int J Cancer 68: 109–113, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Litton MJ,
    2. Dohlsten M,
    3. Hansson J,
    4. Rosendahl A,
    5. Ohlsson L,
    6. Kalland T,
    7. Andersson J,
    8. Andersson U
    : Tumor therapy with an antibody-targeted superantigen generates a dichotomy between local and systemic immune responses. Am J Pathol 150: 1607–1618, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Dohlsten M,
    2. Abrahmsén L,
    3. Björk P,
    4. Lando PA,
    5. Hedlund G,
    6. Forsberg G,
    7. Brodin T,
    8. Gascoigne NR,
    9. Förberg C,
    10. Lind P
    : Monoclonal antibody-superantigen fusion proteins: tumor-specific agents for T cell-based tumor therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 8945–8949, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Robinson MK,
    2. Alpaugh RK,
    3. Borghaei H
    : Naptumomab estafenatox: a new immunoconjugate. Expert Opin Biol Ther 10: 273–279, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hole N,
    2. Stern PL
    : Isolation and characterization of 5T4, a tumor-associated antigen. Int J Cancer 45: 179–184, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Southall PJ,
    2. Boxer GM,
    3. Bagshawe KD,
    4. Hole N,
    5. Bromley M,
    6. Stern PL
    : Immunohistological distribution of 5T4 antigen in normal and malignant tissues. Br J Cancer 61: 89–95, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Erlandsson E,
    2. Andersson K,
    3. Cavallin A,
    4. Nilsson A,
    5. Larsson-Lorek U,
    6. Niss U,
    7. Sjöberg A,
    8. Wallén-Ohman M,
    9. Antonsson P,
    10. Walse B,
    11. Forsberg G
    : Identification of the antigenic epitopes in staphylococcal enterotoxins A and E and design of a superantigen for human cancer therapy. J Mol Biol 333: 893–905, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Hedlund G,
    2. Eriksson H,
    3. Sundstedt A,
    4. Forsberg G,
    5. Jakobsen BK,
    6. Pumphrey N,
    7. Rödström K,
    8. Lindkvist-Petersson K,
    9. Björk P
    : The tumor targeted superantigen ABR-217620 selectively engages TRBV7-9 and exploits TCR-pMHC affinity mimicry in mediating T cell cytotoxicity. PLoS One 8: e79082, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. van der Merwe PA,
    2. Davis SJ
    : Molecular interactions mediating T cell antigen recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 21: 659–684, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Dunn GP,
    2. Old LJ,
    3. Schreiber RD
    : The three Es of cancer immunoediting. Annu Rev Immunol 22: 329–360, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Liddy N,
    2. Bossi G,
    3. Adams KJ,
    4. Lissina A,
    5. Mahon TM,
    6. Hassan NJ,
    7. Gavarret J,
    8. Bianchi FC,
    9. Pumphrey NJ,
    10. Ladell K,
    11. Gostick E,
    12. Sewell AK,
    13. Lissin NM,
    14. Harwood NE,
    15. Molloy PE,
    16. Li Y,
    17. Cameron BJ,
    18. Sami M,
    19. Baston EE,
    20. Todorov PT,
    21. Paston SJ,
    22. Dennis RE,
    23. Harper JV,
    24. Dunn SM,
    25. Ashfield R,
    26. Johnson A,
    27. McGrath Y,
    28. Plesa G,
    29. June CH,
    30. Kalos M,
    31. Price DA,
    32. Vuidepot A,
    33. Williams DD,
    34. Sutton DH,
    35. Jakobsen BK
    : Monoclonal TCR-redirected tumor cell killing. Nat Med 18: 980–987, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Oates J,
    2. Jakobsen BK
    : ImmTACs: Novel bi-specific agents for targeted cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology 2: e22891, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Baeuerle PA,
    2. Reinhardt C
    : Bispecific T cell engaging antibodies for cancer therapy. Cancer Res 69: 4941–4944, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Nagorsen D,
    2. Bargou R,
    3. Ruttinger D,
    4. Kufer P,
    5. Baeuerle PA,
    6. Zugmaier G
    : Immunotherapy of lymphoma and leukemia with T cell engaging BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Leuk Lymphoma 50: 886–891, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Boulter JM,
    2. Glick M,
    3. Todorov PT,
    4. Baston E,
    5. Sami M,
    6. Rizkallah P,
    7. Jakobsen BK
    : Stable, soluble T cell receptor molecules for crystallization and therapeutics. Protein Eng 16: 707–711, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Moysey R,
    3. Molloy PE,
    4. Vuidepot AL,
    5. Mahon T,
    6. Baston E,
    7. Dunn S,
    8. Liddy N,
    9. Jacob J,
    10. Jakobsen BK,
    11. Boulter JM
