Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Other Publications
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleR
Open Access

Proteases as Activators for Cytotoxic Prodrugs in Antitumor Therapy

ULRICH H. WEIDLE, GEORG TIEFENTHALER and GUY GEORGES
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics March 2014, 11 (2) 67-79;
ULRICH H. WEIDLE
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORG TIEFENTHALER
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GUY GEORGES
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Proteases are often overexpressed in tumor cells and/or the stromal compartment and can thus be exploited in tumor therapy to activate cytotoxic prodrugs as, for example, in cytolytic fusion proteins, and for tumor imaging. Specifically, we discuss cathepsin B-activated prodrug conjugates, antibody-directed prodrug therapy, protease-activated peptide-thapsigargin conjugates, protease-activated cytotoxic receptor ligands and other cytotoxic proteins, protease-mediated activation of anthrax toxin, granzyme B as a therapeutic principle in cytolytic fusion proteins, and tumor-imaging based on deregulated proteases.

  • Antibody-drug conjugates
  • antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy
  • Anthrax toxin
  • cytotoxic receptor ligand(s)
  • granzyme B
  • probody
  • thapsigargin
  • review

The human degradome consists of roughly 600 proteases, which are grouped into metallo-, serine, cysteine, threonine and aspartic proteases (1). They regulate physiological processes such as proliferation, migration, cell survival, apoptosis and protein turnover. In tumors, expression of proteases is frequently dysregulated, thus, coopting these physiological processes, which are often based on complex interactions between tumors and their microenvironment (2). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of proteins consisting of 26 members of secreted and transmembrane proteins (3) which degrade the extracellular matrix and regulate the activity of other proteases, growth factors and receptors, thus modulating signaling pathways often associated with pro- or antitumoral outcome (4). The family consists of collagenases, stromelysins, gelatinases and membrane-type MMPs (5). In the context of tumor biology, MMP2 (gelatinase A), MMP9 (gelatinase B), membrane-type1 protease MMP14, matriptase (membrane-type serine protease 1), as well as cathepsin B, a cysteine protease (6), were thoroughly investigated (5). In addition, the serine protease urokinase (uPA) and its specific receptor (uPAR) control matrix degradation and many other biological processes by conversion of plasminogen into plasmin and by receptor signaling based on the interaction of uPAR with many extracellular protein ligands (7). The deregulation of this system in several types of cancer has a significant impact on prognosis and can serve as a possible target for therapeutic intervention (8-10). Other proteolytic systems deregulated in cancer include kallikrein-related peptidases (11), a disintegrin and the metalloproteinase family of proteinases (ADAMs) (12), as well as several types of cathepsins (6, 13). In the following, we summarize approaches for tumor-specific activation of antitumoral agents capitalizing on dysregulated and overexpressed proteases in several types of human cancer. We focus on MMP2, MMP9, MMP14, matriptase, uPA and cathepsin B.

Cathepsin B-activated Drugs

As outlined before, increased expression or altered localization of proteases is typical in many types of cancer (2). Activation of prodrugs through cleavage by cathepsin B is a common principle in pre-clinical and clinical development of anticancer drugs. Cathepsin B is a lysosomal cysteine protease which is overexperessed in numerous tumor types and can be associated with the external cell surface (14). Procathepsin B can be activated by several proteases. Activated cathepsin B can then convert pro-uPA to uPA, which finally activates plasminogen to plasmin, a serine protease, which can degrade several components of the extracellular matrix such as fibrin, fibronectin, laminin and proteoglycans and which is able to activate MMPs (15, 16).

Several strategies for the construction of prodrug therapeutics have been evaluated. A common motif here is the combination of a therapeutic agent with an inactivating peptide substrate which is cleavable by proteases, thus leading to the liberation of the active therapeutic. In addition, more recently, such prodrug molecules were fused to a targeting moiety. Alternatively, peptide-linked therapeutic agents can also be fused to a macromolecular carrier with or without a targeting moiety (17). The targeting module can, for example, be a ligand for a receptor, or an antibody-based moiety. In the case of cathepsin B-activated prodrugs, conversion into the active drugs should occur in the lysosome, but due to possible association of cathepsin B with the cell surface in some types of cancer, extracellular activation of the substrate is also possible. In addition, non-internalizable prodrug-receptor complexes will be activated exclusively at the cell surface. However, depending on the design of the substrate cleavage site, prodrug activation in the serum by cathepsin B-like activity is a critical issue. In the present review article, we summarize selected approaches for the design of cathepsin B-activated prodrugs, including cytotoxic antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) which are at an advanced clinical stage.

Linking cytotoxic agents to high-molecular weight carrier molecules is a strategy to deliver drugs to tumors. The resulting modification of the pharmacokinetic properties of the cytotoxic compound mediates tumor accumulation in pre-clinical models, so-called passive targeting (18). For example, FCE 28068 (also known as PK1) was constructed by linking doxorubicin to N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methylacrylamide copolymers via a tetrapeptide spacer which is cleavable by cathepsins, allowing release of the active topoisomerase II inhibitor (19). This form of passive tumor targeting is also known as the enhanced permeability and retention effect, resulting from enhanced permeability of the tumor vasculature, facilitating extravasation of high-molecular weight proteins such as drug conjugates from the blood vessels (20). In a phase II study of FCE 28068 in chemotherapy-refractory patients with breast cancer, non-small cell lung carcinoma, and colorectal cancer, 6/62 partial responses were observed with limited side-effects thus supporting the concept that polymer-based chemotherapeutics might have different and improved anticancer activities (21). In addition, FCE 28068 was linked to galactosamine, resulting in drug PK2, which binds to the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor, thus achieving liver-specific doxorubicin delivery (22). Indeed, in a phase I study, liver-specific accumulation of PK2 after i.v. infusion was shown, as well as targeting to primary hepatocellular tumors (22). Similarly, the tubulin-binding compound paclitaxel-polyglumex (PPX) is a polymer-drug conjugate in which paclitaxel is linked to a degradable polymer consisting of L-glutamic acid residues. The release of paclitaxel from the polymer backbone is dependent on cathepsin B and other lysosomal proteases (23). PPX was evaluated in a phase III trial versus docetaxel in second-line treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (24, 25). Although PPX and docetaxel led to similar survival rates, different toxicity profiles were noted. Compared to docetaxel, PPX-treated patients had less frequent febrile neutropenia and alopecia, however, increased neurotoxicity was noted for PPX in comparison to docetaxel.

ADCs consist of a targeting moiety, a linker, and a cytotoxic payload. The targeting module can be a ligand for a receptor or an antibody-based moiety directed against a cancer-related antigen (26). After internalization of the ADC antigen-receptor complexes, cytotoxic payloads such as calicheamycin, maytansine, duocarmycin, auristatin or irinotecan are released into the cytosol after cleavage of the linker in the endosome (27). Chemically-unstable, enzyme-cleavable, but also stable, non-cleavable linkers have been explored in this context (26). Chemically labile linkers are hydrazine-based, whereas stable, non-cleavable linkers make use of thioester chemistry (26). The activity of ADCs with stable, non-cleavable linkers seems to depend on the degradation of the thioester-linked antibody component in the lysosome, resulting in the release of the cytotoxic payload (28). Molecules with enzyme-cleavable linkers, on the other hand, rely on the hydrolysis of a valine-citrulline (vc) linker by cathepsin B. This results in the release of the cytotoxic payload, such as the tubulin binders monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and F (MMAF) (29, 30, 31). ADCs based on cathepsin B cleavable linkers are among the most advanced ADCs for the treatment of cancer. For example, brentuximab vedotin, an IgG1 antibody directed against cluster of differentiation-30 (CD30) which is linked to vc MMAE is approved for treatment of therapy-refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (32, 33). Similarly, CDX-011 (glembatumumab vedotin) is an ADC composed of a fully human IgG2 anti-glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein b/osteoactivin (gpNMB) antibody conjugated to MMAE via a vc linker (34). CDX-011 is presently in phase II clinical studies in melanoma and breast cancer (35-36). In addition, a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ADC composed of a fully-humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody and MMAE linked via a vc linker and is currently being evaluated in patients with taxane-refractory metastatic prostate cancer in phase I clinical trials (37, 38). ADCs with analogous design targeting nectin-4 and solute carrier family 4A4 (SLC4A4) are currently being evaluated in phase I clinical studies (27). Also undergoing phase I clinical studies are RG-7458, targeting CD22 in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and SGN75 and MDX 1203, two ADCs based on anti-CD70 antibodies. These are presently being evaluated in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and clear cell renal cancer (27). In summary, it seems that no general design for optimized linkers can be deduced based on previous experience. In addition, ADCs with non-cleavable linkers must be efficiently internalized to exert their cytotoxic function. On the other hand, ADCs with cleavable linkers may mediate cytotoxicity by extracellular cleavage at the tumor cell surface in addition to cytotoxic pathways. Therefore, toxicity directed against antigen-negative tumor cells is expected only for ADCs with cleavable linkers (26).