    : Directed evolution of human T cell receptors with picomolar affinities by phage display. Nat Biotechnol 23: 349–354, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Holler PD,
    2. Holman PO,
    3. Shusta EV,
    4. O’Herrin S,
    5. Wittrup KD,
    6. Kranz DM
    : In vitro evolution of a T cell receptor with high affinity for peptide/MHC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 5387–5392, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Chlewicki LK,
    2. Holler PD,
    3. Monti BC,
    4. Clutter MR,
    5. Kranz DM
    : High-affinity, peptide-specific T cell receptors can be generated by mutations in CDR1, CDR2 or CDR3. J Mol Biol 346: 223–239, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Caballero OL,
    2. Chen YT
    : Cancer/testis (CT) antigens: potential targets for immunotherapy. Cancer Sci 100: 2014–2021, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Syed ON,
    2. Mandigo CE,
    3. Killory BD,
    4. Canoll P,
    5. Bruce JN
    : Cancer-testis and melanocyte-differentiation antigen expression in malignant glioma and meningioma. J Clin Neurosci 19: 1016–1021, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Holohan C,
    2. Van Schaeybroeck S,
    3. Longley DB,
    4. Johnston PG
    : Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer 13: 714–726, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. O’Brien KM,
    2. Orlow I,
    3. Antonescu CR,
    4. Ballman K,
    5. McCall L,
    6. DeMatteo R,
    7. Engel LS
    : Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, somatic mutations and candidate genetic risk variants. PLoS One 8: e62119, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. McCormack E,
    2. Adams KJ,
    3. Hassan NJ,
    4. Kotian A,
    5. Lissin NM,
    6. Sami M,
    7. Mujić M,
    8. Osdal T,
    9. Gjertsen BT,
    10. Baker D,
    11. Powlesland AS,
    12. Aleksic M,
    13. Vuidepot A,
    14. Morteau O,
    15. Sutton DH,
    16. June CH,
    17. Kalos M,
    18. Ashfield R,
    19. Jakobsen BK
    . Bi-specific TCR-anti CD3 redirected T cell targeting of NY-ESO-1- and LAGE-1-positive tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 62: 773–785, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Tussey L,
    2. Speller S,
    3. Gallimore A,
    4. Vessey R
    : Functionally distinct CD8+ memory T cell subsets in persistent EBV infection are differentiated by migratory receptor expression. Eur J Immunol 30: 1823–1829, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Bodmer WF,
    2. Browning MJ,
    3. Krausa P,
    4. Rowan A,
    5. Bicknell DC,
    6. Bodmer JG
    : Tumor escape from immune response by variation in HLA expression and other mechanisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 690: 42–49, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Restifo NP,
    2. Marincola FM,
    3. Kawakami Y,
    4. Taubenberger J,
    5. Yannelli JR,
    6. Rosenberg SA
    : Loss of functional beta 2-microglobulin in metastatic melanomas from five patients receiving immunotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 100–108, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Seliger B,
    2. Maeurer MJ,
    3. Ferrone S
    : TAP off - tumors on. Immunol Today 18: 292–299, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Vitale M,
    2. Rezzani R,
    3. Rodella L,
    4. Zauli G,
    5. Grigolato P,
    6. Cadei M,
    7. Hicklin DJ,
    8. Ferrone S
    : HLA class I antigen and transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP1 and TAP2) down-regulation in high-grade primary breast carcinoma lesions. Cancer Res 58: 737–742, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Ogg GS,
    2. Dunbar PR,
    3. Cerundolo V,
    4. McMichael AJ,
    5. Lemoine NR,
    6. Savage P
    : Sensitization of tumour cells to lysis by virus-specific CTL using antibody-targeted MHC class I/peptide complexes. Br J Cancer 82: 1058–1062, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Robert B,
    2. Guillaume P,
    3. Luescher I,
    4. Romero P,
    5. Mach JP
    : Antibody-conjugated MHC class I tetramers can target tumor cells for specific lysis by T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 30: 3165–3170, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Savage P,
    2. Cowburn P,
    3. Clayton A,
    4. Man S,
    5. Lawson T,
    6. Ogg G,
    7. Lemoine N,
    8. McMichael A,
    9. Epenetos A
    : Anti-viral cytotoxic T cells inhibit the growth of cancer cells with antibody targeted HLA class I/peptide complexes in SCID mice. Int J Cancer 98: 561–566, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Robert B,