Antibody-directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy (ADEPT)

ADEPT is based on pre-targeting antibody-enzyme complexes or corresponding fusion proteins to tumors, followed by administration of an inactive prodrug which is converted to an active drug on the tumor cell surface by these enzymes (39-41). After administration of the antibody-enzyme conjugates, the unbound conjugate is allowed to be cleared from the circulation. This can be accelerated by using mannosylated conjugates (42), or a second antibody (43). For effective treatment, the prodrug has to be an optimal and specific substrate for the enzyme and must not be able to penetrate cells. The inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) of the liberated drug should be below 10 nM, and the ratio of the IC50s of the prodrug and drug should exceed 1,000 (40). The released drug must be able to penetrate tumor cells and its plasma half-life should be short enough to prevent leakage into healthy tissues, but long enough to induce a bystander effect on neighbouring tumor cells. Activation of prodrug can be mediated by proteases, glycosidases, alkaline phosphatase, penicillin amidase, β-lactamase or cysteine deaminase (41).

In the following, we focus on prodrug activation by proteases. Most thoroughly explored, also in terms of translational applications in clinical studies, is carboxypeptidase G2 (CPG2). CPG2 is a bacterial, Zn2+-dependent, homodimer forming exopeptidase, which can cleave a deactivating glutamate moiety from benzoic acid mustard (42, 43). Initial pre-clinical and clinical studies were performed with chemically produced antibody-enzyme conjugates. Subsequently, in order to overcome the variability of random chemical conjugation which results in product heterogeneity, recombinantly produced antibody moiety-enzyme fusion proteins were explored (42, 43). Such a fusion protein consisting of a single-chain variable domain fragment (scFv) directed against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and CPG2 produced in Pichia pastoris for activation of a methotrexate-based prodrug was investigated in more detail. This fusion protein, MFECP, bore branched mannose residues due to post-translational N-glycosylation (44). However, despite rapid clearance via mannose receptors, tumor-to-plasma ratios of 1,400:1 in the LS174T colon xenograft model and 339:1 in the SW122 colon xenograft model were recorded (45). Since the fusion protein localized specifically to CEA-expressing xenografts in the mouse, the prodrug was administered 6 h after administration of the fusion protein. Cycles could be repeated without obvious toxicity (45). Consequently, this concept was explored in clinical studies in heavily pre-treated patients with CEA-expressing tumors. Treatment resulted in stable disease eight weeks after therapy in 11 out of 28 patients (46). Three cycles of treatment could be applied after administration of cyclosporine to suppress immune responses against the fusion molecule (47). For second-generation approaches, humanized antibodies and CPG2 with removed B- and T-cell epitopes are under consideration (48).

Protease-cleavable Peptide-Thapsigargin (TG) Conjugates

The peptide-TG drug platform is based on coupling a chemically modified amino acid containing TG with protease-cleavable peptides (49). TG is a sesquiterpene lactone isolated from the plant Thapsia garganica (50). TG is a lipohilic molecule and an inhibitor of the ubiquitously expressed sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum (ER) calcium ATPase pump (SERCA) (51, 52). The SERCA pump is essential for the function of the ER. SERCA inhibition leads to a 3-5 fold increase in intracellular free Ca2+ accompanied by the depletion of the ER Ca2+, pool resulting in cell death independent of proliferation status (53, 54). Because the toxicity of TG is not cell type-specific, systemic administration of TG would be associated with significant toxicity. Therefore, prodrug molecules were designed with a carrier peptide that does not allow TG to enter the cell until the TG analog is liberated by proteolysis. A PSMA-targeted prodrug was evaluated (55). PSMA is a membrane-bound protease with its catalytic domain exposed to the extracellular space. It exhibits dual exopeptidase activity as both a pteroyl poly γ glutamyl exopeptidase (folate hydrolase) and N-acetylated α-linked acid dipeptidase (56, 57). PSMA is expressed in tumor-associated endothelium, thus potentially enabling TG prodrug activation in the tumor microenvironment (53). The TG-based prodrug G202 (Figure 1A), consisting of a PSMA-specific peptide conjugated to an analog of TG, induced tumor regression in several xenograft models at doses which were minimally toxic to the host (55). Critical issues are, however, the expression of PSMA in the proximal tubules of the kidney and in the brain (58). Ongoing clinical studies will show whether a therapeutic window combining efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile can be defined.

A new emerging strategy for tumor therapy is ablation of supporting stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment by targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts (59). Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a post-prolyl endopeptidase predominantly expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts with a limited pattern of expression in normal tissues has emerged as an interesting target (60). A FAP-activated peptidyl-TG prodrug killed FAP-positive human cancer cells at low nanomolar concentrations, efficiently reduced growth of MCF-7 and LNCaP tumor xenografts, concurrent with ablation of tumor stroma (61). However, activation of the prodrug in plasma was observed indicating a possible limitation of this approach (61). Ongoing efforts are based on activation of TG-based prodrugs by prostate-specific antigen and human kallikrein-2, proteolytic enzymes secreted by the prostate with expression orders of magnitude greater than in other tissues (50, 62). Inactivation of the enzymatic activity of prostate-specific antigen and human kallikrein-2 in the circulation by serum proteins is an encouraging aspect of this approach (63, 64).

Protease-based Activation of Cytotoxic Receptor Ligands and Other Cytotoxic Proteins

Use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) as an antitumoral agent is hampered by its severe systemic toxicity, allowing its clinical application only in the limb perfusion setting (65). Similarly, CD95-CD95L interaction can be exploited for tumor therapy due to its pro-apoptotic effect after delivery of CD95L or an agonistic antibody to tumor cells. However, this approach is also limited because of the induction of apoptosis in normal liver cells, resulting in acute liver failure and thus the necessity for local activiation of CD95L in tumor tissue (66). In order to tackle these issues, an antibody-based targeting moiety was fused to CD95L or TNF via a linker which can be cleaved by tumor-associated proteases such as uPA, tissue type PA, MMP2 or MMP9, to effect specific tumor targeting. In the following examples, the antibody moiety is directed against FAP (67).

A TNF-selectokine, a homotrimeric fusion protein consisting of a scFv antibody fragment directed against FAP as a targeting module, a trimerization domain derived from tenascin C, TNF, and a linker consisting of protease cleavage sites followed by the extracellular domain (ECD) of TNF receptor-1 (TNFR1) was evaluated (68). This cell-bound selectokine mimics membrane-bound TNF. The unique feature of this TNF selectokine is the presence of the ECD of TNFR1 as an intra-molecular inhibitor, thus creating a prodrug. The prodrug exerts minimal TNF activity, but can be activated several thousand-fold after cleavage by tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA). Activated prodrug was shown to bear TNFR-dependent cytotoxic activity in targeted and adjacent FAP-negative cells. Making use of the same species crossreactive anti-FAP moiety, analogous murine TNF constructs were evaluated in which the natural processing site for TNFα converting enzyme was mutated in order to avoid potential cleavage of the prodrug (69). Such cell surface-targeted fusion proteins induced strong cytotoxicity in human HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells expressing MMPs and transfected with FAP. Antigen-positive and -negative cells were affected in a juxtatropic mode. These findings were extrapolated to human TNF prodrugs bearing either a uPA-selective or a dual uPA-MMP-2-specific linker (70). The same basic principle was applied to the design of CD95L-based prodrugs (71). Again, FAP-transfected HT1080 cells were used for the in vitro and in vivo evaluation of the corresponding prodrug molecules. These prodrugs are composed of an scFv-directed against FAP, followed by the ECD of CD95L, a protease-sensitive linker which can be cleaved by MMP-2 and related proteases and the ECD of CD95 as carboxyterminal inhibitory domain (Figure 1B and C). In order to achieve tumor-specific activation of CD95, CD95L is only unmasked after binding of the fusion protein to FAP-positive tumor cells and subsequent cleavage of the linker by tumor-associated proteases. The cleaved scFv-CD95L remains membrane-bound and thereby mimics membrane CD95L. It was shown that activation of CD95L in vitro is dependent on CD95 binding and protease-dependent processing. In vivo efficacy was demonstrated by intra-tumoral injection of FAP-transfected HT1080 cells together with the prodrug one day after tumor inoculation with 1.5×106 cells. This resulted in 80% tumor growth inhibition which was not observed when non-transfected HT1080 cells were co-injected. A critical issue of the approaches, as outlined, is the potential activation of the fusion proteins by serum proteases. Therefore, efficient targeting of the tumor with these effector fusion moieties is mandatory because expression of tumor-associated proteases is not strictly tumor-specific.

Mellitin is a 26 amino acid pore-forming protein derived from honey bee venom (72). Formation of pores in the cell membrane induces cell lysis. In order to target the cytotoxic activity of mellitin to MMP2-overexpressing tumor cells, a biologically-inactive fusion protein consisting of mellitin and avidin connected by an MMP2 cleavage site was designed (73). This fusion protein mediated strong cytotoxic activity after activation by MMP2 in MMP2-overexpressing tumor cells, while only little cytotoxicity was seen in cells with low MMP2 activity. In vivo tumor shrinkage was also shown.