    2. Guillaume P,
    3. Luescher I,
    4. Doucey MA,
    5. Cerottini JC,
    6. Romero P,
    7. Mach JP
    : Redirecting anti-viral CTL against cancer cells by surface targeting of monomeric MHC class I-viral peptide conjugated to antibody fragments. Cancer Immun 1: 2, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Donda A,
    2. Cesson V,
    3. Mach JP,
    4. Corradin G,
    5. Primus FJ,
    6. Robert B
    : In vivo targeting of an anti-tumor antibody coupled to antigenic MHC class I complexes induces specific growth inhibition and regression of established syngeneic tumor grafts. Cancer Immunity 3: 11, 2003
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Zafir-Lavie I,
    2. Michaeli Y,
    3. Reiter Y
    : Novel antibodies as anticancer agents. Oncogene 26: 3714–3733, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Lev A,
    2. Novak H,
    3. Segal D,
    4. Reiter Y
    : Recruitment of CTL activity by tumor-specific antibody-mediated targeting of single-chain class I MHC-peptide complexes. J Immunol 169: 2988–2996, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Oved K,
    2. Lev A,
    3. Noy R,
    4. Segal D,
    5. Reiter Y
    : Antibody-mediated targeting of human single-chain class I MHC with covalently linked peptides induces efficient killing of tumor cells by tumor or viral-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cancer Immunol Immunother 54: 867–879, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Lev A,
    2. Noy R,
    3. Oved K,
    4. Novak H,
    5. Segal D,
    6. Walden P,
    7. Zehn D,
    8. Reiter Y
    : Tumor-specific Ab-mediated targeting of MHC-peptide complexes induces regression of human tumor xenografts in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 9051–9056, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Wells A
    : EGF receptor. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 31: 637–643, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Laskin JJ,
    2. Sandler AB
    : Epidermal growth factor receptor: a promising target in solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rev 30: 1–17, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Govindan R
    . Cetuximab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10: 4241s–4244s, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Novak H,
    2. Noy R,
    3. Oved K,
    4. Segal D,
    5. Wels WS,
    6. Reiter Y
    : Selective antibody-mediated targeting of class I MHC to EGFR-expressing tumor cells induces potent antitumor CTL activity in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer 120: 329–336, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Dahan R,
    2. Reiter Y
    : T cell-receptor-like antibodies - generation, function and applications. Expert Rev Mol Med 14: e6, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shetty V,
    2. Sinnathamby G,
    3. Nickens Z,
    4. Shah P,
    5. Hafner J,
    6. Mariello L,
    7. Kamal S,
    8. Vlahović G,
    9. Lyerly HK,
    10. Morse MA,
    11. Philip R
    : MHC class I-presented lung cancer-associated tumor antigens identified by immunoproteomics analysis are targets for cancer-specific T cell response. J Proteomics 74: 728–743, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Weidanz JA,
    2. Hawkins O,
    3. Verma B,
    4. Hildebrand WH
    : TCR-like biomolecules target peptide/MHC Class I complexes on the surface of infected and cancerous cells. Int Rev Immunol 30: 328–340, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Engberg J,
    2. Krogsgaard M,
    3. Fugger L
    : Recombinant antibodies with the antigen-specific, MHC restricted specificity of T cells: novel reagents for basic and clinical investigations and immunotherapy. Immunotechnology 4: 273–278, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Reiter Y,
    2. Di Carlo A,
    3. Fugger L,
    4. Engberg J,
    5. Pastan I
    : Peptide-specific killing of antigen-presenting cells by a recombinant antibody-toxin fusion protein targeted to major histocompatibility complex/peptide class I complexes with T cell receptor-like specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 4631–4636, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. de Vries TJ,
    2. Fourkour A,
    3. Wobbes T,
    4. Verkroost G,
    5. Ruiter DJ,
    6. van Muijen GN
    : Heterogeneous expression of immunotherapy candidate proteins gp100, MART-1, and tyrosinase in human melanoma cell lines and in human melanocytic lesions. Cancer Res 57: 3223–3229, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Coulie PG,
    2. Brichard V,
    3. Van Pel A,
    4. Wölfel T,
    5. Schneider J,
    6. Traversari C,
    7. Mattei S,
    8. De Plaen E,
    9. Lurquin C,
    10. Szikora JP,
    11. Renauld JC,
    12. Boon T
    : A new gene coding for a differentiation antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on HLA-A2 melanomas. J Exp Med 180: 35–42, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Kawakami Y,
    2. Eliyahu S,
    3. Sakaguchi K,
    4. Robbins PF,
    5. Rivoltini L,
    6. Yannelli JR,
    7. Appella E,
    8. Rosenberg SA
    : Identification of the immunodominant peptides of the MART-1 human melanoma antigen recognized by the majority of HLA-A2-restricted tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. J Exp Med 180: 347–352, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Sugita Y,
    2. Wada H,
    3. Fujita S,
    4. Nakata T,
    5. Sato S,
    6. Noguchi Y,
    7. Jungbluth AA,
    8. Yamaguchi M,
    9. Chen YT,
    10. Stockert E,
    11. Gnjatic S,
    12. Williamson B,
    13. Scanlan MJ,
    14. Ono T,
    15. Sakita I,
    16. Yasui M,
    17. Miyoshi Y,
    18. Tamaki Y,
    19. Matsuura N,
    20. Noguchi S,
    21. Old LJ,
    22. Nakayama E,
    23. Monden M
    : NY-ESO-1 expression and immunogenicity in malignant and benign breast tumors. Cancer Res 64: 2199–2204, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Nakada T,
    2. Noguchi Y,
    3. Satoh S,
    4. Ono T,
    5. Saika T,
    6. Kurashige T,
    7. Gnjatic S,
    8. Ritter G,
    9. Chen YT,
    10. Stockert E,
    11. Nasu Y,
    12. Tsushima T,
    13. Kumon H,
    14. Old LJ,
    15. Nakayama E
    : NY-ESO-1 mRNA expression and immunogenicity in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Immun 3: 10, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Duffy MJ,
    2. Crown J
    : Companion biomarkers: paving the pathway to personalized treatment for cancer. Clin Chem 59: 1447–1456, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Morin PJ,
    2. Sparks AB,
    3. Korinek V,
    4. Barker N,
    5. Clevers H,
    6. Vogelstein B,
    7. Kinzler KW
    : Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC. Science 275: 1787–1790, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Schechter AL,
    2. Stern DF,
    3. Vaidyanathan L,
    4. Decker SJ,
    5. Drebin JA,
    6. Greene MI,
    7. Weinberg RA
    : The neu oncogene: an erb-B-related gene encoding a 185,000-Mr tumor antigen. Nature 312: 513–516, 1984.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. King CR,
    2. Kraus MH,
    3. Aaronson SA
    : Amplification of a novel v-erbB-related gene in a human mammary carcinoma. Science 229: 974–976, 1985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Weidanz JA,
    2. Hildebrand WH
    : Expanding the targets available to therapeutic antibodies via novel disease-specific markers. Int Rev Immunol 30: 312–327, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Hawkins OE,
    2. Vangundy RS,
    3. Eckerd AM,
    4. Bardet W,
    5. Buchli R,
    6. Weidanz JA,
    7. Hildebrand WH
    : Identification of breast cancer peptide epitopes presented by HLA-A*0201. J Proteome Res 7: 1445–1457, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Denkberg G,
    2. Cohen CJ,
    3. Segal D,
    4. Kirkin AF,
    5. Reiter Y
    : Recombinant human single-chain MHC-peptide complexes made from E. coli by in vitro refolding: functional single-chain MHC-peptide complexes and tetramers with tumor associated antigens. Eur J Immunol 30: 3522–3532, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Garboczi DN,
    2. Hung DT,
    3. Wiley DC
    : HLA-A2-peptide complexes: refolding and crystallization of molecules expressed in Escherichia coli and complexed with single antigenic peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 3429–3433, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Stryhn A,
    2. Andersen PS,
    3. Pedersen LO,
    4. Svejgaard A,
    5. Holm A,
    6. Thorpe CJ,
    7. Fugger L,
    8. Buus S,
    9. Engberg J
    : Shared fine specificity between T cell receptors and an antibody recognizing a peptide/major histocompatibility class I complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 10338–10342, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Hoogenboom HR
    : Selecting and screening recombinant antibody libraries. Nat Biotechnol 23: 1105–1116, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. de Haard HJ,