Fusogenic membrane glycoproteins were identified in several viruses inducing cell-cell fusion and syncytia formation, which ultimately results in cytotoxicity and cell death (74). The Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus envelope glycoprotein (GALV) was assessed for its potential for targeted killing of glioma cells. Thus, GALV was linked to the extracellular domain of CD40 ligand as a binding blocking moiety, via an MMP or factor Xa protease-cleavable linker, or a non-cleavable linker. Transfection of constructs with cleavable linkers selectively induced cytotoxicity in glioma cells in contrast to non-cleavable constructs (75). Targeting in this case is necessary due to the ubiquitous expression of the GALV receptor, pituitary-specific positive transcription factor-1 (PIT-1). Adenoviral vectors expressing fusion proteins, as outlined above, were shown to exhibit significant antitumoral potential for gene therapy of glioma gene therapy (76).

Protease-mediated Activation of Anthrax Toxin for Tumor Therapy

Bacillus anthracis, a bacterium that forms highly resistant spores, can cause lethal infections after inhalation or ingestion. The causative agent for lethal infections is anthrax toxin which consists of three components which individually are non-toxic: protective antigen, lethal factor (LF) and edema factor (EF) (77, 78). The unique processing and assembly of the components of the anthrax toxin was exploited in the design of anti-tumoral agents and for the delivery of other toxins into tumor cells. The action of anthrax toxin starts by binding of protective antigen to two broadly-expressed receptors: tumor endothelial marker-8 and capillary morphogenesis protein-2 (79). After binding to its receptors, protective antigen is processed by proteases such as furin, and the remaining receptor-bound moiety of protective antigen forms a ring-shaped heptamer which transports EF, LF, or both of them into the cell to exert their cytotoxic function. The resulting complexes are referred to as lethal toxin or edema toxin. These complexes are internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis via a clathrin-dependent process, and after formation of a channel in the membrane of the endosome, LF and EF are transported into the cytosol. LF is a zinc-dependent metalloprotease that cleaves mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases (MAPKK). EF is a calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase which leads to intracellular elevation of adenosine-monophosphate or cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels, thus interfering with the balance of intracellular signaling (79, 80). Anti-angiogenic effects were observed for both LF and EF due to their effects on MAPKK inhibition and cAMP levels in endothelial cells. LF interferes with MAPK signaling in Ha-ras transformed NIH-3T3 cells, inhibits their growth in soft-agar, reverts their transformed phenotype and inhibits their growth in athymic mice, partly through inhibition of angiogenesis (81). Human melanoma cells were shown to be equisitely sensitive to LF in combination with a small molecule MAPK inhibitor, inducing apoptosis, whereas normal melanocytes were not killed but arrested in the G1-phase of the cell cycle (82). Due to the broad expression of the receptors, tumor-specific targeting of anthrax toxin is essential to generate a therapeutic window. Activation of modified anthrax toxins on the surface of tumor cells is a straightforward strategy. MMPs such as MMP2, MMP9, MMP14 and matriptase, as well as uPA are proteases which are overexpressed on the surface of tumor cells or the surrounding stromal cells. Replacement of the furin cleavage site in protective antigen by those specific for MMPs or uPA leads to tumor-specific activation of protective antigen. Making use of MMP-activated LF, antitumor activity was observed in tumor xenograft models harbouring the V600E activating rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma B (BRAF) mutation, but also in xenografts with non-mutated BRAF (83). In addition, anthrax toxin inhibits tumor angiogenesis by interference with endothelial cell proliferation, migration and tube formation for which MAPK activation plays a crucial role. Delivery of other toxin effector moieties such as the ADP-ribosylation domain of pseudomonas exotoxin into tumor cells making use of the properties of the anthrax toxin complex is another potential application of this system. Thus, fusion of passenger proteins with amino acids 1-254 of LF allows their translocation into, and eventually killing of cells expressing PA receptors with toxic effector molecules such as the ADP-ribosylating moiety of pseudomonas exotoxin, the A subunit of diphtheria toxin, and the A subunit of Shiga toxin (84, 85, 86). Similarly, when amino acids 1-254 of LF were combined with mutated protective antigen proteins, the resulting fusion protein (FP59) mediated selective killing of MMP-overexpressing tumor cells such as fibrosarcoma, breast and melanoma (83). Analogous observations were made with uPA activated protective antigen which resulted in selective killing of uPAR-expressing tumor cells (87). A critical issue is that neither the MMP nor uPA-activation systems are strictly tumor-specific, thus side-effects after administration of these agents are an issue.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Display of G202 (A) and cluster of differentiation 95 ligand (CD95L)-based (B) prodrugs. A: Schematic presentation of G202. The toxic entity thapsigargin (orange) is fused via an aliphatic linker (pink) to a cleavable prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-specific peptide (grey). Protease cleavage sites are indicated by arrows. B: CD95L-based prodrug. The proteins are displayed as ribbons coloured according to domain function. The CD95L prodrug is composed of the CD95 receptor (magenta, pdbcode 3TJE) as the protecting moiety, followed by a trimerization coiled-coil domain of tenascin C (shown in green, helix modeling is based on pbdcode 2F3M), a cleavable linker (grey), a modeled scFv directed against fibroblast activation protein (FAP) (sc FAP) heavy and light variable domains displayed in dark and light blue and their corresponding linker shown in pink, a polyaspartate flag (red) and finally the CD95L domain as an effector (orange, pdbcode 4MSV). The lower left shows the cyclic configuration of the CD95L-based prodrug, bringing the ligand and the corresponding receptor together. The protease cleavage site is indicated by an arrow. The trimeric prodrug is shown in the middle and lower right. The head-to-tail configuration is not shown. The models were generated based on available structural data of domains or entities and were assembled and minimized using DiscoveryStudio40 (128, 129).

Granzyme B as Effector Moiety for Cytolytic Fusion Proteins

Receptor-ligand or antibody-based moieties directed against tumor antigens genetically fused to granzyme B as a cytotoxic principle are presently pre-clinically evaluated as anti-tumor agents (88-92). Granzyme B is member of a family of serine proteases with five different human granzymes (A, B, H, K and M). They are stored in the granules of natural killer cells and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. Granzyme B is an inducer of granule-mediated apoptosis. Granzyme B cytolytic fusion proteins as described above are internalized and induce apoptosis after release from the endosome. Once in the cytosol, granzyme B can directly activate different apoptotic pathways and at different levels, ensuring induction of apoptosis even when some apoptotic pathways are blocked. Important granzyme B substrates include caspase-3 and other initiator and effector caspases, the inhibitor of caspase-activated DNase, and BH3-interacting domain death agonist (BID). In addition, granzyme B can cleave further death-substrates such as poly(ADP ribose)polymerase, DNA-dependent protein kinase, components of the cytoskeleton and the nuclear mitotic apparatus as well as proteins involved in stress response and cellular homeostasis. Numerous variations of granzyme B fusion proteins were studied. Transforming growth factor-α and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Figure 2A) were the targeting domains in the context of ligand-granzyme B fusions, while CD64, GP240, Lewis Y antigen, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and human luteinizing hormone receptor were evaluated as targets for antibody-based moieties of granzyme B-derived cytolytic fusion proteins (88). Despite encouraging in vitro and in vivo efficacy data in various tumor-derived cell lines and xenograft models, several problems preventing optimal efficacy of such granzyme B-based cytolytic fusion proteins have emerged: (i) granzyme B inhibitor PI-9 is expressed in several tumor types and their corresponding cell lines, limiting efficacy; and (ii) granzyme B possesses a strong positive surface charge which causes non-specific binding to negatively charged cell surfaces. This leads to adsorption and off-target effects, as well as trapping of the internalized antigen-fusion proteins in endosomes, resulting in insufficient delivery of granzyme B into the cytosol. Consequently, highly variable efficacy of the corresponding cytolytic fusion proteins was observed. One recent achievement is the generation of granzyme B mutants insensitive to inhibition by PI-9 by mutating positions interacting with the variable reactive center loop of PI-9, which is its primary site of interaction with proteases. Importantly, one of these variants, granzyme B R201K, exhibits the same enzymatic activity in the absence or presence of PI-9 (93). Mutation of sequences responsible for interaction with heparan-sulfate-containing molecules resulted in diminished cell binding but had a negative impact on cytotoxicity (94). Residues 96-103 and 221-226 confer a positive surface charge on mature granzyme B, causing interactions with glycosaminoglycans. Substitution of such cationic residues was shown to have no impact on the enzymatic and pro-apoptotic activity of granzyme B but reduced binding to antigen-negative cells (95). Improved efficacy of granzyme B-based cytolytic fusion proteins was achieved by co-administration with chloroquine, which accumulates in acidic compartments and lysosomes and causes osmotic rupture of these vesicles (95-97). Further approaches for improved endosomal release are the incorporation of (i) protein transduction domains derived from pseudomonas exotoxin or diphtheria toxin; (ii) cell-penetrating peptides or membrane transfer sequences into the corresponding cytolytic fusion proteins; and (iii) insertion of synthetic, multifunctional linkers, as outlined below (98). These linkers are composed of a membrane transfer peptide flanked by an endosomal cleavable peptide and a cytosolic cleavable peptide (98). Potential immunogenicity after introduction of amino acid substitutions has not yet been properly investigated. An interesting example for the improvement of efficacy is a fusion protein between a scFv directed against HER2, a fusogenic pH-sensitive peptide, and granzyme B (99). Tumor cells resistant to lapatinib or Herceptin and expressing MDR1 showed no crossresistance to the granzyme B-based fusion protein, and IC50s between 20 and 90 nM were noted for various HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines. Significant tumor growth suppression was noted in vivo in mice bearing BT474 breast tumors after i.v. administration (99).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Display of a targeted granzyme B-based fusion protein and two different versions of a probody. A: Granzyme B-vascular endothelial growth factor 121 (VEGF121) fusion protein. The model is based on the structures of granzyme B (orange, pdbcode 3PW9) and VEGF121 (blue, pbdcode 1FQ4). The models were generated based on available structural data of domains or entities and were assembled and minimized using DiscoveryStudio40 (128, 129). B: Schematic presentation of a probody. The principle design is derived from a probody directed against vascular cellular adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1) (117). The peptide with lid function (magenta) has affinity to the antibody paratope. Dark and light orange variable domains were taken from a non-related Fab complex (pdbcode 4RNRX), the peptide is linked via a flexible glycine-serine linker (pink) and a cleavable sequence (grey) to the heavy chain variable domain (VH domain). The constant part of the antibody is shown in grey. Protease cleavage sites are shown in grey. C: Schematic presentation of a bi-specific probody. Targeting to antigen 1 is mediated by the V domains shown in dark and light blue. The molecule is based on the knob-into-hole differentiation of the two fragment crystallization region (Fcs), highlighted in dark and light grey. V-domains of an antibody directed against antigen 2 are fused to the C-termini of the Fc portions by connectors with and without a protease cleavage site. VH and VL domains are disulfide bridged. Binding functionality is reconstituted after cleavage of one of the two linkers. The cleavable element is shown in grey and G4S in pink. The schematic presentation is based on the description of a bi-specific prodbody directed against human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) and cellular proto-oncogene of mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (c MET) (120). The protease cleavage site is indicated by an arrow and the disulfide bridge connecting VL and VH domains is shown in green.