    2. van Neer N,
    3. Reurs A,
    4. Hufton SE,
    5. Roovers RC,
    6. Henderikx P,
    7. de Bruïne AP,
    8. Arends JW,
    9. Hoogenboom HR
    : A large non-immunized human Fab fragment phage library that permits rapid isolation and kinetic analysis of high affinity antibodies. J Biol Chem 274: 18218–18230, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Griffiths AD,
    2. Williams SC,
    3. Hartley O,
    4. Tomlinson IM,
    5. Waterhouse P,
    6. Crosby WL,
    7. Kontermann RE,
    8. Jones PT,
    9. Low NM,
    10. Allison TJ
    : Isolation of high affinity human antibodies directly from large synthetic repertoires. EMBO J 13: 3245–3260, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Krogsgaard M,
    2. Wucherpfennig KW,
    3. Cannella B,
    4. Hansen BE,
    5. Svejgaard A,
    6. Pyrdol J,
    7. Ditzel H,
    8. Raine C,
    9. Engberg J,
    10. Fugger L
    : Visualization of myelin basic protein (MBP) T cell epitopes in multiple sclerosis lesions using a monoclonal antibody specific for the human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR2-MBP 85-99 complex. J Exp Med 191: 1395–1412, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Denkberg G,
    2. Lev A,
    3. Eisenbach L,
    4. Benhar I,
    5. Reiter Y
    : Selective targeting of melanoma and APCs using a recombinant antibody with TCR-like specificity directed toward a melanoma differentiation antigen. J Immunol 171: 2197–2207, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Dadaglio G,
    2. Nelson CA,
    3. Deck MB,
    4. Petzold SJ,
    5. Unanue ER
    : Characterization and quantitation of peptide-MHC complexes produced from hen egg lysozyme using a monoclonal antibody. Immunity 6: 727–738, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Porgador A,
    2. Yewdell JW,
    3. Deng Y,
    4. Bennink JR,
    5. Germain RN
    : Localization, quantitation, and in situ detection of specific peptide-MHC class I complexes using a monoclonal antibody. Immunity 6: 715–726, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Sergeeva A,
    2. Alatrash G,
    3. He H,
    4. Ruisaard K,
    5. Lu S,
    6. Wygant J,
    7. McIntyre BW,
    8. Ma Q,
    9. Li D,
    10. St John L,
    11. Clise-Dwyer K,
    12. Molldrem JJ
    : An anti-PR1/HLA-A2 T cell receptor-like antibody mediates complement-dependent cytotoxicity against acute myeloid leukemia progenitor cells. Blood 117: 4262–4272, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wittman VP,
    2. Woodburn D,
    3. Nguyen T,
    4. Neethling FA,
    5. Wright S,
    6. Weidanz JA
    : Antibody targeting to a class I MHC-peptide epitope promotes tumor cell death. J Immunol 177: 4187–4195, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Sastry KS,
    2. Too CT,
    3. Kaur K,
    4. Gehring AJ,
    5. Low L,
    6. Javiad A,
    7. Pollicino T,
    8. Li L,
    9. Kennedy PT,
    10. Lopatin U,
    11. Macary PA,
    12. Bertoletti A
    : Targeting hepatitis B virus-infected cells with a T cell receptor-like antibody. J Virol 85: 1935–1942, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Cohen CJ,
    2. Hoffmann N,
    3. Farago M,
    4. Hoogenboom HR,
    5. Eisenbach L,
    6. Reiter Y
    : Direct detection and quantitation of a distinct T cell epitope derived from tumor-specific epithelial cell-associated mucin using human recombinant antibodies endowed with the antigen-specific, major histocompatibility complex-restricted specificity of T cells. Cancer Res 62: 5835–5844, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Cohen CJ,
    2. Denkberg G,
    3. Segal D,
    4. Reiter Y
    : Generation of recombinant immunotoxins for specific targeting of tumor-related peptides presented by MHC molecules. Methods Mol Biol 207: 269–282, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Klechevsky E,
    2. Gallegos M,
    3. Denkberg G,
    4. Palucka K,
    5. Banchereau J,
    6. Cohen C,
    7. Reiter Y
    : Antitumor activity of immunotoxins with T cell receptor-like specificity against human melanoma xenografts. Cancer Res 68: 6360–6367, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Epel M,
    2. Carmi I,
    3. Soueid-Baumgarten S,
    4. Oh SK,
    5. Bera T,
    6. Pastan I,
    7. Berzofsky J,
    8. Reiter Y
    : Targeting TARP, a novel breast and prostate tumor-associated antigen, with T cell receptor-like human recombinant antibodies. Eur J Immunol 38: 1706–1720, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Verma B,
    2. Neethling FA,
    3. Caseltine S,
    4. Fabrizio G,
    5. Largo S,
    6. Duty JA,
    7. Tabaczewski P,
    8. Weidanz JA
    : TCR mimic monoclonal antibody targets a specific peptide/HLA class I complex and significantly impedes tumor growth in vivo using breast cancer models. J Immunol 184: 2156–2165, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    1. Verma B,
    2. Jain R,
    3. Caseltine S,
    4. Rennels A,
    5. Bhattacharya R,
    6. Markiewski MM,
    7. Rawat A,
    8. Neethling F,
    9. Bickel U,
    10. Weidanz JA
    : TCR mimic monoclonal antibodies induce apoptosis of tumor cells via immune effector-independent mechanisms. J Immunol 186: 3265–3276, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Hawkins O,
    2. Verma B,
    3. Lightfoot S,
    4. Jain R,
    5. Rawat A,
    6. McNair S,
    7. Caseltine S,
    8. Mojsilovic A,
    9. Gupta P,
    10. Neethling F,
    11. Almanza O,
    12. Dooley W,
    13. Hildebrand W,
    14. Weidanz J
    : An HLA-presented fragment of macrophage migration inhibitory factor is a therapeutic target for invasive breast cancer. J Immunol 186: 6607–6616, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Jain R,
    2. Rawat A,
    3. Verma B,
    4. Markiewski MM,
    5. Weidanz JA
    : Antitumor activity of a monoclonal antibody targeting major histocompatibility complex class I-Her2 peptide complexes. J Natl Cancer Inst 105: 202–218, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. ↵
    1. Rosenberg SA,
    2. Yang JC,
    3. Sherry RM,
    4. Kammula US,
    5. Hughes MS,
    6. Phan GQ,
    7. Citrin DE,
    8. Restifo NP,
    9. Robbins PF,
    10. Wunderlich JR,
    11. Morton KE,
    12. Laurencot CM,
    13. Steinberg SM,
    14. White DE,
    15. Dudley ME
    : Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T cell transfer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 17: 4550–4557, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    1. Kershaw MH,
    2. Westwood JA,
    3. Darcy PK
    : Gene-engineered T cells for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 13: 525–541, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Dudley ME,
    2. Yang JC,
    3. Sherry R,
    4. Hughes MS,
    5. Royal R,
    6. Kammula U,
    7. Robbins PF,
    8. Huang J,
    9. Citrin DE,
    10. Leitman SF,
    11. Wunderlich J,
    12. Restifo NP,
    13. Thomasian A,
    14. Downey SG,
    15. Smith FO,
    16. Klapper J,
    17. Morton K,
    18. Laurencot C,
    19. White DE,
    20. Rosenberg SA
    : Adoptive cell therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: evaluation of intensive myeloablative chemoradiation preparative regimens. J Clin Oncol 26: 5233–5239, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    1. Duong CP,
    2. Westwood JA,
    3. Yong CS,
    4. Murphy A,
    5. Devaud C,
    6. John LB,
    7. Darcy PK,
    8. Kershaw MH
    : Engineering T cell function using chimeric antigen receptors identified using a DNA library approach. PLoS One 8: e63037, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Bridgeman JS,
    2. Hawkins RE,
    3. Hombach AA,
    4. Abken H,
    5. Gilham DE
    : Building better chimeric antigen receptors for adoptive T cell therapy. Curr Gene Ther 10: 77–90, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Chmielewski M,
    2. Hombach AA,
    3. Abken H
    : Of CARs and TRUCKs: chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells engineered with an inducible cytokine to modulate the tumor stroma. Immunol Rev 257: 83–90, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Pegram HJ,
    2. Lee JC,
    3. Hayman EG,
    4. Imperato GH,
    5. Tedder TF,
    6. Sadelain M,
    7. Brentjens RJ
    : Tumor-targeted T cells modified to secrete IL-12 eradicate systemic tumors without need for prior conditioning. Blood 119: 4133–4141, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kerkar SP,
    2. Muranski P,
    3. Kaiser A,
    4. Boni A,
    5. Sanchez-Perez L,
    6. Yu Z,
    7. Palmer DC,
    8. Reger RN,
    9. Borman ZA,
    10. Zhang L,
    11. Morgan RA,
    12. Gattinoni L,
    13. Rosenberg SA,
    14. Trinchieri G,
    15. Restifo NP
    : Tumor-specific CD8+ T cells expressing interleukin-12 eradicate established cancers in lymphodepleted hosts. Cancer Res 70: 6725–6734, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Kerkar SP,
    2. Goldszmid RS,
    3. Muranski P,
    4. Chinnasamy D,
    5. Yu Z,
    6. Reger RN,
    7. Leonardi AJ,
    8. Morgan RA,
    9. Wang E,
    10. Marincola FM,
    11. Trinchieri G,