Protease-cleavable Adapters for Improved Cytolytic Fusion Proteins

Cytolytic fusion proteins are composed of a targeting module and a protein-based cytotoxic moiety. The targeting module can be a ligand for a cell surface receptor or an antibody-based moiety, the therapeutic principle as a rule is an enzyme with cytotoxic properties. The concept of cleavable adapters was raised (98, 100) to improve the characteristics of cytolytic fusion proteins. The prototype adapter is composed of a cytosolic cleavable peptide, a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) which is a membrane transfer peptide, and an endosomal cleavable peptide (98). For example, a cytosolic cleavable peptide was designed by incorporating cleavage sites for caspases 1, 3 and 7 and a cytosolic protease from yeast into a corresponding peptide sequence (101). After cleavage, the compound is trapped within the cell, converting a formerly cell-permeable compound into a cell-impermeable drug. CPPs can penetrate membranes by an energy-independent process or by an endocytosis-related process (102, 103). CPPs are of diverse origin, 10-16 amino acids long and can be grouped into peptides composed of basic amino acids such as poly-lysine or poly-arginine, α-helical, and β-sheet peptides (102, 103). Examples are TAT from HIV, penetratin from Drosophila homeotic transcription factor antennapedia, or the preS2-domain of hepatitis B virus surface protein (104). The function of membrane transfer peptides and CPPs is to improve cellular uptake and deliver the cytotoxic molecule directly into the cytosol. Endosomal cleavable peptides on the other hand are based on dedicated translocation sequences which are activated after protease cleavage and usually are derived from diphtheria toxin or pseudomonas exotoxin (105). One exemplary adapter was designed to improve the uptake and transport of the catalytic cytotoxic moiety into the cytosol and subsequently trap it in the cell. This trapping might be responsible for the reduced cytotoxicity which was associated with long circulation times and damage of target-negative cells (98). Saporin linked to EGF with or without adapter was evaluated, and reduced non-specific cytotoxicity was noted by inserting a cleavable adapter, as outlined (101). Similarly, treatment of human EGFR-transfected murine tumor cells with adapter-containing and adapter-free fusion protein showed enhanced efficacy for the adapter-containing fusion protein (106). Surprisingly, however, in vitro cytotoxicity was not affected by the insertion of an adapter (101). Another example is a fusion protein between a humanized scFv directed against CD64 and human ribonuclease angiogenin (107). Insertion of an adapter improved cytotoxicity 20-fold, however, serum stability was reduced, resulting in complete cleavage of the adapter after 1 h, whereas the adapter-free fusion protein was stable with no evidence for cleavage after 24 h. Consequently, a fusion protein bearing a modified adapter with deleted endosomal cleavable peptide was evaluated. Thus, while cytotoxicity of this molecule was still 10-fold better than the adapter-free fusion protein, almost no cleavage was observed after 24 h in the presence of serum.

Finally, the findings as outlined above indicate that an adapter cannot be transferred between fusion proteins by default to improve cytotoxicity and stability but has to be optimized specifically for each fusion protein under consideration.

Activation of Antibodies with Impaired Functionality by Proteases

Antibody-based therapies often exploit targets which play a crucial role in physiological processes and therefore can be associated with serious toxicities (108). For example, blockage of delta-like ligand 4, a notch ligand, leads to inhibition of angiogenesis in pre-clinical models. However, liver pathology, gut and T-cell toxicity, and induction of vascular neoplasms were observed in mice and rats (109, 110, 111). Similarly, the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab, a VEGF-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, can cause side-effects such as hypertension, proteinuria and gastrointestinal symptoms, and in rare cases, gastrointestinal perforation and arterial thromboembolic complications (112). Skin toxicity as dose-limiting toxicity was observed after treatment of cancer patients with antibodies or antibody conjugates directed against EGFR (113, 114). An increased risk of serious infection and a dose-dependent risk for malignancies was observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after anti-TNF antibody therapy (115). HER2-directed therapy with trastuzumab caused an incidence of 0.2-3.8% of class III congestive heart failure in the adjuvant trastuzumab trials of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. This was probably due to the expression of HER2 on cardiomyocytes in addition to tumor tissues (116). This list of serious target-related side-effects could be extended to numerous other examples. Therefore, the probody concept, activation of an inactive preform of an antibody by tumor-associated proteases was raised (117) (Figure 2B). Accordingly, a probody with masked antibody binding site was designed by tethering a peptide to the N-terminus of an antibody-derived binding domain via a flexible linker containing a protease-cleavage site in the context of a scFv-Fc format (117). In a proof-of-concept experiment, such a probody directed against vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, a marker of atherosclerotic plaques, was evaluated (117). In vitro activation of the probody with MMP1 resulted in a 200-fold increase of binding affinity and restored binding to tissue sections from atherosclerotic mice ex vivo demonstrating MMP-dependent probody accumulation in aortic plaques. Analysis of frozen aorta tissue sections from mice injected with such probodies revealed large plaques that stained strongly for the presence of the antibody to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and probody. Regarding possible oncological applications of the probody technology, antibodies against matriptase were successfully used for imaging of colon cancer xenografts, pointing to matriptase as a possible activator of probodies (118). Tumor-specific activation of therapeutic antibodies potentially results in an improved therapeutic index (119). For example, the EGFR-targeting antibody cetuximab was converted into a probody by fusing a masking peptide which blocks binding to EGFR to the N-terminus of the L-chain. The masking peptide (21 amino acids) was fused to a cleavable linker (26 amino acids), sensitive to uPA, matriptase, and legumain. This probody possessed in vitro activity equivalent to cetuximab, was activated ex vivo by xenograft tumors, and suppressed tumor growth in vivo in mouse xenograft models with efficacy equivalent to cetuximab. However, due to the lack of crossreactivity of cetuximab with rodent EGFR, final conclusions are limited. This probody was shown to be activated by human tumor samples in vitro. The probody was nearly inert in the circulation and possessed markedly improved safety with respect to cutaneous toxicity and increased plasma half-life in non-human primates. Therefore, this probdody could be dosed safely at much higher levels than cetuximab (119). Finally, proof-of-concept experiments have shown that bi-specific antibodies with restricted binding functionality can be activated by proteolytic processing (120). The principal design of such a bi-specific probody is shown in Figure 2C. A bispecific antibody which binds HER3 in a conventional, bivalent IgG-like manner and which carries in addition a cellular proto-oncogene of mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (C-MET) binding moiety composed of a variable heavy chain (VH)- and a variable light chain (VL)-domain which can be connected by a disulfide bond was designed (120). The H- and L-chain domains are linked to the C-termini of the constant heavy chain 3 domains, respectively. One of the connectors contains a protease cleavage site for MMP2, MMP9 or uPA. After cleavage of the protease-sensitive connector, steric hindrance is resolved and antigen access and affinity in vitro is fully restored.

Proteases and Imaging

Tumor-associated expression of enzymatically active matriptase has been exploited for tumor imaging (122). Matriptase is a type II transmembrane protease of the serine protease family. It is found on the surface of epithelial cells and its activity is tightly regulated by its cognate inhibitor, hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor-1. In normal tissues, the ratio of matriptase to its inhibitor is low. This ratio increases during progression of some types of cancer, resulting in active matriptase on the cell surface (121, 122). Using a recombinant human antibody against an epitope covering the active site of matriptase, it was shown that tumor epithelium can be visualized selectively (123, 124). Live cell fluorescence imaging showed that the antibody localized only to the surface of matriptase-positive tumor cells, and immunofluorescence experiments with tissue microarray sections from primary and metastatic colon cancer indicated active matriptase in 68% of primary and metastatic colon cancer specimens (122). Near infrared and single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging visualized matriptase in human colon cancer tumors in a patient-derived xenograft model (122). The antibody used in these studies was crossreactive with the murine matriptase ortholog epithin, and radiolabeled antibody was taken-up by tumor xenografts. Specificity of the interaction was demonstrated by inhibition of uptake of the antibody after injection of ecotin, a macromolecular inhibitor of matriptase, before injection of the radiolabeled antibody. Accordingly, active site probes may become important tools for the elucidation of the role of proteases in the pathogenesis of different types of cancer.

Concluding Remarks

Personalized medicine is one of the key issues of cancer therapy (125-127) meaning that patients are treated based on molecular characteristics as revealed by diagnostic tests and/or high throughput sequencing. Overexpressed plasma membrane-associated receptors, oncogenic driver mutations and other deregulated cancer promoting pathways are targets for small molecule- or antibody-derived therapeutics, resulting in inhibition of migration, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of angiogenesis, stimulation of an antitumoral immune response, or synthetic lethality. Knowledge about, and specification of, the expression pattern of proteases in tumors, and quantification of the ratio of inactive proenzymes versus enzymatically active ones in individual tumors could advise treatment with prodrugs activated by the proteases characteristic of the individual tumors. Finally, these findings will also have an impact on optimal tumor imaging. A further future application is the administration of cytolytic fusion proteins with proteases such as granzyme B as an effector moiety.