    12. Rosenberg SA,
    13. Restifo NP
    : IL-12 triggers a programmatic change in dysfunctional myeloid-derived cells within mouse tumors. J Clin Invest 121: 4746–4757, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Trinchieri G
    : The choices of a natural killer. Nat Immunol 4: 509–510, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Simpson-Abelson MR,
    2. Purohit VS,
    3. Pang WM,
    4. Iyer V,
    5. Odunsi K,
    6. Demmy TL,
    7. Yokota SJ,
    8. Loyall JL,
    9. Kelleher RJ Jr.,
    10. Balu-Iyer S,
    11. Bankert RB
    : IL-12 delivered intratumorally by multilamellar liposomes reactivates memory T cells in human tumor microenvironments. Clin Immunol 132: 71–82, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Heinzerling L,
    2. Burg G,
    3. Dummer R,
    4. Maier T,
    5. Oberholzer PA,
    6. Schultz J,
    7. Elzaouk L,
    8. Pavlovic J,
    9. Moelling K
    : Intratumoral injection of DNA encoding human interleukin 12 into patients with metastatic melanoma: clinical efficacy. Hum Gene Ther 16: 35–48, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Kang WK,
    2. Park C,
    3. Yoon HL,
    4. Kim WS,
    5. Yoon SS,
    6. Lee MH,
    7. Park K,
    8. Kim K,
    9. Jeong HS,
    10. Kim JA,
    11. Nam SJ,
    12. Yang JH,
    13. Son YI,
    14. Baek CH,
    15. Han J,
    16. Ree HJ,
    17. Lee ES,
    18. Kim SH,
    19. Kim DW,
    20. Ahn YC,
    21. Huh SJ,
    22. Choe YH,
    23. Lee JH,
    24. Park MH,
    25. Kong GS,
    26. Park EY,
    27. Kang YK,
    28. Bang YJ,
    29. Paik NS,
    30. Lee SN,
    31. Kim SH,
    32. Kim S,
    33. Robbins PD,
    34. Tahara H,
    35. Lotze MT,
    36. Park CH
    : Interleukin 12 gene therapy of cancer by peritumoral injection of transduced autologous fibroblasts: outcome of a phase I study. Hum Gene Ther 12: 671–684, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Kochenderfer JN,
    2. Rosenberg SA
    : Treating B-cell cancer with T cells expressing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10: 267–276, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sinha R,
    2. DeJoubner N,
    3. Flowers C
    : Novel agents for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 20: 669–680, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Park TS,
    2. Rosenberg SA,
    3. Morgan RA
    : Treating cancer with genetically engineered T cells. Trends Biotechnol 29: 550–557, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hoyos V,
    2. Savoldo B,
    3. Dotti G
    : Genetic modification of human T lymphocytes for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Haematologica 97: 1622–1631, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  98. ↵
    1. Davila ML,
    2. Bouhassira DC,
    3. Park JH,
    4. Curran KJ,
    5. Smith EL,
    6. Pegram HJ,
    7. Brentjens R
    : Chimeric antigen receptors for the adoptive T cell therapy of hematologic malignancies. Int J Hematol 99: 361–371, 2014
    OpenUrlPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Kochenderfer JN,
    2. Dudley ME,
    3. Feldman SA,
    4. Wilson WH,
    5. Spaner DE,
    6. Maric I,
    7. Stetler-Stevenson M,
    8. Phan GQ,
    9. Hughes MS,
    10. Sherry RM,
    11. Yang JC,
    12. Kammula US,
    13. Devillier L,
    14. Carpenter R,
    15. Nathan DA,
    16. Morgan RA,
    17. Laurencot C,
    18. Rosenberg SA
    : B-cell depletion and remissions of malignancy along with cytokine-associated toxicity in a clinical trial of anti-CD19 chimeric-antigen-receptor-transduced T cells. Blood 119: 2709–2720, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  100. ↵
    1. Lin P,
    2. Owens R,
    3. Tricot G,
    4. Wilson CS
    : Flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis of 306 cases of multiple myeloma. Am J Clin Pathol 121: 482–488, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  101. ↵
    1. Marin V,
    2. Pizzitola I,
    3. Agostoni V,
    4. Attianese GM,
    5. Finney H,
    6. Lawson A,
    7. Pule M,
    8. Rousseau R,
    9. Biondi A,
    10. Biagi E
    : Cytokine-induced killer cells for cell therapy of acute myeloid leukemia: improvement of their immune activity by expression of CD33-specific chimeric receptors. Haematologica 95: 2144–2152, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tettamanti S,
    2. Marin V,
    3. Pizzitola I,
    4. Magnani CF,
    5. Giordano Attianese GM,
    6. Cribioli E,
    7. Maltese F,
    8. Galimberti S,
    9. Lopez AF,
    10. Biondi A,
    11. Bonnet D,
    12. Biagi E