  • Received February 21, 2014.
  • Revision received March 6, 2014.
  • Accepted March 7, 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. López-Otín C,
    2. Matrisian LM
    : Emerging roles of proteases in tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer 7: 800–808, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Coussens LM,
    2. Fingleton B,
    3. Matrisian LM
    : Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and cancer: Trials and tribulations. Science 295: 2387–2392, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Overall CM,
    2. López-Otín C
    : Strategies for MMP inhibition in cancer: innovations for the post-trial era. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 657–672, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Hadler-Olsen E,
    2. Winberg JO,
    3. Uhlin-Hansen L
    : Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: Their value as diagnostic and prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. Tumour Biol 34: 2041–2051, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Vartak DG,
    2. Gemeinhart RA
    : Matrix metalloproteases: Underutilized targets for drug delivery. J Drug Target 15: 1–20, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Mohamed MM,
    2. Sloane BF
    : Cysteine cathepsins: Multifunctional enzymes in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 6: 764–775, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. D’Alessio S,
    2. Blasi F
    : The urokinase receptor as an entertainer of signal transduction. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 14: 4575–4587, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Schmitt M,
    2. Harbeck N,
    3. Thomssen C,
    4. Wilhelm O,
    5. Magdolen V,
    6. Reuning U,
    7. Ulm K,
    8. Höfler H,
    9. Jänicke F,
    10. Graeff H
    : Clinical impact of the plasminogen activation system in tumor invasion and metastasis: Prognostic relevance and target for therapy. Thromb Haemost 78: 285–296, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Min HY,
    2. Doyle LV,
    3. Vitt CR,
    4. Zandonella CL,
    5. Stratton-Thomas JR,
    6. Shuman MA,
    7. Rosenberg S
    : Urokinase receptor antagonists inhibit angiogenesis and primary tumor growth in syngeneic mice. Cancer Res 56: 2428–2433, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Blasi F,
    2. Carmeliet P
    : uPAR: A versatile signalling orchestrator. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 932–943, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Oikonomopoulou K,
    2. Diamandis EP,
    3. Hollenberg MD
    : Kallikrein-related peptidases: proteolysis and signaling in cancer, the new frontier. Biol Chem 391: 299–310, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Murphy G
    : The ADAMs: Signalling scissors in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 929–941, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Benes P,
    2. Vetvicka V,
    3. Fusek M
    : Cathepsin D-many functions of one aspartic protease. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 68: 12–28, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Koblinski JE,
    2. Ahram M,
    3. Sloane BF
    : Unraveling the role of proteases in cancer. Clin Chim Acta 291: 113–135, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Danø K,
    2. Andreasen PA,
    3. Grøndahl-Hansen J,
    4. Kristensen P,
    5. Nielsen LS,
    6. Skriver L
    : Plasminogen activators, tissue degradation, and cancer. Adv Cancer Res 44: 139–266, 1985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Baramova EN,
    2. Bajou K,
    3. Remacle A,
    4. L’Hoir C,
    5. Krell HW,
    6. Weidle UH,
    7. Noel A,
    8. Foidart JM
    : Involvement of PA/plasmin system in the processing of pro-MMP-9 and in the second step of pro-MMP-2 activation. FEBS Lett 405: 157–162, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Choi KY,
    2. Swierczewska M,
    3. Lee S,
    4. Chen X
    : Protease-activated drug development. Theranostics 2: 156–178, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Seymour LW
    : Passive tumor targeting of soluble macromolecules and drug conjugates. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 9: 135–187, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Duncan R,
    2. Kopecek J,
    3. Rejmanová P,
    4. Lloyd JB
    : Targeting of N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers to liver by incorporation of galactose residues. Biochim Biophys Acta 755: 518–521, 1983.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Seymour LW,
    2. Ulbrich K,
    3. Steyger PS,
    4. Brereton M,
    5. Subr V,
    6. Strohalm J,
    7. Duncan R
    : Tumour tropism and anti-cancer efficacy of polymer-based doxorubicin prodrugs in the treatment of subcutaneous murine B16F10 melanoma. Br J Cancer 70: 636–641, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Seymour LW,
    2. Ferry DR,
    3. Kerr DJ,
    4. Rea D,
    5. Whitlock M,
    6. Poyner R,
    7. Boivin C,
    8. Hesslewood S,
    9. Twelves C,
    10. Blackie R,
    11. Schatzlein A,
    12. Jodrell D,
    13. Bissett D,
    14. Calvert H,
    15. Lind M,
    16. Robbins A,
    17. Burtles S,
    18. Duncan R,
    19. Cassidy J
    : Phase II studies of polymer-doxorubicin (PK1, FCE28068) in the treatment of breast, lung and colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol 34: 1629–1636, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Seymour LW,
    2. Ferry DR,
    3. Anderson D,
    4. Hesslewood S,
    5. Julyan PJ,
    6. Poyner R,
    7. Doran J,
    8. Young AM,
    9. Burtles S,
    10. Kerr DJ
    : Hepatic drug targeting: Phase I evaluation of polymer-bound doxorubicin. J Clin Oncol 20: 1668–1676, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Shaffer SA,
    2. Baker-Lee C,
    3. Kennedy J,
    4. Lai MS,
    5. de Vries P,
    6. Buhler K,
    7. Singer JW
    : In vitro and in vivo metabolism of paclitaxel poliglumex: I dentification of metabolites and active proteases. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 59: 537–548, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Chipman SD,
    2. Oldham FB,
    3. Pezzoni G,
    4. Singer JW
    : Biological and clinical characterization of paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX, CT-2103), a macromolecular polymer-drug conjugate. Int J Nanomedicine 1: 375–383, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Paz-Ares L,
    2. Ross H,
    3. O’Brien M,
    4. Riviere A,
    5. Gatzemeier U,
    6. Von Pawel J,
    7. Kaukel E,
    8. Freitag L,
    9. Digel W,
    10. Bischoff H,
    11. García-Campelo R,
    12. Iannotti N,
    13. Reiterer P,
    14. Bover I,
    15. Prendiville J,
    16. Eisenfeld AJ,
    17. Oldham FB,
    18. Bandstra B,
    19. Singer JW,
    20. Bonomi P
    : Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs. docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 98: 1608–1613, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Ducry L,
    2. Stump B
    : Antibody-drug conjugates: Linking cytotoxic payloads to monoclonal antibodies. Bioconjug Chem 21: 5–13, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Sassoon I,
    2. Blanc V
    : Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) clinical pipeline: A review. Methods Mol Biol 1045: 1–27, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Erickson HK,
    2. Park PU,
    3. Widdison WC,
    4. Kovtun YV,
    5. Garrett LM,
    6. Hoffman K,
    7. Lutz RJ,
    8. Goldmacher VS,
    9. Blättler WA
    : Antibody-maytansinoid conjugates are activated in targeted cancer cells by lysosomal degradation and linker-dependent intracellular processing. Cancer Res 66: 4426–4433, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Widdison WC,
    2. Wilhelm SD,
    3. Cavanagh EE,
    4. Whiteman KR,
    5. Leece BA,
    6. Kovtun Y,
    7. Goldmacher VS,
    8. Xie H,
    9. Steeves RM,
    10. Lutz RJ,
    11. Zhao R,
    12. Wang L,
    13. Blättler WA,
    14. Chari RV
    : Semisynthetic maytansine analogues for the targeted treatment of cancer. J Med Chem 49: 4392–4408, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Carter PJ,
    2. Senter PD
    : Antibody-drug conjugates for cancer therapy. Cancer J 14: 154–169, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Beck A,
    2. Haeuw JF,
    3. Wurch T,
    4. Goetsch L,
    5. Bailly C,
    6. Corvaïa N
    : The next generation of antibody-drug conjugates comes of age. Discov Med 10: 329–339, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Senter PD,
    2. Sievers EL
    : The discovery and development of brentuximab vedotin for use in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Nat Biotechnol 30: 631–637, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Minich SS
    : Brentuximab vedotin: A new age in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Ann Pharmacother 46: 377–383, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Naumovski L,
    2. Junutula JR
    : Glembatumumab vedotin, a conjugate of an anti-glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B mAb and monomethyl auristatin E for the treatment of melanoma and breast cancer. Curr Opin Mol Ther 12: 248–257, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Keir CH,
    2. Vahdat LT
    : The use of an antibody-drug conjugate, glembatumumab vedotin (CDX-011), for the treatment of breast cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 12: 259–263, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Hoashi T,
    2. Sato S,
    3. Yamaguchi Y,
    4. Passeron T,
    5. Tamaki K,
    6. Hearing VJ
    : Glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein b, a melanocytic cell marker, is a melanosome-specific and proteolytically released protein. FASEB J 24: 1616–1629, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Ma D,
    3. Olson WC,
    4. Heston WD
    : In vitro and in vivo responses of advanced prostate tumors to PSMA ADC, an auristatin-conjugated antibody to prostate-specific membrane antigen. Mol Cancer Ther 10: 1728–1739, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Akhtar NH,
    2. Pail O,
    3. Saran A,
    4. Tyrell L,
    5. Tagawa ST
    : Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based therapeutics. Adv Urol 973820, 2012.
  38. ↵
    1. Andrady C,
    2. Sharma SK,
    3. Chester KA
    : Antibody-enzyme fusion proteins for cancer therapy. Immunotherapy 3: 193–211, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Tietze LF,
    2. Schmuck K
    : Prodrugs for targeted tumor therapies: Recent developments in ADEPT, GDEPT and PMT. Curr Pharm Des 17: 3527–3547, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Melton RG,
    2. Sherwood RF
    : Antibody-enzyme conjugates for cancer therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 153–165, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Bagshawe KD
    : Antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) for cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 6: 1421–1431, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Springer CJ,
    2. Antoniw P,
    3. Bagshawe KD,
    4. Searle F,
    5. Bisset GM,
    6. Jarman M
    : Novel prodrugs which are activated to cytotoxic alkylating agents by carboxypeptidase G2. J Med Chem 33: 677–681, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Medzihradszky KF,
    2. Spencer DI,
    3. Sharma SK,
    4. Bhatia J,
    5. Pedley RB,
    6. Read DA,
    7. Begent RH,
    8. Chester KA
    : Glycoforms obtained by expression in Pichia pastoris improve cancer targeting potential of a recombinant antibody-enzyme fusion protein. Glycobiology 14: 27–37, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Sharma SK,
    2. Pedley RB,
    3. Bhatia J,
    4. Boxer GM,
    5. El-Emir E,
    6. Qureshi U,
    7. Tolner B,
    8. Lowe H,
    9. Michael NP,
    10. Minton N,
    11. Begent RH,
    12. Chester KA
    : Sustained tumor regression of human colorectal cancer xenografts using a multifunctional mannosylated fusion protein in antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy. Clin Cancer Res 11: 814–825, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Mayer A,
    2. Francis RJ,
    3. Sharma SK,
    4. Tolner B,
    5. Springer CJ,
    6. Martin J,
    7. Boxer GM,
    8. Bell J,
    9. Green AJ,
    10. Hartley JA,
    11. Cruickshank C,
    12. Wren J,
    13. Chester KA,
    14. Begent RH
    : A phase I study of single administration of antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy with the recombinant anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody-enzyme fusion protein MFECP1 and a bis-iodo phenol mustard prodrug. Clin Cancer Res 12: 6509–6516, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Bagshawe KD,