    : Targeting of acute myeloid leukaemia by cytokine-induced killer cells redirected with a novel CD123-specific chimeric antigen receptor. Br J Haematol 161: 389–401, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    1. Ritchie DS,
    2. Neeson PJ,
    3. Khot A,
    4. Peinert S,
    5. Tai T,
    6. Tainton K,
    7. Chen K,
    8. Shin M,
    9. Wall DM,
    10. Hönemann D,
    11. Gambell P,
    12. Westerman DA,
    13. Haurat J,
    14. Westwood JA,
    15. Scott AM,
    16. Kravets L,
    17. Dickinson M,
    18. Trapani JA,
    19. Smyth MJ,
    20. Darcy PK,
    21. Kershaw MH,
    22. Prince HM
    : Persistence and efficacy of second generation CAR T cell against the LeY antigen in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Ther 21: 2122–2129, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Lollini PL,
    2. Cavallo F,
    3. Forni PN,
    4. Forni G
    : Vaccines for tumour prevention. Nature Reviews Cancer 6, 204–216, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Buonaguro L,
    2. Petrizzo A,
    3. Tornesello ML,
    4. Buonaguro FM
    : Translating tumor antigens into cancer vaccines. Clin Vaccine Immunol 18: 23–34, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  105. ↵
    1. Walter S,
    2. Weinschenk T,
    3. Stenzl A,
    4. Zdrojowy R,
    5. Pluzanska A,
    6. Szczylik C,
    7. Staehler M,
    8. Brugger W,
    9. Dietrich PY,
    10. Mendrzyk R,
    11. Hilf N,
    12. Schoor O,
    13. Fritsche J,
    14. Mahr A,
    15. Maurer D,
    16. Vass V,
    17. Trautwein C,
    18. Lewandrowski P,
    19. Flohr C,
    20. Pohla H,
    21. Stanczak JJ,
    22. Bronte V,
    23. Mandruzzato S,
    24. Biedermann T,
    25. Pawelec G,
    26. Derhovanessian E,
    27. Yamagishi H,
    28. Miki T,
    29. Hongo F,
    30. Takaha N,
    31. Hirakawa K,
    32. Tanaka H,
    33. Stevanovic S,
    34. Frisch J,
    35. Mayer-Mokler A,
    36. Kirner A,
    37. Rammensee HG,
    38. Reinhardt C,
    39. Singh-Jasuja H
    : Multipeptide immune response to cancer vaccine IMA901 after single-dose cyclophosphamide associates with longer patient survival. Nat Med 18: 1254–1261, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Kyi C,
    2. Postow MA
    : Checkpoint blocking antibodies in cancer immunotherapy. FEBS Lett 588: 368–376, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Callahan MK,
    2. Wolchok JD
    : At the bedside: CTLA-4- and PD-1-blocking antibodies in cancer immunotherapy. J Leukoc Biol 94: 41–53, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  108. ↵
    1. Quezada SA,
    2. Peggs KS
    : Exploiting CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 to reactivate the host immune response against cancer. Br J Cancer 108: 1560–1565, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Berman HM,
    2. Westbrook J,
    3. Feng Z,
    4. Gilliland G,
    5. Bhat TN,
    6. Weissig H,
    7. Shindyalov IN,
    8. Borne PE
    : The Protein Data Bank (www.pbb.org), Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235–242, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  109. ↵
    Accelrys Software Incorp., Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, Release 3.1, San Diego: Accelrys Software Inc., 2007.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Vol. 11, Issue 6
November-December 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Genomics & Proteomics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
TCR-MHC/Peptide Interaction: Prospects for New Anti-tumoral Agents
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Genomics & Proteomics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 18 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
TCR-MHC/Peptide Interaction: Prospects for New Anti-tumoral Agents
ULRICH H. WEIDLE, GUY GEORGES, GEORG TIEFENTHALER
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Nov 2014, 11 (6) 267-277;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
TCR-MHC/Peptide Interaction: Prospects for New Anti-tumoral Agents
ULRICH H. WEIDLE, GUY GEORGES, GEORG TIEFENTHALER
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Nov 2014, 11 (6) 267-277;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • TCR Fusion Proteins
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • Antibody-MHC fusion proteins
  • chimeric antigen receptors
  • immunological synapse
  • T-cell receptor
  • T-cell receptor-based fusion proteins
  • review
Cancer & Genome Proteomics

© 2026 Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Powered by HighWire