    2. Sharma SK
    : Cyclosporine delays host immune response to antibody-enzyme conjugate in ADEPT. Transplant Proc 28: 3156–3158, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Chester KA,
    2. Baker M,
    3. Mayer A
    : Overcoming the immunologic response to foreign enzymes in cancer therapy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 1: 549–559, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Denmeade SR,
    2. Isaacs JT
    : Engineering enzymatically activated ‘molecular grenades’ for cancer. Oncotarget 3: 666–667, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Christensen SB,
    2. Skytte DM,
    3. Denmeade SR,
    4. Dionne C,
    5. Møller JV,
    6. Nissen P,
    7. Isaacs JT
    : A Trojan horse in drug development: targeting of thapsigargins towards prostate cancer cells. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 9: 276–294, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Thastrup O,
    2. Cullen PJ,
    3. Drøbak BK,
    4. Hanley MR,
    5. Dawson AP
    : Thapsigargin, a tumor promoter, discharges intracellular Ca2+ stores by specific inhibition of the endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 2466–2470, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Breckenridge DG,
    2. Germain M,
    3. Mathai JP,
    4. Nguyen M,
    5. Shore GC
    : Regulation of apoptosis by endoplasmic reticulum pathways. Oncogene 22: 8608–8618, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Denmeade SR,
    2. Jakobsen CM,
    3. Janssen S,
    4. Khan SR,
    5. Garrett ES,
    6. Lilja H,
    7. Christensen SB,
    8. Isaacs JT
    : Prostate-specific antigen-activated thapsigargin prodrug as targeted therapy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 990–1000, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Christensen SB,
    2. Andersen A,
    3. Kromann H,
    4. Treiman M,
    5. Tombal B,
    6. Denmeade S,
    7. Isaacs JT
    : Thapsigargin analogues for targeting programmed death of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Bioorg Med Chem 7: 1273–1280, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Denmeade SR,
    2. Mhaka AM,
    3. Rosen DM,
    4. Brennen WN,
    5. Dalrymple S,
    6. Dach I,
    7. Olesen C,
    8. Gurel B,
    9. Demarzo AM,
    10. Wilding G,
    11. Carducci MA,
    12. Dionne CA,
    13. Møller JV,
    14. Nissen P,
    15. Christensen SB,
    16. Isaacs JT
    : Engineering a prostate-specific membrane antigen-activated tumor endothelial cell prodrug for cancer therapy. Sci Transl Med 4: 140ra86, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Pinto JT,
    2. Suffoletto BP,
    3. Berzin TM,
    4. Qiao CH,
    5. Lin S,
    6. Tong WP,
    7. May F,
    8. Mukherjee B,
    9. Heston WD
    : Prostate-specific membrane antigen: a novel folate hydrolase in human prostatic carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res 2: 1445–1451, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  56. ↵
    1. Carter RE,
    2. Feldman AR,
    3. Coyle JT
    : Prostate-specific membrane antigen is a hydrolase with substrate and pharmacologic characteristics of a neuropeptidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 749–753, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Chang SS,
    2. O’Keefe DS,
    3. Bacich DJ,
    4. Reuter VE,
    5. Heston WD,
    6. Gaudin PB
    : Prostate-specific membrane antigen is produced in tumor-associated neovasculature. Clin Cancer Res 5: 2674–2681, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Brennen WN,
    2. Isaacs JT,
    3. Denmeade SR
    : Rationale behind targeting fibroblast activation protein-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts as a novel chemotherapeutic strategy. Mol Cancer Ther 11: 257–266, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Wolf BB,
    2. Quan C,
    3. Tran T,
    4. Wiesmann C,
    5. Sutherlin D
    : On the edge of validation-cancer protease fibroblast activation protein. Mini Rev Med Chem 8: 719–727, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Brennen WN,
    2. Rosen DM,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Isaacs JT,
    5. Denmeade SR
    : Targeting carcinoma-associated fibroblasts within the tumor stroma with a fibroblast activation protein-activated prodrug. J Natl Cancer Inst 104: 1320–1334, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Olsson AY,
    2. Bjartell A,
    3. Lilja H,
    4. Lundwall A
    : Expression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) in ileum and other extraprostatic tissues. Int J Cancer 113: 290–297, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Otto A,
    2. Bär J,
    3. Birkenmeier G
    : Prostate-specific antigen forms complexes with human alpha 2-macroglobulin and binds to the alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor/LDL receptor-related protein. J Urol 159: 297–303, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Mikolajczyk SD,
    2. Millar LS,
    3. Kumar A,
    4. Saedi MS
    : Human glandular kallikrein, hK2, shows arginine-restricted specificity and forms complexes with plasma protease inhibitors. Prostate 34: 44–50, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Eggermont AM,
    2. ten Hagen TL
    : Isolated limb perfusion for extremity soft-tissue sarcomas, in-transit metastases, and other unresectable tumors: credits, debits, and future perspectives. Curr Oncol Rep 3: 359–367, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Wajant H,
    2. Gerspach J,
    3. Pfizenmaier K
    : Tumor therapeutics by design: Targeting and activation of death receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16: 55–76, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Kelly T
    : Fibroblast activation protein-alpha and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26): cell-surface proteases that activate cell signaling and are potential targets for cancer therapy. Drug Resist Updat 8: 51–58, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Wüest T,
    2. Gerlach E,
    3. Banerjee D,
    4. Gerspach J,
    5. Moosmayer D,
    6. Pfizenmaier K
    : TNF-Selectokine: A novel prodrug generated for tumor targeting and site-specific activation of tumor necrosis factor. Oncogene 21: 4257–4265, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Gerspach J,
    2. Müller D,
    3. Münkel S,
    4. Selchow O,
    5. Nemeth J,
    6. Noack M,
    7. Petrul H,
    8. Menrad A,
    9. Wajant H,
    10. Pfizenmaier K
    : Restoration of membrane TNF-like activity by cell surface targeting and matrix metalloproteinase-mediated processing of a TNF prodrug. Cell Death Differ 13: 273–284, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Gerspach J,
    2. Németh J,
    3. Münkel S,
    4. Wajant H,
    5. Pfizenmaier K
    : Target-selective activation of a TNF prodrug by urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) mediated proteolytic processing at the cell surface. Cancer Immunol Immunother 55: 1590–1600, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Watermann I,
    2. Gerspach J,
    3. Lehne M,
    4. Seufert J,
    5. Schneider B,
    6. Pfizenmaier K,
    7. Wajant H
    : Activation of CD95L fusion protein prodrugs by tumor-associated proteases. Cell Death Differ 14: 765–774, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Hristova K,
    2. Dempsey CE,
    3. White SH
    : Structure, location, and lipid perturbations of melittin at the membrane interface. Biophys J 80: 801–811, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Holle L,
    2. Song W,
    3. Holle E,
    4. Wei Y,
    5. Wagner T,
    6. Yu X
    : A matrix metalloproteinase 2 cleavable melittin/avidin conjugate specifically targets tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Int J Oncol 22: 93–98, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Bateman A,
    2. Bullough F,
    3. Murphy S,
    4. Emiliusen L,
    5. Lavillette D,
    6. Cosset FL,
    7. Cattaneo R,
    8. Russell SJ,
    9. Vile RG
    : Fusogenic membrane glycoproteins as a novel class of genes for the local and immune-mediated control of tumor growth. Cancer Res 60: 1492–1497, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Johnson KJ,
    2. Peng KW,
    3. Allen C,
    4. Russell SJ,
    5. Galanis E
    : Targeting the cytotoxicity of fusogenic membrane glycoproteins in gliomas through protease-substrate interaction. Gene Ther 10: 725–732, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Allen C,
    2. McDonald C,
    3. Giannini C,
    4. Peng KW,
    5. Rosales G,
    6. Russell SJ,
    7. Galanis E
    : Adenoviral vectors expressing fusogenic membrane glycoproteins activated via matrix metalloproteinase cleavable linkers have significant antitumor potential in the gene therapy of gliomas. J Gene Med 6: 1216–1227, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Liu S,
    2. Schubert RL,
    3. Bugge TH,
    4. Leppla SH
    : Anthrax toxin: structures, functions and tumour targeting. Expert Opin Biol Ther 3: 843–853, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Abrami L,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Cosson P,
    4. Leppla SH,
    5. van der Goot FG
    : Anthrax toxin triggers endocytosis of its receptor via a lipid raft-mediated clathrin-dependent process. J Cell Biol 160: 321–328, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Cryan LM,
    2. Rogers MS
    Targeting the anthrax receptors, TEM-8 and CMG-2, for anti-angiogenic therapy. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 16: 1574–1588, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Shapira A,
    2. Benhar I
    : Toxin-based therapeutic approaches. Toxins 2: 2519–2583, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Duesbery NS,
    2. Webb CP,
    3. Leppla SH,
    4. Gordon VM,
    5. Klimpel KR,
    6. Copeland TD,
    7. Ahn NG,
    8. Oskarsson MK,
    9. Fukasawa K,
    10. Paull KD,
    11. Vande Woude GF
    Proteolytic inactivation of MAP-kinase-kinase by anthrax lethal factor. Science 280: 734–737, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Koo HM,
    2. VanBrocklin M,
    3. McWilliams MJ,
    4. Leppla SH,
    5. Duesbery NS,
    6. Vande Woude GF
    Apoptosis and melanogenesis in human melanoma cells induced by anthrax lethal factor inactivation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 3052–3057, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    1. Liu S,
    2. Netzel-Arnett S,
    3. Birkedal-Hansen H,
    4. Leppla SH
    : Tumor cell-selective cytotoxicity of matrix metalloproteinase-activated anthrax toxin. Cancer Res 60: 6061–6067, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Arora N,
    2. Klimpel KR,
    3. Singh Y,
    4. Leppla SH
    : Fusions of anthrax toxin lethal factor to the ADP-ribosylation domain of Pseudomonas exotoxin A are potent cytotoxins which are translocated to the cytosol of mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 267: 15542–15548, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Milne JC,
    2. Blanke SR,
    3. Hanna PC,
    4. Collier RJ
    : Protective antigen-binding domain of anthrax lethal factor mediates translocation of a heterologous protein fused to its amino- or carboxy-terminus. Mol Microbiol 15: 661–666, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Arora N,
    2. Leppla SH
    : Fusions of anthrax toxin lethal factor with shiga toxin and diphtheria toxin enzymatic domains are toxic to mammalian cells. Infect Immun 62: 4955–4961, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    1. Liu S,
    2. Bugge TH,
    3. Leppla SH
    : Targeting of tumor cells by cell surface urokinase plasminogen activator-dependent anthrax toxin. J Biol Chem 276: 17976–17984, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. ↵
    1. Weidle UH,
    2. Georges G,
    3. Brinkmann U
    : Fully human targeted cytotoxic fusion proteins: New anticancer agents on the horizon. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 9: 119–133, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hehmann-Titt G,
    2. Schiffer S,
    3. Berges N,
    4. Melmer G,
    5. Barth S
    : Improving the therapeutic potential of human granzyme B for targeted cancer therapy. Antibodies 2: 19–49, 2013.
    OpenUrl
    1. Oberoi P,
    2. Jabulowsky RA,
    3. Wels WS
    : Selective induction of cancer cell death by targeted granzyme B. Antibodies 2: 130–151, 2013.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kurschus FC,
    2. Jenne DE
    : Delivery and therapeutic potential of human granzyme B. Immunol Rev 235: 159–171, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Rosenblum MG,
    2. Barth S
    : Development of novel, highly cytotoxic fusion constructs containing granzyme B: Unique mechanisms and functions. Curr Pharm Des 15: 2676–2692, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Losasso V,
    2. Schiffer S,
    3. Barth S,
    4. Carloni P
    : Design of human granzyme B variants resistant to serpin B9. Proteins 80: 2514–2522, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Bird CH,
    2. Sun J,
    3. Ung K,
    4. Karambalis D,
    5. Whisstock JC,
    6. Trapani JA,
    7. Bird PI
    : Cationic sites on granzyme B contribute to cytotoxicity by promoting its uptake into target cells. Mol Cell Biol 25: 7854–7867, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    1. Jabulowsky RA,
    2. Oberoi P,
    3. Bähr-Mahmud H,
    4. Dälken B,
    5. Wels WS
    : Surface charge-modification prevents sequestration and enhances tumor-cell specificity of a recombinant granzyme B-TGFα fusion protein. Bioconjug Chem 23: 1567–1576, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kurschus FC,
    2. Fellows E,
    3. Stegmann E,
    4. Jenne DE
    : Granzyme B delivery via perforin is restricted by size, but not by heparan sulfate-dependent endocytosis. Proc Ntl Acad Sci USA 105: 13799–13804, 2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Kurschus FC,
    2. Kleinschmidt M,
    3. Fellows E,
    4. Dornmair K,
    5. Rudolph R,
    6. Lilie H,
    7. Jenne DE
    : Killing of target cells by redirected granzyme B in the absence of perforin. FEBS Lett 562: 87–92, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Keller J,
    2. Heisler I,
    3. Tauber R,
    4. Fuchs H
    : Development of a novel molecular adapter for the optimization of immunotoxins. J Control Release 74: 259–261, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Cao Y,
    2. Mohamedali KA,
    3. Marks JW,
    4. Cheung LH,
    5. Hittelman WN,
    6. Rosenblum MG
    : Construction and characterization of novel, completely human serine protease therapeutics targeting HER2/NEU. Mol Cancer Ther 12: 979–991, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. ↵
    1. Hetzel C,
    2. Bachran C,
    3. Tur MK,
    4. Fuchs H,
    5. Stöcker M
    : Improved immunotoxins with novel functional elements. Curr Pharm Des 15: 2700–2711, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Heisler I,
    2. Keller J,
    3. Tauber R,
    4. Sutherland M,
    5. Fuchs H
    : A cleavable adapter to reduce nonspecific cytotoxicity of recombinant immunotoxins. Int J Cancer 103: 277–282, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Säälik P,
    2. Elmquist A,
    3. Hansen M,
    4. Padari K,
    5. Saar K,
    6. Viht K,
    7. Langel U,
    8. Pooga M
    : Protein cargo delivery properties of cell-penetrating peptides. A comparative study. Bioconjug Chem 15: 1246–1253, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Jones AT
    : Gateways and tools for drug delivery: endocytic pathways and the cellular dynamics of cell penetrating peptides. Int J Pharm 354: 34–38, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Fuchs H,
    2. Bachran C,
    3. Heisler I,
    4. Sutherland M
    : A closer look at protein transduction domains as a tool in drug delivery. Curr Nanosci 1: 117–124, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  100. ↵
    1. Hudson TH,
    2. Neville DM Jr.
    : Enhancement of immunotoxin action: manipulation of the cellular routing of proteins. Cancer Treat Res 37: 371–389, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  101. ↵
    1. Fuchs H,
    2. Bachran C,
    3. Li T,
    4. Heisler I,
    5. Dürkop H,
    6. Sutherland M
    : A cleavable molecular adapter reduces side effects and concomitantly enhances efficacy in tumor treatment by targeted toxins in mice. J Control Release 117: 342–350, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    1. Hetzel C,
    2. Bachran C,
    3. Fischer R,
    4. Fuchs H,
    5. Barth S,
    6. Stöcker M
    : Small cleavable adapters enhance the specific cytotoxicity of a humanized immunotoxin directed against CD64-positive cells. J Immunother 31: 370–376, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  103. ↵
    1. Hansel TT,
    2. Kropshofer H,
    3. Singer T,
    4. Mitchell JA,
    5. George AJ
    : The safety and side effects of monoclonal antibodies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9: 325–338, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Yan M,
    2. Callahan CA,
    3. Beyer JC,
    4. Allamneni KP,
    5. Zhang G,
    6. Ridgway JB,
    7. Niessen K,
    8. Plowman GD
    : Chronic DLL4 blockade induces vascular neoplasms. Nature 463: E6–7, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Wu Y,
    2. Cain-Hom C,
    3. Choy L,
    4. Hagenbeek TJ,
    5. de Leon GP,
    6. Chen Y,
    7. Finkle D,
    8. Venook R,
    9. Wu X,
    10. Ridgway J,
    11. Schahin-Reed D,
    12. Dow GJ,
    13. Shelton A,
    14. Stawicki S,
    15. Watts RJ,
    16. Zhang J,
    17. Choy R,
    18. Howard P,
    19. Kadyk L,
    20. Yan M,
    21. Zha J,
    22. Callahan CA,
    23. Hymowitz SG,
    24. Siebel CW
    : Therapeutic antibody targeting of individual Notch receptors. Nature 464: 1052–1057, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Li JL,
    2. Jubb AM,
    3. Harris AL
    : Targeting DLL4 in tumors shows preclinical activity but potentially significant toxicity. Future Oncol 6: 1099–1103, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Kamba T,
    2. McDonald DM
    : Mechanisms of adverse effects of anti-VEGF therapy for cancer. Br J Cancer 96: 1788–1795, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Segaert S,
    2. Van Cutsem E
    : Clinical signs, pathophysiology and management of skin toxicity during therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Ann Oncol 16: 1425–1433, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  109. ↵
    1. Tijink BM,
    2. Buter J,
    3. de Bree R,
    4. Giaccone G,
    5. Lang MS,
    6. Staab A,
    7. Leemans CR,
    8. van Dongen GA
    : A phase I dose escalation study with anti-CD44v6 bivatuzumab mertansine in patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus. Clin Cancer Res 12: 6064–6072, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  110. ↵
    1. Bongartz T,
    2. Sutton AJ,
    3. Sweeting MJ,
    4. Buchan I,
    5. Matteson EL,
    6. Montori V
    : Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 295: 2275–2285, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. ↵
    1. Perez EA
    : Cardiac toxicity of ErbB2-targeted therapies: What do we know? Clin Breast Cancer 8(Suppl 3): S114–120, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. ↵
    1. Erster O,
    2. Thomas JM,
    3. Hamzah J,
    4. Jabaiah AM,
    5. Getz JA,
    6. Schoep TD,
    7. Hall SS,
    8. Ruoslahti E,
    9. Daugherty PS
    : Site-specific targeting of antibody activity in vivo mediated by disease-associated proteases. J Control Release 161: 804–812, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. ↵
    1. LeBeau AM,
    2. Lee M,
    3. Murphy ST,
    4. Hann BC,
    5. Warren RS,
    6. Delos Santos R,
    7. Kurhanewicz J,
    8. Hanash SM,
    9. VanBrocklin HF,
    10. Craik CS
    : Imaging a functional tumorigenic biomarker in the transformed epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 93–98, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  114. ↵
    1. Desnoyers LR,
    2. Vasiljeva O,
    3. Richardson JH,
    4. Yang A,
    5. Menendez EEM,
    6. Liang TW,
    7. Wong C,
    8. Bessette PH,
    9. Kamath K,
    10. Moore SJ,
    11. Sagert JG,
    12. Hofstetter DR,
    13. Han F,
    14. Gee J,
    15. Flandez J,
    16. Markham K,
    17. Nguyen M,
    18. Krimm M,
    19. Wong KR,
    20. Liu S,
    21. Daugherty,
    22. West JW,
    23. Lowman HB
    : Tumor-specific activation of EGFR-targeting probody enhances therapeutic index. Sci Transl Med 5: 207ra144, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  115. ↵
    1. Metz S,
    2. Panke C,
    3. Haas AK,
    4. Schanzer J,
    5. Lau W,
    6. Croasdale R,
    7. Hoffmann E,
    8. Schneider B,
    9. Auer J,
    10. Gassner C,
    11. Bossenmaier B,
    12. Umana P,
    13. Sustmann C,
    14. Brinkmann U
    : Bispecific antibody derivatives with restricted binding functionalities that are activated by proteolytic processing. Protein Eng Des Sel 25: 571–580, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  116. ↵
    1. Parr C,
    2. Sanders AJ,
    3. Jiang WG
    : Hepatocyte growth factor activation inhibitors - therapeutic potential in cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 10: 47–57, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  117. ↵
    1. Saleem M,
    2. Adhami VM,
    3. Zhong W,
    4. Longley BJ,
    5. Lin CY,
    6. Dickson RB,
    7. Reagan-Shaw S,
    8. Jarrard DF,
    9. Mukhtar H
    : A novel biomarker for staging human prostate adenocarcinoma: overexpression of matriptase with concomitant loss of its inhibitor, hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor-1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15: 217–227, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  118. ↵
    1. Sun J,
    2. Pons J,
    3. Craik CS
    : Potent and selective inhibition of membrane-type serine protease 1 by human single-chain antibodies. Biochemistry 42: 892–900, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Farady CJ,
    2. Egea PF,
    3. Schneider EL,
    4. Darragh MR,
    5. Craik CS
    : Structure of a Fab-protease complex reveals a highly specific non-canonical mechanism of inhibition. J Mol Biol 380: 351–360, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  120. ↵
    1. Hayden C.E
    : News. Personalized cancer therapy gets closer. Genetic testing allows doctors to select best treatment. Nature 458: 131–132, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Simon R,
    2. Roychowdhury S
    : Implementing personalized cancer genomics in clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12: 358–369, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  121. ↵
    1. Martini M,
    2. Vecchione L,
    3. Siena S,
    4. Tejpar S,
    5. Bardelli A
    : Targeted therapies: how personal should we go? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9: 87–97, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. ↵
    1. Berman HM,
    2. Westbrook J,
    3. Feng Z,
    4. Gilliland G,
    5. Bhat TN,
    6. Weissig H,
    7. Shindyalov IN,
    8. Bourne PE
    : The Protein Data Bank (www.pdb.org). Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235–242, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  123. ↵
    Accelrys Software Incorp., Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, Release 3.1, San Diego: Accelrys Software Inc., 2007.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Vol. 11, Issue 2
March-April 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cancer Genomics & Proteomics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Proteases as Activators for Cytotoxic Prodrugs in Antitumor Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cancer Genomics & Proteomics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Proteases as Activators for Cytotoxic Prodrugs in Antitumor Therapy
ULRICH H. WEIDLE, GEORG TIEFENTHALER, GUY GEORGES
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Mar 2014, 11 (2) 67-79;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Proteases as Activators for Cytotoxic Prodrugs in Antitumor Therapy
ULRICH H. WEIDLE, GEORG TIEFENTHALER, GUY GEORGES
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Mar 2014, 11 (2) 67-79;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Cathepsin B-activated Drugs
    • Antibody-directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy (ADEPT)
    • Protease-cleavable Peptide-Thapsigargin (TG) Conjugates
    • Protease-based Activation of Cytotoxic Receptor Ligands and Other Cytotoxic Proteins
    • Protease-mediated Activation of Anthrax Toxin for Tumor Therapy
    • Granzyme B as Effector Moiety for Cytolytic Fusion Proteins
    • Protease-cleavable Adapters for Improved Cytolytic Fusion Proteins
    • Activation of Antibodies with Impaired Functionality by Proteases
    • Proteases and Imaging
    • Concluding Remarks
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Pericellular proteolysis in cancer
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • Antibody-drug conjugates
  • antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy
  • Anthrax toxin
  • cytotoxic receptor ligand(s)
  • granzyme B
  • probody
  • thapsigargin
  • review
Cancer & Genome Proteomics

© 2026 Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

Powered by HighWire